ML20062C383
| ML20062C383 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hartsville  |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1978 |
| From: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062C374 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7811080167 | |
| Download: ML20062C383 (42) | |
Text
4 E,
I i
1 TENNESSEE VALLEY AU'lHORITY HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PIANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT MARG 31,1978 1
l0 Knoxville, Tennessee September 1978 78TLCS O!h1
.. - =.
CONTENTS Page Background and Highlights.
v I.
General Status of Employment as of March 31, 1978.......
1 II. General Characteristics of Movers..
3 III. Secondary Employment.
4 1V. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions..
4 V.
Future Patterns and Trends...
16 Tables Table 1.
Estimates of Population and Population Change.
5 Table 2.
School Systems' Report of Hartsville Nuclear Plants Direct Impact Students...
6 Table 3 TVA Education Mitigation Payments.
7 Table 4 TVA Local Planning Assistance Payments.....
o Table 5 Traffic Evaluation............
13 Table 6.
Summary of TVA Mitigatica Expenditures as of March 31, 1978.................... 15 t
Appendixes Appendix A - Detailed Survey Results Table A-1.
Town of Current Residence.
19 0
Table A-2.
Origin and Location of Construction E=ployees. 20 Table A-3.
Distribution of Movers and Associated Popula-l tion by County and Co=munity..
21 Table A-4.
Comparison of Survey Results with Projections i
for Selected Parameters..
22 Table A-5.
Mover Summary.
23 Table A-6.
Macon - Employees Living Within the County.
24 Table A-7.
Smith - Employees Living Within the County.
25 Table A-8.
Sumner - Employees Living Within the County.
26 l
Table A-9 Trousdale - Employees Living Within the l
County.
27 Table A-lC.
Wilson - Employees Living Within the County..
28 Table A-ll.
Carthage - Employees Living Within the City Limits.
29 Table A-12.
Ge.llatin - Employees Living Within the City Limits.
30 l
Table A-13 Hartsville - Employees Living Within the City Limits....
31 iii
CONTENTS (Continued)
Page Table A-14.
Lafayette - Employees Living Within the City Limits 32 Table A-15 Lebanon - Employees Living Within the City Limits...
33 Table A-16.
Macon - Employees Living Outside City Limits 34 Table A-17.
Smith - Employees Living Outside City Limits 35 1
Table A-18.
Sumner - Employees Living Outside City Limits.
36 Table A-19 Trousdale - 2xployees Living outside City Limits.
37 Table A-20.
Wilson - Employees Living Outside City Limits....
38 Appendix B - Secondary Socioeconomic Monitoring (Methodology).
39 Appendix C - Traffic Level Defined.
41 EXHIBITS Figure 1 - Towns Containing Construction Employees 42 b
1 t
bd I
iv
~
l BACKGROUNDS AND HIGHLIGHTS As a part of the licensing procedure to begin work on the four-unit Hartsville Nuclear Plants located in Smith and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee, TVA a6 reed to certain monitoring and mitigation actions to reduce the socioeconomic impact in the area expected to accommodate The impact area is defined as Trousdale, Smith, Macon, Sumner, movers.
and Wilson Counties, Tennessee. TVA also agreed to report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the results of the monitoring efforts and mitigation actions taken to accommodate the i= pacts.
This is the fourth in a series of semiar.nual reports which will be sub-mitted during construction of the Hartsville project, including three reporting periods following issuance of the operating license for the t
last unit.
on March 31, 1978, the employment level had reached 4,413; and the mover rate was 28 percent for a total of 1,251 movers which is much lower than projected. About one-third of the work force was hired from the i= pact counties.
TVA's major mitigation expenditures this period were for education
($290,184), local government budgets ($197,000), and e=ployee transportation
($185,582); and TVA's total Hartsville mitigation payments at the end of March were $3,511,224.
i v
HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PIAIMS SOCI0 ECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT I.
General Status of Employment as of March 31, 1978 During April of 1978, a survey of all IVA employees as of March 31, 1978, was conducted.
The timelag between employment and survey enables employees whomovedtomakepersonaladjustmentsandshouldprovideabetterpicture of employee distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice.
The employment level was 4,413, and a total of 3,891 employees, or 88 per-cent of the employees, was surveyed. Of those surveyed, 1,103 indicated they were movers for a mover rate of about 28 percent (table A-1).
Infor-mation on the family status and housing choice was obtained for those who moved (table A-5). While 870 of the 1,103 movers located in the five
(
impact counties, local workers (nonmovers) are co= muting to the project from a much more widespread area.
Information on the distribution of both movers and residents is contained in tables A-1 and A-2 as well as figure 1.
Additional information on the distribution and characteristics of movers is contained in tables A-3 through A-20.
Table A-1 lists the town of current residence of all employees.
It is l
basically a " mailing address" location rather than a jurisdictional location, since all employees must provide a place name even though they may not live within any municipal limits. Figure 1 is based on this table. However, table A-3 prevides a movers' distribution which is based on city limits for the five impact communities.
The data on movers have been extrapolated to the total h,413 employees on a ratio basis.
I
2 At the county level and above, both the origin and location of all employees are contained in table A-2.
The dia6onal lire of the "From-To" tabulation indicates resident employees (nonmovers). For eumple, resident employees from Trousdale County are found by locating Trousdale County in the "From" column and going across the table to the "To" column which also says Trousdale County.
In this survey, 150 residents of Trousdale County were e= ployed at the end of March. Movers are any other data. For example, 21 employees moved from Alabama to Wilson County.
To compare the survey rasults with projections, the parameters from the
" Final Environmental Statement - Hartsville Nuclear Plants" (F2S) for the first two years of construction were applied to the nu=ber of e=ployees surveyed. The results of this coeparison are found in table A-4 The mover rate of 28 percent during this period is considerably less than the projected 45 percent. Also, the distribution of movers varies significantly from that projected with Sumner County receiving the largest share, 30 percent, compared to the projected 20 percent.
The mover distribution to Smith County is low at only 8 percent compared with the projected 20 percent. Trousdale County, with 16 percent, was well below its projected 30 percent. The mover distribution, 8 percent, to Macon County is running close to the projected 10 percent. Wilson County had a mover distribution of 16 percent compared to the projected 20 percent. Sumner County received 377 movers, which is slightly larger than the number of movers projected (3h0); but the other counties contain far fewer movers than anticipated. Mover projections were made only for i
the five impact counties; however, 265 employees moved to other counties.
Davidson County contains 72 movers. However, 101 ecoloyees ind:.cated i
I
3 they moved from Davidson County; and 84 of the 101 moved to impact counties (see table A-2).
II.
General Characteristics of Movers Total Project--Table A-5 contains data on family status and character-istics and housing choice for movers. Table A 4 contains a comparison of the extrapolation of some of these results with projections. As of March 31, 1978, 64 percent of those employees who moved brought their
'Ihe remaining 36 percent moved without their families. School-families.
age children per family averaged 0.8 compared to the projected 1.0.
The total average family size was 3.2 compared to the projected 3.0.
The survey of housing choice indicated 47 percent are living in houses, 22 percent in mobile homes,16 percent in apartments, 6 percent in motel s
and sleeping rooms, and 9 percent in "Other" accommodations.
The "Other" category includes ca=pers, motor homes, and vans.
There is still a considerable variation between the projections (31 per-cent and 47 percent) and survey results (47 percent and 22 percent) for houses and mobile homes respectively, but the projections included in the environmental statement were peak employment. This pattern is expected to change as the project approaches peak employment.
I= pact Counties and Communities--Data on family status and characteris-tics and housing choice for each impact county are contained in tables A-6 through A-10, those covers within the city limits of each of the impact co== unities in tables A-ll through A-15, and for those movers within impact counties but outside of any city limits in tables A-16 throt.gh A-20.
4 i
1 III. Secondary Employment Secondary employment impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade-and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Hartsville project.
If the population increase in a county is greater than that arising directly from the project or from other basic employment increases in the county, there exists the possibility of secondary employment impact. As shown in table 1, only Trousdale County experienced an increase in population during this reporting period which cannot be explained ~by the influx of project-related popu-lation or other basic employment increases. The increase, however, is very small (12 people) and is within the margin of error in the moni-toring procedure. For counties in the same size class as Trousdale, the average error is plus or minus 4.5 percent or about 240 people in Trousdale County. A complete discussion of the secondary employment monitoring methodology is given in appendix B.
IV. Functional Area Imoacts and Mitigation Actions I
Education--Monitoring direct impact on education continued to occur primarily through reports from the seven school districts and the Tennessee Department of Education. School districts and the department submit reports in January and July of each school year showing the names of students whose parents are employed at the Hartsville Nuclear Plants, the school previously attended, school and grade in which enrolled, and essential attendance and transportation information. A summary of school district reports for spring 1978 is shown in table 2.
All school districts reported less direct icpact student enrollment than anticipated.
