ML20062D426

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Public Version of Temporary Change Notices to Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures 1054.1 Re Unusual Event, 1054.2 Re alert,1054.3 Re Site Emergency & 1054.4 Re General Emergency
ML20062D426
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/16/1982
From:
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20062D401 List:
References
PROC-820716-03, NUDOCS 8208060066
Download: ML20062D426 (13)
v • d • e


Text

'

r "TEMPOR ARY CHANCE" SIDE 1 E.Y M Three' Mile Island Nuclest Station Temporary Change Notica (TCN)

TCN No.

3 - 7 'a -3 i 3 Figure 1001 5 (From TcN Los inoesa P#OTE: Instructions and oundehnes n AP t ool Unit No.

T must be followed when comoset no

'? /'6 [FA this Iorm.

Date

(

Unusual Event 1054.1 1.

Procedure Tme No.

2.

Cte nge sinciude me numbers. perserso numbers, and nect word.no of chen

.)

n See attached copy of pages 3.o t ti.o.

Y 3.

Reason for Chanoe:

1982 Revision is based on R. C. Arnold letter l " Corrective Action on February 19s TMI-2 Unusual Event" u d., p4 i.. e.

a.= g. i.

e.

. o W Le--w W)y}#2_

Recommended by )k Y Wfft L.

5. E a

o te 4.

s.roervivs s.enenare i case

(/

No longer then ninety days from effectke date of TCN or os in (a) or (b) below whiefower occurs firm.

6.

Duration of TCN.

TCN will be cancelled by a procedure revision issued as a result ci-a Prceedure Change Re G. J. Giangi (Submit PCR as soon as possible) y (a) submitted by supervoor !ubmittmg TCN l

(b) TCN is not valid after-(tus m cucumstances wn.cn weu result m TCN baire esacedeci tsee. Arioot - Aeoendin a) is the procedure on the Nuclear Safety Related Procedure Ust?

Yes g-l No [--]

7.

(a)

If "Yes", complete Nuclear Safety Evaluation. Is;oe 2 of ini, Formi (sec. AP 1o01 - Acrendiz 8)

(b) Is the procedure on the EnvironmentalImpact Procedure Ust?

~

No Yes q

If "Yes", complete Environmental Evaluation. (side 2 of ih. Form)

Yes No g Does the change ef fect the intent of the original procsdurs?

I (c)

If sit enewers are "no" the chenee may be sooroved by ttw Shitt Supervisor. If ouestion (c) h anw must be rev6ewed by the PORC and soproval by the Station / Unit Superintendent prior to implemen NOTE:

ff et teast one of whom to auwtion (en. ".no" the chance may be soproved by two members o 8.

Review <id Acorfijl Block (c) "no" Block (c) "yes' Approved M

[/2 Approved Date SMO Lacense snitt Supervoor/ Foremen Date

Reviewed, Memcor Plant Mrg.statt cete Members

[^

Reviewed Of PORC 8

7!Okd Approved o.te un. sooer.r.tenoont Contacted ee=

y uno supermtenoeng The beeck (c) "Yes"reyew end soproval chain may be tonowed at animme 8208060066 820802 NOTE _-

/

PDR ADOCK 05000320

PDR, l

F 9.

Approval Date Manager, Generation Quality Assuranceon certein Adn.'votret've Proceouses Inteo m Encicoure 7 of A NOTE:

M.G.O.A. eporses recuated oniv 10.

TCN is Cancelled Oste sneti suoervoorsstwei Foremen l

mum..

--.e.,---

-q__

t

- ~ -

-M

..q~

" EVALUATION" SIDE 2 AP 1001 T: ree Mile Island Nucteer Station Figure 1001-4 N uclear Safety / Environmental lmpact Evaluation

' Unusual Event

.) " 3 0 ~ 3 Q

1. Procedure 1054.1 w.

T.,no...,y cua.. Notic. no.

J g

2. Nnclear Safety Evaluation i

l Does the attached procedure change:

increase the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of

  • (a) equipment important to safety?............................... yesO no '*

\\

create the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated

  • (b) previous!y in the safety analysis report?........................... yesO no O i
  • (c) reduc's the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technical specification?..... yesO noO

{

j

~

I-Details of Evaluation te.

.n.,av.a.

.e, o.a.

. a.. A m <a a.a ive w.e.

This change does not affect plant equipment or operational procedures. This change adds more clear.. cut guidelines.for declaration of emergencies.

f I

Date 9

/s-Evaluation By U"

/ /

a j

~

3.

EnvironmentalImpact Evaluation

'Does the attached procedure change:

(a) possibly involve a significant environrnental impact?......,,.............. yes O no (if 3(a) is "yes", answer questions (b) and (c) and fill in " Details of Evaluation" below.

If "no", state why by filling in the" Details of Evaluation" below).............. yesO no

  • (b) ha've a significant adverse effect on the environment?...................... yes O no
  • (c) involve a significant environmental me.ter or question not previously reviewed and evaluated by the N.R.C........................................ yes O nod Details of Evaluation amen.eeitsa.i c w r.euwoei Evaluation By Date 4.

Unit Superintendent reques:s PORC review l l Check if YES.

5.

Approval Evaluation Accompanying PCR Evaluation Accompanying TCN

~

//

sao uce<=

oei.

