ML20062G702
| ML20062G702 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1990 |
| From: | Edgeworth P NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Shiflett D AECL TECHNOLOGIES |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062G699 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-L-1527, CON-FIN-L-1527-0, CON-NRC-03-90-031, CON-NRC-3-90-31 NUDOCS 9011300141 | |
| Download: ML20062G702 (6) | |
Text
j.
.[
'4 UNITED STATES i7 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,-0:
j
.i-WASHINGT oN, D. C. 20555
'e
/
NOV 131990 AECL Technologies ATTN: Mr. D. R. Shiflett 15400 Cal 6.oun Drive Suite 10's Rockville, Maryland 20855
Dear Mr. Shiflett:
Subject:
Task Order No. 13 Under Contract No. NRC-03-90-031 Entitled
" Electrical Distribution Functional Inspection - TMI," FIN L1527 In accordance with the task order procedures of the subject contract, this letter definitizes Task Order No. 13.
This effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work and the Contractor's
. proposal dated October 17, 1990, incorporated herein by reference.
The cost ceiling of this task order is $72,723.36.
Of the total cost
~,
ceiling amount, the amount representing total reimbursable costs is-
$72,521.97 and the amount representing the fixed fee is $201.39.
l Accounting data for Task Order No. 13 is as follows:
B&R No.:
020-19-14-02-0 FIN No.:
L-1527-0 Appropriation No.:
31X0200.200 Obligated Amount:
$72,723.36 (Obligated under the basic contract)
Please indicate your acceptance of this task order by having an official, authorized to bind your organization, execute three copies of this document in the space provided and return two copies to the Contract Administrator.
You should retain the third copy for your records.
i I-l 9011300141 901116 PDR CONTR NRC-03-90-031 PDC 4
4 Mr. D. R. Shiflett NRC-03-90-031 Task Order No. 13 Page 2 of 2 Any questions regarding this matter should be addressed to Brenda DuBose, Contract Management Assistant, on (301) 492-7442.
Sincerely, 4l<fE
~
f Pa J. f ewort, Contracting Officer Co tract dministration Branch No. 1 Division of Contracts and Property Management Office of Administration
Enclosure:
As stated ACCEPTED:
Task Order No. 13
[h D. R. ShifActt NAME Vice Prealdent & General Manager TITLE alib/to DATE
t y
Contract NRC-03-90-031 Enclosure AECL Technologies
~
STATEMENT OF WORK Task Order - 013
-: TITLE:
Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection - TMI DOCKET NUMBER: 50-289/320 B&R HUMBER:
020-19-14-02
. FIN: L-1527 NRC PROJECT MANAGER:
Wayne Walker, NRR (301-492-1232)
NRC TEAM LEADER:
NeilDella,NRR(215-337-5046)
HRC CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR:
BrendaDuBose,ADM(301-492-7442)
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
November 18, 1990 to January 15, 1991 BACKGROUND A ciectrical Distribution Functional Inspection will be conducted at the TNI Plant...This: inspection will assess on a sample basis the design, operation, maintenance and survelliance of the as configured electrical distribution system including modifications made since receipt of operating license.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this task order is to obtain expert technical assistance to assist the NRC inspection team in the performance of the subject Electrical
' Distribution Functional Inspection'.
WORK REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE The work specified -in this statement of work (50W) falls within Section C.1.3 of-the basic contract's S0W. The contractor shall provide the qualified specialists, and the necessary facilities, materials, and services,to assist the NRC staff prepare for and conduct the subject EDSFI, and document the inspection activities-and findings.
Task Scheduled Completion 1.
Prepare for the subject inspection by One day prior to the reviewing inspection related background inspection.
documentation and records provided by the NRC Team Leader and prepare input to the inspection plant.
I
t y
Contract NRC-03-90-031 ~'
AECLTechnologies(con't) 2.-
The inspection should evaluate whether:
The inspection preparation is scheduled to take place
( a') The installed configuration of the on or about November 19, thru EDS in agreement with the f acility November 21, the inspection drawings such as the Q-list, setpoint is to take place on or about list, and equipment location drawings December 3, thru December 7, and that appropriate physical separa-and December 17, thru tion has been maintained between December 21, with an interven-redundant electrical divisions and ing home-office review period internal plant hazards.
