ML20058F392
| ML20058F392 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/26/1982 |
| From: | Hagan T, Mcdonald R NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM), SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. (FORMERLY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058F373 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-B-7315-2, CON-NRC-02-81-040, CON-NRC-2-81-40 NUDOCS 8207300464 | |
| Download: ML20058F392 (4) | |
Text
..;..,.,,
c,, -- -- -
wr c v
- r. o.i. u..m. t..n,.. w A!.RND!.*JN1 Of CollC11 Allof u!.'OPillCAllON Of CONTP.ACT gr.a:
g,
,i o., i.a m 1
3 i.....~..o,
- w..w,0N NO 2
....o..o..
,, w....c..., <, :... u.. Ovo, O
.,,,,i o
..O r ij n '~ ua s nsuo u cou>t_
6/30/82 NRC-02-81-040 Rev. No. 5 five (5)
.,c.<sn n o e s u,j.,s..,,o. u s ss won }
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommisTion Division of Contracts Washington, DC 20555 i
7 (OW8.UCE (ODE l l
1.4ClilI F ( ODE l 0-l N wt AND sobet1S Aa.tNon.(N1 0, C $0pCitat60N NO C
l Science Applications, Inc.
o.no n., u y 4
1200 Prospect Street
','.*n, "'".
- p. O. Box 2351 x E.E',T.o '. NO NRC-02-81-040
( d' d La Jolla, CA 92038 L
J 9/21/81 - g,,u.a,,,
o.no
, TH.S bio (a A,, tit $ ONs y 10 eaalNDanf N'f 5 Of SUMf1 AllONS n.,
.a.,,..r.a....,.
O.... O *... "a.
O n..w..
v.a.so
.aa....
w.a n.
.-..... e a r........a-.,..s.6..a.,,.<...,...~a.,.........,~a.-
Oa..
.a..ia i.n,, r...a..
...a~. n.n,.a
.is.......... ~ a - -... 6..,,.. 6....... s -.a... i. n,..,..... i... - u i. r r 6,.
......~a~~
,...............a,. 6-..a.'NG Of f lC f r e.co 10 T Hf e Out A f Altutt Of VOut ACsNownlf GlutNT 10 et ettfivio af Inf ISSU
.h.ch.
l.Je...e f e.ea. e
.he..l.e....gm.ad.me ad.nen. a.ebee.
.. 6. 6. r ~, o. ~e. 6,
- r o.n snoeir o., inun iN.oiaicN O, vou. Oen.
- i......... a..... i.... i....
- 6.........,,..s
.a....
a-..a
.... a.
6.-. a o....a a io au Oum a.,No An.u,,, nON o.,A vi,,,...a; B&R No.:
50-19-02-02 FIN No.:
87315-2 Obligate:
$30,000.00 i t. THf5 kCKa APalitS ONt, to ODif.CallONS Of CO.4ta. AU5/OeDt t$
t.: O n.. c u-,. O.a..
... a p.
_J n. cm...u.
. wa i t - me.
.w ow..
4..a..
.a r-d...
f.
i bi O n..w.. -. 4.....
e...'....
.s < a.... e.-.. -.-.......... '.. i - 6... '-... : r -.. o...
<..- d.... >.. '. s i.a > > -
i to (X] 16.. s,,!.~
i a,...
.......a
.. p.....
.....,.e _Cha rJSP_s_ _c1 a u s e o f the conf r_a c t 'i.Beneralfro vis io ns and the mutua1 a.greement of the parties.
a r..,s..u.
.o.. a....,........,,,.. v.a i,.
12 ofice&liO*f Of Av!NO"j NT / uOOlt ic.3.ON 1.
Article I - Statement of Work, paragraph "8" is hereby modified by renumbering
" Task 3" as " Task 4" and adii~ng a new " Task 3" as follows:
" Task 3.
The contractor shall identify system design chinges as appropriate to accommodate changes in thi system design specifications provided by the NRC, i
changes-in technical data on facility operations and performance, and chances in system philosophy.
In addition, the contractor shall provide cost infonnation necessary to assure that the proposed changes in system design will minimize net cost, including annual operating expenses.
