ML20057B053

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-155/93-11 on 930716-0827.No Violation Noted
ML20057B053
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1993
From: Phillips M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Donnelly P
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML20057B054 List:
References
NUDOCS 9309170107
Download: ML20057B053 (3)


See also: IR 05000155/1993011

Text

) .

p,s teau

UNITED STATES

og

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISslON

1

g

Q

REGION Ill

$

[

799 ROOSEVELT ROAD

O,

% . . . #,&

CLEN ELLYN. ILLINOl$ $0137

.+

1

SEP o 9 3993

j

,

Docket No. 50-155

l

Consumers Power Company

l

ATTN:

P.M. Donnelly

e

Plant Manager

'

Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant

10269 US 31 North

Charlevoix, MI 49720

!

Dear Mr. Donnelly:

I

(

l

This refers to the routHe safety inspection conducted by Messrs. E. Plettner,

R. Iermon, and R. Twigg of this office fram July 16 through August 27, 1993.

l

The inspection included a review of activities-at the Big Rock. Point Nuclear

facility authorized by NRC Operating License No. OPR-6.

At the conclusion of

6

the inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff

,

identified in the enclosed report.

j

,

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.

Within

~

l

these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures

'

and representative records, observations, and interviews with personnel.

'

The results of this inspection indicated improvement of inside-containment

j

material c m'ition and cleanliness, reduction of outage dose through strong

i

adherence to the outage schedule and ALARA planning,. and improvement in the

!

use of shutdown-risk assessments. While the conduct of infrequent-activity

i

briefings for the core reload and head-off-critical. test were good, a similar

j

briefing for the primary plant hydrostatic test was poor, contributing to the

loss-of-control of primary pressure during the test.

Another example'of poor

coordination and oversight concerned the troubleshooting and repair activities

on the emergency and standby diesel generators.

1

,

No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the-course of this

inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC

Public Document Room.

,

l

160098

.

.I

l

9309170107 930909

'

'

PDR

ADOCK 05000155

[ -

-

G

PDR

,

- _ , -

-

,

..

.

.

.

. .

._

. - . -

~ . ~ . . - . . . . , , ~ . - -

1.

T.

l

0

S U U 3 1993

\\

\\

r

Con.sumers Power Company

2

l

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

!

l

Sincerely,

,

.

,

l

M. P. Phillips, Chief

Reactor Projects Section 2B

l

Enclosure:

'

Inspection Report

No. 50-155/930ll(DRP)

cc w/crclosure:

l

David P. Hoffman, Vice President

Nuclear Operations

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspector, Rlll

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

Public Health

Big Rock Point, LPM, NRR

SRI, Palisades

bcc'

fisl.%

a

\\

p0

5'

i

.

.

i

l

SEP 0 91993

Consumers Power Company

2

i

l

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

i

gf

M. P. Phillips, Chief

Reactor Projects Section 2B

Enclosure:

Inspection Report

,

l

No. 50-155/930ll(DRP)

cc w/ enclosure:

David P. Hoffman, Vice President

Nuclear Operations

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspector, RIII

l

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

Public Health

'

Big Rock Point, LPM, NRR

SRI, Palisades

!

!

l

i

RIII

Jll

II

p3;O

(

11Iwigg

Piro

illips

I

i