ML20057G180
| ML20057G180 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1993 |
| From: | Beach A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Cottle W HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9310210003 | |
| Download: ML20057G180 (9) | |
Text
+-
m UfdlTED ST ATES
' j e REcv NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,f( [ ),Pg -
REGION IV
[ f!!
![
[
611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 400
.l o,
'g e
AR LINGT ON, T E X AS 76011 -8064
+...+
OCI 151993 Dockets:
50-498 50-499 Licenses: NPF-76 NPF-80 l
Houston Lighting & Power Company ATTN: William T. Cottle, Group Vice President, Nuclear P.O. Box 1700 liouston, Texas 77251 1
SUBJECT:
OCTOBER 29, 1993, MANAGEMENT MEETING AGENDA AND PROPOSED RESTART t
ISSUE INSPECTION SCHEDULE This is to confirm our arrangement to conduct a management meeting, at your
[
South Texas Project facility on October 29, 1993, at 9 a.m., and to provide you the preliminary schedule for our planned restart issue inspections. provides the proposed agenda for this meeting.
In our letter of October 12, 1993, we informed you that we would be unable to schedule all inspections that need to be accomplished to evaluate your readiness to restart Unit I until we receive additional information pertaining to the completion of independent and line management self-assessments, and your notification that the various restart issues are resolved, and selected restart issue closeout packages are ready for NRC inspection.
i provides a list of currently planned restart issue inspections.
In most instances, tentative inspection start dates have been identified on the basis of your current Unit I restart schedule and the availability of NRC inspection resources. Generally, we do not plan to conduct restart issue inspections until you have informed us that you are ready to support the inspections. is a list of questions that the NRC will require a resoonse to in order to firmly establish the schedule for these inspections. We request that you respond in writing to the questions in Enclosure 3 by October 26, 1993.
l Should you have any questions regarding this letter and its enclosures, please contact Mr. Bill Johnson at 817-860-8148.
Sincerely,
/
,f
- %L
/4, A. Bill Beac, Director Division of Reactor Project
Enclosures:
As stated 9310210003 931015 PDR ADOCK 05000498 G
PDR i
^ - ^
~
i 1
Houston Lighting & Power Company l cc w/ enclosures:
l Houston Lighting & Power Company ATIN:
James J. Sheppard, General Manager Nuclear Licensing i
P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483 i
City of Austin Electric Utility Department f
ATTN:
J. C. Lanier/M. B. Lee 721 Barton Springs Road i
?
City Public Service Board ATTN:
K. J. Fiedler/M. T. Hardt P.O. Bcx 1771 San Antonio, Texas 78296 Newman & Holtzinger, P. C.
ATTN: Jack R. Newman, Esq.
i 1615 L Street, NW Washington, D.C.
20036 Central Power and Light Company ATTN:
G. E. Vaughn/T. M. Puckett P.O. Box 2121 Corpus Christi, Texas 78403 i
INP0 Records Center 700 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30339-5957 l
Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie 50 Bellport Lane Bellport, New York 11713 Bureau of Radiation Control State of Texas 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756 Judge, Matagorda County i
Matagorda County Courthouse 1700 Seventh Street Bay City, Texas 77414 I
1 L
Houston Lighting & Power Company Licensing Representative Houston Lighting & Power Company Suite 610 Three Metro Center Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Houston Lighting & Power Company ATTN:
Rufus S. Scott, Associate General Counsel P.O. Box 61867 Houston, Texas 77208
4
- Houston Lighting & Power Company OCT I 51993 I
- becLto DMB-(IE45)'
bec distrib. by RIV:
J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector Section Chief (DRP/A)
Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System DRSS-FIPS RIV File Project Engineer (DRP/A)
R. Bachmann, OGC, MS: 15-B-18 Section Chief (DRP/TSS) h h
6 RIV: ADD:DPA D:Df')
D:DRPnb l
ATHowell: [ S[Chliins_-
ABBeachlf) 10/7/93 (0/g/d 10/h/93 20nnoy t
)
i Houston Lighting & Power Company -
OCT I 51933 bcc to DMB (IE45) bcc distrib. by RIV:
J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector Section Chief (DRP/A)
Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System DRSS-FIPS l
RIV File Project Engineer (DRP/A) l R. Bachmann, OGC, MS: 15-B-18 Section Chief (DRP/TSS) i t
t i
. t i
t RIV: ADD:DR6)h(D: dry ~)
D:DRPnd(
vm fj-v e
ATHowell:ww MC$111ns...
