ML20058A332
| ML20058A332 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1990 |
| From: | NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML113202414 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9010250414 | |
| Download: ML20058A332 (27) | |
Text
..
I-1 l-
.g t
NORTNERN STAT 28 PO~IER = CONPANY
(
l i
- l. (
l NONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT ENERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE SECTION II: OBJECTIVES AND GUIDELINES l
4 i
OCTOBER 2, 1990 1
O SECTION II'Page 1 of 23 9010250414 901016
. 00C". 05^
^
O!!
NONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATIN3 PLANT EMERIENCY PLAN BIERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 EXERCISE OBJECTIVES AND GUIDELINES I
Northern States-Power Company--(NSP) will exercise its Emergency Response Plan-on October 2,
1990.
The exercise will demonstrate NSP's capability. to
-cdequately respond to a simulated accident at the Monticello Nuclear G3nerating Plant (MNGP).
Exercise participants will include the following organizations:
a.
Northern States Power Comoany 1.
On-Sj'.:e Emergency Response Organization a.
Simulated Control Room (SCR) b.
Technical Support Center (TSC) c.
On-Site Support Center (OSC) 2.
Corporate Emergency Response Organization a.
Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) b.
Headquarters Emergency Center (SIMULATED) b.
Sherburne and Wriaht Counties and supporting
- agencies, as identified in the Sherburne and Wright County Emergency Response Plans for the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant, WILL NOT participate in a full-scale support capacity.
Division of Emergency Management an c.
State of Minnesota supporting agencies, as identified in the Minnesota Emergency Response Plan for Nuclear Power Plant, WILL NOT participate in a full-scale support capacity.
Active participation in the exercise will only be required of the above-listed organizations.
If the' exercise scenario requires that any other organizations and/or officials be contacted, they shall be contacted for the purpose of checking communications only.
All other Federal responses to an emergency, including those of the Interagency Radiological-Assistance Plan of the Department of Energy, shall be simulated.
Guidelines have been developed for the conduct of the exercise which reflects l
capabilities of the various participating organizations to meet the cbjectives set forth below.
Each objective is followed by a-paragraph which defines the " extent of play" by the exercise participants.
Plant and Corporate Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures (EPIPs) are also listed which may be used by participants to conduct those actions necessary to satisfy the objective.
e l
O SECTION II Page 2 of 23
<e MONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATIN3 PLANT ENER2ENCY PLAN EEERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990
^ BJECTivzS AND GUIDELINES SUd^4RY The emergency level shall be classified and declared.
1 1.1 NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT (NUE) 1.2 ALERT 2.
State, Counties, NRC, & NSP ERO shall be notified.
2.1 State & Counties within 15 minutes 2.2 NRC within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> via ENS 2.3 Plant ERO within 30 minutes (N/A) 2.4 Plant personnel via page by control room 2.5 NSP Corporate ERO within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> by SCC 2.6 All communications links demonstrated (phones, radios, fax, etc.)
2.7 Of f-site centers & agencies receive timely and accurate information 3.
ERFs shall be activated.
3.1 Actual startup times and activities 3.2 TSC and OSC within 30 minutes 3.3 EOF within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 3.4 HQEC within 90 minutes (Simulated) 3.5 Off-site responsibilities transfer from TSC to EOF within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 3.6 Plant and EOF ERO shift change planning
( ).
The accident shall be detec'ted and assessed.
4.1 Reactor and personnel safety monitored in ERFs 4.2 Off-site dose projections via MIDAS or backup j
5.
The accident shall be mitigated to the extent allowed.
5.1 Decision making and problem solving in all ERFs 5.2 Corrective action formulation 5.3 Repair planning and execution 6.
On-site and.off-site PARS shall be developed and communicated.
6.1 Local Evacuation 6.2 No plant evacuation 6.3 No PARS for the EOF 6.4 No PARS for the General public 7.
On-site radiological surveys shall be performed.
7.1 External beta and gamma radiation surveys, surface contamination, and airborne surveys 7.2 ERF habitability evaluated O
SECTION II Page 3 of 23
a i
MONTICELLO~ NUCLEAR CENERATIN3 PLANT EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 OBJECTIVES AND GUIDELINES
SUMMARY
fcont)
-8' Emergency exposure control shall be performed.
8.1 CAMS and ARMS used in ERFs 8.2 Applicable limits maintained, delays minimized, ALARA 9.
Off-site releases shall be monitored.
