ML20058A160
| ML20058A160 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/15/1993 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058A146 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9311300131 | |
| Download: ML20058A160 (2) | |
Text
-_
- pa nc
.tl h
igWIE E
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
g v,/
wAssincios, o.c. 20sssoooi SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO.112 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-6 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY BIG ROCK POINT PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-155 1.0 JNTRODUCTION By letter dated August 6, 1993, the Consumers Power Company (CPCo, the licensee) requested an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS) appended to Facility Operating License No. DPR-6 for the Big Rock Point Plant. The proposed amendment would implement a reorganization of the plant staff.
2.0 EVALUATION The proposed amendment provides three changes to the TS. The first changes the title " Superintendent" to " Manager" for the Chemistry and Health Physics Superintendent and the Operations Superintendent. This title change will align Big Rock Point with the administrative standard throughout the rest of Consumers Power Company. The second change deletes the reference to ANSI N18.1 in TS Section 6.3.4.
Now that the Operations Superintendent is called the Operations Manager, this reference is redundant to TS Section 6.3.1 because Operations Manager is specifically referenced in ANSI N18.1 The third change requirc-that a representative of the Safety and Licensing Department be a member of the Plant Review Committee (PRC). The Safety and Licensing Department is a new department under the reorganization and it is appropriate that a representative cf this new department be a member of the PRC.
All three changes are administrative only. The changes do not alter the responsibilities or qualifications of the head of Chemistry and Health Physics or Operations, and the changes do not reduce the composition of the PRC.
Therefore, the proposed changes are acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Michigan State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
9311300131 931115 PDR ADGCK 05000155 P
PDR y ;,n -
~
i
)
\\
o l,
4.0. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment changes administrative requirements. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
L. Olshan Date:
November 15, 1993 I
i