ML20059J664

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SALP Repts 50-352/92-99 & 50-353/92-99 on 920315-930925.Some Personnel Errors of Minor Safety Significance Occurred,But Operation Involvement in Station Initiative to Assess Problem Seen as Strength
ML20059J664
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/05/1993
From: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Danni Smith
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20059J666 List:
References
NUDOCS 9311150004
Download: ML20059J664 (4)


See also: IR 05000352/1992099

Text

M&

a

,,

'

-'

ja - 51993

.

,

i

Docket Nos. 50-352

'

50-353

Mr. D. M. Smith

"

Senior Vice President - Nuclear

Philadelphia Electric Company

Nuclear Group Headquarters

Correspondence Control Group

P.O. Box 195

,

Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-0195

-

Dear Mr. Smith:

.

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP)

REPORT NOS. 50-352/92-99 AND 50-353/92-99

.

P

This letter forwards the Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, SALP report for the '

,

' period March 15, 1992, to September 25,1993. This SALP was conducted under the

1

revised SALP process that was implemented by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

l

'

on July 19, 1993. The revised SALP process rates licensees in four functional areas:

Operations, Engineering, Maintenance, and Plant Support. The Plant Support functional area

+

includes: radiological controls, security, emergency preparedness, fire protection, chemistry,

and housekeeping.

Overall, the NRC vbserved an excellent level of performance at Limerick. Strong

performance in the Operations and Engineering areas continued this SALP period. in -

addition, the Maintenance area was improved, with significant progress in decreasing the

maintenance backlog and gaining control of the equipment trouble tag system. Thus far, the

!

implementation of the Nuclear Effectiveness and Efficiency Design Study (NEEDS) has been

well controlled with no adverse impact on safe plant operation. Self-assessments performed

by groups such as the Independent Safety Engineering Group, the Plant Operations Review

,

Committee and the Nuclear Review Board were effective. Proactive licensee management

attention and involvement were evident in implementation of initiatives to address weaknesses

in the maintenance and radiological controls areas. For example, the Independent

Verification Task Force is addressing previous inadequate verifications of. system

configuration, primarily in the Maintenance area. In addition, special radiation worker and

radiation protection supervisor training programs were implemented to address issues in the

,

radiological controls area.

~

9311150004 931105

PDR

ADOCK 05000352

O

PDR.

?

..

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

@

.

-

,

.

- - - - -

y

.

w - 51993

.

.

Mr. D. M. Smith

2

Operations was rated Category 1 and was characterized by long duration safe operating runs -

for both units, which was the result of close management oversight and proactive problem

identification and resolution. Continued outstanding command and control by operators in

response to plant challenges was noted. The use of the simulator in training was shown to be

very effective in the actual response of operators to events. Some personnel ermrs, of minor

safety significance, occurred, but operation's involvement in a station initiative to assess the

problem was seen as a strength.

Engineering was also rated Category 1. Technical expertise, project management skills,

effective internal and extemal communications, good safety perspective and excellent

engineering practices were notable in the planning and implementation of major projects.

Exceptions to the overall high level of performance were isolated and promptly addressed by

corrective actions.

'

Although improvement was observed in the Maintenance functional area, this area was again

rated Category 2. In general, maintenance was effectively implemented, with a significant

decrease in the maintenance backlog noted. Management's commitment to performing

!

detailed event investigations was an observed strength. However, personnel errors, a

!

weakness from the last SALP period, continued throughout this SALP period, especially

,

during the early part of the SALP period. A work scope change, together with weak

interdepartmental communications, contributed to weak work control that resulted in a loss of

power, resultant feedwater transient and reactor scram. Implementation ofinitiatives to

improve maintenance performance have not yet been in place long enough to be judged

effective.

Plant Support was also rated Category 2. The Plant Support areas of security, emergency

preparedness, fire protection, chemistry and housekeeping continue to be very effective and

contributed to safe plant performance. Performance weaknesses in radiation controls were

addressed by increased management attention, but procedure adherence problems in the

radiological controls area continued at the end of the assessment period.

We have scheduled a management meeting with you, open for public observation, at 1:00

t

p.m. on November 19,1993, at the Limerick Training Center. At the meeting you should

[

be prepared to discuss our assessment and any initiatives that you plan to take to address the

-

weaknesses detailed in our evaluation.

We appreciate your cooperation.

,

Sincerely,

Nhal Shed gy:

IhGmas T. latith!

,

Thomas T. Martin

Regional Administrator

!

OFFICIAL RECORD COPX

]

.

--

- - - - - -

.-.-. m

..__ ._____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ,

'

Nny

5 pm

.

-

.

Mr. D. M. Smith

3

Enclosure:

Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Report Nos.

50-352/92-99 and 50-353/92-99

cc w/ encl:

J. Doering, Chairman, Nuclear Review Board

D. R. Helwig, Vice President - Limerick Generating Station

G. A. Hunger, Jr., Manager - Licensing Section

J. L. Kantner, Regulatory Engineer - Limerick Generating Station

Secretary, Nuclear Committee of the Board

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

K. Abraham, PAO (22)

NRC Resident Inspector

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

The Chairman

Commissioner Rogers

Commissioner Remick

Commissioner de Planque

Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)

OFFICLiL 2ECORD COPX

%

Y .*

.

.

NOV

5 1993

-

.

a

Mr. D. M. Smith

4

bec w/ encl:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

J. Callan, NRR

C. Holden, SALP Program Manager, DRIL, NRR (2)

bec via E-Mail:

J. Taylor, EDO

W. Russell, NRR

V. McCree, OEDO

J. Lieberman, OE

W. Scott, NRR RPEB

L. Nicholson, Acting PDI-2, N'RR

F. Rina!di, NRR

Region I Staff

DJIP

.RI;

j@

\\[

b

,pf

ll "p

RI: RSS

RI

HQ:NRR

RI:

EWenzinger RC per

WHehl

CMiller

MBoy'.e

WKane

10/g/93

10P'/93

10/#793

10/3793

10fR/93

16/4/93

RI:RA

TMartin

l{l5/93

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

a:s1pfinal.rt

hh