In
~
~
~
O Table 1 ESTIMATES GF POPULATION AND POIULATION CHANGE FOR MACON, SMITH, SINNER, TROUSDALE, AND WILSON COUNTIES TENNESSEE FOR MONITORING SECONDARY SOCIOECOIKNIC IMPACTS OF HARTSVILLE N'JCLEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTION SEPTDfBER 30, 1977 - MARCH 31, 1978 Remainder of Population Population Change in Change in Project Nonproject Related Change in Population Change in Estimate
- Estimate Population Estimate Related Population
- Population as of Possible from Other Population 9/30/77 3/31/78 9/30/77 - 3/31/78 9/30/77 - 3/31/78 3/31/78 Primary Employment Unexplained Macon County 14,864 14,863
-1 48 o
228 o
Smith County 13,139 12,984
-155 78 o
o o
Sumner County 74,511 76,940 2,429 240 2,189 14,646 o
Trousdale County" 5,506 5,654 148 136 12 0
12 ullson County 48,978 49,512 534 142 392 7,929 0
aTVA Employce Surveys.
oo The 1976 population estimate by the Bureau of Census for Trousdale County was 5,300 with an average deviation of plus or minus 4.5 percent.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, current Population Reports.
Population estimates by Conmunity Economics Projects Group.
9/1/78 m
most instances, the school districts did not update their December survey results.
Table 2 SCHOOL SYSTEMS'S REPORT CHILDREN OF HAR'IEVILLE NUf'TRAR PIAlnB EMPIOYN March 1978 Children of Children School System Local Residents of Movers Total Smith County 190 12 202 Sumner County 293 124 417 Trousdale County 157 79 236 Wilson County 129 35 164 Macon County 117 46 163 Lebanon City 64 48 112 t
Watertown City 18 1
19 TOTAL 968 345 1,313 1.
Public Law 81-874 assistance is available to the school systems to offset additional operating cost.
2.
TVA education mitigation payments are based on these numbers.
TVA, the Tennessee Department of Education, and the seven local school districts in the impact area continue to operate under agreements for alleviating impacts on local school districts. Under these agree =ents, TVA provides funds for classrooms and schoolbuses.
Total education citi-gation payments through March 31, 1978, totaled $1,224,637.80 (table 3).
D This represents an increase of $290,183.51 since the last reporting period.
i 7
Table 3 TVA EDUCATION MITIGATION PAYMENTS School System Facilities Buses Macon County
$ 140,000.00
$ 29,076.70 1 i Sumner County 252,000.00 51,057.02 Smith County 191,743.00 26,979.04 i
Trousdale County 319,340.87 48,706.55 Wilson County 140,000.00 25,734.76 Lebanon City Watertown City TOTAL
$1,043,083.87
$181,554.07 1.
Public Law 81-874 assistance is available to the school systems to offset additional operating cost.
All school systems in the Hartsville Euclear Plants project area with the exception of Watertown (which is eligible) participate in School Assistance in Federally Affected Areas, Title I, Public Law 81-874 programs for fiscal year 1978. Wilson County became eligible for the first time in fiscal year 1978; Macon County in fiscal year 1977; Trousdale County in fiscal year 1976; Smith County, Sumner County, and Lebanon (city) were eligible and participated prior to fiscal year 1975 Since fiscal year 1976, all school systens in the area have experienced significant increases in che number of students claimed and the amount of payments rece:.ved. The i
number of students claimed by the four participating school syctecs in fiscal year 1976 was 983; by the five participating school systems in fiscal year 1977 the total was 1,573: and in fiscal year 1978 the six participating school sysrecs claimed 2,450 students.
8 According to the school systems in the impact counties and the State Department of Education, TVA is meeting its commitments; and the school systems are able to serve the direct impact students received thus far.
Housing--Rental housing in the area continues to be in short supply.
L As before, the efforts of most private developers are primarily concen-4 trated on providing single-family conventional housing. However, the s
demand for rental housing in the immediate area is very high; but few units are under construction.
i The developer of the 93-unit Shady Grove Mobile Home Park in Hartsville has experienced a greater demand for rental mobile homes than rental spaces.
Therefore, he has purchased 25 mobile home units which he rents it. addition to spaces. He contends that he will r m to purchase more units in order to fulfill the housing request.
It is anticipated that the 93 spaces in Shady Grove Park will be filled by August 1978.
i The 150-space cobile home park at Hillsdale (Macon County) has been delayed by the severe winter weather and will not be availab'_e for occupancy until September 1978. Based on the experience of the other mobile home development, the developer is evaluating the possibility of purchasing a number of mobile or modular homes for the Hillsdale site.
Tnese units would be available around the first of November 1978.
i The Hillsdale Park could be expanded to accommodate an additional 50 units if necessary.
a k
i
.. ~,,, - -
f 9
Local Planning and Coordination Assistance--TVA is continuing to assist the local planning commissions affected by this project. Letters of agreement cover a period from October 1 each year through September 30 of the following calendar year. The need for additional assistance to the local planning commissions is evaluated and negotiated on a year-to-year basis as appropriate. A summary of these payments is shown in table 4 Table 4 TVA LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS Amount Paid Total Paid Planning Commissions
'Ihis Period to Date Hartsville-Trousdale County
$ 2,293.38 Smith County 3,250.75 Sumner County 937 50 Wilson County 1,875.00 3,750.00 Carthage 343 18 1,887.56 South Carthage 120.60 482 38 Gordonsville Lafayette 697.86 Gallatin 937 50 2,812 50 Lebanon 1.,875 03 Hendersenville 466.75 1,875 00 Tennessee State Planning Office 20,000.00
'IOTAL
$3,745 03
$39,861 93
1 10 WA is contiruing to provide staff support 't;o the Hartsville Project Coordinating Committee (HPCC). During this reporting period, $25,000 was provided; and the total paid to date is $125,000, i
Water and Sewer--Ihe utility districts 'in the impact counties are surveyed periodically to determine if the water supply and sewer systems are adequate to handle the anticipated additianal connections. Thus far, the water supply throughout the impact area has been sufficient to handle i
the additional connections. Although the sewer systems are generally overloaded during peak flows, these systems are able to accommodate the sewer connections on an average-daily-flow basis.
WA has assisted and is continuing to assist those communities that have experienced significant temporary adverse water and sewer impacts by the construction of the Hartsville Nuclear Plants. As noted previously, in 4
almost all areas, the overall number of actual movers continues to be much smaller than originally projected.
3 A report by the City of Gallatit Regional Planning Commission has caused the City of Gallatin to experience some concern over the impact of construction workers on their water and sewer systems. WA feels that 1
at present, however, there has been no measurable impact on either the water or sewer treatment facilities of the Gallatin systems with the addition of only 8 mobile homes within the city limits and a total of only 30 outside the city in sumner County.
WA has had an inquiry from the consulting engineer representing the city e
of Lafayette concerning a possible review of the impact of construction j
wor.ters on the town's water and sewer systems.
The originally planned mitigation for Lafayette was basedon WA's earliest projections that a total
11 of up to 150 mobile homes would be moved into the immediate Lafayette However, at the end of March the number of movers to Lafayette area.
was still below that projected; and for this reason no mitigative actions by TVA concerning water supply or wastewater treatment facilities in Lafayette appear necessary at this time.
No impact mitigation payments for water and sewer were made during this reporting period. However, TVA will continue to monitor the water and sewer systems in the impact counties to determine their c
capability to handle the mover impacts as they occur.
Health and Medical Services--During this reporting period, TVA has provided $8,243 to the Mid-Cumberland Regional Health Office of the Tennessee Department of Public Health for the cost of nurse-clinician providing services at the Trousdale County Primary Health Care Center.
Additional reimbursement was made to the department for $3,375 to pay for one-half the cost of an environmentalist to work in the impact area.
O
^
During this reporting period, TVA has provided $1,718 to the Upper Cumberland Regional Health Office for one-half the cost of a nurse for j
maternal and child health services in the impact area.
TVA also provided $2,453 during this reporting period toward the purchase of emergency medical training supplies and equipment through the Emergency Medical Services Division of the Tennessee Department of Public Health.
12 Several meetings with 1ccal officials and interested citizens were held to provide technical assistance in planning for an emergency response system for the Hartsville impact area counties. The health component of the system is to oe developed in coordination with other elements.
The health services provided in the impact counties are considered to be adequately servicing the additional population at this time.
Traffic--In accordance with an agreement between TVA and the Tennessee 1
Department of Transportation, the department has been supplying TVA with traffic counts for 12 locations on a quarterly basis beginning in October 1975 1
With approximately 4,400 employees, peak hour traffic east of the site has increased from 120 to h80 vehicles and to the west from 120 to 1,140 vehicles between October 1975 and March 1978. The peak hour traffic volume on Highway 25 west of the site is on the borderline of exceeding i
the allowable volume for level of service D operation (see appendix C).
As expected, this peak volume occurs shortly after the afternoon shift change. TVA is trying to mitigate peak volumes by encouraging increased usage of vanc and buses by TVA commuters. Volumes for other key highway segments are shown in table 5 and are well below the acceptable service volumes for level of service D operation. Volumes have decreased some-what on Highway 25 west of Hartsville Nuclear Plants and Highway 231 between Lebanon and the intersection of Highway 25 due to the reopening of Highway 141 between Lebanon and Hartsville, i
k
13 Table 5 TRAFFIC EVALUATION (october 1975 to March 1978)
Number of TVA Vehicles During Commuter Peak Hour
- Traffic 1975 1978 Highway 25 East of Plant 120 480 335 Highway 25 West of Plant 120 1,140 1,030 Highway 25 Through Hartsville 290 820 755 Highway 25 West of 231 Junction 2lo 570 295 Highway 231 South of 25 Junction 150 340 230 Highway 231 North of Lebanon 150 280 175
- Peak hour is the larger of the two hours (one in the morning and one in the afternoon) during which TVA commuter traffic makes the maximum contribution.
