ML20059F049
| ML20059F049 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/26/1990 |
| From: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Boren D SENATE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059F052 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-55FR12374, RULE-PR-150, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-40, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-60, RULE-PR-61, RULE-PR-70, RULE-PR-72 CCS, NUDOCS 9009110075 | |
| Download: ML20059F049 (2) | |
Text
. - -.
. ~..
/
3.
p Etc 3
o UWITED STATES
~f
.v
')"
fi '
g.
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,, r,,
1; WASH NGTON, D. C,20666 V
...../
July 26, 1990 L
The Honorable David L. Boren United States Senate Washington, D. C.
20510
Dear Senator Boren:
I am responding to your letter of July 19, 1990, which referred a June 7, t
1990, letter from your constituent, Mr. L. A. Tharp, of Gore, Oklahoma. Mr.
Thar) requested your assistance in ensuring that certain proposed regulations-of tie NRC would be amended to protect the due process rights of individuals.
The NRC has proposed-revisions to its regulations which would enable the agency to take enG rcement. action against non-licensed persons, including individuals and corpornions for willfully causing a licensee to violate the Comission's requirements or for other willful misconduct that places in question the agency's reasonable assurance that licensed activities will be conducted in a manner that provides adequate protection to the public health and safety.
Mr. Tharp has provided comments on these proposed revisions under separate cover to the NRC. These comments, which raise the same issues that Mr. Tharp has brought to your attention, have been officially received and docketed by the NRC. We have. initiated a review of all the public coments received on the propostd revisions, and Mr. Tharp's coments will receive careful consideration in'that process.
.The NRC takes very seriously its responsibilities for assuring that activities within the jurisdiction of the agency are conducted in a manner that provides adequate:protectica to.the public health and safety, and at the=same time comport with statutory and constitutional requirements.
I would like to assure you.that any regulations adopted by the Comission will appropriately provide for protection of the rights of individuals.who may become the subject of NRC enforcement action.
Sincerely,
/
Jr7 I
mes M. Tay r ecutive D, rector for Operations 7
}
FULL TEXT ASCll SCAN f[i \\
9009110075 9007.$
q..
A
!ll CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE SYSTEM DOCUMENT PREPARATION CHECKLIST 1
'This checklist is to be submitted with each document (or group of i
I Os/As)~sent for entering into the CCS.
!r'Nr dM.
1.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT (S) o V orrespondence Bearings (Qs/As) j '-
3..
TYPE OF DOCUMENT C
3.-
CoCUMENT CONTROL Sensitive (NRC Only)'
Non-Sensitive 4.
CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and SUBCOMMITTEES (if applicable).
1 Congressional Committee
.1 Subcommittee 5.
SUBJECT CODES J
(a) j (b)
(c) 6.
SOURCE OF DOCUMENTS-(a) 5520 (document name V can.
(c)
Attachments (b)
S (4)-
Rakey (e)
Other 7.
SYSTEM LOG DATES 7!MM Date OCA sent document to CCS' (a)
(b)
.Date CCS receives document-(e)
'Date returned to OCA for additional information l
(d)
Date resubmitted by OCA to CCS (e)
Date entered into CCS by
)
(f)
Date OCA notified that document is in CCS J
8.
COMMENTS
)
= -
-