ML20062D428
| ML20062D428 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 11/08/1978 |
| From: | Benedict R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7811220296 | |
| Download: ML20062D428 (14) | |
Text
.
w W Q. Pp p
'4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
j e(
wAsmNGToN. D. C. M56 s
=y 8 b!g DOCKET NO. o0-382 APPLICANT:
LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY FACILITY:
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3
SUBJECT:
SUlttARY OF CASE LOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETING WITH APPLICANT - WATERFORD UNIT 3 A meeting was held with the applicant, at the Waterford plant site, on 4
September 19, 1978. The purpose of the meeting was to obtain information i
for use by the Forecast Panel in predicting the Waterford Unit 3 fuel load date.
A list of those who attended this meeting is attached as Enclosure 1.
The agenda for the meeting, prepared by the applicant, is attached as Enclosure 2.
The more important slides presented by the applicant are included in.
These slides have been given individual figure numbers.
The salient points brought out during the meeting are:
1.
The plant staff will ultimately total 160. There are now 70 on the staff, and there are 2E in operator training which began in December 1977 and will be completed in April 1979.
2.
The applicant's need for Waterford 3 is presented in graphical form in Figures 1 and 2.
This plant is needed in order to maintain a 16% reserve on the Middle South Utilities 5ystem, of
('
i l
which LP&L is one of five operating companies.
l 3.
An improvement in turnaround time for design engineering work has been realized by having Ebasco do this work at the site rather than at its home office in New York. Drawing and specification issuances are 97*. and 98*. complete, respectively.
l 4.
LP&L supports its projected fuel load date by a curve (Figure 3).
l Since early in 1978 they have kept close track of actual construc-l tion acccmplishments. Although there appears to be a lag in accom-l plishment since July of this year (as shown in Figure 3), LP&L stated that this only affected the river water intake structures f
and was caused by high level of the river. These structures are not on the critical path.
7811220'2 % -6 i
~
The applicant also compared Waterford,3 with similar plants. The comparison included time from the first concrete pouring to fuel load (Figures 4 and 5) and time from setting of the reactor vessel to fuel load (Figure 6). He also provided a comparison of the test schedules of Waterford 3, the Yellow Book average, and that recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.68. Figure 7 shows the critical path for construction.
5.
LP&L proiided the following data on quantities of materials installed.
It should be noted that piping is considered installed when it is in-place in temporary hangers and tack-welded.
f Item Quantity Quantity,
peak Rate Required Installedr Of Installation 8/31 / 7_3 Concrete 206,000 yds.
177,000 yds.
Pipe, 2 1/2" & larger 110.000 ft.
36,500 ft.
6400 ft./ month i~
ft.,
10,000 ft.
Pipe, 2" & under Hangers for pipe 2 1/2" & over (not v400 1300 including restraints)
Exposed conduit 300,000 ft.
31,000 ft.
Cable Tray 42,000 ft.
24,300 ft.
Cable 4,000,000 ft.
5,000 ft.
19,000 ft./ month Terminations 131,000
, Total craft manhours 10,800,000 5,137,000 6.
As of the end of August, 89% of the procurement purchasesorders have
(
been placed. Of the total purchase order value, 74% ha's' been delivered.
Procurement hardspots have included:
a.
Structural Steel b.
\\ Late design of supports' f,or asymetric loads
- c.. Pipe hangers d.
Fan vendor quality assurance program N
e.
Electrical Equipment 7.
The startup organization has been established. About 25 people from LP&L and several consultants are working on the startup program. They all report to the LP&L Lead Startup Engineer (Tom Armington), not to'their home offices.
Startup schedules are being computerized and tied in with the construction schedules. Ultimately there will be about 150 people-Q the startup group.
T'
- L1 8.
At'the close of the meeting, the NRC staff stated that it believes the applicant's May 1981 fuel load date is based on an " aggressive" schedule. LP&L's comparison of the Waterford construction schedule to that of other plants (see Figure 5) shows comparable or slightly shorter span times.
liowever, our past experience has shown that actual construction time usually exceeds that anticipated. Further, the Waterford construction critical path (see Figure 7) includes no contingencies to accomodate unforeseen events.
Based on our experience with other plants, we believe that there may be an additional five to six months required due to a large amount of work yet to be done inside contain-
/
ment. However, we will go along with the May 1981 date for now, but would like to have up-dated information, in early February 1979, on construction accomplishments (as in Figure 3), on bulk quantities (as in Item 5 above), and on critical path progress (as in Figure 7). The applicant agreed to provide this information.
