ML20057A652
| ML20057A652 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 09/17/1993 |
| From: | Blaisdell J, Rodgers R NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| EP-93-564, PROC-930917, NUDOCS 9309150105 | |
| Download: ML20057A652 (79) | |
Text
f - 2/5~
30~ Q3' FIGURE 7.3 Jb 33[-
SJ3 ItKNEITII:A!iT UTII.ITil!!i
]
,,,_,m.-.:.-.
T B
. a...~.~, w.w PROCEDURE TRANSMITTAL RECEIPT FORM @]
g
-.-c.=~.
O>
t
< o
.. ;==
~
.-, e TO:
CONTROL COPY HOLDER #
3'-
Date: 09/17/93 CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS PROCEDURE MANUAL FROM:
R. C. RODGERS, DIRECTOR, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT:
NEW/ REVISED PROCEDURES Attached please find new or revised procedures for the Corporate Organization for Nuclear incidents Procedure Manual assigned to you. Also find a new Table of Contents and a memo describing the changes to each procedure.
]J Please sign and return entire form to:
R. C. Rodgers, Emergency Preparedness NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY POST OFFICE BOX 270 (Room W-125)
HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 This acknowledges receipt of the Corporate Organization for Nuclear incidents Procedures information contained in Transmittal No. 79, dated September 17,1993.
7 p.
.; o Signature of Manual Holder
- Date Copy No.
- lf signing for the Manual Holder, please indicate Manual Holder's name.
kd O
14ones 930Y150105 930917 CONI 1.01 Rev.
23
~~#
PDR ADOCK 05000245 '
Date: December 30,1992 F
ppa ji._
Page:
7.3-1 of 1 nt y w J
E ___
MOSFf'Hi!JtST tlTIIJTII!S g
1,_.,~.a.
M sit.h W.5W f.i$f "$ (6LOTDP UW8MeV
-l j
m.,_,.~.a...
-, e,.e,.i s u.. a cm..
g wet we % i t*it.tw September 17,1993 EP-93-564 TO:
CONI Procedure Manual Copyholders FROM:
R. C. Rodgers O
(Ext. 5655)
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF CONI CHANGES FOR TRANSMITTAL _ NO. 79, DATED SEPTEMBER 17,1993 CONI 1.02, Rev. 46 and CONI 5.01, Rev. 24 The Technical Support Team roster has been updated.
O CONI 4.12, Rev. 6 The recently issued State of Connecticut Procedure, "DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Recommendations" has replaced the former state procedure. The new state procedure uses p!anned PARS associated with posture codes; no calculations are required. The NU PAR form, Attachment 8.A, has also been revised to reflect this.
RCR/JGM/jha O
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL O
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No.
Section Title Section 1 Common Administrative and Operational Procedures P
Section 2 None Section 3 Director of Corporate Emergency Response Organization Section 4 Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment Section 5 Manager of Technical Support 1
Section 6 Manager of Resources 4
Section 7 Manager of External Communications Section 8 Manager of Public Information Section 9 NUSCO, Nuclear Operations Duty Officer Section 10 Emergency Plan Surveillance, Maintenance and Coordination t
Section 11 None Section 12 Recovery Operations i
Section 13 Information Resources Group Team CONI T of C Rev.
76 O
Date: September 17,1993 j
Page: 1 of 12
e CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL 9
SECTION 1.
COMMON ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 1.01 Preparation, issuance and Control of 23 12/30/92 Procedures CONI 1.02 Corporate Emergency Response 46 09/17/93 Organization (CERO)
CONI 1.03 Alerting and Notification Using the 26 10/30/92 Radiopager System CONI 1.04 CERO Staff Training 7
12/30/92 CONI 1.05 Corporate EOC Operations 16 10/30/92 CONI 1.06 Corporate Organization for Recovery 10 07/24/92 Operations CONI 1.07 OFiS Operations 2
07/24/92 CONI 1.08 ERDS Implementation 0
02/12/93 CONI T of C Rev.
76 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 2 of 12
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL SECTION 3.
DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 3.01 On-Call CERO Director 20 02/12/93 I
O
{
CONI T of C Rev.
76 O
Date: September 17,1993 Page: 3 of 12
e CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL SECTION 4.
MANAGER OF RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Revision issue Procedure Number Procedure Tit e Number Date l
CONI 4.01 On Call Radiological Assessment Staff 14 03/15/93 Logistics CONI 4.02 On-Call Radiological Assessment Staff 20 03/15/93 Responsibilities pd General Guidelines CONI 4.03 Estimating Post-Accident Release Rates 9
12/17/90 CONI 4.04 Deleted CONI 4.05 On-Call Field Team Deployment and Radio 11 10/22/90 Operation CONI 4.06 Direction of POSL Field Team 8
04/15/92 Sampling CONI 4.07 inhalation and Ingestion Dose 8
04/15/92 Calculations CONI 4.08 Accident Dose Assessment Model 10 03/15/93 CONI 4.09 On-Call Meteorological Team 8
02/07/92 Responsibilities and Support Functions CONI 4.10 On-Call Radiological Assessment Staff 20 03/15/93 Telephone List CONI 4.11 Radionuclide Deposition and Dose 1
06/15/91 Calculation CONI 4.12 Protective Action Recommendations 6
09/17/93 CONI 4.13 Relocation Surveys 0
04/15/92 CONI T of C Rev.
76 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 4 of 12
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL O
SECTION 5.
MANAGER OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CON! 5.01 On-Call Technical Support Team 24 09/17/93 l
O l
i j
j j
l i
l CON! T of C Rev.
76
{
O Date: September 17,'1993 i
Page: 5 of 12 1
i
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL O
SECTION 6.
MANAGER OF RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 6.01 On-Call Corporate Manager of Resources 3
12/30/92 0
1 CONI T of C Rev.
76 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 6 of 12
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL O
SECTION 7.
MANAGER OF EXTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 7.01 On-Call Manager of External 7
06/29/93 Communications O
CONI T of C Rev.
76 O
Date: September 17,1993 Page: 7 of 12 I
i
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL O
SECTION 8.
MANAGER OF PUBLIC INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 8.01 Public information 18 08/09/93 O
CONI T of C Rev.
76 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8 of 12 F
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL SECTION 9.
