ML20058E172

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/93-20 on 930916-24 & 931018-1104 & Forwards Notice of Violation
ML20058E172
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/23/1993
From: Ring M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Gipson D
DETROIT EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20058E175 List:
References
NUDOCS 9312060198
Download: ML20058E172 (2)


See also: IR 05000341/1993020

Text

. . _ .

_ _._

_ _

~

a

,

,-

.

.

November 23, 1993

Docket No. 50-341

)

The Detroit Edison Company

ATTN:

D. R. Gipson

i

Senior Vice President

'

Nuclear Generation

6400 North Dixie Highway.

'

Newport, MI 48166

Dear Mr. Gipson:

SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-341/93020(DRS))

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. K. Salehi

i

between September 16 - 24, 1993 at your fermi 2 Power Plant facility and

October 18 through November 4, 1993, at the Region III office.

This

inspection included a review of activities at your Fermi plant authorized by

NRC Operating License No. NPF-43. At the conclusion of the inspection, the

!

findings were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the

enclosed report.

'

i

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

activities.

The purpose of the inspection was to dett:rmine whether activities

authorized by the license were conducted safely and in accordance with NRC

'

requirements.

based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared

to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of

j

Violation (Notice).

The violations were issued for not complying with

procedural requirements and for inadequate corrective actions in response to

generated deviation reports (DER). The violations were of concern because

they highlighted an inadequate response to conditions adverse to quality and

several n;issed opportunities to take appropriate corrective actions.

Although 10 CFR 2.201 requires you to submit to this office, within 20 days of

your receipt of this Notice, a written statement of explanation, we note that

this violation had been corrected and those actions were reviewed during this

inspection. Therefore, no response with respect to this matter is required.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC

Public Document Room.

(lP()n

L,

93120fiO198 931 23

~1%

PDR

ADOCK 06000:1 t,1

%

Ii1

O

PDH

3

,

C bllC ~ l b b I

j

'

.

,_ _

_

_ _ _ . _ ~

-

_

_ _ _

_

_ . _ _ _ _.

- . _ ,

!

,-

l

a

.-

l

'

' The ' Detroit Edis - c.ompany

2

'

teovember 23, 1993

!

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

i

,

i

Sincerely,

original signed by B. Burgess

for

j

Mark A. Ring, Chief

Operations Branch

l

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report

i

No. 50-341/93020(DRS)

cc w/ enclosures:

l

John A. Tibai, Supervisor

'

of Compliance

P. A. Marquardt, Corporate

Legal Department

l

OC/LFDCB

{

Resident Inspector, RIII

i

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

'

liarry H Voight, Esq.

i

Michi,an Department of

.

Public Health

Monroe County Office of

J

Civil Preparedness

T. G. Lolburn, LPM, NRR

a

j

bec w/ enclosures:

PUBLIC - IE01

.

d

RIII

RIIg

RI@

RIlh

,

  1. '1

($

S

cg

B. Burgess

illips

F!rng '

'

ll/g)3

ll/p/93

11/2 3/93

11/; 93

i

-

-- -

.

-

-- -