Employee Transportation--During the first week of october 1977, hourly trades and labor employees boycotted the TVA-sponsored van and bus program in protest'to a proposed fare increase. The boycott, which lasted about V
two weeks, was settled after several meetings with employee representatives and a commitment by TVA that there would be no further fare ad,justments for one year.
It took a few months for ridership to build back up, but targetedM employee participation in the van and bus program is higher now thr.n it was before the boycott. This has occurred,even though the tetal number of vans dropped from 121 to 115, through higher ridership per van and doubling (to lo) the number of buses.
In addition, car pooling increased significantly during the boycott and this effect has continued.
- Isrgeted employees are those employees on the day shift living west of the plant.
14 Local Government Budgets--!basuring the impact of the Hartsville con-struction project on local governments in the impact area is an annual process of balancing project-related expenses against project-generated revenues. Projections for the second year indicate that seven local governments may incur deficits from project impacts.
TVA executed contracts with these seven counties and cities to provide payment for the amount of the projected deficits. Contracts executed during this reporting period are as follows:
City of Hartsville
$ 79,000 City of Carthage 1,100 City of Lafayette 1,900 City of Gallatin 33,000 Trousdale County 54,000 Smith County 10,500 Macon County 17,500 TOTAL
$197,000 All local governments in the impact area operate on a July 1 through June 30 fiscal year. A formal monitoring and accountability plan will be implemented subsequent to September 30, 1978. Monitoring and accountability information derived from this plan will be presented in
- he next report.
Local Recruitment and Training--On March 31, 1978, the work force at the Hartsville Nuclear Plants consisted of approximately 28 percent movers, co= pared with a projected rate of h5 percent. A total of 1,367 workers were from the 5-county impact area, and h87 were from Davidson County.
This indicates that local recruitment and training initiatives are continuing to be successful in reducing overall socioeconomic impact within the five counties. The steamfitter training program, which started in March 1977, has graduated 64 trainees who have filled jobs
15 at the Hartsville Nuclear plants. Thirty trainees are presently enrolled in the program. The boilermaker training program started in September 1977 and has 33 trainees who will soon be available to fill jobs at the project. These two programs were developed to help meet the demand for highly skilled craftsmen in critical skill manpower shortage areas and to reduce IVA's construction mover impact. Trainees in these programs are from the 16-county recruitment area.
Summary of Mitigation Expenditures--In tile seven functional areas of mitigation, TVA has made payments totaling $3,511,224. As noted in table 6, the major expenditures this reporting period were for education, local governments' budgets, and employee transportation.
Table 6 SU4fARY OI IVA MITIGATION EXPENDI1URES AS OF MARCH 31, 1978 Expenditures Expenditures This Period To Date
}
Education
$290,184
$1,224,638 1
Housing 423,000 Local Planning and Coordination Assistance 64,862 164,862 Water and Sewer 255,000 Eealth 15,79) 63,128 Local Governments 197,003 300,293 Ec:ployee Tran portation 185,582 1.080.303 TOTAL
$753,418
$3,511,224 1.
Includes $60,000 interest-bearing loan.
16 V.
Future Patterns and Trends It is expected that the employment level will reach 5,800 by the end of September 1978. The mitigation actions which are in progress to minimi::e the impacts of inmoving construction employees are as follows:
Education--Four school districts are in various stages of construction and renovation, and Trousdale and Macon County school districts have completed construction of new facilities. Watertown Special School District conducted a referendum in August to decide whether to renovate the existing building or dissolve and let the Wilson County school syst*m absorb the special school district. As r. result of this referendum, it was decided to keep the Watertown Special School District. A request is being made by the school district to the State legislature for a new tax rate which will hopefully provide additional revenues. This tax rate will be voted on in another referendum around the first of the year. Wilson County has coc:pleted construction on a new 16-classroom facility, and it was occupied in February 1978. Another 20-classroom facility is under construction and will be ready for occupancy and use by the beginning of the 1978-1979 school year. Lebanon Special School District, Sumner County, and Smith County are in the process of renovating and constructing additional educational facilities.
Health--TVA will continue to provide health mitigation payments for the nurse-clinician, environmentalist, nursing services, ambulance services, and emergency technician training. TVA will also furnish technical and financial assistance to Trousdale County for long-ran6e emergency medical cervices planning.
r 17 Local Governments' Budgets--Mitigation for the local governments' budgets continues on an anr.ual basis. During the next reporting period, TVA will negotiate contracts with Macon, Smith, Sumner, and Trousdale Counties and Carthage, Gallatin, Hartsville, Lafayette, and Lebanon totalling approximately $300,000.
Trr.ffic - Employee Transportation--There has been some concern about traffic congestion along Equte 25 west of the plant site. Counts taken thus far indicate that peak traffic volumes on Route 25 occur shortly after the afternoon shift changes. TVA is encouraging increased usage of vans and buses by TVA commuters to alleviate the traffic congestion.
Increasing the shift differential between plants A and B by an additional 15 minutes could mitigate somewhat the peak volumes.
Emergency Response Planning--TVA has assigned a staff person to work with the Hartsville Program Coordinator, HPCC, and local commuaities to evaluate the capability of communities and TVA to respond to disaster situations. Ambulance service, fire protection, rescue squad, and civil defen'se are among the elements that will be studied.
Recreation--The Hartsville Project Coordinating Committee (HPCC) had expressed an interest in developing a comprehensive community recreation program.
TVA will provide technical and financial assistance to the HPCC and individual communities to develop their recreation programs to meet the growing demand.
TVA has committed $30,000 to Wilson County for c first-phase contribution for a $710,000, five-year park development program. TVA's total financial assistance could reach $120,000.
The
18 TVA contribution is contingent upon Wilson County generating sufficient matching money from other sources to complete the proposed program.
Post-Project Assistance--TVA is now working with the Hartsville Project Coordinating Committee (HPCC) to explore long-range industrial development
- )ssibilities for the impact counties. A task force has been formed with representatives of the State of Tennessee, the development districts, Middle Tennessee Industrial Development Association, TVA, and HPCC to 1
develop a set of recommended courses of action for preparing for long-term industrial development in the Hartsville project area. It is the goal of the task force to make these recommendations to the HPCC by the end of the year.
In conclusion, the overall mover rate continues to be lower than expected.
As noted above, a number of mitigation actions are ongoing; and these are judged to be adequate at this time.
O I
1
,ie A 9
8 9
9 O
APPENDIXES 9
h
's
)
I
_-m-.--
Appendix A.
DETAILED SURVEY RESUL73
- O.
Table A-1 Fot LOW UP $4PVfY 19 e
T OV' OF Curt R EtJ T of *;IULPCr 4 0fd Ot.TE
- ,t /11/ 7a
$e HAR TSV ILLE '!UCLE AR 5'L AN T EMPLOYEES R uta T I ME 234451 -
A C TI VC r.MPL Utr E S $ 3-31 -7 A REP 007 2
$e MOVED TO ALFEADY TO Wri T OW ra IN TCA TOTAL POPULAfloti e
B AJr IER 19 7
55 62 1,314
~
CARTHAGF T PI 42 96 138 2,491 C00kEVILLL TN 11 5"
61 17,800
=
$=
CALLATIN TN 192 2117 479 13,362 GORCONSv!LLL Tu 9
23 32 601 HARisv!LLE TN 166 149 315 2,243
$=
H E r.0E R S ct4 TN 59 109 168 28,0E0 LAFavFf7F TN 78 133
- 2CA 2,583 LF.E. At40ta TN 151 226 317 12,492
$=
MUFFREE SRCen TN 13 22 32 28,7CJ
=. NASHVILLE-DAV10 SON TF8 47 4??
- 94 969,0bC 90 P TL A *t o f *f 5
35
)
3, c r,1 RED BOILING SPRINGS T *J A
45 5
956 SMITHvtLLE ft 5
a7 v2 3,7t2
~.7 WE S TMCP FL Ar.0 TN 12
.35 4T 1,423
$ e~. BE THP ard TN 12 23 35 400 CASTALIAN SP R IP. iS T fi 58 19 76 153 Oly0N SPRINGS TN 22 20 42 100 GOCOLE T T SV ILL E Th 4
67 73 21,500 TN 10 36 46 7,541 M A 0 i t0P:
MOUNT JULILI TN 13 57 70 1,566 OLC HICKCpv TN 6
39 44 6,000 PLEASAPT SHALE TN 11 14 25 153 WATERT'6N Tra 7
22 29 1,061 EHITE MCUSL TN 6
11 17 li3T5 SCUT TS'f f L L r KY 5
59 64 3,5P4 SubiUTAL 958 2151 3109 Alf r A P:Co ! A T Pf 3
33 36 6 9
$e ALOG00 Tra 1
6 7
1,'il 7 CEtINA TN H
8 A
1,370 CLA&MSVILLE TN 1
12 13 44,9CJ
$ _ CotVP'DIA Tf; a
7 7
21,0f*
00VELLT0tN TP 1
11 12 32?
