ML20058B779
| ML20058B779 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Indian Point |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1982 |
| From: | Terc N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Crocker H, Galen Smith, Wojnas E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058A345 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-236 NUDOCS 8207260144 | |
| Download: ML20058B779 (18) | |
Text
..
o ;
/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
- Y h
sullllav%~ue k'n'er/
g j/
.una or mussia, nunsvi. vama is.o.
g o
v Docket No. 50-286 2 3 FEB 198?-
'stribution MEMORANDUM FOR:
i FROM:
Nemen M. Terc, Exercise Team Leader
SUBJECT:
INDIAN POINT 3 EXERCISE The Indian Point 3 exercise is scheduled for March 3,1982. I have made lodging arrangements for team members at the Howard Johnson Motor Lodge on SR 59, just northwest of NY Thruway Exit 14. Spring Valley, New York, (914) 623-3838, starting on the night of March 1,1982. The motel rate is
$29.00 per night.
If other arrangements are made by team members, be sura to cancel the above. A schedule of activities is enclosed. Please check with me upon your arrival. Work assignments and scenarios wil,.1 be distributed at the NRC observers pre-exercise meeting on. March Z,1982.
I am enclosing a map of the motel / site and a team roster.
..~r-g Team members are expectN to be free to return home'after the NRC critique, on Thursday March 41982 p
n
,[
N/
4' Nemen M. Terc.
Exercise Team Leader
Enclosures:
A,s Stated Distribution:
G. H. Smith, DEPOS, RI H. W. Crocker, EP&PSB, RI E. J. Wojnas, RI M. T. Mojta, RI I
T. J. Kenny, NRC Residqnt Inspector l
K. Abraham, PA0 l
D. Matthews, DEP.HQ G. T. Lonergan, Battelle P. A. Bolton, Battelle S. C. Hawley, Battelle.
cc (w/o encis):
G. L. Snyder EP&PSB, RI R. J. Bores, EP&PSB, RI B. K. Grimes DEP:HQ S. Schwartz, DEP:HQ
~
l j
- 3
.J Ale 2.
I G207260144 820617 PDR FOIA l
SHOLLY82-236 PDR u-
n----
l TEAM ROSTER (IP-3 ;IXERCISE)
Nemen M. Terc. Team Leader, RI s
W dward.J. Wojnas, RI
~
/ Maria T. Mojta, RI.
/ Karl Abraham, PA0
[ Thomas Kenny, NRC Resident Inspector T
F o/*y;rA NRC Resident Inspector J / Pet- *
"M.
( Walter H. Baunack, RI Dave Matthews, DEP:HQ
[ G. T. Lonergan, Battelle P. A. Bolton, Batta11e
/ S. C. Hawley, Battelle e
..m
I
~
._.-_. L
~
INDIAN POINT 3 EXERCISE SCHEDULE (March 2-6, 19821 Observer's Meeting Auditorium at the IP-2 Simulator B1dg.
What:
9:00 a.m., March 2,1982 (Tuesday 1 Where:
When:
Who will attend:
All NRC Observers Security Briefing (Film).
Auditorium at the IP-2 Simulator Bldg.
What:
1:00 p.m., March 2,1982 (Tuesday)
Where:
Wojnas Majta. Lonergan, Bolton, Hawley, Smith When:
Who will attend:
Media Briefing (FEMAl What:
Verplanch Fire Reuse 1<00 p.m., Marcit Z,1982 (Tuesday 1 Where:
When:
Who will attend:
Terc Site Tour Meet in same Auditorium What:
3:00 p.m., March 2,1982 (Tuesday 1 Where:
When:
All NRC Observers Who will attend:
[
Pre-Exercise NRC Observer's Meeting IP-3 Conference Room (3rd Floor))
What:
About 4:30 p.m. (after Site Tour Where:
When:
All NRC Observers Who will attend:
Emergency Exercise Various locations as assigned 00 a.m. - Ending about 5:00 What:
Where:
Start at 7:
When:
All NRC Observers Who will attend:
Post Exercise NRC Observer's Meeting Howard Johnson Motor Lodge (Team Leader Room)
What:
8:30 p.m., March 3,1982 (Wednesday)
Where:
When:
All NRC Observers Who will attend:
Licensee's Observers Critique Auditorium at the IP-2 Simulator Bldg.
What:
9:30 a.m., March 4,1982 (Thursday)
Where:
When:
All Exercise Observers Who will attend:
./
m
Z f
What:
NRC/ Licensee Observer Crttique Where:
Auditorium at the IP-2 Simulator B1dg.-
I When:
About 11:30 a.m., March 4,1932 (Thursday)
Who will attend:
All NRC Observers What:
NRC Critique and Exit Meeting Where:
Auditorium at the IP-2 Simulator Bldg.
When:
About 12:00 p.m.. March 4,1982 (Thurs' day)
Who will attend:
All NRC Observers and Licensee Management Staff FEMA /NRC Pubite Meeting What:
~
To be announced N M 4 w. h f-^ b Where:
When:
10:00 a.m., March 6.1932. (Saturday)
Who will attend:
Terc, Smith D
9 6
u
~s._+}( _
_ _ i. ':....,,, -.
