ML20058K709
| ML20058K709 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/16/1993 |
| From: | Cordes J NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Bevill T, Jeanne Johnston, Lehman R, Lieberman J, Sharp P HOUSE OF REP., HOUSE OF REP., APPROPRIATIONS, HOUSE OF REP., ENERGY & COMMERCE, SENATE, APPROPRIATIONS, SENATE, ENVIRONMENT & PUBLIC WORKS |
| References | |
| CCS, NUDOCS 9312160013 | |
| Download: ML20058K709 (5) | |
Text
j p ncy UNITED STATES 1
',., e l
[
b'"
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20E66@01
- ...+
November 16, 1993 i
The Honorable Joseph T.
Lieberman, Chairman Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Regulation Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Washington, D.C.
20510 RE:
National Treasury Emolovees Union v. FLRA, No. 93-1422 (D.C. Cir., NRC Motion to Intervene filed July 28, 1993) l
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In June the Federal Labor Relations Authority ruled that an NTEU proposal to negotiate wages with the NRC was not negotiable.
The FLRA found that the particular NTEU proposal in this case would interfere with the right of NRC management to determine the agency's budget.
In addition, however, the FLRA rejected the-d NRC's broad position that the Atomic Energy Act precludes wage bargaining altogether.
The NTEU filed an immediate petition for review in the D.C.
I circuit to challenge the FLRA decision against wage bargaining in this case.
The NRC filed a motion to intervene, which the court l
l of appeals recently granted.
We are working closely with l
Department of Justice attorneys on this case.
i We will keep you informed of any significant de'velopment in
~
l the case.
Sincerely,.
)
M Iih6
.C des, Jr.
l
./
olicitor l
cc:
The $ 4ble Alan K. Simpson 1
I l
I l
l 9312160013 931116 5
PDR ORG NRCG
,.h - i
~. - - - - - -
i 4
- RIGug f
, f$
UNITED STATES j
'[
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -
t 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20MH001 2
l
\\...../
i November 16, 1993 The Honorable Philip Sharp, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515 RE:
National Treasurv P=nloveen Union v. FLRA, No.- 93-1422 (D.C. Cir., NRC Motion to Interv9ne filed July 28, 1993)
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In June the Federal Labor Relations Authority ruled that an NTEU proposal to negotiate wages with the NRCLwas not negotiable.
The FLRA found that the particular NTEU proposal.in this case would interfere with the right-of NRC management to determine the agency's budget.
In addition, however, the FLRA rejected the.
NRC's broad position that the Atomic Energy Act precludes-wage bargaining altogether.
The NTEU filed an immediate petition for review in.the D.C.
l Circuit to challenge the FLRA decision against wage bargaining in this case.
The NRC filed a motion to intervene, which the court of appeals recently granted.
We are working closely with i
Department of Justice attorneys oa this case.
We will keep you informed of any significant development'in the case.
- incerely, f%
^
o b F. Cordes, Jr.
I solicitor
?
The p able Michael Bilirakis cc:
ps atcug f
UNITED STATES
, [
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2
WASHINGTON. D.C. M1
\\...../
j November 16, 1993 I
The Honorable Richard H. Lehman, Chairman 1
Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Committee on Natural Resources United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515 RE:
National Treasurv P=nloveas Union v. FLRA, No. 93-1422 i
(D.C. Cir., NRC Motion to Intervene filed July 28, J
1993) i l
Dear Mr. Chairman:
i j
In June the Federal Labor Relations Authority ruled that an l
NTbU proposal to negotiate wages with the_NRC was not negotiable.
i The FLRA found that the particular NTEU proposal in this case l
would interfere with the right of NRC management to determine the f
i agency's budget.
In addition, however, the FLRA rejected the I
NRC's broad position that the Atomic Energy Act precludes wage bargaining altogether.
i i
The NTEU filed an immediate' petition for review in the D.C.
Circuit to challenge the FLRA decision against wage bargaining in this case.
The NRC filed a motion to intervene, which the court of appeals recently granted.
We are working closely with
~
Department of Justice attorneys on this case.
.i 4
i We will keep you informed of any significant development in
)
the case.
i l
Sincerely, f
f
. Cor es, Jr.