VUnei Supermteno.n

'D.te Reviewed Member of Plant statt Date l

Approvat unit sup.< ntencent o.i.

CDCTE-The Ev.au.t.on "Accomo.nying e PCR" ev.iwate.n end sporovel chain may be foslove.d et anyt.ne.

m u w x = -.. a.x.

.-.n n n,,- _.. u. __

.-r-'M"W

- Mwme w s,

ywa m

~ s'.FO'R USE IN UNIT 11 ONLY 1054.1

~

s Revision 0 n

.'2 3.6 A failure of a safety or relief Typical indications:

valve in a safety releated system a.

Increased R.C.S. makeup to close following reduction of b.

Accoustical valve moni-applicable pressure.

toring or flow measuring eauipment indication.

c.

Continuing drop in system pressure.

3.7 Both diesel generators inoper-Inoperable as defined per Tech-able resulting in a' loss of back-nical Specification of Opera-up emergency power.

bility Section 1.5, or by a loss of the ability to meet any of the conditions of Technical Specifications -

Limiting Conditions for Operation, Section 3.8.1.

3.8 Sustained loss of offsite power.

Loss of all A.C. power indica-cation from offsite trans-mission network:

3.9 The sustained loss of contain-a.

The loss of the ability to ment integrity, meet the conditions of containment integrity as

~ defined in Technical Specifications, Section

'I f

17

^C c n n m c m,{e Q*,_,

Q ). x,

A's indicated by the re-3.10 Reactor buildinc oressure a.

> 0 PSIG'6r below minimum allow-actor building pressure able pressure.

monitoring instrumenta-tion.

b.

Minimum allowable pres-sure per Technical Speci-fication Figure 3.6-1.

3.11 Any fire in a permanent plant

  • Shift Foreman's judgement, structure which cannot be con-based on advice of the fire trolled by the fire brigade brigade leader.

within 10 minutes of discovery.

3.12 Any fire outside plant structures Shift Foreman's judgement, recuiring offsite assistance, based on request of the fire brigade leader for offsite firefighting assistance.

3.13 Any significant loss of assessment Shift Foreman's/ Emergency or communication capability which Director's judgement.

would reduce the ability to detect, assess, or respond to a plant emer-gency.

  • In many. cases the Shift Foreman will assume the position of Fire Brigade Leader.

~

3.0

3 + r y n..
m. :

a v

i

~

=

.c

..f b

b d&

i.

2['[..

2$ 7A.O'&$C-DW.}.,<*$*

1054.1

-m-i.>ci.,s...e

.'~

Revision 1 3.14 Arty security threat, attempted Shift Foreman's/ Emergency entry, or attempted sabotage.

Director's judgement.

j,D.

3.15 Ariy natural phenomenon being As indicated by arty one of the

~

experienced or projected beyond following:

A usual levels.

1.

Any earthquate of a mag-

~

tude >.01g as indicated by the 'Theshold Seismic M'...&r. *

.. V.e v.

Condition

' Ni 2.

Projected 4%rer stage >

.s..'

2. ; ~

4..*'

~

Water Ith$ake.4tructure.

302 ft. at th'eJ1yer

' ' g - *.* + N A.

2 ds:'. V.

4'-

3.

Sustat$ed,wCnds > 75 mph J.-!MJ'--C*.%:.k.N v@L'

'**'O.,f".7. % # M N ;

as in~dicated on Vind

.3; 7gcC" Speedfecorder (CNSD-1A).

'w21.'..

4.

National Weather Service

. d S &'A Y %W~~*.W.

projection of hurricane

-~

M-NYy-; W" N

%c'.

fort'e' winds or a tornado.

" f =? ' M

~

3.16 Onsite aircraft cratn-outside

~5hift Foreman's/ Emergency

.-:;;M'.'A r..hg.f:..,

.k e

" ?ty,Y ttf~ ~ % +D ',.

the protected. area Yence and Dir'ector's judg:sent, j

p%:o 92.*: R Ji3 ~..'3

%. - ~ "

not impacting on plant struc-

' /

  • M.;

tures, or'an onsite train de-

'.N J

2MI.Gi.;% 'O#

railment. \\ ' " e' 7

.ls ywglF;.~.y. W':s.

.y \\%

MN ge,',,. W."-;,.. d. ' ?"',.m.r.

3.17 Any near.or onsite explosion out&

Shif t Foreman's/ Emergency

. 7.

side the; protected area fence and\\'

Director's judgement.

--a..

3,. W 'fe.

not impacting on plant structuMs.

N 3.18 Any nesr or onsite toiR or Y1am-Shif t Foreman's/ Emergency

. N 3.

nable gas or liquid release which Director's -judgement.

,.... - 3

.u Could affect the habitaD111ty re-quired for ' normal 'p1a' nt., operations.

h. N '*.*

,,G;;,'3l5!.y,k.c N

,:) ped 4N$;..;,,x~j ; ;:

W/

'y.,

s.'

c2 :.-.-C-3.19Strikesofoperft employees nShif,t Foreman's/ Emergency

.egf F'/ '

or security guares or honoring g Director's judgement.