...~ e ygggggg -- -,s V--;-
m y
. h.,
- C '.
".i fa-gg won x
=
....l
' c ~~..
~
rs r, "+-. {;s
- ~ * * '
- a a, !
- f. :.
s.
a.,.i.,_ :,.
) wie a ys, m.
, A'
,-- j '
p
,e.*** g -
~
- g:- ; pe '
s
- ~
' me amaa
,a.
.w
.j-m v
N
'- [ {, '
C CNT
~
=... '.... [, '
h *3 pn L A N O T
7 l
/
~-
u i
\\
.M-
- o=*
g-n 9
,2
.m;
- g.,. <
.i 23.
e.
./
j F
...f,p*-a-
. ~.
s.
~
~
" n o.s w-W E
~'
T s-l
- \\
-Q
.s
- 1. r'=~ d -
y.-= }
. ~* h:;- - '. :
...1
. %,/
_l 1
.a
=
[j
$, l,'
0 T
R **
A g
j l
g.
feverst se
-- /-
is j,. -
y,
.y it-
'.b - n m.r w. :_
sisen.
- ' n./,
N K
W
]
.e.
, n..3, s
a r~\\*~.
c-
? -
d
~
O*.'*
- h s -
~
- n.
-N
".""e*a% - c,,, e 7'
- s
%~
y u
u.v. g
,i,,ll,
f.r
~~' ) u
~
f, c
, a,. s
,r a
w J,.C1
+
t.
X %,, o, g
W C
Kfl_ L A /,-
.D 4*
-a k./ ' w L
- 1_-W'= a=
Gs:i=ag e
';s =.
- ~
t. c.
h t '~*'a'*jS ~ &(
,j
' g.. p a
e h.}
,1 l r!
~,
p y
,f;'g,e M
.:e 1
i s
+-
1 c-y, ',',
. < '! \\
jy
=- ; i
=- -
y.
. ',.., [
n===
1 m' 7
ce p4M m,
g,.
u
=
(
.m,. s c o... ih
'a P.. '"'.,
- 4..
r i
f,,,.
l..
4 Q
l',
.v pt-. ;,
~
.c
- " T:': *uns 3
,, ; ',={.
,,l ja,W,. '1. b, -
~
ng.,
.. W. e. e p.m,,,
.N
.J\\g
.1..,
g
- % g
,w,,,,., 5P
== P
_.,; y l
but
- f-P g m,}/
y
_ 4 n.r i
a g,,
a,
.a~ j + 7 'E :
9 z
-3
<-,*a-.e
't=
f
'La*.h f
'v.
a M 1,."..
u
~ mb;r -
- i. \\
h'-u
'~*
- , r,we 3
l sr /.
~
en.
~,.
a
.[t l n n a e,
~ ~,
p la
%=a 4~,
~
. :+
t
}m I.
~
a o s=*
=
s
/
- _s 44, '.,
..% ' 3, Il*'
c- -
M.ryurst.,1""_"."-,
^ ',..
e.-
.g
.,o g
x v
g 2:
I.
/
1
.N
, -(
My a e,.
c e ;-
. I,
\\
\\
s ;,, -
n
. ',h+.
-> *..ter=9,s'5.; O 2 7; M #
- 3,. <,. k, E N >
7 y
3m
,h
- ~ Jr L
- ==='
4 hh; t Je.d;'
r mL
- m %'
> a,,,
sur 6-==
i
' =
l----
o,,,,:. -
J 1
__ hve
'9' "g*
'e i
s g
f
__ f,,. ~.
2 Q_
- ~
'h' w
,,X
/
r-se
,e
~.
m u
yo a
.c
':' L:rsese O, .
l,-
s,'=#*=*
s Q _ h '[
M W
f.
.,:"2 *
'*, (*C' g
, g y
l<
m
,p h
---. :q_.
},,,.
t y
I
"[
l '. -~~ Y,'
[ 4, h,
L+)i r.a s
e
~.....
r y,!..-
L sA~N-l 5
- '.,- ?.,f t.* k
.s.-
s f.h.?.$g W k.
k.'
j
%r u
c x
.;* mJ.L.@ Moapt... A
%.. d.'
- i pjynd.
- s. /A hA-3/"
'~
/zn v4/A d
es q&Ad 3doo N A/d $
S e ud.4 x4 =
s twy
? G& W
,4eb L eso
.5 c xu Q-&
Z._.
~~
3
$<W n'.(2 l
, &M /O M /h$4:
/"Apndda w sc.aer 9u a-7r'af'k A-f A.a. w t
.1
' 6N /V p
[.P6v 2 sQg iTV S 9
,,2.? 2.TE
.1 - f f 7-T
.:z - y
/
%" B1 A~W.
/8-2 C&
@.x/M,/-e5 L,e-~ W~L./, n ay %.
(Ern// b ~n.4"4 )
Alo3 E.R @ ~...&f.. N f... a & (2-sal).
d.llM.d.dlUt C8.l. dl.*:l'il'85's.'A*.!
