ML20058P770

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Ltr Re Revs to NRC Commitment Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-482/85-19.C/As:QA Dept Will Continue to Perform Biennial Audit of Document Control Program to Ensure That Program Remains Effective
ML20058P770
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 10/19/1993
From: Carns N
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
WM-93-0139, WM-93-139, NUDOCS 9310250217
Download: ML20058P770 (2)


Text

__ _

r i

WOLF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION nelis suzz carn,

_0ctober 19, 1993 Premdont and cNet rm.utwe one WM 93-0139 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station F1-137 Washington, D.

C.

20555

Reference:

Letter KMLNRC 85-204, dated August 23, 1985, from G.

L.

Koester, KG&E, to R.

P.

Denise, NRC Sub' ject:

Docket.No. 50-482:

Revision to NRC Commitment Made in WCNOC's Response to NRC Violation 50-482/8519-01 Gentlemen:

The purpose of this letter is to advise the NRC of a deletion of a commitment made in the Reference. The Reference provided Kansas Gas and Electric Company's (KG&E) rerponse to violation 8519-01, which concerned a failure to properly update procedure manuals.

This letter committed KG&E and subsequently Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC),

to conduct and document internal surveillances on all. documents.in the Technical Support Center (TSC) and Emergency Operating Facility (EOF) on a

periodic basis by personnel not assigned document control responsibility of the TSC/ EOF.

An evaluation of the necessity to continue performing indeperdent,

-periodic surveillantes was conducted. This evaluation' included 1 review of error

rates, identification of document control er; ors, and allocation of resources.

Surveillances have documented c.rror rates typically less than

.8%

in both the TSC an3 EOF.

Errr. rs are also identified and documented through the. Performa.me Improvement Request (PIR) process, and Quality Assurance (QA) biennial-vocument Control Audits.

Also, periodic surveillances utilize various personnel who review all controlled documents in - the TSC and EOF.

These reviews require excessive amounts of time to-complete, and have low documented error rates.

For these reasons it has been concluded that this allocation of resources is not cost effective and represents undue burden.

ol 250125 g/ m 0250217 931019 J

G ADOCK 05000482 Psl PDP

~

PO box 411/ Burhngton. KS (E239 / Phone (316) 364-8831 An Equal opportunity Emp!cyer M.T HC/ VET

WM 93-0139 PaEje 2 of 2 As a result of low document control error rates; continued expectations that employees identify, document, and correct document control problems by initiating a PIR, and unnecessary allocation of resources with no reasonable benefit, it was decided to discontinue this. review.

The-Quality Assurance department will continue to perform a biennial audit of the Document Control program to ensure that the Document Control program remains effective.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at f

(316) 364-8831, extension 4000, or Mr'. Kevin J. Moles at extension 4565.

-Very truly yours, I

e Neil S. Carns l

President and I

Chief Executive Officer NSC/jan r

cc:

J. L. Milhoan (NRC)

G. A. Pick (NRC)

W.

D. Reckley (NRC)

-l L. A. Yandell (NRC) j

.I 1

1 3

h i

fj 1

l i

~

1