=
F A lpvf rV TF 0
5 5
1,725 F R A P.KL j fJ T Ps G
5 5
l'172$5 GAINESf0cc TN 4
19 23 1,1t1 G R [ E ri 8; E I L
- T f!
26 26 2,279
=
0_
LA VT. n r, NE Tf!
?
1*
12 5,29" LIPLRTy TN 1
20 21 332 MAFCHESTER T P!
2 12 14 6,RC9 Q. ~S'PIYitia T:4 2
il 13 5,696 j
$ s p g rar.r f r t 0 TN 1
12 9,723 Q,
V A r, LL L R Ifi S
S S
328 V000rtfa Y TN 1
13 11 2,CR7 ANI!OCH f ti 2
16 16 9f?
Q.
ASHLAfJD CITY IN 2
14 16 2,P27
~
A UG U R!.1 CVfA T ft 1
6
?
213 pp Usit CAFCK Tf!
1 11 12 23^
=
O+
eurfAto vittcT Tra e
14 1*
IfL CHEST *vfT H rti r.0 TN 0
9 5
125 a
CG Tioni.s r4 I f4 0
6 6
1H Q =' 00 '.i t ! " N T P:
3 11 13 25,5C" L L rO51 TN 2
11 13 IT L ME'tP I T A GE T f!
3 19 22 6,00C
=
O.
H i Citt A rt TN 3
15 IM 2fD JON TON TV 2
16 1R 90!
LAf. CASTER I f.
1 7
8 150 0
- octrics TN 2
9 11 lac
$1LVER FClfsf IP 4
1 -)
14 150 TCP0K!'.D ILLC Av 0
9 9
2,2C7 Q.
A 0 0Li l'U S KY C
7 7
2L0 St'P701AL 4*
399 441 O.
011 t *.
10.'
23*.
341 Q.
T O T A L P f $8'0N![i 1103 27hh 3 4'J 1 W. I ' WOfXTDRCE TtTel 4413 0
c3-31-te
Table A-2 S'URC E A*.C L a C A T I O% CF C; *.r T ALC T ION Et' P L C Y E C S Ruti DATE 08/11 /78 O
fu PARTSVILLE F t'C L E a r.
(L P R u t4 TIME 234611 ACTIVE E.%LCYEES C3-31-76 REPORT 4
3THEd GTHER OTHER
IMPACT COC72IES----------------
~ iE C.~
T E tJ N'.
met.TUCKY'
~ ^ ' ' '
' ~ ~
r e s.w Td T E c ;# G :L r snITn n r. c c.,
k%E)
. I t S C P.
D A V I CS O'J Co ur.T I ES COUNTIES Co urvTI ES OTHER (4 )
TOTAL Tauu m L: (1)
If, 2
1 7
3 l'"
1
'-~ ~ 1 6 5 '"~ ~~
~ ~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' '
S F I T ri (1) 4 216 5
3
'i
~2 5
1~~
"~~~ ~'
~239
.- *ALCr. (1) 2 17F 3
4 1
1Et
.. _.(1) 11 9
12 52; 3
5 7
2 2
~1~
572'- ~
S u
- rg r a
.IL5CN (1) 10 9
3;3 3
3 2
339
.) A / I C se's (1) 5 12 3
a.1 19 646 6
7 2
TV9 J T rt E R HECFulT I s. COUN (2)
(
9 5
12 9
7 5!i5 7
1 611 r
$JTHER Th. C3:r.Ilis ( 3) 84 36 2F 115 73 f~5 24 175 1
19~
SEE liner KY. C.W.ilis (3) 2 2
1 5
2 2
1 17 1
33 A lais p. A 13 4
4 53 21 4
T 1
'9 113
~
$ A Rd t. r.t a n 2
1 1
1 F~~
l JEc GIA 3
3 1
2 2
1 12
- _ __.t 1 SL ILS !f i l 1
2 1
3 1-1
~
4CRTP CAks IUt.
I 1
1 1
-2 1
~2~~
-' - ~9 t
S'.u f ei C +. 3 : LINA 3
1 1
1 1
I
~ Mh STsTES 29 11 26 fa 7
2 *'-
11 11 1
5 5 ~--
~ 2 6T - - ~~-
0 5
i
..e 17TAL 322 113 2o7 637 O b 72 P~--~62 5~
208~
22 9 2
~3831
~'
i
~
NOTE: DATA C f4 DI A GJ A A L 'jfstif C L TE's 7;cNF0VE RST GI TH THE E X CEP TION ~0F MOVES VI THIN A 'CCureTY- ~ ~~"
(1) # E C R U I T I.d u CJUSTY 4
(23 Ti*a.TS S IE~ C O LN T I Et: " C A;.h 0N o~C L A Ys ~DEK A LG,~ JACKSON " PU TN AM,
~
I FC3 EFTS 04, PUTnE AF GED A t'N TUCh Y C GU r. T !Y S : A L L E P., MO r 8iOE, 'S I MPSOt.
~
l (3) ALL COUNTIES OTHER TM AiJ F E C R U 1 T ir. t couliTIES 4 4 i~ -
~
" 1sti C3is TJ0f-MitCS"# TRR US-RESPONSES FDR CUR KENT ADDRESS.--
}~~
e i
21 Table A-3 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community March 31,1978 Percent Number y
of of Population Influx County Movers Movers School-Age Total Trousdale 16 204 88 439 Smith 8
105 48 246 Macon 8
103 55 258 Sumner 30 377 224 1,004 Wilson 16 197 102 503 Other Counties 21 265 131 626 2
Total 100 1,251 648 3,076 3
Community Carthage
'2 28 2
53 Gallatin 10 120 48 298 Hartsville 11 132 38 235 g
4Q)
Lebanon 5
68 24 156 Lafayette k
h8 25 118 Total 32 396 137 860 1.
Numbers extrapolated 2.
Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding i
3 Within municipal limita l
l l
Table A-4 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters Employment level - 4,hl3 Projected Surveyed Number Movers 1,700 1,251 Percent Movers 45 28 School-Age Children 1,100 648 School-AgeChildren/ Family 1.0 0.8 Total Population 3,900 3,076 Percent Number Percent Number Movers with Families 65 1,105 66 821 Movers without Families 35 595 34 430 Percent Number Percent Number Housing Choice:
Houses 31 527 47 580 Mobile Homes 47 799 22 272 Apartments 18 306 16 204 Motel and Sleeping Rooms 4
68 6
80 Other 0
0 9
115 Total 100 1,700 100 1,251 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County:
Trousdale 30 510 16 204 Smith 20 340 8
105 Macon 10 170 8
103 Sumner 20 340 30 377 Wilson 20 340 16 197 Other Counties 0
0 21 265 2
Total 100 1,700 100 1,251 1.
Numbers extrapolated 2.
Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
March 31, 1978
+
23 Tsble A-5 FJLLOW UP SURVET WORKERS k'HO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PL AN T AREA PAGE C16 RUN DATE 3P/11/78 MOVER GUMMARY REPORT IF ACTIVE EPPLnYCES 03-31-78 RUN TIPE 23443R WITH TOTAL CM1LOREN CN1LOREN MOVEPS CHfLO9EN NtMnER TN IN MOVERS WITH 1 r4 OF GPADE HIGH 61TNOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY POVERS ANNUAL EweLOYEES 40Ugr c a,: E 0 171 93 219 99 49 10 161 NOUSE HE'TLD 28 8
24 6
7 21 49
=
,apakT*ENT RENTED 49 A
19 11 0
43 92_
M0a!LE no"E RENTED 3
4 11 5
0 11 19
=,*2aTL,E HO"E ciNED 23 6
?4 6
1 13 33
- SLEEPING Rv0M 0
0 0
C 0
4 4
" 0 T E t.
4 1
4 2
0 5
9
=
OTHER 12 3
8 3
1 6
14
=
TnTAL
??2 113 399 134 59 113 405 MOUMLY E*PLUYEES MCUSE OC E0 116 63 173 S7 26 7
123 H OU s r A r ':TED 127 60 167 92 27 31 ISP iPab1 PENT *ENTED
- R 13 45 16 1 '
40 te
.icq!LE Nort orNTED 45 22 48 3*
1e 6e 105 M0b!LE Ho"E GWACO 6C 32 82 44 16 23 63
.1LE r s t y; p0OM 1
0 0
0 0
2C 21
'. P O T '. L 7
2 5
2 2
3C 57 a 1T,yE s 28 9
36 12 5
55 F3 TOTAL 432 211 576 293 87 266 69h
, ALL EMDL9YEES HOUSF O t. E n Pa7 146 392 196 75 17 3*4 MOUSE ME*:TED 155 68 211 I?s 34 52 227 i
=
i A P a p T Mi*:T R E *.T E D 97 21
(*
27 1
83 163 MCPILE NOPE RLNTED 53 26 59 35 13 71 1A4
. _*0n!LE knut 0'J f.E 0 He 3P 106 SS 17 36 116 SLEEr1NG ROOM 1
L G
G 0
24 25 50TEL 11 3
9 4
2 35 46
=
QTHER 40 12 44 15 6
61 IJ1 e
TOTAL 724 314 865 427 145 379 1103 W
W i
l l
2b Table A-6 FOLLCd UP SURVEY
'40RKERS VH0 MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR e
PLANT AREA PAGE 006 MACON rut! DA TE 1F /11/78 E MP'.0Y EE S LI f t t.3 d I TH ird TNL COUP.TY TOTAL REPORT 16 ACTIVE EnPLOYEES 03-31-78 RUN TIME 234438 w!TH TO TAL CHILDREt4 CNILOREN
=
MOVERS CHILOREN NUMPER IN IN MOVERS a
'. I T F IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TO T A L FAMILY SCHOOL CHILOREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY E0 VERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES
= M CU51 % ';E D 7
2 10 3
1 1
7 HCUT.L hE*!TED a
a lP.A R T::C f' T RENTED 1
0 L
9 0
e 1
.9 CB I L E PC'*C NE r.TED 1
0 1
0 0
C 1
=
- 1 Cn i_L E h0ML OVAED 1
0 0
0 0
2 3
=
S L E f f' I'.G R LO M
=_MOTTL GTHCP
=
TOTAL tr 2
11 3
1 2
12 9 CURLY E *1PL O YE E S HruSE C W. E 0 10 5
17 12 0
1 11
= X U;r pr ten 12 7
21 11 3
2 14 A P A R T P E *:T 3E.NTED 4
0 4
0 0
4 h
a 00, TLC H O *E o r r: ten 10 6
1G S
4 7
17 M C91 L E HO FC C W.'.E D 10 5
7 3
2 b
15 S Lt rr.fr.r. Eco w 0
c 0
9 r.