- Nifik'Ndk. 6 ',
F.ta!I [Ahjhfib hbil:5}i flI. 8 l,f,#d:i-l 'dh3 fi h(h h-lhik.,
Js EXillDIT 4 1
l (fl9ure1) i ROAD TRAFFIC CAPACITIES
!.k,,
c...
I !:'.I.';
i.-
l 6000 -
m
- 1
\\y 2
I '.':.,
4a 5400 i-1 4800 OC I
l U) 4200 l
m a
90 U 3600 4
, !.. 3 at
+
m o
i'.!
3000 L) 3 lNArt, SAFETY COtlNCI l.... -
.s
~
0 5280 V O
2400 o,TI1 R = -(nV + 11L
.:;.I
._1 u.
L = VEHICLE LENGTH ( = 16 FT.)
1 i
u.
1800
$ 1, * !
O n = SEPARATION DISTANCE (VEHICLE LENGTH PERfPH)
$),!,ij,,
W 1200 g
').Jcl'f'3 l
4
/o
} ip,,
E 600 l
- H.....,
l
. '.) !
l E
O 1
i i,[ '.,.:
l 0
10 20 30 40 50 60
.c,....
' 1.
,1.
VEHICLE SPEED, V(mph) l
.I.
~
5 a g.s
- a
- -q y1, L/.,
...a 5..:
t w
a.-~
El 1 S
.=
c., y I
\\
. c -+.
t :r~.2 &
.%:::-',. W y.
F=-
~.-
p~- ~.= s.;:
~
r" /.m' b
.t
.- J s.
i; r.--. -
4~
.:3p..:-i,..
?. '-- 0 3 t
.~
c~ - -
,1 l
{
,,,a t
a u,,.
u.
,,',/ *;. sj f"
. ~... ~
x "-.
". ~.,C~.p ~'T y 4
.e g
c-
~
=:.-.,.,-
. l..~7 ~ :,.r,.
. 7-.
n,.
t~
~
,a,-
-i jy ',
- Crest
,/..
l
~~
s,ll
..* gg m
, d y,., p
- [
,c,,,,g f *,,,,
,, ' 8 f
unoco I y
,[ *""" *"* *'*. Q, _
. 5 a **i
'}
.;TdG'A n () - ;;-
j
..*g? ;.:, i y.,
- /.
(~
j t~"
=
\\ W t'-
~
~
),
,- L' :. '.' *i;i.~,/,
- ~
%,r i.
4._ c :. ; : ;,
,,,., " j y
. rp
. uw a #,.
"~
s,
- r. ~~ ~
s~--
." -[.,, * " '.*. O",
.I"'N. A m.sA f
- s'."e 1
4 ~
I
'S
- 'F"*'*.'
,,,,,, f ju y..
n.~
.a=.
N
,-~6
~.
.l.R;, c.;,.
'a y,
c.
. =.
"T-*
.u 3
,', t.?**w~w.t
\\ /4 M'
.n c,
b.
bry I
8
, I.
g
)
C M3xn1
. l' " ~. Warz
.i
/
,,,,,=,..a.a-4,,,'l:, -
+ * " " '.
Ce -
'u.. i a 8
.n j
W e.e lNisTON M.. '. '
n
+ * * *
.. m.
.e..,.
u
~, ;
v e
~
- 7.. y.,
A.--l.;~_.
...- /,.0..,..' V7_,_g -- n V s+ iW i,_
vi n
4
..,,/
- -. 's. a.*
~
c.
g~.<
se,4*. '
- sia ~.~.~"/s.
t t
S'a '
- =
"y..
.ef"'
' n,,,
g,-
wi,;M". /
g,,
Re'NE " "'rM *
'"7 9. "2 *'n 7
a
%,,M'"
.f.t-, ve 1
2.3d.
f,"%[ g
~3 n
- 7.,b i
5 4
v...,~.
f.
S.,'-
J.
a
" ip==
~~../,. q,.
,3::.
- g,,,.
- K
.it s2 5
.~
, c',,. g::::::.
< v c;1
,. g,f.:: f,:::.:, g., ' 4:;r." y:8P
~'
w g.,
.c
- F,,,,.',""4"g ". 3. <"
,, -,,. 'r.",,,,
t,
- n
.M j'r/, ) 4, 7.:.:.::,
9 _w:::"",
n,..
<,*~.,,y s.
v ano u
e*
7..n wa %s.,,. ;l" und
~
o
--r n
J'
.e e u..
ah,,.
.m i
~aa.{
i~
.h;
,"E.
s
.m
~'~
N M_ h c_
V.,
v m
o
,,, w/
- r,.,. c
,{k
.y g,,.'
i'. -
e,T, ..
s
' L l O, (u,, ~~,.
s ="~T - -
5--p - E"~,.,i,.. h(,.- $r
,, "?
A un,, n
't j;fE' M. Q ' g q./, [ [if'Wi,g.~ 7"" 'M.,a
,[ i-h B5
. '-*i.,.
