ML20058F923

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises of Completion of Review of Westinghouse 900702 Amend Application Requesting Change to Existing K(Eff) Limit for One Station at Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility.Limit Would Be Raised from 0.95 to 0.98
ML20058F923
Person / Time
Site: Westinghouse
Issue date: 11/07/1990
From: Wilson R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Bidinger G
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
References
NUDOCS 9011090220
Download: ML20058F923 (4)


Text

~

.>. - f Moog.fg '

UNITED STATES

  • [.

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J

5

l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20$5%

\\..... /

NOV 7 1990 f

MEMORANDUM FOR:

George H. Bidinger, Section Leader Uranium Fuel Section fuel Cycle Safety Branch Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS FROM:

Robert E. Wilson Uranium Fuel.Section Fuel Cycle Safety Branch Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS

SUBJECT:

> PROGRESS REPORT ON WESTINGHOUSE AMENDMENT O

I have completed an initial review of an amendment _ application from the JWestinghouse Electric Company dated iluly 2,1990, requesting a change to the g-h existing K limit for one operating station at the Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility. eIbe proposed change is for the K limit for the wash station to be eff increased from 0.95 to 0.98.

The safety issue is that the proposed limit would-allow for essentially no room

~for conditions that could increase the K Attachments 2 and 3 of the request addressedanumberof-abnormal. condition $kn,ddiscussedcontingenciesforthem.

f

- Three =of-the failures listed in attachment 2 deal with operational problems.

Two ofothese failures. deal =with double-batching assemblies in=a wash pit. The third. failure was mechanical damage increasing reactivity.

The discussion

. maintained th'at all damage would decrease K of the assembly.

I performed i

calculationswithaKEN05amodelofaWestikbouse17:by170FAfuelelement.

These calculations focused on 1) ~:serators more effective than water,.

l 2). increased rod. spacing in t6 element due to mechanical-damage, 3) the effect '

of a. steel box in the pit to surround the fuel, and 4) the effect of a' concrete reflector. The'results are shown'on the enclosed table.. From these calculations i concluded that'1) moderators with a CH or CH, base need to be excluded from the area, 2) the-concrete pit walls must be cohsidered, and 3) mechanical damage 3

to the. fuel must be. precluded. The last category would deal'with dropping.the

' fuel-into.the' pit. floor or. dropping something. heavy on'the-fuel.

The test weight-for.the crane is an example of an.obiect'that could be dropped. To-deal with this concern, Westinghouse could supply tests or analysis to show that the fuel would.not deform under credible accidents or describe rigorous controls on the operation to preclude:the accidents.

.f I; L'

PDR ADOCK 07001151 a

'9011090220 901107 C

PDC

$00s g(36,

NOV 7 1990

, George H. Bidinger 2

-It is noted that a. simple physical fix is available.

A stainless steel enclosure for the fuel assembly would lower K and thus eliminate the need for the amendment. A borated steel box would be $vbn more effective and provide for a larger volume for the fuel assembly,

-1 hAve drafted a letter to Westinghouse asking for more information.

I h

Robert E. Wilson Uranium Fuel Section Fuel Cycle Safety Branch.

Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS 1

Enclosure:

. As stated I

oL i

'k lO i

I.

-i L.

l (e

i n

I i'.

,=

NOV 7 1940 2-it is noted that a simple physical fix is available. A stainless steel enclosure for. the fuel assembly would lower K and thus eliminate the need for the amendment. Aboratedsteelboxwouldbe$Nnmoreeffectiveandprovidefor

)

-a larger volume for the fuel assembly.

-1..have drafted a letter.to Westinghouse asking for more information.

]$rh

~

w Robert E. Wilson

'g,

Vranium Fuel Section Fuel Cycle Safety Branch Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS h

Enclosure:

As stated Distribution'w/ encl.

" Docket:7.0 1151 wPDRaus-

<NRCiFilOCenter IMUF R/F c

IMSB R/F-NMSS R/F RWilson

' VL1harpe GBidinger Region 11

-CBassett, Rll EKeegan RW/ MEMO 10 GBIDINGER

~

'D

-.i !

. s.

........4L.f.'W.....--...... f:....--.....UF:

0FC:IMUF:.

IMUF

.9 "NAME:RWilson:mh:

VL harpe:

GHB nger:

LDA1E:11/ 7 /90:-

11/0/90:

11

/. :

).

-OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l

w3.g.,

0

. '4 g9' a

ni iini i

m.-i..mi.

k j

,c.

O l

-o i

Westinghouse 17x17 OFA Fuel Assembly

', so; i

e l

Moderator. Reflector Bou Gap-1-eff Chance Comments i

V-l

,H20

,H2O 0.941 Base Case

-CH -

CH 0.963 0.002 i

i CH2.

CH2

.1.017

0. O~7 6 i

?

H20-H2O 1.010 0.067 fiod spacina. increased 117.

,c, H>

l

"~

Concrete 0.960 0.019 Concrete on 3 sides 0.931 0.010 Concrete on i sido i

i H20' 1/2" O.902

-0.039 1/4" 304SS box 1/2" O.848

-0.093 1/4" 17. baron 7045S box f

"i I

3/4"'

O.'873

-0.068 l

1".

O.894

-0.047 1 1/4" O.907

-0.034

-)

l e

1 c

.)

r w

?

i

-l I

[

-1

.I

.J li f