2 2
"0TEL C
0 0
0 0
1 1
=
E 54E D 5
2 6
4 1
6 11
=
TOTAL 51 25 65 35 10 28 79
=
ALL ! VPLoVEE S
(
\\
HOUSE 0.-'. E 0 17 7
27 15 1
1 18 HCUEE RE:.TE0 12 7
21 11 3
2 14 A P A D T M t '! T RE';TED 5
0 4
C e
4 9
"D91LE N0*C REr.TED 11 6
11 5
4 7
lh
'*chfLF H'*t Ov a:E D 11 5
7 3
2 7
S LEEP It.r. Av0M 0
0 0
0 L
2 2
.o
_50TEL 0
C C
0 0
1 1
OTHEP 5
2 6
4 1
6 11 TO T A L 61 27 76 38 11 30 51 W
9 m
e O
]
I
25 Table A-7 FCLLOW UP SURVEY
ORKERS VHO F0VED INTO H ARTRVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT ARE A PARE 037 SV. I TH RUN DATE 38/11/73 EPPLOYEE5 LIVIP'G '1TMIN Tr E COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-78 RUN TIPE 234438
- ITH TOTAL CnILDREN Cn1LOREN unVERS CHILC#EN httF nE R TN IN POVEPS h1TH 1.N OF GRACE HIGN
'.ITMCUT TUTAL
=
FAMILY SCHCOL CHILCREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS
=
SNNUAL EMPLOYEES
- aau?r cr*:ED 3
2 6
3 2
0 3
=
MCUSE R E '. T E D 3
2 3
0 2
2 5
A P A R T r E *:T R E r.T E D 3
0 1
0 0
0 3
)
10 BILE HOME RENTED 1
1 2
1 C
C 1
MC6ILE pr*E CVNED 2
2 2
1 1
4 6
Yf $P!f!G RUCN w o T F t.
CTPCP TOTAL 12 7.
14 5
5 6
18 NCURLY LMPLOYEES HuuLt c a *4 E 0 12 7
17 10 3
2 14 HeutE pr*TED 16 8
19 8
3 7
25 A F A 9 f Mir:T RfNTED 1
C 2
C C
1 2
w0EILE H E PENTED 4
1 2
1 1
13 17 7Cif ! L E HO M E 0*=' AE 0 6
3 8
6 0
6 12
_tLEEPING dc0F
=
"CTEL
=
1THER 4
0 4
0 0
1
_5
=
TOTAL 45 19 52 25 7
3C 75 ALL EFPLCYEES H 00sr Cwe:ED 15 9
23 13 5
2 17 HCUSE R E *' T E D 21 10 22 8.
5 9
30 APiRTME"Y RENTED 4
0 3
0 n
1 5
?0SILE P0FE RENTED b
2 4
2*
1 13 IS
=
4Cb!LE M9F CVNED H
5 10 7
1 1C 16 SLLfPING PGOM
- C_T_L L OTHER 4
0 4
0 0
1 5
=
TOTAL 57 20 66 30 12 36 93 W
W m
W W
26 Table A-8 FOLLO4 UP SURVE Y a
V0PKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 008
=
SUPT ER RUN D ATE OR /11/78 EMPLOYEE 3 LIVING WITHIN TbE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 10 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES C3-31-78 RUN TIPE 234438
ITH TOTAL Cn1LDREN CHILDREN POVERS CHILDRC'l NUNBER IN IN MOVERS
=
WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH
.ITHOUT TO T A L
=
FAMILY SCHCOL CHIL0oEN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY POVE RS
=
ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE 96.F9 104 50 136 GS 34 7
til
=
H OUEE RE!;TED 13 3
10 4
2 9
22 a,A f t o TF E'?T P E f4T E D 19 5
11 8
0 18 37 P 031 LL htTE ret;TED 2
2 3
3 0
2 4
=,M,0hjlE HO"E C'JNED 6
1 a
2 0
2 6
SLEEPIriG RCOM P
0 0
0 0
2 2
=
'".Tet 1
0 1
P S
3 4
=
= OTHER 4
1 2
1 0
C 4
TOTAL 149 62 171 76 36 43 192 HOUALY EMPLOYLES ttCUSL tr. f. E D 31 14 37 22 2
3 34 HCU!r Rr TED 33 1R 5R 29 9
6
'9 A F A k it.L** T RENTED 15 5
14 6
0 9
24 e
=,10JliLE M9"E DENTED 6
2 5
4 3
If 16
= MCDILL HO*.L DJNED 10 0
17 7
2 2
'4
=_1LEfrf*lf. ROOM e
o e
9 0
1
't
'OTEL 2
0 1
0 0
4 6
=
=_0_TH(P 2
2 3
2 9
6 A
TOTAL 99 46 1 35 TO 13 41 14;
=
. ALL FMPLOYEES
-JOUSE OWNED 135 na 173 A2 36 10 14,5 etusi RE!.TE9 46 21 66 33 11 15 61
= jf A f T,li *:T RENTED 34 10 25 14 0
27 61 M0b!LE HCwC *ENTED 8
4 e
7 G
12 20 "CE*LE
- ^*f O'.' ?:E O 1A 4
25 9
2 4
20 SLEEPING ROOM Q
0 0
0 9
3 3
,10_TI L 3
C 2
0 3
7 10 OTHER 6
3 5
3 3
6 12 TOTAL 24R 108 306 148 49 64 332 l
O e
M P
f
l 27 1
Table A-9 FOLL0s UP SUh VE Y WORMERS VHO MOVED TNTO HAP.TSVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT ARE A PAGE 009
=
TROUSDALE RUN DATE 38 /11/78 EMPLOYLES LIVING wl THIN TnE COUNTY TOTAL REFORT 10 ACTIVE EPPLOYEES L3-31-7E RUN TIME 234438 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDlTN MOVERS CMTLDREN NUMBER Tu TN MOVERS WITH lh 0F GRADE HIGH w1TNruT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILCREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY POVERS 4 ?;fJU AL EPPLOYEES HeUsr a t": E 0 6
4 6
4 1
1 7
NCUSE RENTED 4
0 1
0 1
8 SPARTMENT RENTED 8
1 1
1 J
7 15 MC91LE HnFE RE t4 T E D 3
0 3
0 0
7 10 M CO I LE HOME 0.'t;ED 6
2 9
2 0
4 10
=
SLEEPI':G ROOP J
G 0
9 0
1 1
w;Trt 1
o 0
9 9
9 1
0THEn 0
5 3
s 1
1
=
T)TAL 2P 7
22 7
1 25 S3 H CUALY E"F LOYEES MOUSL n t '; E D 8
4 14 6
4 t
B HOUSE P r *:T E O 12 6
21 13 4
7 19
=
~lpik iPct T RENTt0 7
1 2
1 G
8 15
=c"ILE HOME RCf.TED 17 11 25 16 5
19 36
. MCb!LE PDFr
- g. "iE D 19 10 2T 13 7
5 24
.,1LEEpit.G N00v G
3 C
0 3
7 7
MCTEL 1
(
0 0
0 1C 11
. O THE R 3
3 1
3 0
4 7
TOTAL 67 32 SC 49 20 60 127
.'ALL Fr?LOTCES HOUSF c ' '1 E 0 14 A
22 10 5
1 15
/
. MOUS~ u p. I L 3 16 6
22 13 4
11 27 A P A R Tf:ENT RCN?co 15 2
3 2
0 15 33
- LLILE HG*t F. L t. T E D 20 11 2d 16 5
26 46' MCFILE Mc'E OWNED 25 12 36 15 7
a 34 SLEEPING RJ0F 0
0 0
C 0
6 a
"0TEL 2
0 0
0 0
10 12
.,0THEM 3
C 1
4 5
o TOTAL 95 39 112 56 21 85 16
28 Table A-10 FOLLOW UP SURVEY VORKERS VHC MOVED INTO H ARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT AREA PAGE 010 WILSON RUN OATE 08/11/78 EMPLOYEES LIVIA6 h1 THIN THE C"UhiY TOTAL REPORT 1B ACTIVE EMFLOYEES 03-31-78 RUN TIFE 234438 e
'"I TH TO TA L CHILOREN CHILDREN
=
MOVERS C H I L D R 8" *J NUMPER f f; IN MOVERS WITH 1.N OF GRADE HIGH
.ITHOUT TOTAL
=
FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHD0L SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS A NNU AL EMPLOYEES
=
- _ _H E t r $ r O 'PJ '1
'i 17 44 22 7
2 41 H CUSL Hr'J IED 1
6 2
3 4
- c, 2
6 2
3 11 27
=
MCbiLL HOME ret 4TED 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
(
=
= M JiE HOME osNEO 3
1 4
1 3
1 4
\\.-
S LEE P It'G RGOM D
G 0
0 0
1 1
=
P3TEL 1
2 3
0 0
2 3
= CTbEP 7
2 6
2 1
2 9
TCTAL 73 23 66 27 8
25 55
=
- HOURLY EHFLOYEES st 005E A W'.L D 13 9
24 16 3
0 13
=
= dOUSS R E *:TED 16 9
26 12 4
4 2G A P AP T?tt.T RENTED 7
1 6
1 0
6 13
=
= 2.C(I L E HO'*r R E NT ED 4
2 4
4 0
7 11
= MCPILE HorE Di'NED 6
4 9
5 1
4 10 SLEErffr. R00*
6 0
0 0
0 2
2
=
MOTEL 2
2 4
2 2
1 3
3fMER 4
2 9
1 4
3 7
TOTAL 52.
