ML20059J421
| ML20059J421 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 01/25/1994 |
| From: | Blough A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Gipson D DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059J437 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-M82885, NUDOCS 9402010022 | |
| Download: ML20059J421 (3) | |
Text
-
s g
January 25, 1994 Docket No. 50-341 plSTRIBUTION Mr. Douglas R. Gipson Docket File J. Roe Senior Vice President NRC & Local PDRs J. Zwolinski Nuclear Generation PD3-1 Rdg A. Blough Detroit Edison Company T. Murley/F. Miraglia,12G18 C. Jamerson (2) 6400 North Dixie Highway L.J. Callan,12G18 T. Colburn Newport, Michigan 48166 E. Rossi, 9A2 OGC J. Lieberman, 7H1 G. Hill E. Jordan, MNBB 3701 ACRS (10)
Dear Mr. Gipson:
OPA W. Dean, ED0 B.Jorgensen, RIII OC/LFDCB
SUBJECT:
FERMI RELIEF REQUEST FOR INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM FOR PUMPS AND VALVES (TAC NO. M82885)
In a letter from William S. Orser dated October 10, 1990, Detroit Edison Co.
(DE) requested relief from American Society for Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (the Code)Section XI, 1980 Edition, Winter 1980 Addenda.
Specifically, DE requested relief from the Section XI requirements to measure vibration amplitude displacement during inservice testing in accordance with the limits in Tables IWP-3100-1 and IWP-3400(a).
DE had previously been granted approval, per relief request PR-1, to take velocity readings in lieu of mils displacement readings.
DE proposed alternative testing acceptance criteria for acceptable, alert, and required action ranges which were in accordance with the limits contained in OMa-1988, Part 6 (OM-6) for the high pressure coolant injection main and booster pumps.
We have completed our review of DE's request.
Based on our review, as described in the enclosed SE, and pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii), we find the proposed alternative testing acceptance criteria to be acceptable.
Sincerely, Original signed by L. Olshan for 1
A. Randolph Blough, Acting Director Project Directorate III-l g 20gooy @ @43 Division of Reactor Projects - III/IV/V gg P
PDR Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
- See previous concurrence OFFICE LA:PD31 M/
PM:PD31 9<.-
OGC*
M)D:PD31 C.Jamersh T. Colburn CPW N Blough 0
mE 01/h94 01/)q/94 01/10/94 OlS6/94 0
WE 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY - FILENAME: G:\\WPDOCS\\ FERMI \\FE82885.RRM f
u i r 3
e-i Docket No. 50-341 DISTRIBUTION P. Campbell Mr. Douglas R. Gipson Docket File J. Roe Senior Vice President NRC & Local PDRs J. Zwolinski Nuclear Generation PD3-1 Rdg A. Blough Detroit Edison Company T. Murley/F. Miragha,12G18 C. Jamerson (2) 6400 North Dixie Highway L.J. Callan, 12 It T. Colburn i
Newport, Michigan 48166 E. Rossi, 9A2 OGC J. Lieberma 7M1 G. Hill E. Jordan NBB 3701 ACRS (10) l
Dear Mr. Gipson:
OPA -
W. Dean, EDO B.Jorg sen, P.III OC/LFDCB 1
SUBJECT:
FERMI RELIEF REQUEST F0 / INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM FOR PUMPS AND VALVES (TAC NO. M82885)
In your letter dated.0ctober 10, 990, you reqtiested relief from American Society for Mechanical Engineer Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (the Code)
Section XI, 1980 Edition, Win r 1980 Addenda.
Specifically, you requeste relief from the Section XI requirements to measure vibration amplitude displ cement during inservice testing in accordance with the limits in Tables IWP-31
-1 and IWP-3400(a). Detroit Edison had previously been
_ granted approval, per elief request PR-1, to take velocity readings in lieu of mils displacement re ings.
You proposed alternative testing acceptance criteria for accept le, alert, and required action ranges which were in accordance with t limits contained in OMa-1988, Part 6 (OM-6) for the high t
pressure coolant njection main and booster pumps.
We have compl ed our review of your request.
Based on our review, as described in the encio d SE, and pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii), we find your proposed al - rnative testing acceptance criteria to be acceptable.
Sincerely, l
?
5 A. Randolph Blough, Acting Director Project Directorate 111-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 3
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure:
4 3
See next page LA:PD31k/ PM:PD31 k OGC _
[(A)D:PD31 f
OFFICE 1
C.JamersY T. Colburn hk A. Blough NAME 01/b94k, 01/'l 94 01/11)/94 01/ /94 DATE
/
/
0FFICIAL RECORD COPi - FILENAME: G:\\WPDOCS\\ FERMI \\FE82885.RRM o
v 1
Mr. Douglas R. Gipson Fermi-2
' Detroit Edison Company I
1 cc:
John Flynn, Esquire Senior Attorney Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226 f
Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health Department of Public Health 3423 N. Logan Street P. O. Box 30195 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. Wayne Kropp U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident inspector Office 6450 W. Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 Monroe County Office of Civil Preparedness 963-South Raisinville Monroe, Michigan 48161 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, Illinois 60532-4351 Mr. William E. Miller Director - Nuclear Licensing Detroit Edison Company fermi-2
~6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 i
Dameer 1M3 i