A R. A. Benedict Light Water Reactors Branch No. 2 Division of Project Management
Enclosures:
As Stated
(
ces w/ enclosures:
See next page
I Mr. D. L. Aswell i
Vice President, Power Production Louisiana Power & Light Company l
142 Delaronde Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 cc:
W. Malcolm Stevenson, Esq.
Monroe & Lemann i
1424 Whitney Building New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 i
Mr. E. Blake i
Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trewbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036
?.
I Mr. D. B. Lester Production Engineer Louisiana Power & Lignt Company 142 Delaronde Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70174
(
l l
F
[
r y---
w.
._,_,_.y-,r-
_.. _ _. _ ~ _..
1 i
ENCLOSURE 1
~ 070 ATTENDANCE LIST SEPTEMBER 19, 1978 MEETING WATERFORD UNIT 3 LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY l
Tom Armington - Lead Startup Engineer Tom Gerretts - QA Manager Paul Jackson - Site Representative Dave Lester - Production Engineer (Project Manager)
Lee Maurin - Waterford Unit 3 Station Superintendent Roy Prados - Licensing i
EBASCO SERVICES. INC.
John Crnich - Site Manager Bart Fowler - Planning & Scheduling Bob Milhiser - Project TJperintendant Bob Stampley - Project Manager NRC - STAFF t
Bob Benedict - Licensing Project Manager, DPM Herb Berkow - Program Assistant, DPM Bill Lovelace - Office of Management and Program Analysis Bob Stewart - Reactor Inspector, OIE, Region IV Joe Tappia - Inspector Intern, OIE, Region IV i
t--
. ~
- ?"
- 73 ENCLOSURE 2 WATERFORD 3 NRC SCHEDULE SURVEY MEETING I.
Formal Presentation A.
Introduction B.
Purpose of Meeting (NRC)
C.
LP&L Power Needs and Financial Status D.
Overview of Construction Management 1.
Function of Site Organizations 2.
Ebasco Organization 3.
Ebasco/ Contractor Interface E.
Construction Progress Schedules to Milestones 1.
Critical Path 2.
Schedule Comparison 3.
Key Schedule Indicator (Peak Accomplishments) 4.
Major Contractor Progress Curves F.
Design Engineering i
1.
Close-out Status 2.
Work Force 3.
Major On-going Activities a.
FSAR b.
Start-up Related Work c.
Extra Efforts to Facilitate Construction 4.
Hard Spots
- Conduit
- Procurement Administration G.
Procurement 1.
Close-out Status 2.
Hard Spots a.
IEW - RC Pump and Pressurizer Supports b.
Pipe Hangers c.
Frank Electric H.
Start-up Management - Status and Schedule of Procedures
(.
and Testing I.
Slide Projector Presentation of Plant II. Tour A.
RCB Model B.
LP&L Staff Building C.
Plant III. Group Discussion A.
Scheduling Methods - Method of calculating percent complete, monitoring rate of progress and completion, identifying critical path items, corrective actions B.
Construction Status i
I t.'.
Exit Interview
4 e
8 0
NC'.' F.
i??B i
ENCLOSURE 3 PRINCIPAL SLIDES PRESENTED BY APPLICANT
/
4
'/
e f
33,0CC HISTORICAL PROJECTED 32pco -
i i
31,000 30,000 SYS*E M CwNED CR CPERIJED
(
29,000 CAPAaluTY I
2s,coe -
SYCTEM PEAx HOJRLY LCAD TREfC 27,000 -
4 8
A'CTUAL PEAK H%RLY LCAD f.
MSOO e
PROJECTED PEAK HOUP' Y LCt.O I
2SSOC y,-
24400 -
i l
23000 l
22,000 -
,j zi.ooo 2o ooc -
1 19.000
!$ ispoC
- "8r,eco O/
i
,... e -
- /
l$ is, ooc G i4,CoC p
1
_j MSU ll 7
13 SOC -
.d
- N
's l1000
/A sopc0 -
"~
9,cco
~
F
/.