NUSCO, NUCLEAR OPERATIONS DUTY OFFICER TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 9.01 Incident Notification and 16 06/29/93 Communications CONI 9.02 Emergency Notification Response 3
06/29/93 System (ENRS) Operations O
CONI T of C Rev.
76 O
Date: September 17,1993 Page: 9 of 12
-i J
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL i
e!
SECTION 10. EMERGENCY PLAN SURVEILLANCE, MAINTENANCE AND COORDINATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 10.01 Corporate EOC Equipment and ERDS 27 06/29/93 Surveillances CONI 10.02 Emergency Plans Changes 2
06/29/93 CONI 10.03 Emergency Preparedness Cyclical 2
06/29/93 Schedule CONI 10.04 Exercise Preparation 1
03/15/93 CONI 10.05 Management of Drill and Exercise 1
03/15/93 Critique items O
l i
CON! T of C Rev.
76 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 10 of 12 i
4 CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL SECTION 12. RECOVERY OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision issue Number
_ Procedure Title Number Date CONI 12.01 Implementation of Recovery 2
06/15/91 Operations i
{
O CONI T of C Rev.
76 O.
Date: September 17,1993 Page: 11 of 12
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE MANUAL O
SECTION 13. INFORMATION RESOURCES GROUP TEAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Procedure Revision Issue Number Procedure Title Number Date CONI 13.01 Information Resources Group Team 8
02/12/93 O
CONI T of C Rev.
76 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 12 of 12
O CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE CONI 1.02 CORPORATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION O
This Procedure Change is Approved, and Appropriate 10CFR50.54(q) sb e" 't g
,,, 3-L 2 4'
i Actions Have Been Taken.
//
EPD - Technical Programs Supervisor Revision:
46 Effective Date:
September 17,1993 Concurrence:
Corporate Nucl[N Emergency Plan Coordinator O
s CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE CONI 1.02 CORPORATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure identifies the individuals who will fulfill the different functions required by the Corporate Emergency Response Organization (CERO). See Reference 3.1. The guidelines for the recovery organization are established in Reference 3.2.
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to all corporate office individuals assigned responsibilities for fulfilling functions necessary to respond to nuclear incidents.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 NEO Procedure 2.04, " Corporate Organization for Nuclear incidents."
3.2 CONI Procedure 1.06, " Corporate Organization for Recovery Operations."
3.3 CONI Procedure 1.03, " Alerting and Notification using the Radiopager System."
4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Minor Nuclear incidents - Those which usually require only reporting and notification of state / local officials and corporate management. These are usually responded to by the normal corporate organization.
These are:
Radioactive MATERIALS INCIDENTS, Posture Codes - Golf and Fox; GENERAL INTEREST EVENT, Posture Code - Echo; UNUSUAL EVENT, Posture Code -
Delta-One and Delta-Two.
4.2 Serious Nuclear incidents-Those which require activation of on-call emergency organizations at the stations and the corporate office. These are: ALERT, Posture Code - Charlie-One; SITE AREA EMERGENCY, Posture Code - Charlie-Two; GENERAL EMERGENCY, Posture Codes - Bravo and Alpha.
4.3 On-Call CERO - The group of individuals who will respond to the Corporate Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and State EOC within 75 minutes of the receipt of notification over the radiopager system of an Alert or higher event.
They will support the station and perform as directed by the NU Senior Management during the emergency phase of operation (i.e., until the Unit is in a stable condition).
4.4 Call-Out CERO - The group of individuals who will respond to the Corporate EOC and State EOC when notified to report by the NUSCO Nuclear Operations Duty Officer (NUDO). They will support the Station and perform as directed by the CERO Director during the emergency phase of operation (i.e., until the Unit 1
is in a stable condition).
(Q,/
CONI 1.02 Rev. 46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 1 of 4 t
e 4.5 Normel Hours - The hours between 0800 and 1630 of each working weekday.
4.6 Off-Normal Hours - The hours between 1630 and 0800 of each working weekday and all hours on weekends and holidays.
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The Corporate Nuclear Emergency Plan Coordinator (CNEC) coordinates the ertablishment of the CERO as required by Reference 3.1 and coordinates the selection of its on-call staff.
5.2 The Lead Director shall approve CERO staffing.
5.3 The lead Nuclear Operations Duty Officer for the CERO shall prepare annual on-call schedules and provide the CNEC with a copy.
6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 Emeraency Oraanization 6.1.1 Annually, the CNEC shall coordinate CERO staff selection and submit it for approval to the Lead Director. The CERO shall be established in accordance with Reference 3.1.
This organization is shown in Figure 7.1 and its responsibilities are given in Attachment 8.A.
6.1.2 The staff selected for the on-call CERO is provided in Attachment 8.B.
6.1.3 Changes to the on-call staff shall be made after coordinating with the CNEC and with the approval of the Lead Director. Attachment 8.B shall be revised accordingly within 30 days by the CNEC.
6.1.4 The Lead NUDO for the CERO shall prepare annual on-call schedules for the staff in the format of Figure 7.2. The weekly on-call schedule shall commence on Monday. If Monday is a holiday, it shall commence on Tuesday. These annual schedules shall be provided to the CNEC.
6.1.5 The Lead NUDO shall prepare a weekly on-call schedule using the format of Figure 7.3. This shall be posted near the Lead NUDO's office.
6.1.6 The Lead NUDO shall prepare a list of nemes, addresses and telephone numbers of all on-call and call-out staff in the format of Figure 7.4 on an annual basis. The Lead Director and Lead Managers shallidentify to the Lead NUDO all changes to this list of names, addresses and telephone numbers.
6.1.7 If the on-callindividuals wish to change their on-call weekly schedules they must find a qualified replacement. Furthermore, in order to comply with NUP 90, they must ask the qualified replacement the following questions:
a.
Are you available for unscheduled on-call assignments?
CONI 1.02 Rev. 46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 2 of 4
b.
Have you taken any medication, drugs, or consumed alcohol, which might affect your ability to perform on-call duties?
j c.
Have you consumed any alcoholic beverages within the past five O
hours?
d.
Do you feel fit to perform on-call assigned duties?
If the person has answered yes to questions a and d and no to questions b and c, then the schedule substitution may be made.
Notify the NUDO, include the specific dates and times of the substitution.
i During normal hours, call the Nuclear Operations Support Services Branch and advise the secretary of the on-call schedule change. During off-normal hours use the meridian mail system (telephone no.