ABBeach@)
10/y'V/93 kO/hd 10/h/93 t
8 6
e
q PROPOSED AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 29. 1993 NRC/HL&P MANAGEMENT MEETING l
i I.
OPENING REMARKS James L. Hilhoan, _
Regional Administrator II.
OPENING REMARKS HL&P III.
LICENSEE PRESENTATION HL&P 1
Operational Readiness Plan l
Implementation Status l
Line Management Assessments j
1 Availability of Assessment Checklists r
Independent Assessment Results of Standby Diesel Generator Assessment l
Results of System Certification (to date)
Augmented System / Component Testing Systems / Components to be Tested Details of Tests to be Conducted Restart Items to be Verified for Implementation Effectiveness Unit 1 Restart Schedule Integration of NRC inspections with HL&P schedule IV.
CLOSING REMARKS HL&P V.
CLOSING REMARKS James L. Milhoan, Regional Administrator I
INSPECTION AREA SCHEDULE 1
Turbine-driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Reliability and 10/18/93 Testing Methodology 11/01/93 2
Station Problem Report Process, Threshold, Licensee's 10/12/93 Review of Existing Reports for Issues Affecting 12/13/93 i
Operability and Safe Plant Operation
{
3 Service Request Backlog, Including Reduction 11/15/93 l
Accomplished During the Current Outages and the Licensee's Review of Outstanding SRs for Issues l
Affecting Equipment Operability, Safe Plant Operation, and Operator Work-arounds j
4 The Postmaintenance Test Program, Including Corrective 10/25/93 l
Actions in Response to Violations and Other Process 11/29/93 Improvements and the Basis For the Licensee's Confidence t
That Equipment Removed From Service for Maintenance is l
Properly Restored to an Operable Status l
5 The Outstanding Design Modifications, Temporary 11/15/93 f
Modifications, and Other Engineering Backlog Items, l
Including the Licensee's Review of These For Issues l
Affecting Equipment Operability, Safe Plant Operation, and Operator Work-arounds 6
Adequacy of Operations Staffing 11/1/93 7
Adequacy of Fire Brigade Leader Training and 10/18/93 Qualifications
}
8 Adequacy of Fire Protection Computers and Software, the 10/18/93 l
Licensee's Success in Reducing the Number of Spurious l
Fire Protection System Alarms, and Other Fire Protection Hardware Problems l
9 Licensee Management's Effectiveness in Identifying, Each Pursuing, and Correcting Plant Problems Inspection 1
10 NRC Review of the Effectiveness of the Licensee's SPEAK 0VT Program j
f 11 Standby Diesel Generator Reliability 11/08/93 i
12 Essential Chiller Reliability 11/01/93 j
13 Monitoring of the Licensee's System Certification 10/12/93 j
Program Ongoing I
14 Adequacy of the Licensee's Resolution of the 10/25/93
?
Reliability and Operability of the Feedwater
(
lsolation Bypass Valves a
. ~.
l t
l
.f I
INSPECTION AREA SCHEDULE 15 Tornado. Damper Testing Issues 10/18/93 l
11/01/93 I
16 Emergency Preparedness Accountability Drills 11/18/93 17 Licensee's Internal Restart Readiness Reviews i
l 18 Operational Readiness Assessment Team
)
l 5
l f
a I
1 l
it 1
)
i
.i 4
.I I
i 1
~ _.
4 i
To support the scheduling of the NRC restart issue inspections, please provide 1
answers to the following questions:
1.
What startup issue closeout packages will be verified for completeness-only and which will be assessed for implementation effectiveness?
2.
When will each restart issue closecut package be completed?
3.
What organizations will assess the restart issues, including those specific issues that will be assessed by those organizations?
4.
When will each line assessment checklist be available for NRC review?
5.
When will each line assessment be completed?
6.
When will the independent assessment plan be available for NRC review?
7.
When will the independent assessment be completed?
8.
When will the results of the independent review of the SPEAK 0VT program be available for NRC review?
9.
When will the results of the Standby Diesel Generator assessment be l
available for NRC review?
10.
Will a third-party review of HL&P's readiness assessment be performed?
If such a review will be conducted, what is the projected date that this review will be completed?
?
4 h
i 4
i I
t l
1 e
.