ML20058P100

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Wolf Creek Generating Station Inservice Insp Rept, for Fourth Refueling Outage,Period 2,Interval 1. Nonconforming Conditions Requiring Repair/Replacement of Supports Identified During Routine Maint Activities
ML20058P100
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 08/10/1990
From: Bailey J
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20058P103 List:
References
90-0228, 90-228, NUDOCS 9008160072
Download: ML20058P100 (2)


Text

_ -.

j

., t..

W$LF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION -

John A. Bausy vies pr. ems.u Nuoteer Operemone August 10,.1990-NO 90-0228 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station P1-137

- Washington, D. C. .

20555 4 l

Reference:

WH 89-0099, dated April 3, 1989 from B.-D. Withers, WCNOC to NRC

Subject:

Docket No.-50-482:= Inservice Inspection Summary Report .l for Refuel IV H l

Gentlemen: I l

Attachment 1 provides the Inservice Inspection' Summary Report for the fourth-  !

refueling outage at Wolf Creek Generating Station:(WCGS). : Thit- report is i being submitted in accordance with ASME Boiler:and Pressure Vessel Code;1980

- Edition through Winter 1981 Addenda, Section XI~ Article IWA 6000 Paragraph

~

6230. Records and reports documenting the inspecti 'us are maintained -at WCGS-and are available for review upon request.-

The Reference transmitted the Inservice Inspection'(ISI)' Summary Report for l

the third refueling outage. . Attachment 2 to thisiletter 'provides . revised

.j pages to the Reference which delete enubber supports AE05-R003-242 and AB01- l l R504-145 from'the Results section of the' report. During routine maintenance  !

activities. -nonconforming conditions- were identified- that. required repair / replacement 'of the supports which is : documented in- ,the-Repair / Replacement Sumary section of the- report. A further;revief of=the

- nonconforming conditions has determined'that a failure analysis is not

~

i Q

13a 7 2 0 0 0 ? 1. 9 ..

[qhp( ' 3,'sbdi.rs O U N']f, d 1

9 <

RO. Box 411/ Burimgton, KS 66839 / Phone:(316) 364-8831 An Equal Opportunny Employer MF41c/ VET

I l NO 90-0228 Page 2 of'2 l

i required by the ISI Program Plan since the conditions were not discovered during a scheduled ISI examination. Therefore,.the supports should not have been listed in the Results section of the summary ' report. Additionally, L

these. two supports were examined during the fourth refueling outage with no reportable indications identified.

'If you have any questions concerning this matter, -please- contact me or i Mr. H. K. Chernoff of my staff.

Very truly yours,

.Tohn A. Bailey '

Vice President Nuclear Operations  ;

JABlaem Attachments l cc: R. D. Martin (NRC), w/a D. V. Pickett (NRC), w/a M. E. Skow (NRC), w/a J. S. Wiebe (NRC), w/a b

1 l

l