665-5961). Notify Nuclear Operations, as before, during the next normal hours period.
6.1.8 Call-out individuals shall proceed to the Corporate EOC as soon as possible after being notified.
6.2 Serious Nuclear incident For serious nuclear incidents, the CERO will report to the Corporate EOC and State EOC within 75 minutes after being notified of an ALERT, SITE AREA EMERGENCY, or GENERAL EMERGENCY to support the Station Emergency-Response Organization.
6.3 Minor Nuclear incidents 6.3.1 For nuclear incidents classified as Radioactive MATERIALS INCIDENT -
Posture Codes Golf and Fox; GENERALINTEREST EVENT, Posture Code
- Echo; and UNUSUAL EVENT, Posture Codes - Delta-One and Delta-Two, the normal corporate functional organization will be in effect.
Specific notification actions are described in Reference 3.3.
6.3.2 in the case of UNUSUAL EVENT Posture Code - Delta-Two nuclear incidents, the Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment and his support staff will mobilize as necessary.
7.0 FIGURES Fioure No.
Fiaure Title 7.1 Corporate Emergency Response Organization 1
7.2 CERO Staff-Managers Annual On-Call Schedule 7.3 CERO Weekly On-Call Schedule O
CONI 1.02 Rev. 46 Date: September 17,1993-Page: 3 of 4 r
0 7.4 On-Call and Call-Out Staff Telephone Numbers and Addresses 8.0 ATTACHMENTS Attachment No.
Attachment Title 8.A Functional Responsibilities of the CERO 8.B On-Call CERO Staff Appointment List O
i Ol CONI 1.02 Rev. 46 Date: September 17,1993 i
Page: 4of4
O O
O FIGURE 7.1 CORPORATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION Executive Vice President Nuclear I
Director of Director of CERO Station Emergency
Response
Organization Manager of Manager NU Executive
- Inf rmation Manager of Nuclear Radiological of Manager of Spokesperson Consequence Technical R sources at me mam Group eam Co un ation Du y ff er Assessment Support EOC Radiological Thermal Hydraulic Emergency Assess. Eng.
Engineering Team News Meteorological Manager at Team Electrical Communications
- the State Engineering Team Rep at State EOC EOC Environmental Sampling Team Mechanical Manager of Engineering Team "These are Call-Out positions.
Public Field Team Data in rmation Coordinator Rad Work Center
- Coordinator CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17.1993 Page: 7.1-1 of 1
1 FIGURE 7.2 CERO STAFF-MANAGERS ANNUAL ON-CALL SCHEDULE Year Page of Emergency Rad. Work Field Team Rad.
Week (Mon 0800 Nuc. Ops.
News Mgr. Public Mgr. Rad.
Mgr. Tech.
Ctr.
Data Assessment to Mon 0800)
Director Duty Off.
Manager Info.
Conseq.
Support Coordinator Coordinator Engineer
- When holiday occurs on Monday, the schedule coverage extends to 0800 on Tuesday.
CONI 1.02 Rev. 46 Date: September 17.1993 Page: 7.2-1 of 2
s O
e c
3 r r gu 9
Mo 9
s 1
e R
7 1
re2 bf t
mo xEm e2 t
.m p2 o
6 e rg 4S7 C
M
- e e vt g ea a RDP mae T
E G
L R
U I
D EH la am C
S ic e T
r t
L c.
fo L
leg A
E n E
C
-N e
g g
O y
a n
a P
E m d
L
.a s
2 A
h e e
2 7
U cT u
0 e
T OR N
1 E
M n
I N
o N
A 0
O U
m 0
C s
G S
8 c
lai a 0
I F
R mlu e E
aT o
r G
er t
hd g s
A T y n d
N HE ne A
t x
M t
e p
e F
m g
F e
a x
r A
e e
T d
n v
o o
S le N
c O
iF le u
R v
d E
n t
e E
C r
p h
a m
c e
s e
Y x
e E
h t
,y a
d r
n om o
ea e
M te T M
no s
ru 0
c 0) c 80 o
008 y
O n0 a
o d
i Mn lo o
(
h kM e
n o
e e
t h
W W
FIGURE 7.3 CERO WEEKLY ON-CALL SCHEDULE WEEK OF TO Director of Corporate Emeroency Hesconse Oroanization (DCERO)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd. (Time /Date)
Initials Nuclear Operations Duty Officer (NUDO)
Name Revision:
Name Per Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Emeroency News Manaaer (ENM - State EOC)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Menacer of Public Information (CMPI - Corporate EOC)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Manaaer of Resources (CMOR)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Menacer of External Communications (CMEC)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials IRG Team (IRG)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials O
CONI 1.02 Rev. 46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 7.3-1 of 3
FIGURE 7.3 CERO WEEKLY ON-CALL SCHEDULE WEEK OF TO l
Manaaer of Rad. Cons. Asses.
(CMRCA)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Radioloaical Work Center Coordinator (RWCC)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials field Team Data Coordinator (CFTDC)
Name Revisior -
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Radioloaical Assessment Enaineer (RAE)
Name i
Revision Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Meteoroloaical Team (CMET) j Name 1
Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Environmental Samplina Team 4
(POSL - Exempt)
Name
[
Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials O
CONI 1.02 Rev. 46
- Date: September 17,1993 Page: 7.3-2 of 3 i
i
t S
FIGURE 7.3 CERO WEEKLY ON-CALL SCHEDULE WEEK OF TO Environmental Samplina Team (POSL - Nonexempt)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials i
Menaaer of Technical Support (CMTS)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Thermal Hydraulics Enaineer (CMTS-TH)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Mechanical Enainegr (CMTS-M)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials El?ctrical Enaineer (CMTS-E)
Name Revision:
Name Per. Cov'd (Time /Date)
Initials Call out:
Two additional Directors One additional Duty Officer One Nuclear Network Coordinator O'
CONI 1.02 Rev. 46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 7.3-3 of 3
FIGURE 7.4 CERO ON-CALL & CALL-OUT STAFF O
CERO
Title:
Year:
Business Name Home Address Home Telephone Extension 8
O O
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 7.4-1 of 1 -
i e
ATTACHMENT 8.A CERO DIRECTOR Reports To:
Executive Vice President - Nuclear Supervises:
Corporate Emergency Operations Center Director of Station Emergency Response Organization CERO Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment CERO Manager of Technical Support CERO Manager of External Communications CERO Manager of Resources CERO Manager of Public Information CERO Nuclear Operations Duty Officer CERO Information Resources Group Team Basic Function:
Ensures the coordination of station emergency response operations and CERO support of station cmergency response and recovery operations. Serves as the official company spokesperson for the emergency. Also ensures NU response actions are coordinated with the State emergency response actions.
