ML20057D144
| ML20057D144 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/24/1993 |
| From: | Selin I, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Bevill T, Jeanne Johnston, Lehman R, Lieberman J, Sabo M, Sasser J, Sharp P HOUSE OF REP., HOUSE OF REP., APPROPRIATIONS, HOUSE OF REP., ENERGY & COMMERCE, SENATE, SENATE, APPROPRIATIONS, SENATE, ENVIRONMENT & PUBLIC WORKS |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057D145 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-58FR21662, RULE-PR-171 CCS, NUDOCS 9310010172 | |
| Download: ML20057D144 (7) | |
Text
}Y0
[ lp** "ow,'o, i
UNITED STATES
%g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
't
~
%, '....."E September 24, 1993 CHAtRMAN The Honorable Martin Olav Sabo, Chairman Committee on the Budget United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with the requirements of OBRA-90 to recover I
100 percent of our budget authority, the NRC published a final rule on July 20, 1993 establishing annual fee schedules for its licensees for fiscal year 1993.
The final rule also eliminated a generic exemption from annual fees previously applicable to nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission's need to revisit the generic exemption for nonprofit educational inscv2 Lions was occasioned by a March 16, 3993, decision of the U.S.
Courc of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Allied Signal, Inc.
v.
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, No. 91-1407 and Consolidated Cases)
)
which forced the Commission to acknowledge the serious weakness j
of, and abandon, the passthrough argument formerly made on behalf of these institutions.
i Following publication of the final rule, the Commission received i
a petition from Cornell and eleven other universities for reconsideration of the final rule and requesting reinstatement of the exemption for nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission has decided to grant the petition to reconsider this matter and is issuing a proposed rule to amend 10 CFR Part 171 to restore the generic exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions.
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed rule which is being
)
transmitted to the Federal Register for a 30 day public comment period.
Sincerely, Y
29007~'
Ivan Selin
Enclosure:
Proposed Rule cc:
Rep. John R.
Kasich I
9310010172 930924
/h PDR COMMS NRCC 1
CORRESPONDENCE PDR o
i e ne,
v i
/
o UNITED STATES
~g
-[%-
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y., 7 g
W ASWNGTON, c. C. 20555 j
t
- j
- 53 *****
September 24, 1993 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Jim Sasser, Chairman Committee on the Budget i
United States Senate Washington, D.C.
20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with the requirements of OBRA-90 to recover 100 percent of our budget authority, the NRC published a final rule on July 20, 1993 establishing annual fee schedules for its licensees for fiscal year 1993.
The final rule also eliminated a generic exemption from annual fees previously applicable to nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission's need to revisit the generic exemption for nonprofit educational institutions was occasioned by a March 16, 1993, decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Allied Signal, Inc. v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, No. 91-1407 and Consolidated Cases) which forced the Commission to acknowledge the serious weakness of, and abandon, the passthrough argument formerly made on behalf of these institutions.
Following publication of the final rule, the Commission received a petition from Cornell and eleven other universities for reconsideration of the final rule and requesting reinstatement of the exemption for nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission has decided to grant the petition to reconsider this matter and is issuing a proposed rule to amend 10 CFR Part 171 to restore the generic exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions.
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed rule which is being transmitted to the Federal Register for a 30 day public comment period.
Sincerely, Ivan Selin
Enclosure:
Proposed Rule cc:
Senator Pete V. Domenici
pCrop y[g
'o tJNITED STATES q
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOM y'
7, g
W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 7
p 4
Y
'%.. + J September 24, 1993 CHAIRMAN l
The Honorable Tom Bevill, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C.-
20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with the requirements of OBRA-90 to recover 100 percent of our budget authority, the NRC published a final rule on July 20, 1993 establishing annual fee schedules for its licensees for fiscal year 1993.
The final rule also eliminated.a generic exemption from annual fees previously applicable to nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission's need to revisit the generic exemption for nonprofit educational institutions was occasioned by a March 16, 1993, decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Allied Signal, Inc. v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, No. 91-1407 and Consolidated Cases) which forced the Commission to acknowledge the serious weakness of, and abandon, the passthrough argument formerly made on behalf of these institutions.
i Following publication of the final rule, the Commission received a petition from Cornell and eleven other universities for reconsideration of the final rule and requesting reinstatement of the exemption for nonprofit educational institutions.
The I
Commission has decided to grant the petition to reconsider this matter and is issuing a proposed rule to amend 10 CFR Part 171 to restore the generic exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions, j
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed rule which is being transmitted to the Federal Register for a 30 day public comment period.
Sincerely, w$ "Jh Ivan Selin
Enclosure:
Proposed Rule cc:
Rep. John T. Myers l
p uog
/
o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICN
.,.g g
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 3
- j
'%... + $g September 24, 1993 CHAIRMAN The Honorable J.
Bennett Johnston, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Washington, D.C.