"~;3 d
,,,,,- u.:::[ <,- -
._4,
+
r.
y
(
s.-
i 0
, n :m ',
m.,
=-a.e a g u-t.l,,
r, saw, J t
t o,,,.-
gr.
,.a.,
~
ried
. ~
l
.. n
. = =.
Onwaix s
'.j?,Ty,,
. E,t '
a.
/
i
)
o o
., wy n O
- STAMFORD w.~
', g.. Ql,,,
a:
C t v
. wtCn 2
- M
~
=
.4 s'
pnc.to.
,w a n,,n,,
maac its ggg g r
arts n
g
M.*/
d, (astmgs-j It O i f ',;
sc id R10GL j
us.ect n
[l Osment g
y g.
. EN ROCHELLE 0.
T l
<*=it i
M
,g,,,;
- g. TERS h PORT COVEq,c.a fat Nestisdse,,,,,,,,,
= =,..
. es.tne CLEM e
+-
o 2._
,,. Comsact
, d,*g 4 k'#
~ nt
. wasHtNGTON ('T
- i. '
f.! ONt lt s
),{
g.
<["
j..u '^. h j
l etts E t
- u. erg p,, g.
mm f..tycs.
c t.
',,g Madis.. 6-(EWA
'j
' f"""'""'
5 5. [
, n 'C,
"* ;. j r.
p N
2
+
_a
' ~ -
e
~.
W atctiue g' gg}y 0 3
- .r, C.[....,c..,ntto
~ f, 7., it.J
-.,1 I
12 l
13 14 e
- l, x. g,,'j4
- .~...
g*,;, -*
j k.. M. '"rTrisn J;
s o,.,~
J 4:
,' 7.r.;.g,,. 'T.A.'.:.::.' ~',, ),,./..e ' !:;;%,
1 F ',
~,,a, :;,
,...,,,,
- s.,,5(,
l
. ", @,A,'..M 7.<*'7 ',**.~,:',',*2",'"""..~
h,,. rg '..'d<l 3
.t c--.~.-
w-r l,,G '.'
. d3 i
~
.o
- n
- e
.u -
ae t
y,,,.
("-
co--=*
Q d'*-
- ' *I*a
- r nir".a e an.,
o.'
l
- =s' 9a f
c-
.3
'*5 c, a.
,, e 'e 03,,
e.
n.
.Ie,.
..c,t m
... -- n
-e
,,,s,.
~, - r*
,, s!
s r
v.
A';.::~j,,,,,,, /, t.L. c..
,p,;,,
aq. e :.-,
~
.'n
=;;,.
,g, T/ ', 6,,, 7.,i f.
T
.A
> v ::
A,*,", s.m-jg, arnagte s
a.
Grut a
a.
.. c.
a':.7 " M 4,-
,1
,/
(
=
,. rT'3"
.r*-
.e o---
5 tt y? ', ' <-~= ;,,;,,,f,,.., W. 2:::: >
~ * ' - ~ '
~*
' f.'e
.. j;~'-* *
,g
/
a,,
- ,,;- +J
- ;
N
~
- d(T
. ;7,i; ~m u
maa-~~
ar::d e-r.. *.'
i a
g
,, :r 6,, r
. ~,_,
s s
,,8 %.
~
v e,.~.c.g.,.,
y d
t
,\\
~ < ~ ~.
,, cr~
'" M.:".,..
ad-4. Q.m
- MME e'
~ " * ~. ' * -.
"r" 2,,; f ;,'
',,7*' $ ".'", ~
8
- a
- 6 ON
.f c.
- 12,~,,,,,;/ -: Q :~.
>S J
- -f~,,,
1
-.t
' '. ' =
T-'
.-8 A=;--
'.,;3f;$..,,,,,7,. :,'w%., e.,,.. i,al,
. '-- LT cars =
't y,
4 reu 4
s' pi
^
- a
- i
=
w.
~%-
i
.h.ur o
u' e
p,,u/
- * * * ', * * ",,,, $.!NCSTON y,s
/
=
.nurier a
g I
?~~p,
=
.r4 y
,,,, * : u ew, m-t l
l
'~5.lT' b.. _. - :,,,,[,,,}.- d
$t
.e "
. e.
s' c
-d.
~
x
,s' A
g g r.-.,_,
~
t'ib
".'c'**i
.s
- n ***
, &s
' h"'1 r
u..- -
.a f*,,."
g
. r"artr 9.."
%oo,,'-
- =****
.~ n 4 u
~.J,',,,,,,..\\g '.f
,,.".'-,""""S jp'.m T,,,,,, C'[a'it'a l's='*%
r i
r
~~
y.o,, s.,ca j.
' a tm.bi,'sa...H ry= * **
I cHFEPSif J.6 g
agd n
h,.",.,",*y,'a sa.
e J Ai gton eg e
A D.es,
- ag =.
,2ll:".