9.1 Two field teams dispatched from plant-9.2 Two field teams dispatched from PI (Will be simulated).
9.3 Beta and gamma readings,- contamination, airborne surveys and ground deposition 9.4 Sample analysis in the EOF 10.
Access control shall be maintained.
10.1 Access control maintained by security at ERFs 11.
Clear communication shall be demonstrated with outside agencies.
11.1 Appropriate communications systems used 11.2 Correct plant conditions communicated 11.3 Off-site radiological conditions communicated to MDH 11.4 Engineering organizations notified 11.5 Messages clearly stated and content understood 12.
Proper analysis of information and effective communication by the technical staff will be demonstrated.
12.1 Reactor and personnel safety monitored in ERF's.
12.2 Decision making and problem solving in all ERF's.
12.3 Corrective actions formulation 12.4 Repair planning and. execution.
13.
First Aid and/or rescue teams shall be used.
13.1 The issuance and control of dosimetry demonstrated.
13.3 Decontamination procedures for a contaminated injured person willi be demonstrated.
13.4 On-Site first aid capability demonstrated.
14.
Medical support personnel shall be activated.
14.1 Transport of'a contaminated injured person demonstrated.
14.2 The use of trained first responders /EMTs demonstrated.
SECTION II Page 4 of 23
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATIN3 PLANT EMERCENCY PLAN EXERCISE
' OCTOBER 2, 1990 17ECTIVES AND GUIDELINES SiiiGiARY (cont) 15.
Prompt access for emergency equipment and support personnel by security will be demonstrated.
15.1 Support of a medical emergency will be demonstrated.
15.2 Capability of providing access for emergency personnel and equipment will be demonstrated.
16.
Emergency Event termination will be demonstrated.
1 16.1 Termination of Alert will be demonstrated.
-NONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATIND-PLANT ENER!ENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990
+
'FOR'NSP (LICENSEE) EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION:
. I '.
Identification and Classification'of the Emeraency Obiectiver Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP personnel shall:-
correctly identify and classify the emergency as a NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL-EVENT (NUE) OR AN ALERT.
Guideline:
1.1 When given initiating conditions of high coolant activity, the site Superintendent will classify the emergency as a NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT (NUE).:
1.2 Within five minutes of the event (either the steam-explosion or I 131 activity > 300 uCi/cc), the Site Superintendent will classify the event as an ALERT.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective:
PLANT:
A.1 - 101 Classifications of Emergencies A.2 - 102 Notification of Unusual Event (NUE)
A.2 - 103 Alert O'
1 O
SECTION II Page 6 of 23
-NONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATIN3 PLANT EMERIENCY PLAN EXERCISE p
OCTOBER 2, 1990 Accident Notifications-l
.Obiective:
Upon emergency level declaration, MNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall promptly complete accident notifications to the appropriate State and County / City. agencies (15' minutes), the NRC (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />), MNGP personnel and Emergency Response Organization (30 ~ minutes), and NSP Corporate i
Emergency Response Organization (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />).
Guidelines:
2.1 Notifications of emergency classifications to the State of Minnesota, and Wright and Sherburne County.
will be completed within is minutes.
Initially l-these notifications will - be made by the Shift-Emergency Communicator (SEC) at the plant. Off-Site Communicators at the Emergency Operations Facility
)
(EOF) will assume these responsibilities after it.
becomes fully operational.
j 2.2 The NRC will be initially notified within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> by knowledgeable plant staff via the ENS hotline.
The extended use of. this communication line will be determined by-the NRC participant.
This communication link may eventually be transferred to i
a technical support person in the EOF.
2.3 Notification of MNGP per EPIP procedures within 19, O
minutes by the SEC is N/A (daytime exercise).
2.4 The control Room staff will notify MNGP personnel of the ALERT classification via the plant page.
2.5 NSP Corporate Emergency Response Organization will.
be notified within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> by the NSP System Control Center (SCC) per-the Nuclear Emeraency Notification List for System Control Center.
2.6 ' All major NSP emergency communication links will be demonstrated utilizing designated emergency response communication equipment, e.g.,
telephones, ENS.
phone, HPN phone, field team radios, and facsimile transceivers.
2.7 Off-Site NSP emergency centers will be updated with accurate and timely information.
O SECTION II Page 7 of 23
"* SE:S rERE'EEEIE """
5 L
OCTOBER 2, 1990-2.