20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with the requirements of OBRA-90 to recover 100 percent of our budget authority, the NRC published a final rule en July 20, 1993 establishing annual fee schedules for its licensees for fiscal year 1993.
The final rule also eliminated-a generic exemption from annual fees previously applicable to nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission's need to revisit the generic exemption for nonprofit educational institutions was occasioned by a March 16, 1993, decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Allied Signal, Inc. v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, No. 91-1407 and Consolidated Cases) which forced the Commission to acknowledge the serious weakness of, and abandon, the passthrough argument formerly made on behalf of these institutions.
Following publication of the final rule, the Commission received l
a petition from Cornell and eleven other universities for reconsideration of the final rule and requesting reinstatement of the exemption for nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission has decided to grant the petition to reconsider this matter and is issuing a proposed rule to amend 10 CFR Part 171 to restore the generic exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions.
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed rule which is being transmitted to the Federal Register for a 30 day public comment period.
Sincerely, Ivan Selin
Enclosure:
Proposed Rule cc:
Senator Mark O.
Hatfield
- ga arow Io, UNITED STATES
(
.[
1,.,
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E-WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 i
1 6
s, September 24, 1993 i
CHAlHMAN The Honorable. Richard H. Lehman, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Committee on Natural Resources United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
l In accordance with the requirements of OBRA-90 to recover 100 percent of our budget authority, the NRC published a final rule on July 20, 1993 establishing annual fee schedules for its licensees for fiscal year 1993.
The final rule also eliminated a j
generic exemption from annual fees previously applicable to' nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission's need to revisit the generic exemption for nonprofit. educational institutions was occasioned by a March 16, 1993, decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Allied Signal, Inc. v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, No. 91-1407 and Consolidated Cases) which forced the Commission to acknowledge the serious weakness.
of, and abandon, the passthrough argument formerly made on behalf of these institutions.
Following publication of the. final rule, the Commission received a petition from Cornell and eleven other universities for reconsideration of the final rule and requesting reinstatement of the exemption for nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission has decided to grant the petition to reconsider this matter and is issuing a proposed rule to amend 10 CFR Part 171 to restore the generic exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions.
i Enclosed is a copy of the proposed rule which is being-t transmitted to the Federal Register for a 30 day public comment period.
Sincerely, 4
t Ivan Selin f
Enclosure:
Proposed Rule I
cc:
Rep. Barbara Vucanovich
-l
+
Os.* "'00, o
UNITED STATES
[Y NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION m
W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 S
c
~
'%.....J September 24, 1993 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Philip Sharp, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with the requirements of OBRA-90 to recover 100 percent of our budget authority, the NRC published a final rule on July 20, 1993 establishing annual fee schedules for its licensees for fiscal year 1993.
The final rule also eliminated a generic exemption from annual fees previously applicable to nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission's need to revisit the generic exemption for nonprofit educational institutions was occasioned by a March 16, 1993, decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Allied Signal, Inc. v.
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, No. 91-1407 and Consolidated Cases) which forced the Commission to acknowledge the serious weakness of, and abandon, the passthrough argument formerly made on behalf of these institutions.
Following publication of the final rule, the Commission received a petition from Cornell and eleven other universities for reconsideration of the final rule and requesting reinstatement of the exemption for nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission has decided to grant the petition to reconsider this matter and is issuing a proposed rule to amend 10 CFR Part 171 to restore the generic exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions.
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed rule which is being transmitted to the Federal Register for a 30 day public comment period.
Sincerely, 4
Ivan Selin
Enclosure:
Proposed Rule cc:
Rep. Michael Bilirakis
/ p asag%
UNITED STATES
~,
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,,., 7 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 j
4 September 24, 1993 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Joseph I.
Lieberman, Chairman Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Regulation Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Washington, D.C.
20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with the requirements of OBRA-90 to recover 100 percent of our budget authority, the NRC published a final rule on July 20, 1993 establishing annual fee schedules for its licensees for fiscal year 1993.
The final rule also eliminated'a generic exemption from annual fees previously applicable to nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission's need tu revisit the generic exemption for nonprofit educational institutions was occasioned by a March 16, 1993, decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Allied Signal, Inc. v.
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission'and the United States of America, No. 91-1407 and Consolidated Cases) which forced the Commission to acknowledge the serious weakness of, and abandon, the passthrough argument formerly made on behalf of these institutions.
l Following publication of the final rule, the Commission received a petition from Cornell and eleven other universities for reconsideration of the final rule and requesting reinstatement of the exemption for nonprofit educational institutions.
The Commission has decided to grant the petition to reconsider this matter and is issuing a proposed rule to amend 10 CFR Part 171 to l
restore the generic exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions.
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed rule which is being transmitted to the Federal Register for a 30 day public comment i
period.
Sincerely,
/
w / w,/
/
A Ivan Selin
Enclosure:
Proposed Rule cc:
Senator Alan K.
Simpson
-