Primary Responsibilities:
1.
Assume command and coordination of all corporate and station emergency response O
operations.
2.
Coordinate NU emergency response operations with the State emergency response actions.
3.
Anticipate situations and problems; make contingency plans.
4.
Dispatch responsible person (s) to Joint Media Center and State of Connecticut EOC.
5.
Assign specific tasks to the CERO Managers and solicit recommendations from them.
Principal Workina Relationship:
1 1.
Director of Station Emergency Response Organization 2.
NU Corporate Management 3.
All CERO Managers 4.
State EOC and Joint Media Center Management e;
l l
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.A-1 of 10 l
1 ATTACHMENT 8.A CERO MANAGER OF RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Reports To:
CERO Director Supervises:
Personnel assigned to Radiological Assessment Basic Function:
Provide assessment of stations' radioactive releases on the public health and safety.
Primary Responsibilities:
1.
Develop Protective Action Recommendations (PARS) and interface with State / Federal agencies in the assessment of the dose consequences, public protective actions and i
radiological data collection / analyses.
2.
Recommend changes in Emergency Classification based on radiological conditions or potential radiological consequences.
3.
Evaluate or recommend potential means to minimize the release of radioactive material from the site.
4.
Support Site Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment with personnel and methods for off-site dose calculation and assessment of station releases. Do more O
sophisticated assessments as necessary.
5.
Deploy off-site monitoring teams, trend radiological measurements, and correlate calculated off-site dose projections.
l 6.
Provide emergency dosimetry services.
7.
Provide health physics and radiological emergency services.
Principal Workino Relationshios:
1.
CERO Director t
2.
Site Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment 3.
CERO Manager of Technical Support i
4.
CERO Manager of External Communications i
5.
CERO Manager of Resources 6.
State Department of Environmental Protection Management i
O r
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 i
Page: 8.A-2 of 10 i
ATTACHMENT 8.A Staff Expertise Needed:
Off-site Radiation Dose Calculation Health Physics Calculation Environmental Radiological Monitoring Meteorology Radiochemistry Radiation Shie!ci.ag and ALARA Evaluations Personnel Dosimetry State / Local Community Emergency Plans On-Call Support Teams:
Radiological Work Center Coordinator Radiological Assessment Engineer Field Team Data Coordinator Meteorological Team Environmental Field Sample Collection Team O
i
~
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.A-3 of 10
i e
ATTACHMENT 8.A CERO MANAGER OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT i
l Reports To:
CERO Director Supervises:
Personnel assigned to reactor core thermal-hydraulics support teams, mechanical, and electric engineering technical support teams.
Basic Function:
Provide engineering support to restore the plant to a safe, stable condition.
I Primary Responsibilities:
1.
Provide engineering support, as requested.
1 2.
Consult with technical experts within the related disciplines, as requested.
3.
Evaluate plant technical data, trend information and determine corrective actions to mitigate the consequences of the incident.
4.
Determine potential for core damage.
i Principal Workino Relationships:
1.
CERO Director 2.
Manager of On-Site Technical Support i
3.
CERO Manager of Resources 4.
CERO Manager of External Communications S.
CERO Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment t
Staff Expertise Needed:
Fluid Dynamics and ECCS Systems Core Thermal - Hydraulics Mechanical Engineering l
i Electrical Engineering Safety Analysis
System Design
I On-Call Support Teams:
Electrical Engineering Team Mechanical Engineering Team Core Thermal-Hydraulic Engineering Team
}
t i
l CONI 1.02 Rev.
46
[
Date: September 17,1993 Page:
8.A-4 of 10 I
e ATTACHMENT 8.A CERO MANAGER OF EXTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS Reports To:
CERO Director Supervises:
Personnel assigned to external communications at the Corporate EOC.
Basic Function:
Coordinate technical communications between the Corporate EOC and the Site EOC, the Local, State and Federal EOCs and also the Joint Media Center.
Primary Responsibilities:
1.
Collect technical data for CERO and NU Senior Management.
2.
Assist the CERO Manager of Public Information to insure technical accuracy and timeliness of NU input at the Joint Media Center.
3.
Relay updated information periodically to the other personnelin the Corporate EOC and NU senior management.
4.
Provide a person to assist the NU Corporate Representative in the State EOC.
Principal Workina Relationships:
1.
CERO Director 2.
CERO Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment 3.
CERO Manager of Technical Support 4.
CERO Manager of Resources 5.
Site Manager of Technical Communications 6.
CERO Manager of Public Information 7.
NRC Regional and Headquarters Staff Staff Expertise Needed:
Telephone Operation Technical Writing Typing l
9:
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page:
8.A-5 of 10
)
ATTACHMENT 8.A CERO MANAGER OF RESOURCES Reports To:
CERO Director Supervises:
Staff Administrative and logistics groups and design and construction groups assigned to assist in the emergency operations.
Bnsic Function:
Coordinate the acquisition of personnel and equipment from within NU or from consultants / contractors needed to support emergency operations.
Primary Responsibilities:
1.
Acquire personnel or consultants for engineering design and construction reviews.
2.
Acquire housing, office, and construction equipment.
3.
Acquire personnel to meet needs in the technical and craft disciplines.
4.
Arrange for purchasing, financial, and legal assistance.
5.
Provide for food deliveries to the Corporate EOC or other designated location.
6.
Provide for general office support such as typing, reproduction and print duplication.
l Principal Workina Relationshios-i 1.
CERO Director 2.
Site Manager of Resources 3.
CERO Manager of Technical Support 4.
CERO Manager of External Communications 5.
CERO Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment 6.
Corporate Purchasing / Legal Departments Staff Expertise Needed:
Acquisition and logistics of different technical and craft personnel and equipment Purchasing Agent Transportation Consultant Security Consultant i
Administrative Consultant Legal insurance Medical CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.A-6 of 10
a ATTACHMENT 8.A CERO EMERGENCY NEWS MANAGER Reports To:
CERO Director; NU Executive Spokesperson Supervises:
NU Nuclear Information Staff Directs the overall public information response for NU Btsic Function:
Primary Responsibilities:
1.