.. ?.Zg. iN,'@de.

of picketynes by these employees..q) k

,a,;

3.20 Transpo t1 of any contaminated Shif t Foreman's/ Emergency rhb@29.@

injured personnel free the site to Director's judgement.

s M:,i%I S M E @',,i

"'**d'''"*'-

O

$([e h9,"Gh.i

'M 3.21 M A C W q 1 cchdi g Shif t Foreman's/ Emergency

=

,[;.....?9.."%'*.-

awa Director's judgement. ~

hn'.'Mfi;JS,"

f: ?.;..

"O her plant conditicas are is h o:e: In exercising :he as to the need for decia:judg:en:

l

f %'g 5

';r,v.g '.. s 9..1 6-progress or have occurred which 1:g an I

g,;

2' j.

9,,

. ? - '.','..

may indicate a poten:ial Unusual Iven:, u=certain y ces-p degradatics of the level of cerning safe y sta:us cf the plt =:,

W,f f ' -

sa:ety of the plant."'

the 1e:g:h of time the uncer: sin:

resolu:icn of a=prospe::s for ez y a l. h..

d;. d a I

exists, and the 17 l

~'

iguities should be l

.JJ.2.,.

considered; i.e., uncer: tin y aben:

'.f$d'i the level of safety of the pla=:

(

-..$,.s. m

  • ::9 @j.gc,..y,, y.. M...,

t' az:ending beyc=d a reascuable time i

',m period is a sufficient basis for

,, < f;.'n ~ -;;.W'*-' *;

l i

dac1a:L:g an Unusun Eve :."

g*r,.:..% h sS Y$ww,'. ?.,; h kh.0 I

,."f.",C N.g e

4.0 E ERGENCY ACTIONS

..;.,.s.a:- ; w C.: <.

.,q.i,':~ -

t..

-..;y..,. '..

4.1 Upon recognition that any of Emergency Action Levels of Section 3.0

.. ~. ~

above have been reached or exceed, the Shift Foreman shall announce

%Q",..
( N. (-2.

" ~.

7 f.u ;.

or have ant.ounced, the following message over the pubite address M[fNf<%hgbk.h.

c.c; system (merged): (NOTE: Turn on wnelen siren switch.)

l

,. w -

b::.)d 3

s

-u g'g y.:C '.4-5 ~.e.. ;T r,-;;;.:

M.:: c.

,.w.y.

Wt

..:=.=.=

-,, ~:i.

0 f

r i,

av' "TEMPOR ARY CHANGE"

-s

$10E 1 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Figure 1001 5 Temporary Change Notice (TCN)

TCN NO.

J N-3 83 om, - n..

...,,_on.. n. e-...n Unit No.

E musi w sonowoo wnen como tene jf Y %

the f orm.

Date 1.

Procedure 1054.2 Alert No.

T stie 2.

Ctn noe (inciuoe one, numbers, perso,soh numbers, and es.ct wardine of enenee.)

See attached copy of page 4.0.

3.

Reason for Chance:

Revision is based on.R. C. Arnold letter " Corrective Action on February 19, 1982 TNI-2 Unusual Event".

s, /

4.

Recommended by O/NM 4/94t.

5. y
  1. 744L_,

(f pay kosys s.eneture a Date 6.

Ouration of TCN - No toneer then nonety days from of f acthe date of TCN or es in tal or tbl below whichever ocaars f ket.

~(a)

TCriwill be cancelled by a procedure revision issued as a resc!t of a Procedure Changt Request to be submitted by G. J. Gianai (Submit PCR as soon as possible) lX l aupervisor fucmittme TCN (b) TCN is not valid after-l l

(f n m cecumstances wn.c.n win result m TcN oeire conconecs 7.

(a) is the procedure on the Nuclear Safety Related Procedure Ust?

ts.c. A*ioot - Apoendin si If "Yes", complete Nuclear Safety Evaluation. (s.oe 2 of thi. Formi Yes g No i i

(b) ' is the procedure on the Environmental Impact Procedure Ust? (so Ar toot - Aendin et if "Yes", complete Environmental Evaluation. Iside 2 or this permi Yes l

l No g (c)

Does the change af fect the intent of the original procedure?

Yes No g NOTE: If all aneaers are "no" the chenee may be soproved by the Shif t Supervisor. If ouestiore (c) is enewsrod "yes". the chenee muet be renewed by the PORC and aoorovel by the Station / Unit Sucurrintendent prior to imolementation. If the answer to question (c) is "no" the chenee may be sporoved by t4o members of the plant menspement staff et loset one of whom holds e senior reactor coeretors license on the unit affec$ls in accordance with persermon 3.6.4.2 of AP 1001 8.

Review and Approvst)

Block (c) "yes" Block (c) "no" I

Approved O.

hu[# b 4 N Approved snitt np6rmsor/ Foremen Date aRO Lacense Date l

Reviewed Member Plant Mrg, statt Date l

Members Reviewed Of PORC a

Chairman of PORC De te 5

"010 Approved Contacted v

oors p

unit supermtencent Date Date g unit supermtence NOTE: The twocis (c) "Yes" ew and approval ensin may be f ollowed at anytime.

9.

Approval Manager, Generation Quality Assurance Date M.G.O.A. accrevel rooused only on certain Adn. wirsirve Proceoures lestoo in Encsosure 7 of AP t oot NOTE:

10.

