ML20058F290

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-282/93-12 & 50-306/93-12 on 930927-1115 & Notice of Violation
ML20058F290
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/1993
From: Wright G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Antony D
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20058F293 List:
References
GL-89-10, NUDOCS 9312080062
Download: ML20058F290 (2)


See also: IR 05000282/1993012

Text

!

,

o

UNITED STATES

gp aafcoq'o,,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

o

REGION lil

.?

}

S

oE

799 ROOSEVELT ROAD

4

o

- U

[

GLEN ELLYN. ILLINOIS 60137-5927

g' .v f

. ..*

DEC C

1993

Docket No. 50-282

Docket No. 50-306

Northern States Power Company

ATIN: Mr. D. D. Antony

Vice President, Nuclear

Generation

414 Nicollet Mall

Minneapolis, MN 55401

Dear Mr. Antony:

This letter refers to the Generic Letter 89-10 motor operated valve inspection

conducted by Ms. C. A. Gainty and others of this office on September 27 through

November 15, 1993. The inspection included a review of activities authorized for

your Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Station.

At the conclusion of the

inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff

identified in the enclosed report.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the

inspection. These areas consisted primarily of a review of the implementation

of the Prairie Island Motor Operated Valve Program established in response to

Generic Letter (GL) 89-10.

Within this area, the inspection consisted of a

selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to

be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of

Violation (Notice). You are required to respond to this letter and should follow

the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your response, you should document the specific actions taken and any -

additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response

to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of

future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action

is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

Considerable progress was noted in your GL 89-10 program; however, weaknesses

were identified in the areas of test control and technical evaluation (Sections

2.2.2, 2.3, and 2.4.2) .

Management attention in these areas is essential to

ensure program effectiveness.

Concerns were also 4dentified with your analysis to determine which MOVs were

considered susceptible to pressure locking. For example, your analysis concluded

that the sump B valves were not susceptible; however, we presented two scenarios

by which we feel pressure locking is possible.

This item is considered an

inspection followup item and is discussed in Section 2.7.2 of the enclosed

,

inspection report. You have indicated your intention to evaluate the scenarios

'

and take appropriate action.

I

nn -

93120B0062 931202

J

PDR

ADOCK 05000282

G

PDR

%bke-2E01

. .

.

-

.

.

.

.

.

l

!

DEC 2

1993

.

Northern States Power Company

2

[

You are requested to respond and address each of the inspection followup items

\\

identified within 60 days of your receipt of this inspection report. Include in

!

' -

your response: (1) the schedule and details for any planned corrective actions

!

regarding motor brakes, Limitorque's Part 21 report on elevated temperature

effects, and pressure locking; and (2) your assessment of the potential for

i

pressure locking for the MOVs identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this

letter, its enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the

NRC Public Document Room.

I

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject

to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

,

\\

Sincerely,

t

f I' '

C

/ G. C. Wright, Chief

!

Engineering Branch

!

Enclosures:

I.

Notice of Violation

j

2.

Inspection Reports

No. 50-282/93012(DRS);

No. 50-306/93012(DRS)

'

3. Prairie Island Gate and

Globe Valve Data

cc w/ enclosures:

E. L. Watzl, Site Manager,

Prairie Island Site

M. Wadley, Plant Manager

OC/LfDCB

Resident Inspector, RIII

Prairie Island

Resident Inspector, RIII

Monticello

John _W. Ferman, Ph.D.,

Nuclear Engineer, MPCA

State Liai~on Officer, MN

s

Prairie Island LPM, NRR

T. Scarbrough, NRR

,

P. Eapen, RI

F. Jape, RII

.!

T. Westerman, RIV

P. Narbut, RV

i

M. Holbrook, INEL.

-

. - .

- .

.

. .

.

.

__

.

. _ . , ,

b