Supervise the NU Nuclear information Staff.
2.
Coordinate all public information functions, including all NU news releases.
Serve as the NU Official Spokesperson at the State EOC until relieved by the NU Executive 3.
Spokesperson.
Principal Workina Relationship:
1.
CERO Director 2.
NU Executive Spokesperson 3.
Corporate Manager of Public Information Staff Expertise Needed:
Communications Specialists J
l 1
Oi CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.A-7 of 10
s ATTACHMENT 8.A CERO MANAGER OF PUBLIC INFORMATION Reports To:
CERO Director Supervises:
NU Nuclear information Staff assigned to the Corporate EOC.
Basic Function:
Draft NU news releases; coordinate all public information activities at Berlin.
Primary Responsibilities:
1.
Acquire technicalinformation from the Site Manager of Public information and CERO Directors / Managers.
2.
Prepare NU news releases for the Joint Media Center.
3.
Assist in the preparation of materials for use in TV/ Radio appearances and news conferences at the Joint Media Center by NU management.
Principal Workina Relationship:
1.
CERO Director i
2.
CERO Manager of External Communications 3.
Emergency News Manager at the Joint Media Center 4.
Site Manager of Public Information Staff Expertise Needed:
i i
Communications Specialists i
J I
I i
1 O
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: ' 8.A-8 of 10 l
a
e ATTACHMENT 8.A NUCLEAR OPERATIONS DUTY OFFICER Reports To:
CERO Director Supervises:
None Basic Function:
To ensure that the on-call and call-out staff is assembled at the Corporhte EOC and to assist the CERO Director in maintaining communications with the station EOF.
Primary Responsibilities: (at EOC) 1.
Initia!!y er.sure that all on-call CERO staff have responded.
2.
Assist the CERO Director in maintaining communications with the Station EOF, control room and TSC.
3.
Maintain Corporate EOC status boards and commitment follow lists.
4.
Assist the CERO Director in rnaintaining documentation of decisions and recommendations.
5.
Call out CERO staff as deemed appropriate by the CERO Director.
Staff Expertise:
O Knowledge of station operations O'
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page:
8.A-9 of 10
ATTACHMENT 8.A INFORMATION RESOURCES GROUP TEAM Reports To:
CERO Director Supervises:
None Basic Function:
To ensure on-call staff is able to access the computer programs necessary to l
support the CERO.
Primary Responsibilities: (at EOC) 1.
Act as a single point of contact for all computer related problems arising in the Emergency Response Facilities.
2.
Support the operation of the following programs:
OFIS, and NPR Staff Expertise:
Knowledge of IRG computer systems and OFIS and NPR software.
O r
1 i
O CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993
'l Page: 8.A-10 of 10 j
]
ATTACHMENT 8.B NORTHEIAST LITIIJTIES M
E
==-~~-
1
-,, - rmumm-M L
L J ~ ^"" " ' "-
O September 17,1993 WDR-93-GN-216 d
TO:
Distribution * * ' f' FROM:
W. D. Romberg (x3520)
SUBJECT:
REVISION TO THE CERO ON-CALL AND CALL-OUT STAFF This memo revises the previous June 29,1993 listing of the CERO staff. A vertical line signifies changes made by this revision.
Directors W. D. Romberg (lead)
E. A. DeBarba G. L. Johnson G. D. Baston E. R. Foster R. T. Harris M. V. Bonaca H. P. Risley R. M. Kacich Manaaers Radioloolcal Consecuence Assessment R. C. Rodgers (lead)
R. A. Crandall H. W. Siegrist D. G. Aloi R. J. Schmidt Manaaers Technical Support J. A. Blaisdell (lead)
M. P. Hi!!s A.R.Roby D. A. Dube R. P. Necci M. S. Kai J. H. Ferguson G. R. Pitman O
1 CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 j
Date: September 17,1993 j
Page:
8.B-1 of 4 l
l
.Nuciser Operctions Duty Officers T. J. Dente (lead)
M. F. Marino O
T. A. Mulder M. J. Whitney E. Abolafia Corporate Manaaers Public Information (Berlin EOC)
P. C. Bandzes (lead)
A. J. Castagno J. T. Pillitere A. J. Tatro R. J. Gallagher S. A. Aitken D. L. Beauchamp A. E. Nericcio P. A. Winkler G. M. Wilson S. L. Jackson Emeroency News Manaaers (State EOC)
A. J. Castagno (lead)
A. J. Tatro S. A. Aitken R. J. Gallagher P. C. Bandzes G. M. Wilson S. L. Jackson D. L. Beauchamp R. A. Winkler A. E. Nericcio J. T. Pillittere information Resources Group Team D. O. Flood (Coordinator)
D. J. Auretta E. Babij B. A. Pawlicki T. E. Finch B. D. Fitterman Mechanical Enaineers (reports to Technical Support Manaaer)
G. E. Cornelius F. J. Lukaszek R. C. Thomas M. Kupinski C. J. Ashton P. D. Mason R. W. Wells S. J. Weyland Electrical Enaineers (reports to Technical Support Manaaer)