TCN is Cancelled snett swoorvoors$nstt Foremen De re

...~,-.

w

~

..-w_

T

" EVALUATION' a.a SIDE 2 AP 1001 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Figure 1001-4 N uclear Saf ety/ Environmental lmpact Evaluation d-32-3'3

' Alert

1. Procedure 1054.2 w.

v

.ry ca.ne. u

. w..

2. Nuclear Safety Evaluation Does the attached procedure change:

~

n

  • (a) increase the probability of occurrence or t e consequences o an acc ent or malfunction of j

h f

id noO equipment important to safety?............................... yes creats the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated i

  • (b) previously in the safety analysis report?........................... yesO noO i

'(c) reduc's the margin of safety es defined in the basis for any tschnical specification?..... yesO no.*

~

I Details of Evaluation

.n a,.n.

t.

ni.a.

. n.". Am.a.emw w r

  • .e.

This change does not affeEt plait 'equipmen't' or operationai procedures.

This change adds more clear-cut guidelines for declaration of emergencies.--

l

.L t

I Evaluation By kIl Date 91-f/'

//

~ ' '

~

m.

3. EnvironmentalImpect Evaluation

'Does the attached procedure change:

(a) possibly involve a significant environtnantal impact?...................... yesO noO l

(if 3(a) is "yes", answer questions (b) and (c) and fill in " Details of Evaluation" below.

I If "no", state why by filling in the " Details of Evaluation" below).............. yesO noO

  • (b) have a significant adverse effect on the environment?...................... yes O no
  • (c) involve a significent environmental me.ter or question not previously reviewed and noC enluated by the N.R.C................s........................ Yes Details of Evaluation r Am.n.smsn.i w r

=.ei l

l Evaluation By Date 4.

Unit Superintendent requests PORC review l j Checkif YES.

5.

Approval Evaluation Accompanying PCR Evaluation Accompanying TCN M/[

7//N sao u=.a-o~

7 Urus Sup.rmiepdnt

~

(T.t.

i l

~/

Reviewed M.mc.e of Pt.nt Siatt Det.

/

Approval unn superinuno.ni o.i.

NOTE.

Th. Ev.au. tion " Accomo.nvins. PCR".v.sv.t on.ad.porow.I chain m.y ti. f ollove.d at.nytwn..

w - mh m%

,a,,----

    • eegioe'w--

=N og' w*g*

__g

-n.. i...

..t v..-.

Y,,p.n$?$$ b...f}....Y'$=*YOS }" " ?
  • ?

h

.. x.

,' ' m

_,.,m

/l 1054.2 Revision 1 "a#

.,-or..

l

.g'i V e,fy..

w.i v, 3.17 Any near or onsite toxic or Shift Foreman's/ Emergency flammable gas or liquid release Director's judgement.

.~

.c which affects the habitability

[g?C.- o

,p - n..

l

.',. v.y.,...

twguired for normal operations.

7'.i.dl) 3.18 Known explosion damage to any Shift Foreman's/ Emergency

_'-~....

permanent plant structure.

Director's judgement.

?

3.19 An ongoing security compromise.

Shift Foreman's/ Emergency

=

M,..s'

.., N..

e Director's judgement based on IQ(c".:,5;." -.

advice of plant security.

- wp-= :*O :. c : - - > ~;--- - -

3.20 rpi 1

Shift Foreman'.s/Imergency fi_.'-- 2 Judgement. -

n. 9. M - w r @..s'Mii.

'O ar plant conditions are in 3 Note: In exercisi.ng the judgmen

% s{@I @ & Ci Q % 3"Y.M.w E.'j;,,[.'M.-d.'

progress or have occurred which j as to the need for declari=g an

'~.a. g p.w.e.9 may involve an actual c
Alert, uncertainty concerning potential substan
ial degrada-safety status of the plant, the

t. ~2.,i"' -g.,1 tion of the level of saf e:y of length of ti=a the uncertainty F 6'f;.ib.

'Me

/h -*

the plant.'

resolu: ion of a=pects for earlvbiguities, and exists, the pros

'Qfr%M.%$.$

Ji 3

'g'.tiv

$f976..'

poten:ial fcr substantial deg aida-tien of the level of saf ety of the g i#.M.-:/p.. r;:. N '-~ p %..4. ' ' '.

plan: should be censidered; i.e.,

!~.(v.,J.,M[: -;*n.DT.. 9-N' ). N 3 y @ d i d @ % '

substan:ial degradation cf the uncertain:v as to the exis:ence of

+

E. %.C.' c,.c5dE '.iu extending beycmd a reasonable ti=e

  • level cf safe:7 of the plan:

??$#f ;1f,':

. @..g- ; n. u ; ; n..J.

period is a sufficien: basis for c

--..s~

declaring an Alert.

j s.e 7 -:..

I i

mv w

--v.t.~........,,y...._.

4.0 EERGENCY ACTIONS

,,--,, W.~. wa,-.6

.- p l

.,v7,. smp MP.<v-y.,. k.~ *'. ".,,5 Initials

+.

s

-c.. -l t th.,.r. v ei...,,r &.

o-e

. -.< Sw.

