ML20058K556

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Draft Environ Impact Statement Dtd May 1972 Reviewed
ML20058K556
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/07/1972
From: Cox R
ARMY, DEPT. OF, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
To: Muller D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 9102120480
Download: ML20058K556 (2)


Text

.

..D

+

g 1

0r,'e?

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 50-263

~~

ST. PAUL DISTRICT, CORPS Or ENGINEERS 1210 u. s. Post orrsct a cusTou Houst ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 sN REPLY REFER TO

C522-PL 7 July 1972 1
'r. Dcniel P..
uller i

/,0cistant Director for Environnental Projects Directorate of Licensing United States 1, tonic Ener;y Co:ciccion

'.lachincton, D. C.

2C51;5 h

F i

Dear 'Ir. :

uller:

Reference ic rade to your lettcr of 26 25; 1.072, (Doclet ::o. 5C-2C3) inclosin; c cory of the drr ft en'ciroinrntal inpr:ct stattnent for the

enticcllo ;uclear Gcntr;. tin; Piccit, Unit ::c.1,
intcf. My 1972.

i The statenent has been revicued.

It appctre to cover nicquately tic Lepcetc of the envircn cnt "nich ure cffected by ti.e propoct1 cnt i

'dich fall rithin our purvicv.

t Einccrcl;r ycm,

,</ _

', JN$w~

l.rncl

..s-1.

.t..

r

>w--

+-

As stated Oc1cc.c1, Coras cf rn;ineerc District Tz.,;ineer f

Copy Parnished:

.'r. Tinothy f.theson General Councel Ccuncil on Invironncntc1 Qualit;-

Enocutive Office of the President 722 Jackson Place, I!.U.

Wachin-ton, D. C.

20506 EOTE: You nc;r be interected in the attached succcction; rr:fe 'cy the reviewin; biolocist which you nny vich to consider in prepreing the final inptet staterent, t

w l

9102120480 720707 CF ADOCK 05000263i CF

i

.O i

i 50-263' i

CO' m_.. %e t

II TiiE CITE t

Considering the doubts raised about planting coniferc, ve vonder why another type of planting vac not chocen.

j Y

C; VIRO:!" CAL I!"ACT OF PIXIT OPITJCIO::

There could be a tabulcr corpcrison of prescnt and predicted effluent radionuclide concentrations, with Tederal and Etate standardc.

Transmiscion line enviro: rental impactc do not appear to be included.

ore adequate precentation of the (te:perature) plu e distribution could be given, from horizontal, vertical and seaconal percpectives.

3 Ter fish species temperature acclination and tolerance curves for e

physiological parcneters should be included.

r i

I!either Table V-2 nor any other presente original or present alpha or beta counts.

Vnat effect vould the fog fron coolin; torers have on transpiration and other microclinate-sencitive life processes?

VIII SIIORT-TEnJ' USES /d!D LO::G-TZK: PRODUCTIVIS

(

l What is the life of the project?

t What cre the Ionc-tern health-related implications of radioactivity and other pollutant enicnionc?

ZI 11MATIV"O TO PROPOSZD ACTIO: IJ.T) COST-3Z:ZTIT K:ALYECS OF "':EIR

[

EliVIRO:!'22:!AL ZTFECTS

!?icht there be a need to linit porcr consunption and grovth?

t i

Iior vould long-tern rangers to public hec.lth of alternatives conpare j

vith thcse from the project?

[

GLOSSI.RY i

A definition of " curie" could be included.

p Factors for calculating erposure and dosace could be included with the t

convcrsion factors.

1 APPE" DIX A Charte should include hc.lf-liver of icotopes, since some are quite long.

e t

?

k t

I i

fi

..