ML20059F940
| ML20059F940 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/12/1994 |
| From: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 M931222, NUDOCS 9401180029 | |
| Download: ML20059F940 (2) | |
Text
.. _.
/,...,o, UNITED STATES y
'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I}3 7
x g
W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 kN I
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE
%, ' N'
.....J January 12, 1994 REFER TO:
M931222 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MEMORANDUM TO:
James M.
Taylor a
Executive Director for OpeM)tions FROM:
Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary}3 7
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFfNQ ON RESULTS OF LICENSE EXTENSION WORKSHOP AFD PROPOSED CHANGES TO LICENSE RENEWAL RULE (SECY-93-331), 10:00 A.M.,
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 1993, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)
The Commission was briefed by the NRC staf f on the results of the license extension workshop and proposed changes to the license renewal rule.
The Commission raised several questions concerning the definition of the term age-related degradation unique to license renewal (ARDUTLR) and whether or not it is needed in the rule.
The Commission also expressed interest in the responses to the eleven questions which appeared in the Federal Reaister notice of the workshop.
The staff should provide this information to the Commission.
(EDO)
(SECY Suspense:
2/11/94)
Although the license renewal rule will have some dependence on the maintenance rule, the Commission noted that the industry has a significant amount of experience with maintenance even though the rule is a recent introduction.
When developing the statement of considerations to explain the rule, the language should be consistent between the statement of considerations and the rule, even to the extent of using the same language when referring to specific requirements.
In particular, the Commission requested that the staff carefully review the use of the terms SSC and SC throughout the proposed rule and statement of considerations to ensure consistent usage when each is appropriate.
The Commission will provide further guidance to the staff in their votes and the subsequent SRM on SECY-93-331.
]
1400 1
M3k 9401100029 940112 PDR 10CFR h
PT9.7 PDR
es 2 --
l cc:
The Chairman Commissioner Rogers J
Commissioner Remick Commissioner de Planque OGC OCA OIG Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLDP (via E-Mail)
PDR - Advance i
DCS - Pl-24 i
)
I l
l l
~~
,-w,-
,w a
-r-e-
,4wy.w,,,-,-v, m-,-n,-
,r---
,,r---,---