ML20058C003
| ML20058C003 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/17/1993 |
| From: | SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058B949 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9312020312 | |
| Download: ML20058C003 (7) | |
Text
-
I i
t b
t t
ENCLOSURE 6
l JOSPEII M. FARLEY UNIT 2 CYCLE 10 RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT f
P f
h I
i 6
9312O20312 931117 DR ADOCK 05000364 PDR wa
I TABLE 1 RADIAL PEAKING FACiOR LIMIT REPORT c
' Itis Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.1.11 of the Joseph M. Farley Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specified core planes for Cycle 10 shall be:
I i
For VANTAGE 5 fuel:
1.
F,y less than or equal to 2.52 for all core planes containing Bank *D' control rods.
l RR 2.
For all unrodded core planes:
RR F,y less than or equal to 1.87.
i P
For Low-Parasitic (LOPAR) fuel:
1.
F,y less than or equal to 2.37 for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods.
RR i
2.
For all unrodded core planes:
F,y less than or equal to 1.75.
~
+
t t
t I
i i
A-1 w ow.m nm l
i
TABLE 1 (cont.)
RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT
'Ilese Fxy(z) limits are used to confirm that the heat flux bot channel factor Fq(z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:
VANTAGE 5 fuel:
Fq(z) 5
[ 2 45 ][K(z)] for P > 0.5 and, P
Fq(z) s 4.90 [K(z)] for P s 0.5 1
Iww-Parasitic (LOPAR) fuel:
Fq(z) 5
[ 2_3_2][K(z)] for P > 0.5 and, P
I 55 0
Fq(z) s 4.64 [K(z)] for P i
assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of Control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial renon and power distributions as described in the
- Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures,"
WCAP-8385, September,1974. Therefore, these Fxy limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met and the ECCS acceptance criterien limit of 2200*F for peak clad i
temperature is not exceeded.
t a
A-2 w ow.m um
FIGURE 1 VANTAGE 5 M AXIMUM (FOT x Pret) VERSUS CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 6
l f f i
3 4
1 4 !
i i
i
'N Q
f i
4 4
+
2*4 A
A A A A:A A
i m,%
A a
.I a
d
'd 8
usu
{
i u
A I
t A'
~ ' M_
& A a
i i
2*3 RA w
A e
A i
A A
i R
)
e "iA I
A a
2.2 i
A.
l 6
s
'b 2.1 l
i t
2.0 i
i
+
_j J
t E1.9 cu l
l t
g 1*8 e
p I
!A 8
i L
i s 1.7 o
3.E.
i a
i e
s E
i i
e s
pq l. g et w
2 i
3 i
(
6 1.5
- i e
i e
a a
9 1.4 5
4 4
i 4
I h
b I
y g
s s
{
e a
t 1.3 s
se FXY LIMIT = 1.87 1.2 4
1 i
9 9
1.1
,i h
I g
i E
1~0 0 2
4 6
8 10 12 COREHEIGHT(FEET)
A-3
FIGURE 2 LOPAR M AXIMUM (FQT x Prel) VERSUS CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 2.5 i
i i 4
i i
e i i
i 2.4 i
t t
i i i Nm 2*3
' %i
1 f
t 1
i A
A'm l
T T
i i j
+
+
. i e
%u T
lT 1
1+
i i
+
x.
+
m T
4 i
t+
+
+
+
A A
+
8 f
+
...+
+
e v
T
}
2*1 r+
T i
e
}
e {
i j
v:
T.
+
i i
i e
+
i 2.0 i
+
J E1.9 i.
ou 8
6 f
f i
i pg 1.8 s--
+
a O
I e
e i
k t
l l
s 1.7 a
0 3
i t
i i
X l*b
=t t
t i
e i
i 2
i e
i i
1.5 i
f i
e 1.4 l
i i
i i
i f
i e
e 1
1*3 e
i
)
e a
j
}
e i
i i
I g i!FXY I.lWIT = 1.75 1.2 l
l 4
t 4
1.1 I
O 2
4 6
8 10 12 1'0 COREHEIGHT(FEET)
A-4 1
FIGURE 3 VANTAGE 5 ARO Fxy VERSUS CORE HEIGHT 3.1 V5 WAX ALL0 FABLE 3.0 l
FXY LIMIT o
2.9 BEST ESTIMATE I
I 2.8 I
I 2.7 I
I 2,6 I
I
+
I 2.5 I
I I
I 2.4 l
l I
3
>.2.3 f
+
1 I
22 o
s 5
I I
2.1
+
+
+
2.0
++*
1 I
+++.
..+ ++++
+
r I*++
1.8 i
1 I
1.7 3
I i
1.6 i
~ "
o o D "
i o
I 1.5 a
u u
o l
l 1.4 I
i 1.3 O 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 COREHEIGHT(FEET)
Nota: Best Estemste values bound both the LOPAR and VANTAGE 5 A-5
FIGURE 4 LOPAR ARO Fxy VERSUS CORE HEIGHT l
3.1 LOPAR WAX ALL0 FABLE l
3.0 1
I FXY LIMIT i
I 2.9 a
BEST ESilWATE 3
i 2.8 I
I 2.7 I
I 2.6 I
I 2.5 i
l i
I I
2.4 i
I I
I I
2.3 s
f I
I 2.2 e
8 a:
- 2.1 I
I 2.0 I
i
+
>+ +-
i 1.9 l ++
++
,#+
i
+ +
+
L
,++4
++ ++++ +
+
1 1.8 1 2
+I 4
+
+ ++ 8 1+.
1.7 I
i I
1.6 I
o a o D a
a e
o "
I 1.5 y
o,
n r
a I
1.4 I
i 1.3 0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 COREHEIGHT(FEET)
Note: Best Estimate values bound both the LOPAR and VANTAGE 5 A -S t