D. B. Vail R.J. Young G. M. Olsen G. R. Townsend G. J. Filippides S.I. Stricker M. T. Smaga N.
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.B-2 of 4
i Therm-l Hydrrulics Enoineer (rcoorts to Technical Support Mentoer)
M. L. VanHaltern (lead)
A. Gharakhanian A. Chyra N. K. Jain W. B. O'Connell D. J. Parker Y. F. Khalil J. Parillo C. H. Wu J. R. Guerci Meteorolonical Team (reports to Rad. Consea. Assessment Manaaer)
H. L. Chamberlain H. L. Conway R. T. Myers S. L. Ragland J. W. Leavitt Radioloalcal Assessment Enaineer (reports to Rad. Consea. Assessment Manaaer)
D. W. Miller J. G. McHugh C. A. Flory T. E. Quattrochi S. M. Torf T. L. Drake Field Team Data Coordinator (reports to Rad. Consea. Assessment Manaaer)
A. S. Klotz C. Borea T. J. Reyher M. E. Birch G. J. Kelly L. M. DeLuca C. J. Scully R. D. Hinkle Radioloaical Work Center Coordinator (reports to Rad. Consea. Assessment Manaaer)
W. J. Eakin W. R. Koste D. W. Marzilli L. J. Landry J. J. Hawxhurst I.L.Haas O
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17,1993 i
Page:
8.B-3 of 4
4 Environmental Samplina Team (reports to Rad. Consea. Assessment Mrnault}
r (Exempt)
G. A. Martel (lead)
O R. W. Parker D. P. Struthers P. T. Stachly R. C. Marchinkoski Environmental Samplina Team (reports to Rad. Conseu. Assessment Manaaer)
(Non-Exempt)
R. D. Bedard G. J. Buyce N. A. Corsi L. T. Remkiewicz R. B. Laffins A. W. Love W. A. McDermott R. E. Nejfelt D. S. Oliva J. J. Quinn R. Waggoner P. H. Crete Mannaer External Communications O
G. P. VanNoordennen (lead)
R. Osella
[
E. P. Perkins P. J. Miner M. J. Wilson l
R. H. Young i
Manaaer Resources W. H. Stairs (lead) l H. H. Wong J. B. Overbaugh R.F.Lucas W. E. Beauregard J. P. Doherty WDR/RCR/kri I
c:
Millstone Station Vice President Connecticut Yankee Station Vice President i
Berlin Security Captain O
CONI 1.02 Rev.
46 Date: September 17.,-1993 Page:
8.B-4 of 4
I a
l CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE CONI 4.12 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS O
This Procedure Change is Approved, d 7[v~ j,,.
and Appropriate 10CFR50.54(q)
Actions Have Been Taken.
'7 Lead ManagerMladiological Consequence Assessment Revision:
6 Effective Date:
September 17,1993 Concurrence:
- M Corporate Nuclear,Er'nergency Plan Coordinator i
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE CONI 4.12 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 PURPOSE To provide the process for the Corporate Manager of Radiological Consequence Assessment (CMRCA) to develop and submit a General Emergency Protective Action J
Recommendation (PAR) to the Director, Corporate Emergency Response Organization (DCERO).
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure is to be used by the CMRCA.
3.0 REFERENCES
None 4.0 DEFINITIONS i
None 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES O
5.1 The CMRCA develops a General Emergency PAR (Attachment 8.A) and submits it to the DCERO for forwarding to the NU Representative in the State EOC.
5.2 The CMRCA shall be f amiliar with the content of Attachment 8.D, in particular, Sections 2.4,3.1 (step 3 and step 8) and Attachments 1 and 2.
J 5.3 The CMRCA shall be prepared to discuss the details of the NU General Emergency PAR with the DCERO, the NU Executive Spokesperson in the State EOC, and the State Department of Environmental Protection.
5.4 The CMRCA shall be prepared to provide estimates of whole-body radiation doses that might be received by people confined to nursing homes and hospitals.
6.0 INSTRUCTIONS
}
1 6.1 The development of PARS should commence in an anticipatory fashion at the tinie it is clear that plant conditions are degrading and a General Emergency declaration is imminent, it shall be submitted to the DCERO preferably prior to the declaration of a General Emergency or very shortly thereafter.
Note: A PAR shall not be submitted by NU for emergency classifications lower
/
than a General Emergency as they are not warranted by the severity 0
CONI 4.12 Rev.
6 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 1 of 3
)
i I
level.
I 6.2 Use the process established in Attachment 8.D to develop PARS. Since NU will have no current knowledge of environmental constraints or actual evacuation times, NU's focus should be on plant conditions, meteorological forecasts and potential or actual radiological releases.
The CMRCA should complete Attachment 8.A.
f 6.3 If time does not permit in-depth evaluations, use the precautionary PARS provided in Attachment 8.D.
Expanded PARS can be developed later. In addition to the guidance provided in Attachment 8.D, step 3, use the following considerations in developing rapid / streamlined PARS:
1.
At all times the population most at risk (closest to the plant) should be the highest priority for evacuation. This is the 2-mile ring.
2.
In general, it is preferred that a General Emergency PAR should be provided to the DCERO at least 120 minutes prior to the start or anticipated start of a major core release. This would afford the optimum time to process the PAR, implement and complete evacuation of the 2-mile ring.
3.
Recognize that per U.S. EPA guidance, the Emergency Broadcast System instructions have been prepared in blocks of three (3) contiguous downwind sectors.
Hence, based on knowledge of meteorology use only 3 downwind sectors at a time in the PAR. If you have to add more sectors, prioritize by blocks of 3 contiguous sectors.
4.
If meteorology is highly unpredictable, or it is the time of day when the downwind direction is rapidly changing, use as appropriate the 2 mile ring, 5-mile ring, or 10-mile ring options (instead of downwind 3 sectors).
5.
If realistic "what if" calculations _o_r plant damage conditions, and lack of a success pcth, o_r actual releases indicate whole-body radiation doses at the site boundary will be equal to or greater than 5 rem, recommend to the DCERO a change in Emergency Classification to General Emergency - ALPHA and provide the appropriate PAR.
7.0 FIGURES None 1
O CONI 4.12 Rev.
6 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 2 of 3
p.O
. ATTACHMENTS Attachment No.
Attachment Title O
8.A NU - Protective Action Recommendations 8.B Special Needs Facilities - Millstone EPZ 8.C Special Needs Facilities - Haddam Neck EPZ 8.D DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Recommendations l
i O
i s
'l O
i CONI 4.12
- Rev, 6
Date: September'17,1993 Page: 3 of 3
?
- r
i ATTACHMENT 8.A NU - PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION (PAR)
TO:
CERO Director - Berlin Approved By Date/ Time FROM:
Corporate Manager Radiological Date/ Time Consequence Assessment - Berlin
SUBJECT:
GENER Al. EMERGENCY - PAR This General Emergency PAR is provided for your concurrence and transmittal (amended as necessary) to the NU Executive Spokesperson in the State EOC, Hartford. Additional information is provided below (only as deemed appropriate) as explanation for this PAR.
PARS 1.
Evacuation Ring Distance (Miles):
Sector Distance (Mi/es):
Sectors (Prioritized Groups of 3):
2.
Shelter Distance (Mi/es):
Sectors (Prioritized Groups of 3):
3.