8 --
K
- l* *. [< ~.
k,,g,,,~y. " r: c
,,j,-
nai 4
- 7*A
..e
{'
=-s*
v.-
-T"
'""*"*v' c.,,,
g=-
- - ~. ' -
. ' ' ' ' f(
-u
-';r r,' "
.c.
n
'ri e
8 a
.g m
1
. q 3
%-* *.a New
'n~~~,
k "aw
~,
w P.n:..(c:w.
- e s
.f wiua,,..,,.
,, p v.: s '
s
,, a;-
s, ex,.,
,,. g,na..
lW.
]
.<4.b:::y~.
~,-
. uT-4 5
4 p
- i, c;; -
0"'*l' %,,,""*"" >M 'O; b a;aje
,D
.,9,,,', tI ". 7 I
n ""
,e..
, c :.', C -
4 c.,'."'
. N.j
~
- =.
,s 6
iaii...
g,,,,,,,.
9 "
T, q. Y.
. ', ',,,S e
-(
A A BUE,
==r*
. u*s 1
l,,,;.y;g,,,.
" i g., ".49 - hg,,.
W" ' : T., ya
$F i.
~
l y. p.
c
,. p.,,
6 ;p
. m
... ~
,,,.. hse.,-,oj n.m p
un1 vs..
w-a.
.I
^5.'.i Y ~ [,.$ o,
'::-f -
dia.M a n
.k.< " 'T:::h e
i v.
,:,., c m,,,
.e
., ~
,a s -
en
.c e
.. p.
w
,,, f..c
+,d2 >'.. --
2",.,
~
,,. wtu
, E
. 'I
. swotiurt j '*'8
.-==s-f.,.is. P.rt m
Oss I ORT, h [,,,'rini
"'***ht a
- '"m,.
=,
Dab'"./ fMORWALK F, )
h)t,,w..
' g,..
a g
s g5 4M N = o @*y
.O, et.f,.,<.. g ",,, p.'.'
'artsi 8==a==
oSTAMFORD
,.y.
a
- ,,,s
, -GREENWICn a
M n,.t n
Waaaqu j
,,s j l
n loumia UI dastinck ort enester g-gg
...a.
, ' i 38'O RfDGE'
(
i' 387'58 s.a.=* a=*
l a Ja*'
=
a TERSO I
}{
y
.}.
,u.
s tow =
- a eure.
. tavltle a
o CLEN at Nestlagtse,,,,,
m e-PORT COVE 3c, -
... can,mut e
6,,
Parsipp 2(T"' g.
"I) s WASHINGTON i
y ;,
w,,,
s
.,, p1
.t w..
u.ama n z,.y
.V '
' ~
Y..
...' y4NGSTO N k
L HlCKSVL LE
,]
u,6.. efjEWARL,.
oin r
l RK 'CI,T.. ' J.,.
', ' b "' " -
3 ER i
N
,. weive
,9 t
i I.")BETHer:.n. ",v, u
,~.
N,
_ocw tt ts ~
g
,., g g ',I cmq In s
/
pr"8 -
... n,..t
,.. ~,..,.w 12 13 14
Pfy"/
iw,,
,;,c ur.r 3y
' /Q.1M 1 - 4',-/s e.S sm e ~/h (~ /,/nkA n f,r) 7
- 2. - +' d~a.s B c:<-r (<yyen k pr 4)
S/d871 4*PdN')~f (fee,rn Mel'4C C/v4 /A / S//Al, d.C 10- <~ rf / sw c,nc1) e feso c.w n;>.er a.r xin nwc.
,,e nor su -c.cs.
c r s r+,wti.c, an.s r wa u ef9-nea0 (m a u.a cJas,y c.an, a srr.eeto) 0 b'.d5 f s?fri [R/d'sTJ c/Cd //' f'c(t u /* nr 2 Er*rf/T
$ TrW.9c s esJ.28 L AaAP diiloC4-J civ 7/>CZ 7 g.#c;s'sq 77.
s$ dA"ATUs/l b
~
A Od d}'/c V/'/%D
/3
.m c r7 M ps x 7;#"7 M
s
- Kd y3 70 4* r.9 c. Piss /I.-
l L
ft?d'AdisT/SMM.f 0 a./'t D eq s f x c4 f (d/fdlQ, 1-(
J..f*Mvf S i f g AQ d /*c h it.0,Ce~.e A d / d l
.~
I
CPdA)f7E /& {14's*7.?UJ*fA) A 4'iw.45't (pcri
.fa v,ec.m.e. w ori 5
- Si96 AT, fA"CDf TAAf.+s!*~o A e rat. pg7,y,,4;7,,y
(
pn (o r.ce.ez e -w.rs.c.csw +&runwwiv<ae) p 7kt id iA
)sec 77P97A* ifx/o c.ciq^94 J' sw.in? rCf PCd l'2Eh
~
'fY
( $/ dads, WS- /'Ac)*rf7*y g g,:,4g icx n ra o, OAC-fl +,vJ Ad% /s/ 7.sc drS v2.+;7rxt - 7 ysc y pitys L/7.74E.7s oc tu t74 Ar/foJ:-
\\-
O AlLc Cd-77rrl c CW7.(~AJ /i'get A pc y oD+ c cnt=c se7) M Tah[.Y W.C 2 t?'7L( 70 9s U 174 JJfAt 77 fYf
,h $0 CES
$a v 59.CiC jQjs7 i/KELy ~.f4WJ. p, J/N*dD U/LL ogof g
1-1 1
l
. s.,
otSF NUREG-A6 W
~
EMERGENCY CLASSES l
PREDETERMINED i
CONDITIONS (ACTION LEVELS)
ClliSSIFICATIONS (SCOPING)
NOTIFICATIONS
~
IMMEDIATE ACTIONS i
I (CORRECTIVE, ASSESSMENT, PROTECTIVE)
O
- l c(5d&
NUREG.QS W EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SCHEME OFFSITE LICENSEE AGENCY CLASS ACTION ACTION NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT NOTIFY AWARENESS ALERT MOBILIZE STANDBY RES0URCES JWEA SITE, EMERGENCY FULL MOBILIZE AND MOBILIZATION INFORM PUBLIC GENERAL EMERGENCY FULL RECOMMEND MOBILIZATION PREDETERMINED PROTECTIVE ACTIONS 0FFSITE
\\
1
c= o.-
.e-
+ 62.. 6 a
7.. co. 6 ei.