29 E2 41 14 27 79
=
s ALL E P'P L O Y E E S
\\
H CUSE 0 J'.ED 52 26 68 36 10 2
54
=
H 0tJSi RErTED 20 10 32 14 6
- o 2PAlt?"ta!T RENTCO 23 3
12 0
17 42
?.GUILL NtME RENTED 4
2 4
4 C
5 13
=
- _w00ftE H".NE nt!NE D 9
5 13 6
1 5
14 SLEEDIN". hdON O
C C
0 0
3 3
.F0TEL 3
2 4
2 2
3 6
OTHER 11 4
15 3
5 5
16 TOTAL 122 52 148 EF 22 52 174 W
9 m
W e
e
.m,
31 Table A-13 FOLLOW UP Sun VE Y wo#KERS WHO MOVED INT 0 H AR TSVILLE fitCLEAR PL ANT AREA PAGE 903 e
e w&PTSVILLE RU?8 DATE CP./11/78 EPPwCYLES Livir;C sliNIN TPL CITY LIMITS MEOGRT 1A ACTIVE EroLOYEES C3-31-7e RUN TIME 23443e
'.' ! T N TOTAL CHILCkEN CHILDREN MCVERS CHILDRFN NUMPER ft IN F0 VERS
.'I TH IN OF UPADE HIGH 6ITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCur0L CHILOREN SCHOOL SCPOOL FAV!LY POVERS ahNU AL C"rL OYCES HCU$E 0% ** F 0 1
1 3
1 0
1 2
M OU T.L hr* TED 1
0 0
0 U
1 2
=
. _ A P A 4 T F E*:T GENTED 7
C 3
0
?
7 14
'CRILE h0*E R E '. T E D 2
C 1
3 0
4 6
MJcILE HOME 0'.'t.EO.
C 0
0 C
0 3
3 SLtLPING RUCM C
0 0
0 0
1 1
._HCTEL CTPER
=
TCTAL 11 1
4 1
m 17 2R Y UFLY L*PLOYEES MCUSF 7 W '. E D 1
0 0
?
O O
1 H CU SC RE'a TED 9
5 17 I?
4 7
15 A F A
- iFE* T FEeTE3 6
1 2
1 e
14 VfAILE HO"E CENTE0 8
A 14 9
2 It 25
. 5CLfL'E r "4C ts%ED 10 5
9 4
3' 4
14
~
3LEfr!nr. A0cv 0
3 n
0 t
7 7
..*0TLL 1
0 C
~~~
s F
9 OTHEF 1
0 0
P 4
5 TOTAL 35 17 42 2*
9 53 eS LLL F"PLCVTE!
HCU$t J..ED 2
1 3
1 0
1 3
'f CU CE St*iTED 9
5 17 10 4
h 17 A rA D TS L*,7 RE*:TE0 13 1
2 1
0 15 28 MOLILi h0*E RENTE0 1J 6
15 9
2 19 29 r ?'? f t i wa-E n s.'.E n 13 5
a 4
3 7
17 S LEL F I':0 600P G
0 5
0 e
o
=
MCTFL 1
C 0
S S
9
.~itriA 1
0 0
a
~~-
TOTAL 46 16 46 25 9
70 116
=
=
=
s O'
. 32 Table A-ll+
FOLLOW UP SUR VE Y VORKERS UHO POVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PL ANT AREA PAGE 304 e
LAFhYETTE rut! DATE G8/11/79 EMPLOY EES LIVII.G JI Tttiti ital CI TY Litt1 TS REPURT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-78 RUN TIME 234438 WITH TOTAL CitILDREN CHILDREN F0 VERS CHILOPEN NUPPER TN f.N MOVERS a
LITH IN OF G9ADE HIGH W I TH.* U T TOTAL a
FAftflY SCHOOL C H I L D R E P.
SCHOOL SCHOOL F A t:ILY MOVEDS ANNUt.L E:tPLOYEES
=
=_wrOSr O'" E D 2
0 2
0 0
0 2
HOUTE i r'J TE D a
_A P_t. R_T r E r:T pENTED 1
G C
4 3
P 1
4051LE McrE RENTED 1
0 1
G 0
0 1
- 2c:qll e,n E 0'.mED S LLEFI'JG Ru0M
=_*0TEL CTPER
=
TOTAL 4
0 3
0 0
C 4
MGURLY EMLOYEES HCUSF O W.L D 4
2 7
6 0
0 4
M000L p r'1 T E D 5
2 a
3 2
1 6
A P A P 1"E *' t RENTED 3
0 3
O 3
6
. wnPILF novE *ENTED 6
9 7
3 4
3 9
1 2
1 J
2 S
=
9 terr!'r 230M 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0TLL 3
3 C
3 1
1 1
=
OTHER 2
1 3
?
1 4
6 TOTAL 23 11 31 15 7
15 38 A lt. r P ot svrg t
[
\\
MOUSF CAED 6
2 9
6 0
C 6
a HCUEE P.r'.TED 5
2 9
3 2
1 6
A pan TMr.-y q t t.T g n 4
3 3
0 3
T a
90 RILE Hr"E RENTED 7
5 5
3 4
5 10
=
y PILr u.w g e.JNEO 3
1 2
1 G
2 5
SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
10 Tt t.
O C
0 0
0 1
1 OTHER 2
1 3
2 1
4 6
T O T a t.
27 11 34 15 7
15 42 W
80 e
48 J
33 Table A-15 FULLow UP SURVEY
=
VORMERS VHO MOVED INTO H ARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT AREA PAGE 005 e
e CE D A.NON RUN DATE 08/11/78 EMPLOYECS LIVING WITMIN TME CITY L1"ITS REPCF1 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYECS 03-31-78 RUN TIFE 234438 VITM TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVE 9S Chit 0cEN PUMPER IN IN MOVERS Ei 'H IN OF GRALE h1GH
'ITHOUT TOTAL F A.u ! L Y SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY 910 VE RS
=
A NNUAL EMPLOYEES a.
MCUTE 6LLES 6
1 6
2 0
0 6
MLU0t R Ct. T E D 2,
0 3
't 3
L 2
._AP,AoT*EST.8ENTED 10 1
4 1
0 7
17
= M00!LE nGTE PFt.TED 0
J 0
0 0
1 1
90bfLE MnFC OWP;ED 0
0 c
c 0
1 1
/
SLLEPING MOO"
. "0TFL r,
C C
e 0
2 2
OTPEA 3
0 0
J 0
1
=
TC T a t.
21 2
13 3
3 12 33
^
MOUALY Et4LOYEES HCU5t C.*u C 9 2
2 8
6 1
0 2
H"USr pr"TED A
3 12 6
1 3
11 APADTPLPT hENTLD 4
C 3
0 3
4 8
=
"C'11LE P9FE RENTEC 0
0 0
0 G
1 1
MCDILE ho*t 0"NED 1
C 0
0 0
1 2
.,jlfE71SG A007 0
0 C
0 0
1 1
"0TE L 2
2 4
2 2
0 2
OTHES
. ~ TOTAL 17 7
27 14 4
10 27
. ALL E"PLOYCES' HCUSE 0'c. E D 8
3 14 8
1 0
8
. H CUsi nr t: TE D 10 3
15 6
1 3
13 l
.,A P A p f.4 C N T nENTED 14 1
7 1
0 11 25
. MOBILE eqaE PENTES C
C u
0 0
2 2
- C S I L E ".' *tE OV%E O 1
0 C
C 3
2 3
S L EE P I P.G R G 0 F.