Accident Motification (cont) i l
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective:
l PLANT:
A.2 102 Notification of Unusual Event (NUE)
A.2 - 103 Alert A.2 - 501 Communication During an Emergency-A.2 - 503 Record-Keeping-During an Emergency CORPORATE EPIP 1.1.1 Corporate Emergency Response Organization EPIP 1.1.2 Notifications EPIP 1.1.3 Public Information EPIP 1.1.8 Communication Equipment and Inforr.ation l
1 i
l i
O SECTION II Page 8 of 23
t-M:NTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATING PLANT EMER0ENCY PLAN EXERCISE ~
OCTCBER 2, 1990 i
Emercancy Resconse Orcanisation and Facility Activation pbiectivet Given simulated accident conditions,. MNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall. activate the TSC, OSC, and Access Control' within 30 minutes and the EOF staffed within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
Guidelines 1 3.1 - Upon notification, the participants will demonstrate actual startup times and activities for each emergency center.
3.2 The TSC and OSC will be fully functional within 30 minutes.
3.3 The EOF will be staffed within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.- An EOF Coordinator will be on' duty in the EOF within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
3.4 The HQEC will be fully functional within 90 minutes.
(simulated).
3.5 The transfer of appropriate off-site
-responsibilities (e.g.,
off-site - communications, dose assessment, and off-site protective action.
recommendations) from the Onsite EmergencyL
~i Organization to the Corporate Emergency Response O
organization (EOF) will be demonstrated within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
3.6 The NSP Emergency Organization will demonstrate through discussion and staff planning the ability to perform a shift change in the TSC, OSC, Access
~
Control, and EOF.
l l
O SECTION II Page 9 of 23 I
+e p-
__,,_,w
-r l
NONTICELLO NUCLEAR OT,~NERATIN3 PLANT i
l EMER!ENCY PLhN EXERCISE J
OCTOBER 2, 1990' 3.
Eneroency Response Oroanisation-and Facility Activation fcont)
The following EPIP's may be used 'to support this.
-I objective:
PLANT:-
A.2 - 001 Emergency. Organization A.2 - 106 Activation of the Technical Support Center-(TSC)
A.2 - 107 Activation of the Operation control Center-(OSC)
A.2 - 108 Access Control During Emergencies A.2 -~411.
Establishment-of Secondary Access Point
.l F3 - 22 PI Radiation Protection Response to a MNGP Emergency CORPORATEs-EPIP 1.1.1 Corporate Emergency Response Organization EPIP 1.1.5
.Startup and Operation of. EOF EPIP 1.'1.6 Emergency Organjzation Shift Turnover EPIP 1.1.8
-Communication Equipment'and.Information 1
l l
O SECTION II Page 10 of 23
_,;+
a-NONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATINS PLANT EMERGENCY ^ PLAN EXERCISE N
o OCTOBER 2,-1990
( ). - Accident Detection and hasessment Obiective:-
Given sianlated accident conditions, MNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall demonstrate assessment of-plant operational parameters and radiological data.
Guidelines:
4.1 Plant conditions and events.important to reactor,.
containment, and personnel safety will be monitored and assessed in the SCR, TSC, and EOF.-
4.' 2 Offsite dose projections will be performed by use of MIDAS.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective:
PLANT:
A.1 - 101 Classification of Emergencies A.2 - 106 Activation of Technical Support Center (TSC)
I A.2 - 107 Activation of Operation Support Center 1
(OSC)
A.2 - 108 Access Control During Er.ergencies
{
A.2 - 301 Onsite Monitoring and _ Protective Action Criteria 1
A.2 - 204 Offsite Protective Action Recommendations-A.2 - 209 Responsibility of the Radiological Emergency Coordinator A.2 - 405 Release Rate Determination A.2 - 406 Offsite Dose Projection l
A.2 - 502 Record Keeping During an Emergency CORPORATE:
1 EPIP 1.1.4 Emergency Organization Records and Forms-EPIP 1.1.5 Startup & Operation of EOF l
EPIP 1.1.11 Dose Assessment and Protective Action Recommendations 4
-I s
O SECTION II Page 11 of 23
WONTICBLLO NUCt.RAk CENERATING PIANT EMERGENCY PIAN REERCIGE OCTOBER 2, 1990 5.
hacident Ritiaation obiectivat Given simulated accident conditions, NNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall demonstrate mitigation of the accident.
