ML20062G080
| ML20062G080 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 02/21/2020 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | |
| SECY/RAS | |
| References | |
| 85FR03947, NRC-2020-0021 | |
| Download: ML20062G080 (1) | |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 2/27/20 2:26 PM Received: February 21, 2020 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k4-9f5c-q50t Comments Due: February 24, 2020 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0021 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Transfer of Control of Licenses and Approval of Conforming License Amendments Comment On: NRC-2020-0021-0001 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments Document: NRC-2020-0021-DRAFT-0044 Comment on FR Doc # 2020-00824 Submitter Information Name: Arthur Greenberg General Comment Consideration to the Chernobyl dome and its upkeep or the Japanese allowing the dumping of radioactive water from their wrecked power plant, the Indian point reactors were always dangerously close to urban NYC and the Lower Hudson estuary and with decommissioning why should the Energy Dept. allow for dangerous and perhaps cataclysmic mishandling of untold historic dangerous loose ends too close to millions of people and their future....the worst possible outcome could even supply circumstance for acts of terrorism and should be handled with the strongest possible respect for the people of New York, not a shell for profit like a old tin can waiting to be kicked, whether the noise disturbs the neighborhood,or even ends up in the neighbors yard.......
Page 1 of 1 02/27/2020 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648439bc6b&format=xml&showorig=false