ML20057D660
| ML20057D660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 09/29/1993 |
| From: | Farber M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Delgeorge L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057D661 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9310050140 | |
| Download: ML20057D660 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000456/1993020
Text
p\\Cf5
-
-
.
,
Q
_
v
a\\
'
SEP 2 91993
g
.
Docket No. 50-456
Docket No. 50-457
License No. NPF-72
License No. NPF-77
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. L. O. DelGeorge
Vice President, Nuclear Oversight
and Regulatory Services
Executive Towers West III
1400 Opus Place, Suite 300
Downers Grove, IL 60515
Dear Mr. DelGeorge:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. S. G. Du Pont,
E. R. Duncan, T. J. Kobetz, and J. D. Smith of this office on July 10 through
September 10, 1993. The inspection included a review of activities authorized
for your Braidwood facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the
findings were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the
enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within
these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations'of procedures-
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
activities'in progress.
The two events described.in Paragraph 6 of this
report represented two different approaches by your staff.- In the case of the
residual heat removal pump activities, station personnel demonstrated good
planning, teamwork, management involvement, and a conservative approach to
ensuring safety.
However, during a prior period, these attributes were not
evident with the activities associated with the fire prevention system until
station management became. involved.
Your staff was effective in determining the root ~causes and human factors
associated with these events. This effort was instrumental in your
development of corrective actions and lessons-learned.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
of NRC requirements. However, as described in the enclosed inspection. report
(Paragraph.6), you identified this violation. Therefore, the violation will
not be subject to enforcement action because your efforts in identifying and
correcting the violation meet the criteria specified in Section VII.B.(2).of
the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
I
(Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part'2, Appendix C,Section V.A.).
040nu
por '
,
7310050140 930929
n
ADOCK 05000456
[S
G
O
,
.
,
.
Commonwealth Edison Company.
2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy' of
_
this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC
Public Document Room.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
-
Sincerely,
Oricinal Sicned by Martin J. Tarter
Martin J. Farber, Chief
Reactor Projects Section IA
Enclosure:
Inspection Reports
No. 50-456/93020(DRP);
No. 50-457/93020(DRP)
Distribution:
S. Berg, Site Vice President
K. Kofron, Station Manager
A. Haeger, Regulatory Assurance
Supervisor
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory Services
Manager
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspectors, Braidwood,
Byron, Zion
D. W. Cassel, Jr., Esq.
R. liubbard
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
Utilities Division
Licensing Project Manager, NRR
R. Newmann, Office of Public
Counsel, State of Illinois Center
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
bcc: PUBLIC - IE01
W
9' >
Hausman
Farber
_(0
4 b.s\\ *0'>