Guidelinest 5.1 Decision making and problem solving will be demonstrated at the various emergency centers by the appropriate participants, e.g.
Control Room Operators, Shift Technical Advisor (STA),
Shift Supervisor in the Control Room; Emergency Director and TSC Staff; Emergency Manager and EOF staff; and Power Production Management in the HQEC.
5.2 Corrective actions will be formulated in an attempt to mitigate the accident;
- however, unforeseen corrective actions that may defeat the scenario will not be permitted by the exercise controllers.
5.3 Simulated equipment failures will require repair planning and briefings leading to emergency repairs.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objectivet PLANT A.2 - 102 Notification of Unusual Event A.2 - 103 Alert A.2 - 502 Record Keeping During an Emergency CORPORATE EPIP 1.1.5 Startup & Operation of EOF 9
SECTION II Page 12 of 23
u.
MONTICEL14 NUCLEAR ECNERATICG PLhMT RKERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 Protective Action Decision unkina Obi ect ive_i_
Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall develop and promotly communicate appropriate protective actions for onsite end EOF personnel, and for the protection of the health and safety of the general public.
Guidelinest 6.2 Local evacuation and accountability will be demonstrated.
6.2 Simulated plant conditions WILL NOT warrant a plant evacuation for nonessential personnel to an onsite assembly point.
6.3 Based on the scenario, No PROTECTIVE ACTIONS Will be warranted for personnel functioning in the EOF.
6.4 Based on the scenario, NO. PROTECTIVE ACTIONS will be warranted for the general public offsite.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective:
PLANT A.2 - 201 Onsite Monitoring and Protective Action Criteria A.2 - 204 Offsite Protective Action Recommendations A 209 Responsibilities of Radiological Emergency coordinator CORPORATE EPIP 1.1.11 Dose Assessmert and Protective Action RecommendatiNs O
SECTION II Page 13 of 23
==
NONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATICO PLANT l
EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 7.
onsite Radioloalcal Monitorine obiective Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP personnel shall perform timely, appropriate, and accurate radiological surveys on-site (in-plant and out of plant)
Guidelinest 7.1 on-site radiological nonitoring will include, as 1
appropriate, external beta and gamma radiation surveys; direct and loose contamination surveyst and sampling for airborne particulate, iodine and gas.
7.2 Radiological habitability will be properly evaluated in the TSC, OSC, Access control, and EOF.'
The following EPIp's may be used to support this objective PLANT A.2 - 201 On-Site Monitoring and Protective Action l
Criteria A.2 - 403 In-Plant Emergency Surveys i
9:
1 i
l O
1 SECTION II Page 14 of 23
MINTIC3LLO NUCLCAR CENERATIC3 PLkNT ENERGENCY PLAN REERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 maeraenev madiation msrnosure contrstl obiectiver Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP and -NSP Corporate personnel shall control emergency radiation i
exposures within applicable limits.
Guidelines!
8.1 Continuous air monitors and area radiation monitors will operate in the SCR, TSC, and EOF.
8.2 Applicable limits will not be exceeded, unnecessary delays will be minimized, and exposures will be maintained ALARA.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this f
objectivet j
PLANT A.2 - 201 On-Site Monitoring and Protective Action Criteria i
CORPORATE EPIP 1.1.16 Off-Site Personnel and Vehicle Monitoring O
and Decontamination EPIP 1.1.17 Personnel Monitoring at the EOF O
SECTION II Page 15 of 23
j NONTICELLO WUCLEAR CENERATING PLkNT i
ENER ENCY PLhN CEECCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 9.
of f-site Monitorincr i
Obiectlyg1 Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall correctly monitor offsite radiological releases through a program of surveying, sampling, and analyzing.
Guidelines!
9.1 MNGP will dispatch at least two field monitoring teams for off-site radiological monitoring.
9.2 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant will assist in off-site monitoring upon notification and arrival at the EOF. (TEIS WILL BE SINULATED).
9.3 Offsite radiological monitoring will include beta / gamma radiation surveys; contamination surveys; air sampling; and ground disposition. :.. required.
