ML20058G667

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Requirements Memo Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote, on 931124 in Rockville,Md Re Commission Approved Order Responding to Petitions by NRC & Advanced Medical Sys,Inc Asking for Reconsideration of Commission 930930 Order
ML20058G667
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/24/1993
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Stephen Burns
NRC OFFICE OF COMMISSION APPELLATE ADJUDICATION (OCAA)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 M931124B, NUDOCS 9312100047
Download: ML20058G667 (1)


Text

!

[pa macq%

UNITED STATES I

g' 'i

  1. 'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

W ASHINGT ON, D.C. 20555 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE p

S REFER TO:

M931124B j

/

November 24, 1993 OF FICE OF THE SECRETARY I

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Stephen G.

Burns, Director Office of Commission Appf $ ate Adjudication l

FROM:

Samuel J.

Chilk, Secreta

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFIk TION / DISCUSSION AND VOTE, 10:30 A.M.,

WE!D SDAY. NOVEMBER 24, 1993, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) t-t I

I.

SECY-93-307 - Advanced Medical Systems. Inc.'s and NRC Staff's Petitions for Reconsideration of CLI-93-22 l

l The Commission, by a 4-0* vote, approved an Order responding to petitions by the NRC staff and Advanced Medical Systems, Inc.,

asking for reconsideration of the Commission's September 30, 1993 Order affirming in part, and reversing and remanding in part, an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board decision.

The Order denies both petitions for reconsideration.

I (Subsequently, on November 24, 1993, the Secretary signed the Order.)

i cc:

The Chairman Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Remick Commissioner de Planque OGC EDO OCA OIG Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail) i PDR - Advance tedCS - P1-24

  • Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C.
55841, provides that action of the Commission shall be determined by a

" majority vote of the members present."

Commissioner Remick was not present when this item was affirmed.

Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 3-0 in favor of the decision.

Commissioner Remick, however, had previously indicated that he would approve this paper and had he been present he would have affirmed his prior vote.

f,

'gh j PDR 10CFR 0020G7 9312100047 931124 i b PT9.7 PDR 4

U 3 v I I

o s6 '