L 0
G 3
C 1
1
. " 0 T_E L 2
2 4
2 2
2 4
l OTPED 3
0 0-C 0
1 4
TOTAL 38 9
43 17 4
22 60 l
l l
l l
l l
~
34 Table A-16 FOLLOW UD SURVEY WORKERS WHO POVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE C11 MACON RUN DATE S8/11/78 EMPLOYEES LIVI.46 GuTSIDE CITY LIMITS REPCRT IC ACTIVC EMPLOYEES C 3-31 -7 8 RUN TIf1E 23 4438 WITH TO T AL CHILOREN CHILDREN MOVEnS CNTLDREN P!U M PE R TN IN POVrRS WI TH IN
=
OF fiRADE MIGH WITHOUT TOTAL F AMIL Y SCn06L CHILnREN SCHOOL Sch00L FAMILY MOVERS A*WUAL E*"LOYCES
.=
HCUsr 9 ".E9 5
2 H
3 1
0-5
=
MCUSE MENTED a
A P A N T w.E *.T DENTED
=
M 0!!!LE MOME RE *.TED
=
= _' 0B ij _C nn **E OV NE D 1
0 0
0 0
2 3
_SLELPIt." ROOM a
- 0TrL JTHER
=
TOTAL 6
2 8
3 1
2 8
E URLY E t.PLO Y L LS 1CU!t C "'. E D 6
3 10 6
C 1
7 m,H;Usg prs:;ED 6
4 13 6
1 1
7 APARTMLNi RENTED C
0 3
0 0
1 1
_'py!LE HN'E o r. N T E D 4
1 3
2 0
4 e
=
MOBILE Hv.*E caned 7
4 5
2 2
3 I?
=
.3Lfir!*+. ranu 10TEL
=
_JTHER 3
1 2
0 2
5 3
=
TOTAL 26 13 31 lb 3
12 3h ALL E:"PLOYEES HnUSE S.":TD 11 5
18 9
1 1
12
=
nCUSE R r *. T E D 6
4 10 6
1 1
7
=
APADTFEMT RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
T*d5} LE Mat:E der.TED 4
1 3
2 0
4 8
40hfLE Honr OWNED A
4 5
2 2
5 13 SLEEPING N00M MOTEL l
= JTHER 3
1 3
2 0
2 5
TOTAL 32 15 39 21 4
is 46 O
e 9
m W
H I
I
4 35 Table A-17 F3LLOW Up SURVEY l
'J0PMERS WHO MOVED INTO H AP TSVILLE P;UCLEAR PLANT AREA PACE a12 e
S"ITH RUM O A TE 3d /11/ 78 E."P LO YE ES L I V I.4'o cuts 10E CITY LIMITS REPORT 1C j
ACTIVE E?PLOYEES 33-31-78 RUN TIME 234438 1
l WITH TOTAL CN1LGREN CHILDREN MOVFRS CMTLO*EN P UP.PER IN IN McVFRS
=
=ITH 17.
OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL a
F AMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVEPS
=
A NNU AL EMPLOYEES
=
H OUt r T.':#0 2
2 9
3 2
e 2
=
HGUSL k E'4 TE D 0
0 L
3 1
2 a
, A P.A R T v E '; T AENTED t
0 0
C 0
n 1
M0b!LL ect:E RENTED 1
1 2
1 0
C 1
=_jq0J1E enMF O ' ' t, E D 2
2 2
1 1
2 4
3LELPING ROOP
- Cfft
=
JTHER
=
TOTAL 7
5 9
5 3
3 1G
=
f NCURLY E*PLOYCES
=
HOUSE ng E0 9
5 13 6
2 1
10 HOUSE HE" ten 14 A
17 A
3 1
15
=
A P AR TrEt:T AENTED M01.!LE HDt'E RLSTED 1
1 1
1 1
in 11
=
MGb!LE ocPE Gi?.LD 6
3 6
6 3
4 10
=
=_SLTEPINi kOO*
1JTEL
=
OTHER 4
0 4
0 1
1 5
=
TOTAL
$4 17 43 23 6
17 51 a
=
=
ALL FMPL O YEE S
=
~
.dLUS! 0 '. < E 0 11 7
18 11 4
1 11 HOUSL RE"Tr.D 15 8
17 8
3 2
17
=
=_aPARTwteT RENTED 1
0 3
3 3
0 1
.ich!LE HOP. SENTED 2
2 3
2 1
10 12
=
y 0, f t r wr.vt owsto a
M 13 7
1 6
14 36EErl % HC0ft
_10 RL
=
OTHER 4
0
+
0
=
1 5
TOTAL 41 22 52 26 9
2r 61
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
36 Table A-18 FOLLOJ Ur SURVEY V0PMERS '4HC POVED INTO H ARTSVTLLE "'UCLEAR PLANT AREA P AGE 013 SUMNER RUN DATE 38/11/79 E*PLOYLES LIVlt.G OUTh!DE CITY LIMITS REPORT IC ACTIVE EMFLOYEES L3 31-7e RUN TIME 23443C WITH TOTAL CHILDVEta CHILDREN 40VE45 CHTLDREN S'IM P E R TN TN "0 VERS
'.' I T H l t..
GF Ga. AGE HIGH
'4ITMCUT TOTAL F AMIL Y SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS Af4NUAL E"PLOYEES HOUtt n'/N E D 76 41 inR 51 31 4
80 HouSL RCAft0 6
2 5
3 2
5 11 A F A R T' EP'T mENTE1 3
1 1
1 0
3 6
1 1
1 0
2 3
5b!LL h3ME OJPd D 4
1 6
2 C
2 6
(
SLEEPIN. ROOM woTrt 9
0 0
C 0
2 2
CTHEF 3
1 2
1 C
0 3
TOTAL 93 47 123 59 33 16 111 HOUkLY E P'P LJ YL EJ MCUSt N4 f 0 16 7
21 13 3
1 19
_H 0;U S $ rti.TED 15 8
29 16 4
3 le AF A% !rL* T M E :.T ED 2
0 2
0 u
1 3
M CL I L L tPE 'E*JTED 6
2 5
4 3
0 12 rSh!Lt t* 0 ' t.
N t.0 0 7
4 14 6
2 2
9 S L EE P f '.1 ROOM
- 0TEL 1
0 1
0 0
1 2
OTHER 0
0 0
C 0
4 4
TOTAL 49 21 72 39 6
16 67 ALL E F f't.1 Y E E S wCUSE F,'.ED 94 46 129 44 31 5
99 M CU S *: R r t. T E D 21 10 3*
19 6
e 29 A P A R T"L*'T R E rlT ED 5
1 3
1 0
4 9
3 6
6 L
lb
- 0%ftF $40VC OJNED 20 9
2 4
15 3 LCf.P I 44 F00M 10fCL 0
1 0
0 3
4 OTNER 3
1 2
1 J
4 7
TOTAL 142 68 195 98 39 36 178 De l
4 37 Table A-19 FULL 0w UP SUMVEY WOPKERS VHO MOVED INTO H AR TSVILLE t:UCLEAR P'L ANT AREA PAGE 014 TROUSDALE RUN DATE ?S/11/73 EMPL0y t E S LI VIr.G Uuf Slue CI TY LIMITS RLPCRT 1C
- CTIVE EPDLOYEET C3-31-7A RUN TIME 234438
' I TH TOTAL CHILLREN CHILDEEN PcVERS CHILODEN HUPPER IN IN POVEPS
=
WITH IA.
OF GRAOC HIGH WITHOUT TOTtL
=
F A*!L Y SCH00'.
CHIL DR EPJ SCHOUL SCn00L FAMILY t.0 VE RS
=
=
ANNUAL EwpLOYCES
=
.=
wcUtE 0"orn 5
3 5
3 1
0 5
=
HOUSE SENTED 3
C 1
0 0
3 6
LPART*ENT DENTED 1
1 1
1 0
0 1
=
M;b!Lt HO'tC 9 ENTE 0 1
0 2
0 0
3 4
=
.w Site N c rE 0t.C 3 6
2 9
2 3
1 7
=
S L E L P I t. G K O O *.
=
waTrt O Tnf R 0
C J
?
=
1 1
TOTAL 16 6
18 6
1 P
24 HOURLY E.%LOYLES HCULF 0 '. '. E Q 5
2 P.
2 2
C 5
=
HCUSF ErsTED 4
1 4
3 0
0 4
AeARitE'.T RENTLD 1
V u
a J
G 1
=
__03 t L E H O*C R E N T E D 9
5 11 7
3 4
13 MCLILE n0ML C '.' N E O 9
5 lb
=
9 4
1 10 3 r t e i s e.' oce=
"0TEL 3
0 0
0 0
2 2
=
_] Ty E o 1
0 1
0 0
f 1
=
TOTAL 29 13 42 21 9
7 36 ALL EFFIAYEEM
=
t HOUSE c :*.En in 5
13 5
3 0
!?
H CU!!
W E.Tr r 7
1 5
3 0
3 l '.
a p t. r, t E * 'T GENTED 2
1 1
1 0
0 2
H OBILL N' ME RENTE0 15 5
13 7
5 7
17 J
=
MCSILF HO*C 0'NE7 15 7
27 11 4
2 17
=
SLEEPING RCOM 20Trt e
n 0
O 2
2
=
OTHik 1
C 1
C 1
2
=
TOTAL 45 19 60 27 10 15 63 W
h 8
5
.9
o 38-i i
Table A-20 FO[ LOW UP SURVEY VORKERS WHO MOVE 0 INTO H ARTSVILLE f.UCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 015 e
WILSON RUN DATE 38/11/78 EMPLOYEES LIV 14G QUTSIDE CliY LIMITS REPORT 1C ACTIVE EMPLOYEES S3-31-78 RUN TIME 234438 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILOREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUyprR IN IN MCVERS WITH Ib.
