ML20058D611

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Radiological Confirmatory Measurements Insp Repts 50-254/93-27 & 50-265/93-27 on 931025-29 & Notice of Violation
ML20058D611
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  
Issue date: 11/18/1993
From: Pederson C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Pleniewicz R
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20058D614 List:
References
NUDOCS 9312030228
Download: ML20058D611 (3)


See also: IR 05000254/1993027

Text

. .

.

_

._

.

.

..

.-_

'

, .

Q@

. .

.

,

,

.,

9

'

NOV 181993

!

!

Docket No. 50-254

Docket No. 50-265

t

Commonwealth Edison Company

!

ATTN: Mr. R. Pleniewicz, Site

Vice President

!

Quad Cities Nuclear

Power Station

i

1400 Opus Place, Suite 300

t

Downers Grove, IL 60515

Dear Mr. Pleniewicz:

.

3

SUBJECT:

RADIOLOGICAL CONFIRMATORY MEASUREMENTS INSPECTION AT QUAD CITIES

{

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. S. K' Orth of

i

.

this office on October 25 - 29, 1993. The inspection included a review of

authorized activities for your Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and

'

2.

At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with

those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

'I

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

-:

activities in progress.

In addition, our Mobile Laboratory was at the site

!

during the inspection to perform independent measurements of radioactivity.

I

Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities,

concerning the implementation _ of the radiological environmental monitoring

3

program (REMP), appeared to be in_ violation of NRC requirements, as specified _

'

in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). 'Although the NRC has the

'

. ability to exercise discretion in licensee identified violations in Section-

'

VII.B. of the " General Statement of Policy for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

i

(Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), this violation has been cited'

>

because of the extended duration of the violation and because your corrective

,

actions did not appear to address the root cause of the violation.

Certain

!

improvements have been noted in REMP oversight, but the extended duration for

which these activities remained unidentified by your staff indicated a lack of

station oversight in the program's administration.

Certain other of your activities, concerning the reporting of sample

collection deviations in the REMP, also appeared to be in violation ~of NRC

requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. This violation is of-

concern because it indicated a lack of openness with the Commission. The

information you reported to the Commission.in the 1991 and 1992 Annual

r

Radiological Environmental Operating Reports failed to properly describe the

deviations which had' occurred in your program and your corrective actions.

4

I

gg Ob

r

264 140

9312030228 931110

PDR

ADDCK 05000254

'

G

PDR

-

_

._

_

_ _ _

_

-

._

__ _

-

_

_

_ _.

__

,

'

i

.

.

i

NOV 1 8 1933

f

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

,

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

!

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this

i

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results o; future

t

'

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

!

The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

L

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL.96-511.

We will gladly discuss any auestions you have concerning this inspection.

(

Sincerely,

"Origind signed by CyntMa D. Pederson"

l

Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief

,

Reactor Support Programs Branch

Enclosures:

!

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Reports

i

>

No. 50-254/93027(DRSS);

!

No. 50-265/93027(DRSS)

<

>

cc w/ enclosures:

!

Mr. L. O. DelGeorge, Vice President

Nuclear Oversight & Regulatory Services

G. Campbell, Station Manager

A. Misak, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

'

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

i

Services Manager

(

OC/LFDCB

'

Resident Inspectors LaSalle

,

Dresden, Quad Cities

Richard Hubbard

v

J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public

l

,

Utilities Division

!

Licensing Project Manager, NRR

!

Robert Newmann, Office of Public

Counsel

!

State Liaison Officer

l

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

Commission

ir()

l

bec:

PUBLIC

(see previous page for concurrences)

RIII

RIII

RIII

RI

i

Orth /jp

McCormick-Barger

Hiland

P egn

1

. . .

.-

-

. - , .-

.-. ..

.

.

...

1

.-

-

.

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

,

!

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

!

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your resporise to this

!

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future

,

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is-

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

I

i

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Poom.

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

i

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

.

,

!

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

!

Sincerely,

.:

!

Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief

'

Reactor Support Programs Branch

-

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Reports

-!

'

No. 50-254/93027(DRSS);

!

'

No. 50-265/93027(DRSS)

!

cc w/ enclosures:

R. Pleniewicz, Site Vice President

l

G. Campbell, Station Manager

i

A. Misak, Regulatory Assurance

l

Supervisor

l

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

2

Services Manager

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspectors LaSalle

Dresden, Quad Cities

,

Richard Hubbard

i

J. L McCaffrey, Chief, Public

j

Utilities Division

'

Licensing Project Manager, NRR

Robert Newmann, Office of Public

,

Counsel

State Liaison Officer

l

p,. p. # p A

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

1

qdg

,

Commission

g

bec:

PUBLIC

Ye3

RIII

Rill

RIII

RH

yD

%

QMW

Orth /jp

ficCormick-Barger

Hiland

ecson

'W' b '

t!laQp

NlIfl0

HlylYff3

y-

. .

.

.