6
.\\..
Epg prJNu#L
~
NUCLEAR
RESPONSE
INCIDENT P L ANNING
RESPONSE
i 2
]
EMERGENCY PROTECTION RESTORATION j
2 Preliminary evalu-Develop emergency response 2 atton of incident l
P an
[ end projected doses E",$8",$$" ' j Tleid monitoring and continuing evaluation g
and test plan of exposure pathways, population at risk, dose projections. PAGs. and protective actions iN Activate State A 86 M/I I
/
Protective action decision
~..-
[ie eNi#
Protective Action Restorative
~
j g
p plan initiated implemented Action h
U l
I Notify State 1
Decision to Acceptance authorttles Radiation l
prepare emer-or returns to guide levels gency response plan 3
.i.DT@l
(
Projected Dose Time
~
Hotification time 1
Response time l!
Implementation time
'g [,Q (4 PE73'Oru/d Time before population exposure fje77,,,y 44yp a (Ideally protective actions would be implemented during this time.)
.i Possible accumulation of projected dose before initiation of protective action Partial accumulation and partial avoidance of projected dose Time in which projected dose is avoided by protective action Partial accumulation of projected dose during restoration FIGURE 1.1 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR RESPONSE Pt.AfHilHG AHD RESPONDING TO HUCLEAR INCIDENTS l
/
Population Density vs. Evacuation Time 36 0 52 0 Q17 34 OEVENT 10,000 NUMBER 6
0 42 Oli N
38 e
35 0 en 1,000 05 g
18 0 33 m
I 0 39
~
~
k E
0 47 c
1 m
m c
.9
~
%3 1
On o
100 a
ne 0 28 0 53 10 1
10 100 Time required to evacuate affected area (hours)
REF: Evacuation Risks-An Evaluation EPA-520/6-74-002
March 8, 1982 f
INDIAN POINT Type of System Sirens Equipment Ordered April - June 1981 Equipment on Hand 100%
(
Installation 8egan June 1981 Installation Complete January 31,1982 Fraction of System Installed 100%
System Test Method Individual sirens tested by radio transmission during l
installation Present Status 100% of sirens tested by 2/27/82.
Expect deficiencies to be corrected by 6/1/82.
Deficiencies:
Orange County Weak radio signal at 2 s'irens.
Need repeater.
1 Putnam County Telephone line needed repair.
West Chester County Two strens had electrical problems (.1 siren to be tested.)
Rockland County Some minor problems including a weak radio signal at siren.
3k
I, OSURE NO. 1 March 8,1982 INFORMATION SHEET _
(Facilities Expected to Miss February 1,1082 Date)
Subject:
Prompt Public Alert and Notification Systems A.
Background
1.
Facility:
Indian Point 1, 2 & 3 2.
Size:
Unit 2: 873 MWe; Unit 3:
965 MWc a
3.
EPZ Sita 10 mile radius B.
Alert System Data and Current Status 1.
Type of alert system:
Fixed sirens.
l 2.
Dates design study initiated and completed: Prior to January 1981.
1 3.
Date equipment ordered:
April 1981 through June 1981.
4.
Amount of equipment on hand:
100. percent.
5.
Date installation of equipment began: June 1981.
l
~
January 31, 1982 6.
Date installation of equipment completed:
(Radio encoder installation in Rockland County was last iteml 7.
Fraction of system installed:
100 percent.
8.
Date of initial alerting system test: Individual sirens activated from radio transmitter during installation.
Four remain to be tested.
9.
Results of initial alerting system test and scheduling for fixing deficiencies: Orange County: 2 weak signal: have to install repeater.
Putnam County:
telephone lines from activation line to remote control unit was disconnected.
- CONTINUED AT BOTTOM OF PAGE.
- 10. Date of alert and notification test (evaluated by FEMA): March 3,1982 (Note:
FEMA, Mr. Petrone, at Public Meeting requested a re-testing of total siren system.)