Mk[-h5 h

"'I UP8" C09'IIIon that any of the Emergency Action Levels of l

j

  • 4.r*% %

section 3.0 above have been reached or exceeded, the Shif t lJ % $,, y,-

2;,

vr e -.

nW@-m).;%u f 4"$,

Foreman shall announce or have announced, the following

.d rF/4 1

.Gf!h.k,,h.',

kh.-

  • **I*

3.I

' *(

SIRIN SWITCH.)

g57 f

' ATTENTION ALL. PERSONNEL; ATTENTION ALL PERSONNEL: AN MN.".?/2.Q@..'

ALERT HAS BEEN DECLARED IN UNIT 2.

ALL EMEERS OF THE

... 4.2

  1. -1 ONSITE AND ONSHIFT EERGENCY ORGANIZATION REPORT TO YOUR STATIONS. ALL OTHER PERSONNEL AWAIT FURTHER

. --A*. <... @....

u.

Q z w.c...

,.fM.,k.,@.y.,%.s....@

n INSTR' CTIONS.* (If emergency is radiation-oriented, add J

. z

. s --.

.v.c.r : -

"There will be No Smoking, Drinking, or Eating until p,.wwg:.c.g&...m.. w..',

l.

4'..

a..e-y.M:,-.S 1

9l.'h.,,'?'.W[

T+.Mp&&,i

. c-;o/ f 7

further notice") (Give a brief description of the event le unen.

.xmark

.- [. O'.@,.'.er.. ii and repeat the announcement). (NOTE: TURN OFF WHELEN u

.,,.c :..

SIREN SWITCH.)

f 4.2 The Shift Foreman shall assume the duties of the Emergency Director until properly relieved. He shall announce to the i

.s..

.,,,.s.

~~',e./**.**_.

1..,.*. ? : (' ':
,....'.^?..

M N

.s '. h g

p.- W

t. ' ew. *..,y e

ni:".-d /

Control Room personnel that he, has

~'

"~

~ Wfd..

(name)

., bas.wr. d-w

~ ; % -.,f.,[bs..

e 3

. t - 8, ; -

assumed the duties of the Emergency Director.

4.0 i

ae" AI443_ _

g,"

=D-

'M-'*-

W---

N$DN

Y~

{ h

~ f W.

-,,/

"TEMPOR ARY CHANCE"

/m.

\\

SIDE f Three Mile Island Nuclest Station Figure 1001 5 Temporary Change Notice (TCN)

TCN No.

3 - Fo-3 II NOTE: Instructions and gu.delines in AP t ool (From TCN Los inoea8 muis w Ionowoo wnen como.eting Unit No.

"Ir the f orm.

,/a.ha r

0,t,

1.

Procedurs 1054.3 Site Emergency No.

Title 2.

Ctc noe sinciude pose numbers, peragroch numbers. end e=ect wording of enen, i See attached copy of page 4.0.

r 3.

Reason for Chance:

Revision is based on R. C. Arnold letter " Corrective Action on February 19s 1982 TMI-2 Unusual Event".

at 9

.r 4.

Recommended by AUu W

%'ftlGt

5. n SW -

ivhy/n te suWwser's segnatus4 e

oste g'

/

6.

Duration of TCN - No longer then ninety days from effective dote of TCN or as in (e) or (b) below whichever occurs f *arst.

(a) 18/N will be canctiled by a procedure revision issued as a rssult of a Procedure Change Request to be submitted by G. J. Giangi (Submit PCR as soon as posible) y surwresor tuomitt.ns rCN (b) TCN is not valid af ter-l l

titu n cwcumstances wn.cn wits result an TCN oeire cancenect 7.

(a) is the procedure on the Nuclear Safety Related Procedure Ust? (Sec. AP 1ool - Appendix Sl g

No i If "Yes", complete Nuclear Safety Evaluation. (s;oe 2 e sms Formi Yes (b)' is the procedure on the EnvironmentalImpact Procedure List?

(Sec. AP toot - Aprendiz 8)

If "Yes", comp!ste Environmental Evaluation. (:r.de 2 of this Form)

Yes l

l No g (c)

Does the change effeet the intent of the original procedure?

Yes y

No p NOTE: ff all ensaers are "no" the change may be approved by the Shif f Supervisor if question (c) is enmered "yes". the change must be renewed by the PoRC and approval by the Station / Unit Superintendent prior to impiemontetson. If the answer to question (c) is "no" the change may be sporosed by tw3 members of the plant management stoff et feest one of whom holds a senior reactor operators facense on the unit effecinIlI in accoroence with peregreen 3.6.4.2 of AP 1001.

~

~

8.

Review and Acor[

Block (c) "yes"b Block (c) "no" Aoproved Mf./9 N *M Approved smet supern.orif oremen oete sao ucense onte Reviewed Memcer Flent Mrg. staf f Oate Members l

Of PORC

/

Reviewed 2

Casirmart of PORC os te 7/M/O Approved Contacted I

f'"* Posi

~ Detie uns: supermtencent Dete Approved MNA_

VUKt sLoerentencent Date l

NOTE: The block fc) "Yes"r and approval chain may be followed at anytime.

1

~

a S.

Approval Manager. Generation Quality Assurance Date i

l NOTE:

M.G.Q.A. soorovos rooured onty on cortein Adn. irstrairve Procedures fistea in Enclosurs 7 of AP 1001 10.

