ML20058J705

Comments on Cormier Re Applicant Proposed Amends to Emergency Plan.Aslb Should Not Schedule Addl Discovery & Motions for Summary Disposition Until Amends Completed & Plan Reviewed by Committee to Bridge the Gap

ML20058J705
Person / Time
Site:	05000142
Issue date:	08/06/1982
From:	Hirsch D COMMITTEE TO BRIDGE THE GAP
To:	Frye J, Luebke E, Paris O Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8208110179
Download: ML20058J705 (2)

Text

w COMMITTEE TO BRIDGE THE GAP y

1637 BUTLER AVENUE e203

/

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 0(ggTED (213) 478-0829 g

as from: Box 1166 Ben Iomond, CA 7500500 -9 m 57' (408)336-5381 Amst 6, M2 0FnCE Of SECPEM G CXETM & SERWL John H. Frye, III, Chairman BRANCH Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 S

Dr. Oscar H. Paris Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of The Regents of the University of California (UCLA Research Reactor)

Docket No. 50-142 (Proposed Renewal of Facility License)

RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 'IO EMERGENCY PLAN Dear Administrative Judges Yesterday I received a copy of Mr. Cormier's letter, dated August 2, regarding Applicant's proposed amendments to its emergency plan.

However, a copy of the proposed amendments was not included.

I note in Mr. Cormier's cover letter, however, the suggestion that the Board now schedule additional discovery and motions for summary disposition related to the emergency plan contention.

We feel such scheduling is not appropriate until full service of the proposed amendments to the plan is completed and CBG has been given l

reasonable time to review the plan and determine what discovery we may need l

thereon.

Furthermore, we note that the Staff indicated at the prehearing conference that its supplement to the SER addressing the emergency plan was scheduled to be issued on July 31 (TR 633, 640). Determination of the

" amount and the time of discovery, if any, which CBG wishes to submit on these amendments to the application and the revised emrgency plan, and the l

Staff's evaluation of the emergency plan" (TR 633) should await, in CBG's view, release of that Staff SER supplement on the emergency plan. Given the target date of July 31 given by Staff, that supplement should be received any day now.

l 8208110179 820806 PDR ADOCK 05000142 C

PDR y

~

\\

w JUDGE 3 FRYE, LUEEEE, PARIS August 6, 1982 Page Two Finally, CBG respectfully suggests that in addition to reviewing the proposed amendments to the Emergency Plan and the SER supplement thereon as to what discovery might be necessary, CBG would also wish to review those new materials as to whether any modifications to the Emergency Plan contention are necessary.

Res ectfully u [ e[,

(

/'

Daniel Hirsch President COMMITTEE TO BRIDGE THE CAP cc service list k