- 11. Results of alert and notification test and schedule for fixing deficiencies (by FEMA): Evaluation not complete, reviewing adequacy of system and 2 Nt *dcN' breaker problem, siren not tested.
9 CONTINUED: WestChesterCo$nI*yS#
8 S
Rockland County:
19 sirens had one minor problem and 1 siren had a weak radio signal.
' h e,
INDIAN POINT 1, 2, & 3.
- 12. Proposed compensatory measures until alert system initial test:
Route alerting procedures.
C.
Factors bearing on enforcement in addition to items B.2-8 and 12 above 1.
Equipment vendor problems:
l 2.
Local design approval problems:
i 3.
Right of way problems:
4.
FCC frequency (. license) problems:
Rockland County's FCC license expired and re-appbication was rejected on January 16, 1982.
Licensee worked with Rockland County and FCC to obtain new license that would permit transmitting of tone.
FCC license received 1/29/82.
5.
Adverse weather:
6.
Licensee written communications to NRC on factors above:
i
e e
~ ~~T~ :LF
~ ~
~~
. Ikw dwpi
' $55Webnh["
s p t w a s p u ?l' ?: L.LI
~-
minna _
1 ourucpM 7I m oi~~rm ddl not axrk fd..
L....I LI
~
~ ~
~L.
~
~
~~
a m e n e x o.
o
% d e a d o H h i : ) s (i o /
L L.
at)xmL
.OktikhIEU
. men.Enx$89$.)h:7f6f /
t apw m Helpes mda cat l
\\
[
$ $lh.. O h hl k
t i4 din?
H)2Hbt/0)t'S.
C/
8"lwfin52M %
Aw 3(
D. O fool)
. fi g
V ca '
s,. lent Consoldated Ed: son Comcany et N*w Y-k. 'ne 4 Irving Place. New Yct'. NY 10003 Telephone (212) 460 2533 March 15, 1982 Mr. Richard C.
DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Re:
Indian Point Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-247 Consolidated Edison's Response to Notice of Violation dated February 12, 1982
Dear Mr. DeYoung:
This is in response to your letter of Februgry 12, 1982, en-
' closing a Notice of Violation relating to the requirement that licensees demonstrate, by February 1, 1982, that admin-istrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public located within the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone.
Our position on this matter is set forth in the enclosed Statement in Reply to Notice of Violation.
Ve
,truly ypurs, I k.v 1'
cc:
Mr. Ronald C.
Haynes, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection of Enforcement Region I U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa.
19406 Mr. T.
Rebelowski, Senior Resident Inspector U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.
O.
Box 38 Buchanan, New York 10511 7I pv 0y ga 9"9 p0 3Lp o
gok
.J 0
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
)
)
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF
)
Docket No. 50-247 NEW YORK, INC. (Indian Point,
)
EA 82-34 Unit No. 2)
)
)
CONSOLIDATED EDISON'S STATEMENT IN REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION In accordance with 10 CFR S 2.201) and the Office of Inspection and Enforcement's Notice of Violation dated February 12, 1982, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., (Con Edison) licensee of Indian Point Unit 2, supplies its response to the alleged item of noncompliance with NRC regulations set forth in the Notice, as follows:
1.
The Notice alleges noncompliance with 10 CFR S 50.54(s) and Appendix E yo 10 CFR Part 50, as relate to the establishment of administrative and physical means for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone.
10 CFR S 50.54(s) requires the submission of radiological. emergency i
f response plans to the NRC.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, at Section IV.D.3, provides in pertinent part that:
1 W fpp Yj&
/-
l A licensee shall have the capability to notify re-sponsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency.
The licensee shall demonstrate that the State / local officials have the capability to make a public noti-fication decision promptly on being informed by the licensee of an emergency condition.
By February 1, 1982, each nuclear power reactor licensee shall demonstrate'that administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
The four-month period in 10 CFR 50.54(s )( 2 ) for the correction of emergency plan deficiencies shall not apply to the initial installation of this public notification system that is required by February 1, 1982.
The four-month period will apply to correction of deficiencies identified during the initial installation and test-ing of the prompt public notification systems as well as those deficiencies discovered thereafter.
2.
Con Edison denies the alleged violation.
Con
- Edison completed installation of an alert dnd notification system ( ANS )' in the four counties within the plume exposure The pathway EPZ of Indian Point prior to February 1, 1982.
installation of the ANS was undertaken and carried out in co-operation with The Power Authority of the State of New York
( Authority ).
By,so doing, Con Edison satisfied the require-ments of 10 CFR S 50.54(s ) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 (46 Fed. Reg. 63032) for initial installation by that date, and for-a demonstration that administrative and physical means had been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public.
3.
Completion of initial installation of the ANS in compliance with Appendix E,Section IV.D.3, to 10 CFR Part 50 was attained on January 31, 1982 with the completion of the 1
installation of an encoder in Rockland County.