9.4 Off-site samples will be transported to and analyzed in the EOF countroom.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective:
PLhMT A.2 - 202 Off-Site Monitoring During an Emergency A.2 - 410 Out-of-Plant Surveys A.2 - 424 EOF Count Room Counting Procedure CORPORATE EPIP 1.1.5 Startup & Operation of EOF EPIP 1.1.10 Off-Site Surveys EPIP 1.1.11 Dose Assessment and Protective Action Recommendations EPIP 1.1.20 Control. of Radioactive Materials at the EOF i
O-SECTION II Page 16 of 23 l
NONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATICJ PLANT I
EKERGENCY PLAN EEERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 l
f '/.
\\0 Access Control
\\_
Obiectivet Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall maintain control of access into the plant and EOF respectively throughout the emergency.
i Guidelinest 10.1 Access Control vill be demonstrated by both NSP and Security personnel at the plant, and EOF throughout l
the simulated emergency.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective PLANT A.2 - 108 Access Control During Emergencies A.2 - 411 Establishment of Secondary Access Control Point CORPORATE i
EPIP 1.1.5 Startup & Operation of EOF EPIP 1.1.17 Personnel Monitoring at EOF f
i O
SECTION II Page 17 of 23
NONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATING PLhMT EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 11.
Interface with sunnort oraanisations and sovernment Aeencies obiectiver Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP and NSP Corporate personnel shall demonstrate clear communication with outside support organizations, and government agencies in a
timely manner using appropriate communication channels.
Guidelines!
11.1 The appropriate communication systems will be used (e.g.,
telephones, ENS
- phone, HPN
- phone, and facsimile transceivers).
11.2 Appropriate plant conditions will be communicated to the state's emergency government.
11.3 Pield survey data and of f-site dose projections will be shared with the State Health Department.
(simulated).
11.4 Plant architectural and design engineering i
organization will be notified and kept informed of plant events, depending on the extent of their participation. Advice from these organizations will be considered if so offered.
I 11.5 Messages will be clearly stated and the conten understood by the recipient.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective:
PLANT A.2 - 102 Notification of Unusual Event (NUE)
A.2 - 103 Alert A.2 - 501 Communications During an Emergency CORPORATE EPIP 1.1.2 Notifications EPIP 1.1.3 Public Information EPIP 1.1.8 Communication Equipment and Information EPIP 1.1.14 Vendor and Consultant Services SECTION II Page 18 of 23
'. a MONTICELLO WDCLEAR CENERATING PLANT EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990
/~L2.
Analysis of information and effective communication by the Technical
(_/
staff.
obiectiver Given simulated accident conditions, this technical staff shall demonstrate proper analysis of information, 1
assessment of operational parameters and effective communication of corrective actions.
Guidelines:
12.1 Plant conditions and events important to the reactor, containment, and personnel safety will be monitored and assessed by the technical staff.
12.2 Decision making and problem solving will be demonstrated by the technical staff.
12.3 Corrective actions will be formulated in an attempt to mitigate the accident;
- however, unforeseen corrective actions that may derail the scenario will not be permitted by the drill controllers.
12.4 Simulated equipment failures will require repair planning and briefings leading to emergency repairs.
The fol.'owing EPIP's may be used to support this objective.
O A.1 - 101 Classification of Emergencies A.1 - 102 Notification of Unusual Event (NUE)
A.1 - 103
.\\lert A.1 - 201 Onsite Monitoring and Protective Actions criteria A.1 - 204 Offsite Protective Action Recommendations A.2 - 210 Engineering Support in the TSC A.2 - 405 Release Rate Determination A.2 - 502 Record Keeping During an Emergency O
SECTION II Page 19 of 23
=
NONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERhTI[G PLANT EMERGENCY PLhN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 13.
Use of First hid and/or Rescue Teams.
Obiective:
Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP personnel shall demonstrate first aid and/or rescue capability.
Guidelines:
13.1 The issuance and control of dosimetry to support a contaminated injured person will be demonstrated.
13.2 Decontamination procedures for support of a
contaminated injured person will be demonstrated.
13.3 On-site first aid capability will be demonstrated.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective:
i PLANT A.2 - 303 Search and Rescue A.2 - 402 Contamination Control A.5 - 100 On-Site Medical Emergency A.5 - 200 Contaminated Casualty Transport A.5 - 300 Casualty Care at Local Hospital A.5 - 400 Contaminated Casualty Transfer h'
t l
t l
O l
SECTION II Page 20 of 23 l
l 1
lu
t
= y..
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR CENERATINJ PLANT EMERGENCY PLAN C12RCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990
('T4 Use of Medical suonort Personnel.
\\j.
Objective Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP personnel shall demonstrate the capability of treating a contaminated injured man.
