ML20058L022
| ML20058L022 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/01/1990 |
| From: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| TASK-PII, TASK-SE SECY-90-266, NUDOCS 9008060052 | |
| Download: ML20058L022 (6) | |
Text
. _ _........... - -
RELEASED TO THE PDR l
E f' " %>,
l f//(,/qn h
l l
i l
dfite '
ini p'
.................t@s l
g 5
\\,,,,,/
L POLICY ISSUE August 1, 1990 sacy-90-26e For:
The Comission( ONM From:
James M. Taylor Executive Director for Operations i
Subject:
QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT ON THE NRC REQUALIFICATION i
PROGRAM l
Purpose:
To provide a quarterly status report on the NRC requalification i
program as requesi.ed by the Comission in a memorandum dated l
June 9, 1988, from Chairman Zech to the EDO.
Discussion:
The revised NRC requalification program as described in Examiner Standard ES-601, " Administration of NRC Re,dalification Program Evaluations," was implemented on Octc,ber 1,1988.
This report sumar1 es the status of the NRC-administered k
re;ualification examinations and requalification program c,'41uations from October 1,1988, through June 30, 1990.
The requalification program results for each facility at which NRC conducted a requalification examination are provided in the enclosure. A sumary of the requalification program results is given below.
A REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM RESULTS
SUMMARY
Programs Operators Operators SAT /UNSAT Eumined Pass / Fail 68/10 1350 1157/193 The sumary figures and coments from the examiners indicate I
that the p ogram is able to discriminate b& tween weak and competent operators and between satisfactory and urisatisfactory requalification training orograms. All fecilities are scheditled for NRC-administered requal1fication examinaticns by November 1990.
The staff accomplished its plan to administer requalification f
l NOTE:
TO BE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE IN 10 WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS PAPER Kenneth E. Perkins, NRR 49-21031 0'U; roc ~ %w y, w (4
4
(
. :The Commissioners.
examinations to 10' percent of-the licensed reactor _ operators in
~
FY 1989.
In addition, the staff is on schedule in its' plan for FY 1990 to administer requalification examinations to 25 percent-of the remaining licensed reactor operators.
i f
i The staff will continue to provide the Commission with quarterly l
status reports on the NRC requalification program until the NRC has administered these evaluations at-a11 facilities, f
s
/
es M. Ta or xecutive Director l
v Tor Operations l
Enclosure:
Requalification Program Results DISTRIBUTION:
i Commissioners OGC OIG-GPA
- j REGIONAL OFFICES
- F00
' ACRS i
- SECY, n
I
. )
e Y'
2 I
'?
k
't va.
p t
A REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM RESULTS (October 1988 - June 1990)
Facility Candidates Candidates Failed Program Evaluated Examined Passed / Failed Written / Operating SAT /UNSAT Date
]
Palo Verde 16 15/1 0/1 SAT 10-88 Limerick 1 13 12/1 0/1 SAT 11-88 Beaver Valley 1 12 11/1 1/1 SAT 12-88 Susquehanna 16 15/1 0/1 SAT 2-89 Indian Pt. 2 12 10/2 1/2 SAT 2-89 Monticello 15 12/3 2 l'.
SAT 2-89 Point Beach 12 7/5 5/0 UNSAT 2-89
' Turkey Pt.
24 12/12 6/11 UNSAT 3-89 Sunner 24 21/3 3/1 SAT 3-89 Braidwood 12 11/1 0/1 SAT 4-89 Palisades 8
8/0 0/0 Note 1 4-89 Ft.'Calhoun 5
4/1 1/U SAT Note 2
'4-89 Diablo Canyon 36 34/2 1/1 SAT 5-89 ANO 1 12 10/2 2/0 SAT 5-89 Quad Cities 12 11/1-1/0 SAT 5-89 Kewaunee 12 11/1 0/1 SAT 5-89 i-Maine Yankee 12 12/0 0/0 SAT 5-89 Haddam Neck 12 11/1 1/0 SAT 5-89 Fitzpatrick 12 12/0 0/0 SAT 5-89 SAT 6-89 Hope Creek 14 12/2 1/1 Ginna
.12 6/6 2/5 UNSAT 6-89 e
I i ;.
7s 1 04
~.
y f' II 2-
- Facility' Candidates-Candidates-Failed Program 1
' Evaluated Examined Passed / Failed Written / Operating =
SAT /UNSAT-Date=
Yankee Rowe 12 9/3 1/3 SAT 6 Farley 22 17/5 4/2-SAT-
~6 Perry 12 11/1 1/0 SAT.