4,000 lA /
(
7pOO I
i A7 5400
/@
LPSL
.,e S,000 W
/
4p00 3,mo
,.,g-a-
- ,.3 d 2SCO e h
- &h~,.
b i,000 I
i I
i I
I I
I I
I I
I t
t t
8965 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 19 83 81 82 83 84 YEAR 1
MSU AND LPSL LC.*.D AND CAPAC!Tr FIGURE 1
i i
)
i t
24 -
e.,,
,/(9 I
gg e
.20 -
w TH WATE*FC90 3 M CTKR C.*.PACITY ACCITCNS g-1 g
g 18
\\
\\
16 h
~
'N
\\
$ 14 g
\\
w m
\\
w
\\
/
C 12 -
\\
>=
Z O
s 10 -
g wfDCff WCCRFORD 3 ASSUMING
\\
w 0,
,/
o 8
G 6 -
4 -
(
f f
f I
1 f
78 79 80 86 82 83 84 YEAR 0
0 e
e I
t MIDDLE SCtJTH SYSTEM RESERVE MARGN-FIGURE 2 j
e
e e
f
.u.
c.. {.
.;.. i.
L a.._.i
_p,
+y i
ep.
'.'u84 o..'
.....I.
W
.il 9'
I CO
-- L - -...L L.,....
i.
k M
p
= ;.
t.
e i
W
~
t e
3
..~'*~3 6
g i
i i
e
.6 4
'~~~~-'~~~P-~'.'=.....~~'
~ ~ i r.
~.
2 c
w
.e
=d O
b m
.i c..
=
eit
-a
.~.-.,- - _,
O
.t 1 i
O4 1
M......
h a
==
6 W
g e:E3
- C
,--- --- 2 1
m n,
o r
LaJ I
e ct 2
\\.
3
,t,.,D
- 4...%
a
.9..
E 4..
E gi e
.6
.e y
e f
I C,
j I.l
_b n.
8!
@ 2 lQ i-- i, -.
4\\e
. -. ' =..........
i p.
cn i 22.,.
e p
4 e
O g,;J
- 3 i.
=.
w a
<l 0
3
-o M
2 -
}.
e t
_ _ =
i.,:
e 3
+
as
.t t
6
= w.
.._.4._,
U@
1 i
4 *3
- L.J9. -..,..
......,... 5-m...-.
i i
.
a, g,-
,u _ 4,__ _
e a.e z
w s
3
\\
i i
M g [.
Ci i
i x
i
_.=
4 i
- %g gO 4,.
co <!
A.
g Q 5 8 e
i m ai s.
i e
i oy e as
-e
- l 3-If
( Q 4
i e
36 I
i L
%t t
1
-i r
c, d
cr
,--~ i t-7 - --
z.
r ei c
s 6
r
<i i
t.
%,i r
i
/
cn,,
w s
.-s, i
i
<f e
E 6
6 31 i.- _
9
.--1--...._.
[';. :: i_..- :
. 1..-.. _..- -tr. -d.& - -- A p _.'.....L_.. i i..
m
. g.
- 3...
=*
. y.7 f _...-... _
i
(.O e i J,
W a.
I i
.2 cn 6
I f
I
" 2*
i i
<g
/
3, t
1 i
i e
I i.
Memm-mn=num O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O C
O m cc 5
c sn v
eq W
-e
.-4 IN33W3d
.e s
9 I
~
l I
l l
l l
l
6 4
- /!
4 r.
.-. un
~
S.CHEDULE. COMPARISON '
~
1979-1982 s- - P.W, R'S SCHEDULED FOR FUEL LOAD
\\
.nYELLOW BOOK CONSTRUCTION DdRATIO..Ni FIRST-CONCRETE TO FUEL LOAD S
LEGEP!D: YELLOW DOOK SCHEDULE I
I WilEN CONCRETE STARTED
$/ ~]
U l '- q;jj CURiiENT YELLOW BOOK I
E m.
SCllEDULE B
yo s, g
g 6
f-U k
I',
T a 80 5
3 8
0
- 3g s
___p,.____._______-
7.
j r
3 g
g w e,o - ~
~
=
~
l g
y
, 40 s
s o
4 w
f 3
l
~
)
{
w
~
5 3
l l20 E
t C-u att b3#
h$
p/ hg*
g:=,'; f I
["4 jr :
E/3 51.'. $ $$
$$ u$$
/J 5.e t
~'t
_= $ g.3 l$$500;ES 1 i i
i 8'
!73
- 3
. i i
i g j" "l,2 I SID l
l a
, cousrauct.o= pTsuo?a evas aus to neucai. co.esa narious n.s sore vcuow mocs FIGURE 4 sucser wisacoas a
'^A N
s' o G78
\\-
COMPARISON OF CONSTRUCTION HAJOR
~
HILESTONES BASED ON 5/81 F.L.
e Pl. ACE PROJECT lst CONC. TO START NSSS TO START COLD llYD.