December 10, thru December 14, 1990.
(b)' The EDS meets the. appropriate regulatory requirements and licensing commitments.
(c) Electrical motive.and control power of the correct frequency and adequate voltage is available on demand to assure components will function.as required to achieve safe shutdown and mitigate accident consequences.
(d) Proper logic for system actuation, operation, control and protection has been incorporated in the system.
Review of proper logic includes review of control logic diagrams, and ladder diagrams of programmatic controllers, to verify that proper interlocks and permissive have been included in the design to achieve the required design functions of systems and components.
(e)' Setpoints have been correctly chosen for over current protective relays to (1) assure proper breaker coordination.between different voltage levels; (2) to-prevent exceeding the vendor specified thermal limits on motors, containment electrical penetrations and cable insulation systems; 3) to allow starting of electrical equipment under. degraded voltage conditions; and 4) to provide adequate pre-trip alarms, when applicable.
(f) Setpoints and time delays have been correctly chosen for other protective relays for attributes such as under-voltage, under-differenctial-current, thermal overload and phase synchronization to assure function-ality of the EDS.
i
['
(
- (g) The scope, depth and frequency of maintenance, surveillance and testing of electrical systems and components is adequate to verify their functional performance.
(h) The operators understand the design bases and the limitations of the EDS. The inspectors should determine whether the design bases and operating limitations have been adequately addressed in normal and emergency @erating procedures, (i) 'The EDS support system such as HVAC, EDG fuel oil transfer system, EDG :ooling water system and air-start system etc., are adequate to support operation under design basis
. conditions.
3.
Prep,are an inspection report input.
Documentation of inspection at office on o about December 24 thru December 28, 1990 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
. Technical Reports At the completion of Task 1, provide inspection plan input to the NRC Team
-Leader..The format and scope of this input shal; be as provided by the NRC
' Team Leader.
During Task 2, each contractor specialist shall prove daily reports to the NRC Team Leader. The format and scope of these reports shall be as provided by t'e NRC Team Leader.
n At thr:. comp'letion of Task 2 (prior to the inspection team's exit meeting with the licersee) each contractor specialist shall provide a-draft inspection report input to the NRC Team Leader. The format and scope of this input shall t
be as provided by the NRC Team Leader. Typically, this input will consists of handwritten senmary of the specialist's inspection findings.
At the :omp;Mion 'of Task 3, the contractor shall deliver each specialist's final 11spectionreportinput(feederreport)totheNRCProjectManager (original and one copy) with one hard copy.and one computer diskette version (IBM Displaywrite 3 or 4, or other IBM PC compatible software acceptable to
.o
. the NRC Team Leader) to the NRC Team Leader. The format and scope of the final report inputs shall be as provided by the NRC Team Ler. der.
Each specialist's feeder report will serve as documentation of the specialist's inspection activities, efforts, and findings, and will be used by the NRC Team Leader for the preparation of the NRC's inspection rcport. As a minimum, each specialist reports input shall include the following:
identify of the individuals (name, company, and title) that provided information to the specialist during the inspection.
For each area inspected, a description of the activities and general findings and conclusions reached regarding the adequacy of the area.
I for each area with a concern or findings, a discussion of the concern of finding with technical bases.
BUSINESS LETTER REPORTS The contractor shall provide monthly progress reports in accordance with the requirements of the basic contract.
MEETINGS AND TRAVEL One, three-person, five day trip to the TMI plant site, located in Hr. risburg, Pennsylvania, to prepare for the subject inspection.
Two, three-person, five day trips to the TMl plant site to assist NRC in conducting the subject inspection.
One, three-person, five day trip to Region I office to assist NRC in documentation of inspection acivities.
3 The contract specialist shall coordinate all travel arrangements in advance with the NRC Team Leader.
ESTIMATED LEVEL 0F EFFORT J
Number Discipline Hours
]
Project Manager 90 l
1 Hechanical Systems Engineer 244 2
Electrical Design Engineer 488 Support Staff 20 The estimated level of effort for each of the specialists consists of 64 hours7.407407e-4 days <br />0.0178 hours <br />1.058201e-4 weeks <br />2.4352e-5 months <br /> for inspection preparation, 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> for on-site inspection activities, 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for home office inspection related review during the intervening period between the on-site inspection periods, and 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for inspection documentation.