The proposed changes in system design specifications may be suggested by the NRC Project Officer or the contractor and may arise from review of prior results.
However, any changes suggested by the contractor are subject to the approval of the NRC project Officer prior to implementation of work with respect to such changes.
(a)
The contractor shall address the first two (2) proposed changes on the attached list entitled Design C_hange Subtasks, within FY 1982 and include those study results in the report Feliuired by Task 4.
c207300464 820726 (Continued on next page)
-040 PDR
....... -a s....,,......., c.a......s.
.~........ - iua.... s... -... s.,a... ~
,_,a.a.
....a...s l3 COMs.C1CarOf f f aOR 15 stOuisto 10 S.CN IM.$ DOCU.Af N, AND BliL*,N _ _ (Q,.g $ 10 gMU eC. OFf.CI 05 N TH S U i
- 37 t Ot i7 UNn(D 1 75 t
I8 * * *^f C C O*C I
t n
s
......C
..- -,c n -.
..~.i. a.....,,
u. a.No unT O,,<.m.,7,,,.,,...,,
- i. o.n s,c.~,o
,,... a 0, mm..o,NG On.a.,,,,..,...,,
.. e. n >< ~io RICHARD J. MCDONALD
'S SR. Contract Representative 7 /5 P 2. k Timathy F. Haqa_n_
v
.,.................... ~. -. -
3o_ioi
.., g.. - L..
e m
.n. m - _
r.--
.- m -
,,7,'y, Q ;
y g
,n-..
t
- **+%
r u
<it J
(b)
The contractor shall also address a maximum of seven (7) additforui proposed changes in FY 1983.
Items three (3) through seven (7) on the attached list are represcntative of t he types of chan.jes the cont ractor will be required to evaluate und are provided to the rontractor for cost proposal purpnses only.
The proposed changes shall be identified, in writing, by the Project Officer, and shall be reported on separately.
The fiRC will furnish specific changes to be evaluated at least three (3) conths before a report is du%"
2.
Article 1 - Statenent of !!ork, parograph "C3" is hereby modified to read as follows:
"By July 30, 1982, the contractor shall provide to the P0 ten (10) copies nach of a complete draf t of an interim final report, and by August 30, 1983, a complete draf t final, report, fhe P0 will furnish comr.ents on each draf t to the contractcr within thirty (30) days after receipt of the draf t.
Based on these comments, the contractor shall revice the draf t and submit the report in ten (10) copies of the P0 and one (1) cot > of the unclassified portion to the Contracting Officcr.
The revised interim report shall be delivered to the I;RC by October 4,1982.
The revised final report shall be delivered by October 31, 1983.
The contractor shall also submit camera ready copy suitable for publication as a !!UREG report.
The reports shall be in the format specified in fiRC Ibnual Appendix 3202 for
" Formal Contractor Documents."
3.
Article I - Statement of !!ork, paragraph "0" is hereby modified by adding a new subparagraph "d." to read as follows:
"d.
Two additional briefings on conclusions and recommendations of the study '
within FY 1982.
Periodic meetings (quarterly meetings anticipated) with the Project Officer during FY 1983."
4.
Article H - Period of Performance, paragraph "A" is hereby modified to read as follows:
"A.
Performance under this contract shall cenaence on Segtenber 30, 1981 and shall continue until October 31, 1983, at which time all reports shall have been submitted and all work under the contract shall have been completed."
5.
Article 111 - Consideration and Payment (Incrementally funded CN F),
paragraph "A" is hereby modified to read as follows:
"1.
It is estimated that the total cost to the Government for full performance of this contract will be $323,952.00, of which the sum of $297,203.00 represents the estimate reimburseable costs, and of which 526,J~49.00 represents the fixed fee.
~
2.
There shall be no adjustment in the amount of the controctor's fixc4 fee by reason of dif ferences between any estimate of cost for performance of the work under this contract and the actual cost performance of that work.
~
3.
The amount presently obligated by the Government with respect to this contract is $?54,765.00.
It is estimated that the amount currently allotted wilt ~c~oTMr-~peFformance under this contract thrcugh 9/30/82.
