ML20059H977
| ML20059H977 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/04/1993 |
| From: | Scaletti D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Throm E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| PROJECT-679A NUDOCS 9311100290 | |
| Download: ML20059H977 (4) | |
Text
a pa a%
j 1
[,E UNITED STATES
> tf/ !
'd((
/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,/
i t
WASWNGTON, D.C. 20555 4 0 w.
g November 4, 1993 Project No. 679 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Edward D. Throm, Acting Director Advanced Reactors Project Directorate Associate Director for Advanced Reettors and License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Dino C. Scaletti, Sr. Project Manager Advanced Reactors Project Directorate Associate Director for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
FORTHCOMING HEETING WITH AECL TECHNOLOGIES (AECLT)
DATE & TIME:
November 16, 1993 9 a.m. - 3 p.m.
LOCATION:
Sheridan Park 2251 Speakman Drive Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5K 182 DATE & TIME:
November 17, 1993 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
November 18, 1993 9 a.m. - 1 p.m.
LOCATION:
Whiteshell Laboratories Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada R0E ILO PURPOSE:
Visit the CANDU test facilities at Sheridan Park and Whiteshell Laboratories and to discuss potential research needs for the CANDU 3 design certification application. (See agenda).
i 4MO} O CONTACT:
Dino C. Scaletti, NRR 504-1104 gg RE CEEg ggpy 002060
- ginggo 9ano4 yo t y
679A pg
{
L(g
Edward D. Throm November 4,1993.
PARTICIPANTS *:
.A_Efil MCB E. Throm V. Snell A. Mortada Aly R. Landry
.L. Rib D..Scaletti AECL RES.
RES L. Simpson et al.
B. Sheron, RES, R.Meyer,RES{S*
L. Shotkin, R
- Whiteshell meeting only.
Ort-hal ciga?d by Dino C. Scaletti, Sr. Project' Manager.
Advanced Reactors Project Directorate Division of Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor-Regulation-
Enclosure:
Agenda cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
- Meetings between the NRC technical staff and applicants or licensees are open for interested members of the public, petitioners, intervenors,.or other parties to attend as observers pursuant to the "Open Meeting Statement-of NRC Staff Policy", 43 Federal Reaister 208058,6/28/78.
Distribution:
Docket File-NRC & Local PDRs BSheron, RES PDAR R/F TMurley/FMiraglia LShotkin, RES JCallan DCrutchfield RMeyer, RES I! Travers EThrom DScaletti' PShea AChaffee, EAB OGC
-EJordan, AE0D ERossi NRC Participants ACRS (10)
OPA NRR Mailroom P0' Dell GZech 0FC SPM@DA3 LA:PDST-APD:PDAR NAME
.DSktN:bs-PShea IX d EThrom k DATE 11/th93-11/8 93 11/493
/
0FFICIAL RECORD C0PY DOCUMENT NAME: MTGNOTE.DCS
,m v3'
~
4
r ;- _
- Edward'D. Throm November 4, 1993 CANDU Project No. 679 cc:
Louis N. Rib, Licensing Consultant AECL Technologies 9210 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 410 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Bernie Ewing, Manager Studies and Codification Division Atomic Energy Control Board P.O. Box 1046, Station B 270 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 559 i
A.M. Mortada Aly, Senior Project Officer Advanced Projects Licensing Group Studies and Codification Division Atomic Energy Control Board P.O. Box 1046, Station B 270 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario, Canada KlP SS9
)
Project Director - CANDU-3 AECL CANDU 2251 Speakman Drive Mississaugua, Ontario, Canada L5K 182 j
L. Manning Huntzing Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C.
20036 Steve Goldberg, Budget Examiner Office of Management and Budget 725 17th Street, NW.
Washington, D.C.
20503 A.D. Hink Vice President / General Manager AECL Technologies 9210 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 410 Rockville, Maryland 20850
.c r
ENCLOSURE NRC Visit to Whiteshell, Canada, on CANDU Integral Thermal-Hydraulic Facility Testing AGENDA Wednesday, November 17, 1993 0900 - Integral Test Facility Description and History
- Facility Design and Choices
- Scaling Analyses and Compromises
- CANDU 3 vs. CANDU 6
- Approach toward heat losses, end fittings, and other nonrepresentative issues Plans for new facilities 1100 - Short tour of Integral Test Facility Lunch 1300 - Key thermal-hydraulic phenomena and scenarios investigated
- Discussion of key phenomena and scenarios
- Test matrix and rationale for choice
- Instrumentation used and rationale (How mass and energy inventory are determined)
- Plant transients (how simulated)
- Key test results and comparison to code predictions 1700 - Adjourn l
Thursday, November 18, 1993 0800 - Facility Operation
- Compensation for heat and mass losses
- Choice of initial and boundary conditions
- Reproducibility of tests
- Documentation of facility geometry, test conditions,
)
instrumentation, and test results 1100 - Pressure tube slumping tests
- Facility description and scaling j
- Instrumentation
- Test Matrix
- Key phenomena and scenarios investigated
- Comparison of test date to code predictions Documentation of facility geometry, test conditions, instrumentation, and test results 1300 - Adjourn
.J