Con Edison sub-mits that so long as installation of the ANS was completed by February 1,1982, any deficiency that might have existed on that date is covered by the 120-day period for correction of defi-ciencies provided by Appendix E,Section IV.D.3, to 10 CFR Part 50.
4.
Initial testing of the operability of Orange and Westchester Counties ' ANS was completed early in January 1982.
This testing involved 1) local testing of each siren by manually depressing push-buttons located in the control box on the siren's pole, and 2) testing of the county-wide system by sending a radio, signal from the encoder in each county's Emergency Opera-1 I
- tions Center and thereafter verifying actuation of the siren by l
checking each siren's electrical circuitry in the control box on the siren's pole.
(Note that a few individual sirens ' control boxes were inaccessible for checking during this initial test and were therefore considered deficient.
See paragraph "7"
below.)
5.
Initial testing of the operability of the Putnam
. County system by the same two-step process used in Orange and Westchester Counties was undertaken in mid-January.
This test l
uncovered a county-wide deficiency.
The deficiency was re-paired by February 1, 1982 and retesting of the Putnam County ANS was completed on February 5, 1982.
6.
As of February 1, 1982, local testing of the Rockland County's sirens, on an individual basis, had been
1
\\
\\
l l
l t
completed.
A test involving the sending of a radio signal from the County's encoder had not been carried out.
The i
Authority (on behalf of both Con Edison and the Authority)
-advised the Commission Staff by telephone on February 1, 1982 that initial testing, as distinct from initial installation, could not be completed in Rockland County by ' February 1,1982 because the County had temporarily lost its Federal Communica-i tions Commission (FCC) radio license for the transmitter l
being used for the ANS.
Concerted efforts by Con Edison, the Authority, and Rockland County achieved an expedited reinstate-ment of Rockland County's FCC license,'with modification permit-
)
ting use of the frequency for the ANS, on January 29, 1982.
Initial testing of the operability of the Rockland County system, including step two of the process described in paragraph "4"
was completed by February 3, 1982, except for those sirens iden-l tified in the note in paragraph "4".
T.
Initial system. testing for operability in all four counties was completed by February 5, 1982, the date by which retesting of the Putnam County ANS was completed.
Access to control boxes on the poles of eight sirens to verify their response to the radio signal was delayed because of their l
' I
inaccessibility, due primarily to winter weather conditions.*
This was resolved by February 19, 1982.
8.
Con Edison and the Authorii
' ormed the NRC Staff of the status of initial siren installation and initial testing by letters dated July 24, 1981, October 30, 1981, December 31, 1981, January 29, 1982 and February 26, 1982.
9.
Con Edison and the Authority advised the Commis-sion in a telephone call on January 29, 1982 that completion of initial installation and initial testing of the Rockland County ANS had been delayed Py the FCC's rejection of Rockland County's application for renewal of its radio transmitter li-rense, that every possible ef fort was continuing to achieve reinstatement of the license, and that reinstatement was ex-l pected imminently.
In fact, that license renewal was granted on the same day and, as the Staff was subsequently informed, installation of Rockland County's encoder was completed by February 1, 1982.
10.
In addition to the telephone call identified in paragraph "9" the Authority and Con Edison made frequent telephone calls to the NRC Staff during the week of February 1, 1982 to advise the Staff of the progress being made with initial Four of the eight sirens that were temporarily inaccessible are located in a large state park and are included in the ANS primarily to insure alerting summer camp and seasonal transient populations.,
/
testing, the problems remaining,'and deficiencies identified.
11..
Con Edison and the Authority advised the NRC oy letter dated February 26, 1982 that initial testing, in addition to initial installation, had been completed.
12..
As described in paragraph "9" above, on January i
29, 1982, Con Edison and the Authority notified the NRC Staff of the possibility that in'stallation of the ANS might not be com-pleted by February 1, 1982.
However, installation was completed by that date.
Since administrative and other physical means (including provision for telephone communications and emergency broadcast system activation) had already been es-1 tablished for activating emergency public notification plans, Con Edison respectfully submits, as set forth in paragraphs
- 2" and "3* above, that the ccmpletion of installation by February 1, 1982 satisfied the requirement of Appendix E,Section IV.D.3, to 10 CFR Part 50.
1 11.
Even'if the Commission were to conclude that completion of initial installation of the ANS throughout the plume exposure pathway EPZ by February 1, 1982 did not satisfy the Indian Point licensees' obligations under the regulatory provisions set forth in the Notice of Violation, no penalty l
would be appropriate.
By the terms of the Commission's letter of February 12, 1982 which accompanied the Notice of Violation,
~
no civil penalty should be imposed because initial testing, as well as initial installation, was completed before March 1, 1982.
. Dated:
New York, New York March 15, 1982 t
f 3'
46hn D. O ' TooJ'e Vice President Consolidated Edison Company of NeM York, Inc.
State of New York
)
County of New York )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th day o March, 1982, 1
Notary Public DAV!D WATSOf 3 Nctarf Pwc;a. }.' :'. New Yorst No. 03 4504376 Qus:tfled in Drenx Count 193 3 Ccmaussion Espi'es March 30,y e