TOTAL START HSSS
- START COLD llYD.
TO START F.L.
ST. LUCIE WI 36 HOS.
22 HOS.
11 HOS.
69 HOS.
ST. LUCIE #2 34 24 7
65 WPPS #3 36 18 8
62 WATERTORD #3 35.5 25 6.5 67.0 AVER. OF 40 PWR PLANTS PER 4RC CONST.
34 28 8
70 STATUS REPORT lL. KARL STUOV 3/l/18l
- HILLSTONE #3 NOT INCLUDED IN TIIIS CATECORY DUE TO 60 HONTil DURATION FOR FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS.
FIGURE 5
W Ast &
' %. ( A Y
NGV 3 r,. -
INR SOIEDUIE 00iPARISOtl - VESSEL SEITIl0 'IO REL IIMD110 t
JULY 1978 YEllill BOOK.
A.
~
- HARCil 1976 YEllai BOOK Sr.1101E 1*
W SES 3 ST. UX:lE 2 CAllAIMY 1 SAN OtomE 2 BYPON 1 NORlli A! Cit
<0016111tX"fl0t1 ACr1VITIES VESSEL SETTING - PRIMARV 20 FOS.
22 tOS.
23 FOS.
17.5 FOS.
27 FOS.
12 toS.
22 tOS.
60GNDARV vip 1NG STAKr UP INITIAL FluSil (ECCSI 2.0 3
2 10 0.5 12 1.0 C0lv IlvDRO
.5 0.5 1
1.5 1
2 0.5 8ASEtIHES 4.0 1.5 2
1.5 1
1 3.0 1.0
)
5 1.0 0.5 ItRT
.5 lidT TUNCTIONAL 1.0 1.0 3
1.5 3
NRC RfviEW
.3.0
'3.0 2
.'5 3.5 1
2.0
~
START UP TOTAL A d a.I 9.5 10 24 10 21 8.0
[J0$
31.5 33 41.5 37 33 30.0 TOTAL CONSIRilCTION i ST ART-UP VURATION -
VLSSLt SETTING TO CORE LOAU Fl.URE 6 G
i
(
e a
v 8
I
- e. a x -,
- ?
C*
g,,a g
- e. FM, we.
2
?
j 9j ll 5.:
1, L l,
, T r
3:
1 i I e-4 l 9
- j
.g i
w O
==e
- a h
%5 he!
W j )
- e.. W E m
o e
we or j
1~
f_
,,. _. 4 6
e-p m au e=== =u.
s_
7
(
W 6
g m
y-
' _, 5
[m
,.g g
D'T T
T I
N-4 r--o
- 1 H.
'u/
a x'
1
.=
a
% "T a
.I i
I z.
m g
w ee s e
.(
?
e.
~
t 1
O' g
i 2
- s a
,s p
e T-1 t
t l
=
'. y _v gi m{
l d
me me d
a e
a%
a N
- s u.a 1
I l
n'***
I s -)
i 1
eg g
CIC i
i-P*
4 r
C
.C
.I~ ?.'
- I." :
C
,i..
Q g
La.,
e t
,?=.
- w m
- g,,
- t-TI
=-
I o g '. f. _
- L..
8 it
.h l
0
~
-t i
- .i
- h A
3
?
E 8
- e..
E Y
_3' }
pd 3
4j l
I l
T E
l 6
g u
I
=
- [
i h,*3I I
=
- j a
A f:,;
. m g
..- u;.
r s-a 5
- -Y g
=
~ _ Wl-"T s
F 7
=
s ' :4 w il v
=
l
.i l1 4
%4. [I l
[b de I
'~
[
--3 e
b-'
=
i d
i g,
-l h
.,.. '.i,* t w ty
-~
~
.L
\\
n 2
s s
T8 -
.e
- 1 - 9 7
US s
l JA%
- t.
6
., g
.4 1
g
- L
's.
a -
Q y
' Wl
' am 4
.
- 1
~
D'hi.
=
l l I
s
.4
=l l
i N N., j
[..
ZE; ;t I
a
.a I
a i i
. L
- t e
)
2
- Ce
-e a-
.8 g
d
}
. 5 : io #
.I
%.e i -
Q 9
r 42 1
4 >-
43 u
J P