TCN is Cancelled sn.et suoervi.oristust Foremen oste

~~~

~ ~ Z.'5.

U

^~~~~.f

~ -

- _"1: ' '..-. -. -. -. _ _ _

g l

^ S.* -,'

" EVALUATION"

$10E 2 -

I AP 1001 Three M.le Island Nuctear Station Figure 1001-4 N uclear Saf ety/ Environmental Impact Evaluation

1. Procedure 1054.3 e

Site Emeroency

?" D*338 T ese T.,ncorery Change Notate N..

84.,
2. Nieclear Safety Evaluation t,

Does the attached procedure change:

increase the probability of occurrence of the consequences of an accident or malfunction of l

  • (a) equipment important to safety?............................... yesO noO a

create the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated

'(b) previously in the safety analysis report?........................... yesO noO i

'(c) reduc's the margin of safety es defined in the basis for any technical specification?..... yesO noOl

~

t Details of Evaluation se...n.av.m a.v.

o.m.,. no. Amca.oo.ii.a..

it..=v

.4.1 w

I

. This change does not affect plant equipment or operational procedures.

This change adds. more clear-cut guidelines for declaration of emergencies..

l

/lf k((/IAM Date Vr fu Evaluation By y,

(

~~ '

3. Environmentallmpact Evaluation

'Does the attached procedure change:

(a) possibly involve a significant environmentalimpact?...................... yes caO (if 3(a) is "yes", s.iswer questions (b) and (c) and fill in "D etails of Evaluation" below.

If "no", state why by filling in the " Details of Evaluation" below).............. yesO noO

  • (b) have a significant adverse effect on tha environment?...................... yes no O

'(c) involve a significant environmental ma..ter or question not previously reviewed and evaluated by the N,R.C........................................ yes O naD

, Details of Evolustion :A m en

.,u n.:o w r.w.mi Evaluation By Date l Check if YES.

Unit Superintendent m '_TO: Deciew l 4.

~...

5.

Approval Evaluation Accompanying PCR Evaluation Accompanying TCN

,g M

[rd Sao ucense.

o i.

(,,,,,ine Super mienc.<yf

' ' Dete

/

Reviewed Memcor of Plant Suff De te paroval u, suo r.nunoent o ie s

The iveaves.on Accomo.ny.no e PCR" eveavation and soproval ches may be f allowed at anytime.

NOTE.

r

.._.,n

.._..z-.,-._.-,

x

.v

i 3

u t.

4

-g.w;,.

).. ~ _;.

c.

,.. e.

. v

-if^1 TmG,% M $,iW G.,.

1o54,3 Revision 1 3.13 Entry of toxic or flammable gases Shift Foreman's/ Emergency

-. m <

m' into vital areas wnich affects Director's judgement.

operation of safe shutdown equip-

"*"I*

3.14 Evacuation of the control room when the control room is evac-s where Control of the shutoown usted and control of the shut-3 systems is not estabitshed with-down systems cannot be estab-

_.a

.m.

in 15 minutes.

11shed.

... ~.

y.j,*p "_*

,, [

i.

3.15 Reactor building pressure As indicated etyhhe, reactor

..c.

..6_.

r_. -

,.n,s. y. p -

-> 4 psig.

building pressur itoring

. - _ -, m.

S15t***

.' b j

{D, ?

3.16 tyions tAat all Shift [o n 'IEmergency w"

"r f.g i

- f:,yCy :.yf:... y. m,J. @, - m W,

.M.

,t atAon emerge c

~ ~'Otre gement.~

a m.c n

Uane' r14 tu '

No:e: In exercising the judg=en:

s. ~h *Wr

  • i,%.

s-ess.a *g..,s.'.r..;.' y'.Q-W*/#.'.W.tyd,9%y n. c -

paEM

' M 'Ir On-W'*

as to the need,c dec aring a Site g.m'- :.. p

-t

.. w

^ tVs E=ergesey. a=v uncer:tisty ec=:e: -

?

g.

0:her plan conditic s are in ing the statu's of plant fune:1c=s

.e5

~

h, m.

h, %. C %t g M.

progress or have occurred which needed for protectien of the public.

Jw> 4M;e.AM.:G.y-s

=ayinyolveactualc like17 the length of time the uncerta:. :v f:y?"p g r;.

m; -

=ajor.ailures o. plant exists, the p;cspe::s f er early

.td r

4 2A fp ::ic=s needec fer pro:ec:ic: resolu:icn of a biguities, and':he M. W y,. 4 -":qch.9NE%g

o. the public.

. potential degradatica cf the plan:

f'::c:ic.s needed fe: prote:: ice of

.
.... S. '.%M.nc.

'$f.MJ z :.. ~ > ~

.-e s.

. w J.., y

-he publi: should be c::sidered: 1.e c

t'.c.';!.G.*.7 :1-N @

s ignifica.:: us:er: tin:7 a.s c :he reliabili:y of plan: f.: ctions fc bey==e::ing the public extending azot

~

d a reascrable :ize perioc is

f....

.s Si e

ey T /S Q,I1E Q.f.9-?

4.0 EMERGENCY ACTIONn

\\

.. -%y- :n,...h.. y '*:.y ; -.m

  • eu. ';-

--s.8 Inttial

4

. A g'.*Ig 4

recognition tnat any of IIne~rgs3ency Action Levels have been c

u.- y.

p. h.. d M.W O:..,.

N.W.w.%.+Q'.m.'JS 4.1 Up M

e.Ns M :J P reatnea-or exceeded, tne Snif t.fbreman sna11 announce or have

