ML20059J332

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Commission Approved Issuance of Proposed Rule 10CFR26.24(d) Re fitness-for-duty (SECY-90-136)
ML20059J332
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/08/1990
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 9009190265
Download: ML20059J332 (2)


Text

-

M 1

y

%o O

UNITED STAT ES '

[' 3 g g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

(

i

~

3 W ASHIN GT ON, D.C. 20555 a

\\....../

L 3,y 3, 1990-RELEASED TO THE PDR OFFICE OF THE

- SECRET ARY

/>

O-r MEMORANDUM FOR:

James M.-Taylor Executive Director for Operations:

FROM:

ual J. Chilk, Secretary

.p-I

SUBJECT:

SECY-90-136 - FITNESS FOR DUTY - TENNESSEE VALLEY' AUTHORITY i

This is to advise you that the Commission-(with Commissioners--

Roberts, Rogers,. and Curtiss agreeing) has approvedLissuance of a proposed rule modification which would add-the following to 10

~

CFR Section 26.24 (d) :

"No individual may be removed'or' temporarily suspended from unescorted ~ access based: solely on unconfirmed positive initial screening test results in the absence of other evidence that the individual is impaired or that?the individual might otherwise pose a safety hazard "

The Commission (with Commissioners = Roberts, Rogers, and Curtiss agreeing) does not support relaxation of Section 26.24(e) to-allow a licensee's management to act on the basis.of'an l

unconfirmed initial positive test without further information on why the initialitest results cannot be: confirmed'by the MRO and i

communicated to licensee's management within-10 days.,

If the-staff believes that there is & need for additional changes in this matter, the staff should advise the Commission of the basis for its belief that there are-problems in this area and propose-revisions to deal with the problems when it submits:the rulemaking' package on Section 26.24 (d).

l A Federal Register Notice should be prepared to solicit public comments on the proposed amendment to 10 CFR Part 26 and forwarded for Commission review and approval..

(EDO)

(SECY Suspense:

5/31/90) 0?l27 l

NOTE:

THE SRM'AND THE SUBJECT SECY PAPER WILL BE MADE l

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE WHEN THE PROPOSED RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL RFGISTER 9009190265 900500 (Di PDR 10CFR P 79, 7 PNU

( \\

w

Fi y

2'-

i Chairman carr disapproved this~ action; he disagrees that TVA's l

program represents-a." relaxation" of.the rule and he supported the staff's, alternative of reconsidering the desirability-of removing employees from unescorted. access at the earliest-

-possible time after a preliminary positive test.

Commissioner Remick disapproved.

He is not convinced that the; actions by TVA create a significant problem, and does-not believe that the NRC should intrude into an area of management:

prerogatives.

Therefore, he believes that the Commission should neither reexamine this issue nor make a modification to the Fitness-for-Duty-Rule.

cc:

Chairman Carr.

Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Rogers

+

Commissioner Curtiss Commissioner Remick 4

oGC l

l-i l

s e

'r j

L l

l t

u

-