Guidelines:
14.1 Arrangements for the transport of a contaminated injured man will be demonstrated.
14.2 The use of trained first responders /EMTs to a simulated contaminated injured person will be demonstrated.
The following EPIP's may be used to support this objective PLANT A.2 - 303 Search and Rescue A.2 - 402 Contamination Control A.5 - 100 on-Site Medical Emergency A.5 - 200 Contaminated casualty Transport A.5 - 300 casualty Care at Local Hospital A.5 - 400 Contaminated Casualty Transfer i
i t
SECTION Il Page 21 of 23
NINTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLhWT EMERCE1*CY PLkN REERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990
^
15.
Use of security Personnel to Provide Pramat necess for Eneroen.
Equipment and Personnel.
Obiectivet Given simulated accident coaditions, MNGP security personnel shall demonctcate the capability of providing emergency equipment and personnel prompt access.
Guidelines:
15.1 Se;urity personnel will demonstrate support of a medical emergency.
15.2 Security personnel will demonstrate the capability of providing prompt access for emergency personnel and equipment.
t i
l i-l O;
i O
SECTION II Page 22 of 23
e,..
MINTICELLO NUCLCAR CENERATICJ PLANT EME2CENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 l
v.
EMERGENCY EVENT TERMINATION.
3 obiective Given simulated accident conditions, MNGP personnel shall demonstrate the capability of terminating from the ALERT.
Guidelines:
15.2 Termination of the ALERT will be demonstrated.
i i
i 4
)
l i
i I
L I
i i
I l
SECTION IT Page 23 of 23 l
l
ig i...
MENTICELIO NUCLEAR' CENERATIN3 PLANT EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE i
OCTOBER 2, 1990 SCENARIO NARRATIVE
SUMMARY
& TIMELINE Time Event / Condition 0745 INITIAL CONDITIONS (IC - 91)
Reactor has_been at full power for 14 months.
There is an upward trend in I 131 dose equivalent.
Chemistry is taking hourly samples with the next sample results due momentarily and then on the hour.
Due to an excessive number of fuel lenkers and concerns from the state and federal government and the general public, NSP upper management has ordered a shutdown of the Monticello i
Nuclear Generating Plant for early refueling.
Management has committed to having the plant shutdown and cooldown to 0
less than 212 by 1600 tonight.
A NRC Meeting with NSP management, regarding unrelated issues, is scheduled for October 2, 1990 (today) at'0830.
I All rods are inserted, normal reactor shutdown /cooldown is-0 465 F' saturation in progress with reactor temperature at temperature and reactor pressure at 487 psig. Operations is at step 29 in the Shutdown Checklist. Steam Jet Air Ejector (SJAE) #11 has been removed from service. #12 SJAE is in service.
Two Maintenance personnel are making preparations for shipping a resin cask. Thus the turbine building door is open, the transport truck is !.n the turbine building and a RPS is stationed at the turbi,e building railway entrance.
Sunny and cool.
Light, variable winds from the north, becoming wes':erly by midday.
Noon time temperatures in the 50s. No chan:e of precipitation.
Reactor Wator Clean Up (RWCU) is out of service due to through wall leakage at the junction of the 3/4" CAVs return line to the RWCU suction line. The system is isolated and tagged.
0807 Chemistry reports that I - 131 dose equivalent continues to trend upwards and the results of the last sample indicates 118 uCi/gm. This is a NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT per GL - 6.
~0812 A
NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT is declared.
An announcement should be mado over the Public Address System and notification to appropriate agencies begun.
Normal shutdown /cooldown should continue.
SECTION V-1 Page 2 of 5
i l
eg.,' e MONTICEL1O NUCLEAR CENERATING PLANT l
EMIRGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 Time Event / condition
'0847 While locally opening the f12 SJAE pressure control valve I
bypass, the 2" steam line to the air ejectors breaks within l
the SJAE room, pressurizing the air ejector room, lifting l
the ceiling plates and initiating an unmonitored release.
'0847 The operator performing the opening of the bypass feels the handwheel go slack and hears an explosion.