Hospitals, Nursina Homes - Actions:
4.
Other Actions:
(e.g. Ingestion Pathway)
Plant conditions resultina in actuallootential Radioloaical Releases Meteoroloaical Conditions / Forecasts Dose Results (Calculated or Measured)
O; CON 14.12 Rev.
6 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.A - 1 of 1
s ATTACHMENT 8.B SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES - MILLSTONE EPZ Facility Sector-Community Facility Name Address Type Capacity Zone East Lyme Niantic Correctional Institution 103 West Main St.
CF 544 P-4 Groton Town Fairview Starr Hill Rd.
CCNH 60 C-6 RHNS 60 1
Groton Regency Retirement 1145 Poquonnock Rd.
CCNH 119 D-8 and Nursing Center RHNS 59
)
Pequot Medical Center Hazelnut Hill Rd.
OTC N/A D-8 j
Montville Haughton Cove Manor 841 Norwich-New HA 19 B-10 i
London Tpke Shantok Home 254 Norwich-New HA 15 B-9 i
London Tpke l
New London Bacon and Hinkley Home 581 Pequot Ave.
HA 10 D-5 Beechwood Manor, Inc.
31 Vauxhall St.
CCNH 45 C-6 Briarcliff Manor 179 Colman St.
HA 25 C-5 Camelot Nursing Home 89 Viets St. Ext.
CCNH 60 C-4 Lawrence and Memorial 365 Montauk Ave.
GH 231 D-4 Hospitals Nutmeg Pavilion Healthcare 78 Viets St. Ext.
CCNH 140 C-4 i
Sunny Lodge Rest Home 47 Cedar Grove Ave.
HA 15 C-5 Waterford Bayview Healthcare Center 301 Rope Ferry Rd.
CCNH 60 A-2 RHNS 30 Greentree Manor Convalescent 4 Greentree Dr.
CCNH 90 A-6 Home New London Convalescent 88 Clark La.
CCNH 120 B-4 Home Seaside Regional Center 36 Shore Rd.
RF 100 F-2 B-2 Waterford Health and Rehab 171 Rope Ferry Rd.
CCNH-148 Center o
i CCNH -
Chronic and Convalescent Nursing Home CF Correctional Facility GH General Hospital
.i HA Home for the Aged OTC Outpatient Treatment Center RF Retardate Facility RHNS -
Rest Home with Two Levels of Care J
CONI 4.12 Rev.
6 Date: September 17,1993
-l Page: 8.B - 1 of 1
)
t ATTACHMENT 8.C SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES - HADDAM NECK EPZ Facility Sector-Community Facility Name Address Type Capacity Zone Chester Aaron Manor Health Route 148 RHNS 60 J-6 Care Facility Aaron Manor Annex Route 148 HA 18 J-6 Chesterfield Chronic 132 Main St.
CCNH 60 H-7 and Convalescent Home Gicndale Manor Rest Middlesex Ave. Route 154 HA 18 H-5 Home Wilcox House 132 Main St.
HA 8
H-7 Deep River Deep River 59 Elm St.
CCNH 30 H-8 Convalescent Home, Inc.
Riverview Lodge, Inc.
10 Prospect St.
HA 31 H-8 Durham Dogwood Acres Brick Lane RHNS 29 N-10 East Chestelm 534 Town St.
CCNH 53 E-2 Haddam Convalescent Home RHNS 13 East Barbara's Rest Home 9 West High St.
HA 41 A-7 Hampton Cobalt Lodge Route 151 CCNH 60 R-6 Haddam Haddam Manor 1179 Saybrook Rd.
HA 15 J-1 Walkley Hill Home 875 Saybrook Rd.
HA 14 N-1 Middletown CT Valley Hospital Eastern Dr.
MHF 439 Q-9 High View Health 600 Highland Ave.
CCNH 90 P-10 Care Center, Inc.
Middlesex 100 Randolph Rd.
CCNH 120 P-8 Convalescent Center, RHNS 30 inc.
Middletown Health 111 Church St.
RHNS 180 P-10 Care Center, Inc.
Middlesex Memorial 28 Crescent St.
GH 402 P-10 Hospital i
CCNH -
Chronic and Convalescent Nursing Home GH General Hospital HA Home for the Aged MHF Mental Health Facility RHNS -
Rest Home with Two Levels of Care CONI 4.12 Rev.
6 1
Date: September 17,1993
.j Page: 8 C - 1 of 2 i
l ATTACHMENT 8.C (Cont'd)
SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES - HADDAM NECK EPZ Facility Sector-Community Facility Name Address Type Capacity Zone Portland Elmcrest Psychiatric Hosp.
25 Marlborough St.
MHF 229 Q-10 and Treatment Center Greystone Rest Home, Inc.
44 High St.
HA 50 Q-10 Portland Convalescent Centre, Inc.
333 Main St.
CCNH 89 Q-10 CCNH -
Chronic and Convalescent Nursing Home GH General Hospital l
HA Home for the Aged MHF Mental Health Facility 4
RHNS -
Rest Home with Two Levels of Care l
O I
O CONI 4.12 Rev.
6 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.C - 2 of 2
g o
ATTACHMENT 8.D O
1 STATE OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCY PLAN AND PROCEDURES Total 17 Pages Department of Environmental Protection Radiation Control Division DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Recommendations O
O CONI 4,12 Rev.
6 Date: September 17,1993' Page: 8 D - 1 of 1
5 i
l State Agencies Rev. August 1993 O
~
I of 17 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Re:c:n=endations Pace:
i STATE AGENCY PLAN AND PROCEDURES 3.3 DEPARTAIENT OF ENVIRONSIENTAL PROTECTION RADIATION CONTROL DIVISION DEP-RCD-4 PUBLIC PROTECTIVE ACTION RECO3DENDATIONS 1.0 Puroose To provide, at the Incident Class GENERAL ENERGENCY, Posture Code i
Bravo or Alpha level, the State Emergency Center, Chief Executive Officer (State CEO), local community Chief Executive Officers (CEO's), the Director State Department of Environmental Protection, Radiation Control Division (DEP-RCD), the Director State Office of Emergency Management (OEM), and Northeast Utilities (NU) with a process to make public Protective Action Recommendations (PARS) and decisions after considering plant conditions, l
actual or potential off-site radiation levels, forecast meteorology, road and weather conditions, evacuation time estimates and available resources.
l
[
2.0 Responsibilities l
2.1 State EOC. Chief Executive Officer (State CEOY (a)
Declare a state of civil preparedness emergency (State of Emergency) in Connecticut per General Statute 28-9.