..=,eee *
- ewq.<m.,=,-.m.w.= g ew venm== = =
-****=ep%
,w
.=e
,u
-+e.
., =
ge-
=e
===eeem-*
_1_l_1_--__--Y'-------------
- - - -~~
~~
p s
O
,i'N l',.9;E 3 0F 3 m
3... -
4 r
6.
/.rticle IV - Overheat.'/Ceneral and Mninistra tivd pat es_, paragraphs 'P and "B" are hereby bodifledito read as follows:
y g
1 "A.
Pendie.g the establishmen't of final overhead rates which shall be negotiaged based oil audit of actual costs, the contractor shall bc reimbarsed fd/ alleyable indirect costs bc<munder at the provisional rate of 83.5 percentiof direct costs excluding subcontracted items.
\\
g s i B.
Pending tne esthblishment of final fringe benefit rates which shahl be snegotiated based on audit of actual costs, the contractor shall
't be reimbursed for ahlowable indirect costs hereun(icr at the provisional rate of 40.48 percent of direct labor."
~
.g Article V - Ailowable Cost is hereby modified by adct'ng a [cwlpiragraph "C" 7.
to rea<1 as.fc110ws:
~
),(
s' sj 1j,
"C.
.CpmpurcqCost Q,
The con';ractor is hereby authorized to incur comp;ter cost in pertorn4nce of this requirement; not to exceed !)f00.00."
f Article X1' - Key _ Personnel is hereby modified to,rc$ as follows:
8.
\\
.t
" Pursuant to this ARflCl.E (Key Personr.1), Lld G11ouing indivi, duals ard 9,
,l considered to be essential to the successful byformance of tf e wrk I gf' i
l hereunder and shall not be replaced withou,t the prior approvey of the
}(
Contracting Officer.
In such event, the r.Wntractor agrees tif substitute persons possessing substantially equal abili?ies and quitifications 2
satisfactory to the Contracting Officer.'
)
1,
Dr. J. Glancy (Principal Investigator)
Dr. J J F.' k"mpey Dr. T. McDaniel Dr.
J., Stcddard
/-
As a result of this r.odificadion, total clintract obl @,Etions are indedased by1
$30,000. 00 from 5224,765. 00 to $254,765. J0.
i y
e t
i i
~m
", o
~
I
,/
4 l
r.
l i,' '
.I I
s t,
a t
'4
/
2 1
r f I pi 1
\\,
Y
,8
\\
f,
},
/
\\
)
L
~
r f
a G
-.r - K
-- - - -.... m.
.m
DI M M Cl:ANGE. !ttL1 A5LS
.l (1) Redesign abrupt material contro'l test structure to minimize costs associa with 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> detection, time specification, for Type A material, instead a
.s 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> specification, and rcorresponding change in other detection tim) specifications.
1.imit control team rotation by shift instead of weekly.
Costs to meet trickle loss requirements utilizing the SA1 combined approf i
shall be shown separately as shall any costs associated with work rule constraints and response requirements.
(2)
In addition to the change in the detection time speci' fica tion, redesign I
N abrupt material control test structure to minimize costs associated with eliminating the plantwide limit on control quantities, so that each cont s.
quantity may be a formula quantity.
,j 7
' - - -.Q)rjvaluate the effectiveness of the ability of the response procedures to
- hlf4, resolve alarms, and modify those procedures as appropriate to-givb a mir p-M cost system with the required effectiveness.
1 :(
t o
'f (4)
Replace mass balance forms of material' control test balances with separt c'ontrols -on yields and concentrations and determine cost savings that ri I
e' i
' (5) Add to the design associated with (2) abdve the cost of doing a materia e
balance for each' process line on a campaign basis.
This will replace t 4
- l ll other plantwide and trickle loss detection specification.
a-E (6)
Examine tradeoffs between detection and response to explore the possibt
)
of lowering costs.by performing 'some procedures only wh/n required ratl b-
~
1) than routinely.
J
?\\
i.
- \\;
p (7)
Explore impact of changes experienced in fuel processing steps'over th
,t Detenaine minimum cost for system design based,cn new data.
~
b' year.
f I
_