ML20059G152
| ML20059G152 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1993 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Wallace M COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059G155 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9311080020 | |
| Download: ML20059G152 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000254/1993025
Text
-
.
,.
.
. .
..; ,
_
, ,
.
.
OCT 2 61993
.
j
.
..Qf
\\
.
.1
<
Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265
,
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATIN: Mr. M. J. Wallace .
Vice President and
j
Chief Nuclear Officer
Executive Towers West III
1400 Opus Place, Suite 500
-
Downers Grove, IL 60515-
,
Dear Mr. DelGeorge:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. T. Taylor,-P. Prescott,..
.
K. Walton, and R. Roton of this office from August 21 through September 30, .
1993.
This inspection included a review of authorized activities for your
1
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station facility. At the conclusion of the
inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff
identified in the enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in.the report. Within
-
these areas, the _ inspection consisted of a selective . examination of procedures..
j
and representative' records, interviews with personnel, and observationiof
activities in progress.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to'be' inLviolation .
of NRC. requirements, as specified in the enclosed . Notice of Violation
d
(Notice).
d
'l
You are required to respond to this letter and should' follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
Inlyour-
response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
q
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your. response to this
<
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions-and the results of future-
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC. enforcement action.is
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
During this report period, instances of ' poor procedural adherence, a lack of.
system knowledge, and' poor quality pre-job briefings were identified.
Similar
problems have been noted in other recent NRC inspection reports.
These items
show a need for management action to ensure personnel' are knowledgeable ~of
i
assigned tasks.
As part of your response to the enclosed' Notice, we ask that
I
you specifically address your planned corrective actions regarding management.
.I
o
oversight to improve task performance.
1
_
050079
)
l .
Jj'
9311000020 931026
PDR- ADDCK 05000254 -
l
0
.
.
--
,
..
.;
,
,
..
.
i
DCT 2 61993
1
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the- Commission's regulations, a' copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will'be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the. accompanying Notice are not
i'
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
,
?
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL S!CND CY 7. O. MAR.II.T
l
Edward G. Greenman, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
!
No. 50-254/93025(DRP);
i
No. 50-265/93025(DRP)
1
i
cc w/ enclosures:
L. DelGeorge, Vice President, Nuclear
Oversight & Regulatory Services
1
R. Pleniewicz, Site Vice President
,
G. Campbell, Station Manager
,
A. Misak, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory Services
!
Manager
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspectors, Quad Cities,
',
Dresden, LaSalle, Clinton
R. Hubbard
l
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
i
Utilities Division
Licensing Project Manager, NRR
.
R. Newmann, Office of Public Counsel,
State'of Illinois Center
State Liaison Officer
,
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
l
J. B. Martin, RIII
H. J. Miller, RIII
bcc:
PUBLIC
!
!
Q
f
N
,
Hiland
C1ayton
Hausman
Gr g y
oleh3
gg(p
musie
j
'
,
b
-