,W:ey b. ?" :', < ;.:

rw-f.;.:

" : 5.,. -

q-s Mp.idl.fi' 'm$.[p.J":1."',',

announced, the following nessage over tne pubi_tc.4ddress system m.

m

.,. 61'.<;,% v, r:$%... ~ u.>....;A <;)...p.

(merged):

\\.

  • w3 2

l MMM NNM$dN.:,.i NOTE:

a s

Turn on Wne$en 51ren Switen...N 2p'.a 'v' '....

HAS BEEN DECLARED IN UNIT 2.

ALL'NON-ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL IN UNIT 2 l

(,p E '

~~

~

ATTENTION ALL PERSONNEL; ATTENTION ALL PERSONNEL, A SITE EMERGENCY wum.hm...,,F.r.e una..e:.ms.:.n.wa

REPORT.TO UNIT"2 WAREHOUSE. ALL NON-ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL IN THE i

~

~

UNIT 2 AREA REPORT TO THE UNIT 2 WAREHOUSE. ALL PERSONNEL IN H.P.

J'

...C.v%-l<<,'Q'g'^h)la.... ', Q;

[$.. -

?

CONTROLLED -AREAS PROCEED TO THE H.P. ACCESS CONTROL PolNTS. ALL

.,E MEMBERS OF'THE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION REPORT TO YOUR STATIONS.

- yg;, nc THERE WILL BE NO SMOKING, DRINKING OR EATING UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.

y Mr..'

(Repeat message slowly).

  • f V ".parw.,.m-/.' %.'.

W :s

.. 7,dinb.Q.4, #c+..; :..n

~, c.

y.~n m

.. - g'
**.E.%.

NOTE:

Turn off whelen Stren Switch.

.%.~'

. r,-

x TD i'h" [~ (g.-QQ 4.2 The Snift Foreman sna11 assume tne duties of the Emergency Director T

untti properly relieved. He shall announce to the Control Room

~

~

f i

j:

personnel tnat he (name) has assumeo the

.. r

.c 4 17,,

  • 4;.

t

..w.

- f.; h. $ ' Y, r*om9.?&n$%*b l?)

-W4:5 m'g# ).,. '.E *

..,Mt,

4.0

' g-4; "

.j q 7

2.~

m.:

i~n_.:-. - r

- - ~~~

~ ~ - - - ----

y.,,,,...,.

.~,,g

.,_.,,..,%g,,

m gis g = n %-

. _ [,

r

" TEMPORARY CHANGE"

-dMP 1801

$10E 1 Three Mile Island Nucteer Station Figure 1001 5 Temporary Change Notice (TCN)

TCN NO.

3 3 i O NOTE. in.ituctions no eu.oes.nes m Ap iooi 8 F'o= T 9L'*5 'a'

must be foisowed when compi ime Unit No.

E

/

/Ya r

Date "T

1.

Procedur, 1054.4 General Emergency No.

Titte 2.

Cru noe (inciude pese numberi. persersph numbers. and erect wardme nf ch nee.)

See attached copy of page 2.0.r 3.

Reason for Chanoe:

Revision is based on R. C. Arnold letter " Corrective Action on February 19, 1982

-TMI-2 Unusual Event".

. e1 4.

Recommended by kN M

  • Ub
5. A MCw MMM

/Defe superviu(posonsture

/

Dete 6.

Duration of TCN. No toneer then ninety days from of f active date of TCN or as in (a) or (bl below whichever occnars first.

(a)

TCN will be cancelled by a procadure revision issued as a result cf a Procedure Change Request to be submitted by G. J. Gianci (Submit PCR as soon as possible) lXl Supervrsor ucrmitmg TCN (b) TCN is not valid af ter-l l

(f als in carcumstances wn ch w.il tosult in TCN ceare canceslaci 7.

(a) is the procedure on the Nuclear Safety Related Procedure List? (sec. AP 1ool - Appendix 8)

If "Yes", complete Nuclear Safety Evaluation. (sios 2 of this Form Yes No iy i

(b) ' la the procedure on the Environmental Impact Procedure List?

(sec. AP toot - Aprwune e)

. es n No g Y

If "Yes", complete Environmental Evaluation. (s;de 2 of this rormi g

No p (c)

Does the change offect the intent of the original procedure?

Yes NOTE: If all eneners are "no" the chenee may be approved by the Shrf t Supervisor, if evoetion (c) is answered "yes". the change must be renewed by the PORC and approvel by the Station /Jnit Superintendent prior *.D implementetron. If the answer to question (c) is "no" the thenee may be opprowd by TM members of the plant menessment eastf et leset one of whom hoids e senior reactor operetors license on the unit affec$8 in accoraence with parecroph 3.6.4.2 of AP 1001.

l 8.

Review a*id Appro Block (c) "yes" Block (c) "no" 4r/ O E8 ~ ##2 Approved Approved "

Shitt Sup6meor/ Foreman Oate 38 0 t.acense Da te Reviewed

  • Memoer Plant Mrg. Statt Date Members Reviewe '

Of PORC Contacted M

O Approvet' 7

~

t

'Ca te

{ PORC Memoor.

Defe gl/ tJmt Supermt Approved wit suo.r nienaen Deie NOTE: The beach (c) "Yes" review orid sporoval cheen may be followed et anytirne.

S.

Approval Manager, Generation Quality Assurance Date MG.O.A. sporo' el focused only on certom Adn.swtraseve Proceoutes lestoo in Enciosure 7 of AP t oot NOTE:

v 10.

TCN is Cancelled Stutt Supervrsort$ rust Foremen Date e-m

,-w_.

w, a.

p.s

--m ss

,,-e,mema p

em

-o m* s.e w ee

" EVALUATION'

. '__ l~

SIDE 2' AP 1001 Three Mile Island Nuefeat Station Figure 1001-4 Nuclear Safety / Environmental Impset Evaluation rieneral Fmpropnev 2*U*hO