S licitor
- a. "
i y
cc:
The sonorable Barbara Vucanovich 2
a
- m
a nco t
UNITED STATES
+
. [
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION a
WASHINGTON. D.C. 21sB5-0001
/
November 16, 1993 i
i i
The Honorable J. Bennett Johnston, Chairman l
subcommittee on Energy and Water Development committee on Appropriations United States Senate Washington, D.C.
20510 RE:
National Treasurv 1P=nlovaes Union v. FLRA, No. 93-1422 i
(D.C. Cir., NRC Motion to Intervene filed July 28, 1993)
Dear Mr. Chairman:
l In June the Federal Labor Relations Authority ruled that an NTEU proposal to negotiate wages with the NRC was not negotiable.
The FLRA found that the particular NTEU proposal in this case
]
would interfere with the right of NRC management to determine the l
agency's budget.
In addition, however, the FLRA rejected the NRC's broad position that the Atomic: Energy Act precludes wage l
bargaining altogether.
The NTEU filed an immediate petition for review in the D.C.
circuit to challenge the FLRA decision against wage bargaining in this case.
The-NRC filed a motion to intervene, which the court of appeals recently granted.
We are working closely with Department of Justice attorneys on this case.
l We will keep you informed of any significant development in the case.
Sincerely, p.
Jo ordes, Jr.
S
- itor, e
cc:
The le Mark O. Hatfield j
l 4
a,
4 UNITED S ATES
[
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
f WASHINGTON. D.C. MEEE-0001 s...../
I November 16, 1993 i
j i
l The Honorable Tom Bevill, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development 1
Committee on Appropriations f
United States House of Representatives j
Washington, D.C.
20515 RE:
National Treasury P=nlovees Union v. FLRA, No. 93-1422 I
(D.C. Cir., NRC Notion to Intervene filed July 28, i
1993) f
Dear Mr. Chairman:
\\
j In June the Federal Labor Relations Authority _ ruled that an NTEU proposal to negotiate wages with the NRC was not negotiable.
i 1
The FLRA found that the particular NTEU proposal in this case j
would interfere with the right of NRC management to determine the 1
agency's budget.
In addition, however, the FLRA rejacted the NRC's broad position that the Atomic Energy Act precludes wage j
bargaining altogether.
8
]
The NTEU filed an immediate petition for review in the D.C.
1 Circuit to challenge the FLRA decision against wage bargaining in i.
this case.
The NRC filed a motion to intervene,'which the court of appeals recently granted.
We are working closely with Department of Justice attorneys on this case.
l We will keep you informed of any significant development in i
the case.
~
I
- carely,
. Co es, Jr.
j p
_ g, S licitor
~
j g..
TheRhprableJohnT.Nyers cc:
i 1
1 i
L i
(
m
.m,.
.._---,..e,
m.xx.m.... - -. -
-- - - --~
l
~
I CcNGRESSIONAL CCRRZ8PONDENCE SYSTEM i
DOCUMENT PAEFARATION CEECKLIST i
l nis checklist is be submitted with each document (or group of Os/As) sent for s ing into the CCS.
i i
1.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION 0 DOCUMENT (S) 4 Q
ll $fAdit t7A D d. A' Ne 2
2.
TTrz or--
Correspo Sensitive (NRC Only) X on-Seasitive l
N 3.
DOCUMENT CONTROL 1
j 4.
CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and SUSCOMMITTEES (if applicable) l j
Congressional Committee l
t j
Subcommittee l
a 5.
SUBJECT CODES l
(a) q (b) i l
(c) i j
s.
SOURCE OF DOCUMENTS i
l (a) 5520 (document name (b)
Scan..
(c)
Atlashments j
(4,
(.,
I 7.
SYSTEM 148 DATES I
Date OCE sent desument to CCS (a) 4 I
(b)
Data CCS. receivees desument (c)
Date returned to 0C1 for additional information 0800t4 (4) 3 t.,,,,3,tss.,my_oca e,ee.
i (e)
Date entered inte CCS by
~
l j
(f)
Date OCA notified that document is in CCS l
8.
CCMMENTS i
5
~