ML20057B296

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Requirements Memo Re Briefing Held on 930910 Involving Proposal to Realign Regions IV & V.Commission Requests Further Info to Resolve Issues Promptly
ML20057B296
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/16/1993
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 M930910A, NUDOCS 9309210163
Download: ML20057B296 (2)


Text

I o'

I

[ p*to,%

o UNITED STATES 3s

'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHIN GT ON. D.C. 20555 S[.

If IN RESPONSE, PLEASE "jj REFER TO:

M930910A i

t September 16, 1993 OF F IC E OF THE SECRETARY James M. Taylor MEMORANDUM TO:

Executive Director for O hhations FROM:

Samuel J.

Chilk, Secretary

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIS NG ON PROPOSAL TO REALIGN NRC REGIONS IV AND V (SECY-93-171 and SECY-93-252), 9:00 A.M.,

FRIDAY, SEFFEMBER 10, 1993, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on the proposal to realign NRC Regions IV and V.

The Commission requested further information on whether Regions I, II and III conduct 100% audits of travel vouchers and whether j

any of these Regions would be in a position to perform the health physics mobile lab functions of Regions IV and V.

(EDO)

(SECY Suspense:

9/17/93)

The Commission also requested a comparison of Option 3, as presented in SECY-93-171, and Option 0, as presented in SECY-93-252, specifically, if Option 3 includes any of the same efficiencies in Option O.

With respect to the use of contract personnel, the comparison should include contract personnel in instances where a cost savings is realized and delete contract personnel where it does not provide a cost savings.

Chart 6 should be revised accordingly to reflect this.

(EDO)

(SECY Suspense:

9/17/93)

In the interest of resolving this issue as quickly as possible, the Commission requests an expedited response to the above.

After the Commission has received the above information, it will consider a final decision on the options proposed for the possible realignment of Regions IV and V.

The staff should also examine the efficiencies presented in SECY-93-252 for potential application in the other regions and in headquarters.

9309210163 930916 PDR 10cyg 0

PT9.7 pyg

[

0 cc:

The Chairman Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Remick Commissioner de Planque OGC OCA OIG Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail) j PDR - Advance i

DCS - P1-24 i

j l

4 t

i.