ML20059G067

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-327/93-42 & 50-328/93-42.Responses to Examples 1 & 2 of Violation Need More Detail Re Cause & Corrective Actions
ML20059G067
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 01/05/1994
From: Crlenjak R
NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region II)
To: Medford M
Tennessee Valley Authority
References
NUDOCS 9401210090
Download: ML20059G067 (5)


See also: IR 05000327/1993042

Text

- _ - - . - _ - - - - . - _ - _ - - - -

- - _ - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - _ - -

_

.,

'.

J ja}

f

e

-

'

JAN

5 1994

.

Docket Nos. 50-327, 50-328

License Nos. DPR-77, DPR-79

Tennessee Valley Authority

ATTN: Dr. Mark 0. Medford, Vice President

Technical Support

3B Lookout Place

1101 Market Street

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT N05, 50-327/93-42 AND 50-328/93-42

Thank you for your response of December 13, 1993, to our Notice of Violation,

issued on November 9, 1993, concerning activities conducted at your Sequoyah

Nuclear Plant. We have evaluated your response to violation 50-327,328/

93-42-03 and found that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201. We will

examine the implementation of your corrective actions during future

inspections.

We have reviewed your response to violation 50-327,328/93-42-01, and have the

following comments.

Your response to Example 2 of the violation fails to

address the subject of the violation.

The violation concerned a circumvention

l

of the procedural requirement that the person placing a safety ground be

_

l

issued the clearance before placing the ground. The response states that the

reason for the violation was that procedure SSP-12.3 did not require

accountability for the exact locations where the grounds were installed.

However, although the procedure did allow floating grounds, it clearly and

specifically required the person installing the ground to hold the clearance.

The response did not address the circumvention of this procedural requirement,

which was the subject of the violation.

The responses to Examples 1 and 2 of the violation need more detail with

respect to cause and corrective actions. These violations are of particular

concern because multiple supervisory personnel (foremen) were involved in

circumventing procedural requirements, and in directing others to c5 so as

)

well.

)

Example 3 of the violation concerned the failure to remove multiple

individuals from a clearance hold order while meggering was in progress. The

response states, "The reason for the violation is that the foreman holding the

clearance did not verify that each individual had been removed from the hold

order before testing began." This statement contradicts procedure SSP-12.3,

which specifies that Operations (the designated SRO), not the Maintenance

foreman, is responsible for ensuring that other individuals are removed from

the hold order prior to testing. As detailed in the inspection report, there

was no record on the hold order form that Maintenance had notified Operations

of the meggering activity as required.

Therefore the response to this

190023

9401210090 940105

PDR

ADOCK 05000327

G

PDR

7

y

_ --

- -------- -------

-

JAN -51994

.

Tennessee Valley Authority

2

'

violation example does not addecss the failure of Maintenance to notify

Operations that meggering was to be performed, so that Operations could remove

other individuals from the hold order in accordance with procedures.

The response to Example 4 of the violation is inadequate, in that it only

addresses the issue of hold order form entries which lacked some of the data

for the logged work activities.

The response does not address the much more

important aspect of the violation, detailed in the inspection report,

involving work activities which were performed but were'not recorded on the

hold order forms at all.

i

Collectively, Examples 3 and 4 of the violation identify a number of examples

where there was no record on the hold order sheet that Operations personnel

,

were made aware of maintenance activities in progress. This lack of work

i

'

control and in the interface between the Operations and Maintenance

organizations is not addressed in the licensee's response.

We request that you provide a supplemental response to our Notice of Violation

that addresses the above comments. We appreciate your cooperation in this

i

matter.

Sincerely,

(Original signed by P. Kellogg)

R. V. Crlenjak, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 4

Division of Reactor Projects

cc:

(See page 3)

.-

JAN

5 1994

.

Tennessee Valley Authority

3

"

.

cc:

Craven Crowell, Chairman

Robert Fenech, Vice President

Tennessee Valley Authority

Sequoyah Nuclear Plant

ET 12A

Tennessee Valley Authority

400 West Summit Hill Drive

P. O. Box 2000

Knoxville, TN 37402

Soddy-Daisy, TN .37379

W. H. Kennoy, Director

0. J. Zeringue, Senior Vice

Tennessee Valley Authority

President

'

ET 12A

Nuclear Operations

400 West Summit Hill Drive

Tennessee Valley Authority

Knoxville, TN 37902

3B Lookout Place

1101 Market Street

Johnny H. Hayes,. Director

Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

Tennessee Valley Authority

ET 12A

Michael H. Mobley, Director

400 West Summit Hill Drive

Division of Radiological Health

Knoxville, TN 37902

3rd Floor, L and C Annex

401 Church Street

TVA Representative

Nashville, TN 37243-1532

Tennessee Valley Authority

Rockville Office

County Judge

11921 Rockville Pike

Hamilton County Courthouse

Suite 402

Chattanooga, TN 37402

Rockville, MD 20852

Bill Harris

General Counsel

Route 1, Box 26

Tennessee Valley Authority

Ten Mile, TN 37880

ET 11H

400 West Summit Hill Drive

bec:

(See page 4)

Knoxville, TN 37902

B. S. Schofield, Manager

Nuclear Licensing and

Regulatory Affairs

Tennessee Valley Authority

4G Blue Ridge

1101 Market Street

Chattanooga, TN

37402-2801

Ralph H. Shell

Site Licensing Manager

Sequoyah Nuclear Plant

P. O. Box 2000

Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379

-

i

.

,

'

'

Tennessee Valley Authority

4

,

bcc:

J. R. Johnson, RII

G. C. Lainas, NRR

F. J. Hebdon, NRR

P. J. Kellogg, RII

D. E. Labarge, NRR

NRC Document Control Desk-

,

NRC Senior Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

2600 Igou Ferry

Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379

,

f

i

i

i

i

i

P

RII/DRP

CX9J.

Along

j

14/ 4 /93

-

t

.

RII/DRP

RII/DRP

RII/DRP

RII/DRP

~

$ PKellogg

  • WHolland

W SShaeffer-

-*SSparks

12/. /93

12/

/93

12/

/93

12/

/93

y GEL W_McOS t WCOMEdCt

.

1

_______-____-_ _ -

,

.

JhN

5 1994

,

'

Tennessee' Valley Authority

4

.

bcc:

J. R. Johnson, RII

G. C. Lainas, NRR

F. J. Hebdon, NRR

P. J. Kellogg, RII

D. E. Labarge, NRR

NRC Document Control Desk

NRC Senior Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

2600 Igou Ferry

Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379

.

RII/DRP

ALong

12/

/93

RII/

RII/DR

RII/DRP

RII/Q P

ellogg

olland

haeffer

SSparks

12/ n /93

12/ 7 /93

12/97/93

12/yy/93

9

  1. 1T*<'da-/t7

N

T

_

l'

..

. . .

..

,.

.

.