6-89
-l
)
Comanche Peak 12 12/0 0/0 SAT "7-89 l
. Browns Ferry 24 15/9 6/4-UNSAT 7-89 1
Nine Mile Pt. 2 29 19/10 8/8 UNSAT.
7-89 i
1 LaSalle 15 14/1 0/1 SAT 8-89 i
8-E9 Waterford 12 11/1 1/0 SAT 9-89 Cooper 12 11/1 1/0 SAT 9-89 Zion 12 5/7 2/5 UNSAT 9-89 Clinton
-16 12/4 3/1 SAT 9-89' 4
Hatch,
24 23/1 0/1 SAT ~
'9-89
]
Catawba 24 18/6 5/3
' SAT 9-89 Millstone 3 12' 6/6 0/6
-UNSAT 9-89'
.f Indian Pt. 3
'13 13/0 0/0 SAT-9-89 Millstone 1 20 19/1 0/1 SAT 10-89 1
S. Harris 1 24 20/4 1/4 SAT 10-89 Pra ric Island 16 16/0 0/0 SAT 10 1Palo Verde 35 34/1 0/1 SAT 11-89 Big Rock Pt.
12 11/1 1/0 SAT 11-89 Vermont Yankee 12 12/0 0/0 SAT 11-89 TMI-1 20 19/1 0/1 SAT 11-89 1
i
+:
,1
' ;% 3 l
-4 L
q
/-
Facility.
-Candidates-
' Candidates' Failed Program -
Evaluated
~ Examined Passed / Failed Written / Operating SAT /UNSAT" Date' i
Pilgrim 20' 17/3 1/2-SAT 12 Grand Gulf 20.
17/3 0/3 SAT-89 l
St. Lucie.
20 17/3
-1/2 SAT-12-89 D.C.-Cook 20 16/4
-2/3 SAT 12-89
'I
~ Limerick 13 9/4 1/3 UNSAT 1-90 Susquehanna 20
.18/2 0/2 SAT 1-90 River Bend 20 19/1 0/1 SAT 2-90 Milistone 3 17 15/2 0/2 SAT 2 McGuire--
24 21/3 0/3 SAT 2-90:
Browns Ferry 20-20/0 0/0 SAT
.2 callaway.
16 16/0 0/0 SAT 3,
Palisades 8
6/2 2/1 SAT Note 3 3 -
Peach Bottom 22 20/2 2/0'
. SAT 3-90 g - e.
(
Maine Yankee 7
6/1 0/1 Note 1 3-90:
'WNP-2 24 22/2 1/1-SAT 3-90 SqT 3 South Texas 28 24/4 4/0 Monticello 15 15/0
-0/0
- SAT 3-90 Point Beach 15 14/1 0/1 SAT 3-90 Salem 12 12/0 0/.-
SAT 4-90 Turkey. Point 16 14/2 0/2 SAT 4-90 Trojan 20 17/3 2/2 SAT 4 n Calvert Cliffs
-13 13/0 0/0 SAT 4-90 LaSalle 30 29/1 0/1 SAT 4-90 Braidwood 21
'16/5 0/5 SAT 4-90 1
j
- 7..
j 4
'Y L
,l i
- 1.,.
(
1
. Facility Candidates Candidates' Failed Program Evaluated Examined
. Passed / Failed Written / Operating SAT /UNSAT Date.
j I
n B
Nine Mile Pt. 2 -
15-15/0 0/0
-SAT-5-90 1
Davis-Besse.
20 16/4
'3/1 SAT--
.5-90
_0yster Creek 21-16/5 3/2 SAT-
.5-90 Brunswick 20 7/13 3/12' UNSAT:
5-90 i
Perry
. 12 12/0 0/0 SAT 5 !
i Fermi 12 9/3 2/2 SAT 5-90 4
+
f l
Byron 23 22/1' 0/1
. SAT 90 Haddam'%ck.
12 12/0 0/0 SAT 6-90 Beaver Valley 2' 16 15/1 0/1-SAT
-5*
' Millstone 2 13 13/0 0/0' SAT t->
[
f Clinton' 16 12/4 0/4 SAT 6-90 Duane Arnold
. 16 12/4 0/4 UNSAT-6-90 See Note 4 Note 1: Program evaluation oeferred until sample size meets the guidance of-Examiner Standard ES-601-(12 operators).
' Note 2:' Sample size for program evaluation was 13, with n. operators
~
- examined in March and May 1988 during the pilot program and 5-operators examined in May 1989.
Note 3: Palisades requitlification program meets the ES-601 requirements
~
(12 or more operators sampled) for program evaluation (See Palisades
,4-89).
Note ~4: Duane Arnold requaitfIcation program is unsatisfactory because 3 out of 4 crews failed the dynamic simulator evaluations.
l-9.
4 f
1
- '