The maintenance personnel and 'che RPS stationed at the railway entrance hear the explosion and observe a cloud of steam coming from the vicinity of the air ejector room. One' of the maintenance personnel falls and becomes injured.
l The explosion will cause a slow loss of condenser vacuum, a local continuous Airborne Monitor (CAM) alarm and a stack 1-Wide Range Gas Monitor (WRGM) alarm. Additionally, there will be a Stack High Radiation Alarm causing a Partial Group l
II Isolation and SBGT Initiation.
l The operators will be in several C-4 casualty procedures at this time. They should also consider the Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP's) and determine that they have entry conditions for C.5 - 1300 (Secondary Containment Control) and C.5 - 1400 (Radioactive Release).
- 0848 The RPS notifies the control Room that there has been an 1
l explosion with steam and smoke and an unmonitered release I
since the steam is escaping the building via the railway entrance.
He also reports that one of the maintenance personnel fell and is injured.
j
'0850 An ALERT should be declared at this time based on either GL i
24, GL 29 or GL 1.
WHEN an ALERT is
- declared, an i
announcement should be made over the public address system and the proper notifications should be started.
'0850 The Fire Brigade is dispatched to the turbine building railway entrance.
Radiological considerations should be discussed by both the Control Room and the Fire Brigade. The Control Room should also be investigating the cause of the explosion.
l
'0853 The MSIV's may be closed and thus the steam leak isolated.
II the MSIV's are not shut, THEN the RPS stationed at the railway entrance should report that steam is still coming from the turbine building. The operators should conclude that the steam leak can be isolated by shutting the SJAE/Recombiner supply valves (MS 13-1 & MS 13-2) in the condenser hotside.
SECTION V.1 Page 3 of 5
g...
M3NTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT 4
EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 SCENARIO NARRATIVE
SUMMARY
& TIMELINE Time Event / condition 0900 The Fire Brigade should arrive at the scene, make necessary radiological assessments and perform first aid on the victim. They should notify the Control Room that there is a contaminated worker with injuries that needs transport to the local hospital.
- 0905 once the Fire Brigade notifies the Control Room of the extent of the injuries, the hospital should be notified and an ambulance requested.
'0905 Survey teams should be dispatched to check for ground depositions and track the unmonitored release.
- 0907 Chemistry reports that I 131 dose equivalent is 304 uCi/gm.
This should keep them in an ALERT per GL - 6.
'0915 The ambulance arrives and the injured man is transported to the hospital.
0927 Based upon the chemistry results, discussion between NSP management and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) officials have led to the decision to expeditiously cooldown and de-pressurize the reactor once the steam leak is isolated-
~0930 Once the leak is isolated, then the cooldown can continue via RCIC or starting the mechanical vacuum pump (MVP),
regaining vacuum and dumping to - the condenser with the bypass valves.
~1010 once normal cooldown is established, the EXEP,CISE will be halted. A time jump of approximately 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> will be made to expedite the scenario. IC - 93 will be set up.
l 1
f I
l SECTION V.1 Page 4 of 5
\\V"*
MONTICELLO' NUCLEAR GENERATIN3 PLANT O
EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE OCTOBER 2, 1990 SCENARIO NARRATIVE SUKMARY & TIKELINE
~ Time Event / Condition
- 1030 NTW_INITI & CONDITIONS RHR is flushed in preparation for S/D cooling.
All rods are inserted, normal reactor shutdown /cooldown is in progress with reactor temperature at 278'F and reactor pressure at 48 psig. operations is at step 39 of C.3.
The-plant is still at an ALERT due to primary chemistry. (I -
131 is 304 uCi/gn).
'1055 The plant should be at a reactor pressure of 40 psig and ready to commence S/D cooling.
j When the operator attempts to open the shutdown cooling outboard isolation valve (MO - 2030), the valve fails. This will put the plant in procedure C. 4-B. 3. 4. A - (alternate cooling). The procedure is workable but operations need to be alert to certain conditions, i.e.,
SPDS' reactor temperature is invalid since it defaults to ' saturation temperature. The true indication of reactor temperature is l
recire loop temp via CO6 recorders.
"1115 Alternate cooling should be available. OSC should be making preparations to repair Mo - 2030. A mock-up will be used to help simulation.
1130 Lunches arrive.
~1200 conversations should be held to discuss return to normal shutdown and progress of Mo - 2030 repairs. The procedure (C.4-B.3.4.A) has no guidance on how to return to normal SDCLG if it is regained. I.E times permit, THEN the scenario should terminate once normal shutdown is achieved.
300 The plant and simulator participants are released, once
~
normal shutdown cooling is achieved or at the discretion of the Chief Controller,
- 1 SECTION V.1 Page 5 of 5