1. Procedure 1054.4 e

a..

Tm

~

v.,no...,y cune. Notice No.

I

2. Nuclear Safety Evaluation Does the attached procedure change:
  • (a) increase the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of f

equipment important to saf ety?............................... yesO no u

  • (b) create the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated j

previously in the safety analysis report?........................... yes no O i

'(c) reduce the margin of safety es defined in the basis for any technical specification?..... yesO nou l

t hails nf Evaluation :...

.,n,.n.

e...o.

.u tione.,. n.. Amen.u.ii.n.

is. uw.

This change does not affect-plarrt-equipment or operational procedures.

This change adds _ more clear-cut-guidelines for declaration of emergencies ~._.

g

........ _..... _... Evaluation By Dets f/

Ft.

f/

  • / /

V

3. EnvironmentalImpact Evaluation

'Does the attached procedure change:

(a) possibly involve a significant environmental impact?......,,............. yes no (if 3(a) is "yes", answer questions (b) and (c) and fill in " Details of Evaluation" below.

If "no", state why by filling in the " Details of Evaluation" below).............. yesO no

  • (b')

have a significant adverse effect on the environment?.....................

yet no O

'(c) involve a significant environmental mt.ter or question not'previously reviewed and evalua ted by the N.R.C................a........................ yes O no Details of Evaluation umca.aestionsi e w r ie.es Evaluation By Date 4.

Unit Superintendent requests PORC review l l Check if YES.

5.

Approval Evaluation Accompanying PCR Evaluation Accompanying TCN SRO Licana.e Date g pg LAsn.: Superinteno.n Cote Reviewed Mernoer of Plant Si. aft Date Approval Unit Supenntencent Os te l

t NOTE: The Evadues.on "Accorno ny ne e PCR" evaluatwi and soo,ovel cha.n rney tie foliovved at anyterne.

l m.. m aa xx.:.,.

.....L:

-__1_.

- y -< - q - * --..

w-- :- -.

aw -- -

~

~w.

_.r_

_ w==~ -ww.

I Revision 1 l

2.0 ATTACHENTS 2.1 Attachment I, General Emergency Notifications 2.2 Attactment II, Emergency Status Report 2.3 Attachment III, Checklist for Notification of Significant Events made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72.

i.c.\\

3.0 EMERGENCY ACTION LEVELS

~~'

INITIATING CONDITIONS'

.IND'ICATIDN 3.1 Actual or Projected doses at a.

Actual or projected the Exclusion Area Boundary indication on HP-R-219

> 100mr/hr, (whole body).

Gas,' Particulate, or Iodine' channels, using

,' actua1' meteorology for

. M.q

' detemination.

. ~-

'V sl b; Dnsite monitoring team reports of > 100 mr/hr at the ExclusGn Area s

?

D Boundary.

-.n 3.2 Significant levels of radiation '.',

As indicated by either:

in the reactor containment -

~

building and potential loss of -

a.

Reactor butiding pressure containment integrity. %

> 4 PSIG and high

.a ~

radiation and/or activity levels present.

'.. ~~

b.

Reactor building has indicated high radiation

, J.

and/or activity levels

~

'~ ~

and hydrogen concentration is > 3

~~

percent by volume 7

~

.. ~.

3.3 Loss of physical control of Shift Foreman's/ Emergency the facility.

Director's judgement based on advice from Plant Security.

3.4 04. peg plin't;4ofiditiEs/ ext Shift Foreman's/ Emergency Trp'm what'ever3dur' s,(ttia. J A

_ Director's judgement.

e mike /rdlea'se' ofisignificant f b'ount's 'of. radioactivity 14La M(/ e nNote:

m ezerc..

as to :he need.gsing the judgmen:

t/

cr ceclaring a gg333%g,j -

e General :.nergency, any uncertainty j

0:her plant conditions are in con:E ning the Jo:ential for la' ge progress or have occu: red which releases or rac:.cac:.ve na:er:.al,

( may involve actual or 4-inen:

the leng:h of cine the uncer als:7 substanzial core derradation or exis s, and One prospects for une melting, with potenzial for loss early resolution or a=biguities,

shoulc be cons:. cered,

1. e.

s :.gn:. -

of. containnent integrity, or may

=ake release of significan:

fican u=certain:7 as to rhe amounts of radioactivity in a potential for large releases cf j

shor: time possible.

radioactive caterial er ending l

, beyond a reasonable :-he period is -

!a sufficient basis for declaring a 2.0 iGeneral I.nergency.

-._..s

__~ _.

- ~ -. - -

- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - -

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20062D426&oldid=4456711"