OF GRADE HIGn m1THOUT TOTAL F AMIL Y SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCH30L FAMILY MOVEPS
=
A NNU AL EMPLOYE ES WCUST qwNrn 33 16 3R 18 7
2 35 H0VSE MENTED 2
1 3
2 0
4 6
J P A_,R T P E P:T RENTED 6
1 2
1 0
3 9
10d1LE HG"E RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
f
=
"0DILE 80"E 0'.'NEO 3
1 4
1 0
0 3
(
SLELPING RJ0M 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOTEL 1
0 3
0 0
0 1
3THL4 4
2 b
2 1
1 5
TOTAL Ai 21 53 24 A
12 61 HOURLY E"FLOYEES MCUSL J W'# E D 12 8
20 13 3
0 12 H OUSE R E*J TED H
6 14 6
3 1
9
'AFART*LNT *ENTEU 3
1 3
1 0
2 5
v0SILE pour g rt;T E D 4
2 4
4 3
6 13 M OU I LE ho kE 0.*'.E0 5
4 9
5 1
3 8
- S L F f p ! *:". R 0 0 4 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MCILL G
0 0
0 J
1 1
OTHER 4
2 9
1 4
3 7
TOTAL 36 23 59 30 11 17 53 ALL F*PLOYEES jicu3f OWNED 45 24 58 31 10 2
47 H CU$i 40 TLD 10 T
17 n
3 5
15 APAoTME*?T GENTED 9
2 5
2 0
5 14
~s0DILE HO"E RENTED 4
2 4
4 3
7 11 40P!LE Ho*T n '> t.E O A
5 13 6
1 3
11 SLEEP 143 ROO 1 0
J J
0 0
2 2
M3TEL 1
0 0
0 G
1 2
ETTHEh 8
4 15 3
5 4
12 TCTAL 85 44 112 54 19 29 114 9
e
---,.n.-
---w
--u-=
.,.---.-,--r
--.-m--
39 Appendix 3 SECONDARY SOCIOECONQ4IC IMPACT MONITORING OF HARTSVILLE UUCLEAR PLANT ENVIRONMEITIAL IMPACT AREA Secondary impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade and service related resident population of the five-county area having an impact on community facilities and services which can be attributed to the Hartaville construction project.
TVA's monitoring program will consist of a three-step procedure during each reporting period for estimating and reconciling population changes for each of the impact area counties. Residential customers of powr distributors and school enrollment will be used to provide independent estimates of county residential population change during a given reporting period. Population for the beginning of the first reporting period will be estimated by applying the procedure outlined in Step I below to the most l
current estimate of county population provided by U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports. Subsequent estimates of population for the start of a reporting period will be the TVA estimate at the end of the previous reporting period and will be adjusted each time more current censits estimates are available.
An estimate of secondary impact will be made using the following three-step process.
i Step I Ratios of school enrollment and residential customers to population will be calculated at the beginning of the reporting period for each of the impact area counties. These ratios will ba applied to the number of resi-dential curtomers and schaol enrollment at the end of the period.
This yields two estimates of population change during the reporting period.
These two estimates are averaged to produce a single estimate of population change for each of the impact area counties.
Step II Project employment population, taken from TVA employee surveys, will be subtracted from total adjusted population.
If a residual population in derived, the analycis vill continue to Step III.
40 Step III This step comprises an analysis of nonproject related primary employment and its secondary effect to determine what part of the remaining unexplained population change should not be attributed to the project.
An estimate of change in total employment in each of the impact area counties during the reporting period is made using monthly data from the " CPS Labor Force Summ ey" produced by the Tennessee Department of Employment Security.
In order to determine that part of the change in total employment which can be attributed to forces other than the construction project, it is necessary to estimate the change in nonproject related employment. Change in nonproject related primary employment is estimated using a linear interpolation of primary employment as a percent of total employment in 1970 and projected to 1980, as given in the 1974 report by the Tennessee State Planning Office, Tennessee Migration, Population Families, Income, and Manpower Demand Projections to 1990 for Development Districts and Counties. A ratio of.65 will be applied to the change in nonproject related primary employment to determine that part 6f the change in secondary employment which can be considered nonproject related. The total employment change is converted to population using an average family size of three and subtracted from any unexplained population remaining. [If there is no other explanation for the remaining population, then the possibility of it being the result of secondary employment does exist. However, there may be a delay of undetermined duration between a change in employment and the resultant change j
in population. Therefore, the unexplained population in any particular county should persist through more than one reporting period before it is termedassecondaryimpact.]
As results of the 1980 Census of Population or any other special census or census estimates are published, the population base of the impact area counties will be recalib sted. Residential customers, school enrollment, I
and total population will be recorrelated. Essenti::lly, a new population base will be estimated from which to measure changc 1hroughout the remainder of the monitoring period.
[ Revised 3/16/78]
l
I g
e s
Ist Appendix C TRAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating co'nditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds.
Drivers have little freedom to naneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but c'onditions can be tolerated for short periods of time.
d Source:
Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87,1%5 e
e h
i
-.v-r'+
.?
.t*
w..;
/
_.ml n<
p-f..
- "".~a=y, ;,,,.
l
.4
(-.
r
.y
,,f
/
M<
tJH O E 6.>
,J
[.'.*~74,. 7h 3**.h s
~
- 2. = y M.,,,,r\\;...,.'. p, 2 ",
,q,*.1, 'I
'. -Q,,
],.,e
_,,,,,,,,,, ( --]L- :ang
),,,,,
,a*.a.
-a.***
=: 16
)
sr.
- v
==
w m<
-, &~~ ':%
.,. :.=
u
.v'-.~.---.
s l
Q. __, -1,,,, _,,a--
- ty> nhy..
's V
OC "<.
.%g c.
c%
m is v (.
,3 LE 3 o 74 ca..
5 t
a.==."
p " f
,"L o.
s suunen h
"'~-
p, T.J A' '. i g t.
k I
1
'~
,fy 9 ~.e -
N,,,
e
^ 5'
~'^
/.
- d. \\ "~~~ I
~
~~
" 2.,\\,.I(.[ N ',/--. - s.. :4 "JDt.--
m
}
3,.,
/
~
,_I L
a 1
g m.
.... 1
%0 a ~ ~*
e.
TH uso tt f v (s
==
g,,,,,,1,
)
p g
g-lL~ ;,
, =, v7.: yf 3 q u. m 3-
""7
~~i
(,,)
-.~
s
. 7
)
m t
f es.u.um.
rrn1 eo e.,,..:w
,p,
~ % s <..
7.g =
rau 9
l4EHVi_L
^
l gr.
j, 3)
. -g n,
F- ~'M
..C I.
4' N
>:2 : h l=s M ' T ~* - [L %
E P.C v.-
\\
n, f.m
,,.s..igt-p ~j:, y.sl t- %;f7M"'"~ :"-- '". =-
=
- - W sy g_ Q-vw g
- - -. N,,; ~=:. \\
y 3
e r
~t,. y.v s
~ ~ ~ -.
4 3
.,,,,,, #. %7.g.p~ ~ -
j k-Ia
.w.Q
'7 -
cs, p
4,.c.
- y,j
_=
7-,
- g.. -)>
(,,
_s cys S w.
'.JJ.p d._y-(%; w
--- p I Qx N."'t='c='
--'sg y _.
g
'v w
't
~u
- - =
+;-~~
. N..,
e 8 r f.....
.M
~. - -
)
'\\
of s
s. *.
t.. cue e u "t
f f
s s
.s 3
4, fr.HITL a
/,,,,
n.
s m
r
,%' sJ :;b-y--
4 purfr.. ado '
i
..s nT.1 n a e:
/
.\\, ~..,y
/ a>
)i g%)f. 4m. ylx :
ef f
ls.
,l.
h y
+
s
~-
<.3
...._ f pmmy;x'/
{
n m a a,/
e.
,v,pv I
}
=
a v
.:,/
'; L h-.
Yh
}
~
~'
~
//
b "hh d [
l.&.,,, 5(j'Q;;-' [&"I.'.. W...*l_ h t iLnQ* Dj, f,...[a={[\\ %l f'(Y. y
--.C ' f -
/
,[
f'
\\'
' * ~ - " "
/
f.'
~
f 8 d.A.
/
'3 FIGURE I
- p. dr I.-
/
L -- [' ' - J ' _.,..Pf.,
g. ? n 93\\t* ** **'"\\'% ", f>q~, p4'>.
,-.: TOWNS CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES o
...u s.,
HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT 1,
v A PLANT SITE
~..- e
.._..., }- ^'
y 1
->= ~,,,. "-~~
/,
' s.f. ' D+4 guisatiamS-l l9l j
MARCH 1978 m..
,7
' ~~l O
15 30 g cp r u.
y ~~~ *-
. M o < y} C n, 's "
gh.Q4. f. -
~
C CWS f.'NED CONTAW EEMES
".{~'
SCALE O
MILES
/
<._,..-,e;.4w.. y_...h j s
_,