(b) Approve the public Protective PARS provided by the Director State l
DEP and NU.
T 2.2 Director State of Connecticut DEP-RCD (a)
Provide to the State CEO, PARS based on an assessment of the conditions and taking into consideration the PARS provided by NU.
l 2.3 Director State of Connecticut OEM l
(a)
Implement the PARS approved by the State CEO by notifying the local community CEO_'s.
I
i State Agencies Rev Augus: 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Publi: Protecuve A:non Recc==endatic::s P2re: 2 cf 17
~
O (b) Initiate EBS messages notifying the public and coordinating with siren activation.
(c)
Notify the Host Communities.
(d) Monitor and repon on status of PARS implementation.
2A Northeast Utilities (a)
Classify the emergency based on plant conditions and actual or potential off-site radiation levels.
(b)
Develop PARS based on emergency classification level, and/or actual or potential radiation levels off-site, forecast meteorology.
(c)
The NU spokesperson in the State EOC will provide the NU PARS to the State DEP and the State CEO.
3.0 Instructions / Actions 3.1 Plume Pathway Protective Actions The steps in the public Protective Action decision making process are provided in Attachment 1, along with the responsible party.
Precautions a.
Public Protective Actions such as Evacuation and/or Take Shelter are warranted only at the Incident Class GENERAL EMERGENCY, Posture Code Braro, or Alpha levels.
b.
Prior to declaration of a State of Emergency by the State CEO, local communities will use only the Precautionary PARS (Attachment 2).
c.
Use the Precautionary PARS (Attachment 2) when time is not available to develop more specific PARS.
d.
Follow-up or additional PARS should allow appropriate time for the initial PAR to be implemented and almost completed.
After the State of Emergency is declared by the State CEO per j
e.
5 State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Reco:n:nendations Page: 3 of 17 O
i General Statutes, PARS coordination and approval are the responsibility of the State CEO.
1.
Sten 1 - Event Classification i
NU will use unit-specific Emergency Action Levels (EALs) to classify the emergency. The EALs will consist of in-plant i
t instrument readings, plant damage conditions and radiation release rates that warrant the Emergency Classification Levels.
j l
These EALs are developed per NUREG-0654 guidelines to l'
l classity emergency events. The State of Connecticut Emergency 4
Classification Scheme will be used, which is consistent with the f
federal scheme in NUREG-0654.
2.
Sten 2 - Declare State of Emereencv 5
The Director OEM is responsib'e for recommending to the a.
State CEO the declaratior of a State of Emergency per General Statute 28-9 upon ce:ermining that one or more of the State CEO's emergency powers amended in Sections 28-9 through 28-11 C.G.S. will or will likely need to be invoked.. The implementing process will be through the State CEO's notification to the Secretary of the State as per Section 28-9, C.G.S.
i b.
The Director OEM is responsible for notifying the State Agencies and all EPZ communities and NU of this declaration by the State CEO.
3.
Sten 3 - Develon PARS t
Adopt the objectives of PARS as provided below in the a.
order of priority.
(a) Reduce the risk for early fatality and early injury to individuals from actual or potential radiation levels, j
i.e., individuals projected to receive integrated whole body dose in excess of 200 Rem and 50 Rem respectively.
)
(b) Reduce risk to special segments of the public 1
IJ
State Agencies Rev. Aurun 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Reco:::nendations Page:.: of 17 O
especially in utero fetuses, infants, and children under 10 years, projected to receive doses in excess of 10 Rem.
(c) Provide protective actions to obtain dose reduction for individuals who are projected to receive integrated l
whole body doses in excess of 5 Rem and thyroid doses in excess of 25 Rem.
7 (d) Reduce long-term milk pathway risks to the public through putting grazing milk animals on stored feed if l
significant animals are in the effected zone.
b.
Apply the following considerations -
(a) The two most important types of immediate public protective actions for plume exposure are Take Shelter and Evacuation or a combination of these. Access control is also implemented along with these two actions.
(b) Public protective actions such as Evacuation or Take Shelter are required only upon declaration of an Incident Class GENERAL EMERGENCY, Posture Code Bravo or Alpha.
(c) After plume passage, dose rates from deposited radio-activity (fallout) levels can warrant selective relocations of the sheltered population from " hot spot" areas. Field Teams will be the primary source of radiation information about deposited radioactivity.
Use the same priority as stated in 3.a. above.
O
s i
State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Pro:ective Action Recommendations Page: 5 of 17 t
(d) If the appropriate information is available to deter:rdne if the sum of the time to the start of the release of radioactivity and the duration of the release is less than the time to complete the evacuation action, then consider that sheltering maybe a more prudent immediate protective action as the risk of evacuation is avoided. This consideration does not apply to the 2-mile ring, Evacuation is the preferred protective action.
(e) If hazardous environmental conditions (i.e., weather or road conditions) exist that would significantly I
increase the risk of evacuation or its time to complete, then Take Shelter maybe a preferred action. These are referred to as environmental constraints e.g.,
hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, flooding, heavy snow, etc.
(f) At all times the risk of a protective action versus benefit must be considered. If life threatening radiation levels (3.a.(a)) are imminent, then evacuation in relatively adverse environmental conditions (see 3.b.(e)) is warranted. However, if radiation levels are unminent, at dose saving levels (3.a.(c)),
then evacuation in adverse environmental conditions might not be warranted.
(g) Evacuation of hospitals, nursing homes etc. where bed-ridden and intensive care patients are present is not recommended, unless integrated dose levels are projected to be in excess of life threatening levels (over 200 Rem whole body) and projected to occur
. over a time in excess of that required to evacuate the facility. Doses to the health care workers who staff these facilities should be evaluated.
(h) An Incident Class GENERAL EhERGENCY, Posture Code Bravo or Alpha will more than likely j
be declared based on plant damage conditions (EALs)
)
i occurring t. : ore radiation releases begin and it is O
likely that significant radiation releases may not occur.
.1
State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP. RCD 4 Public Protective Action Recommendations Page: 6 of 17 O
(i) Protective actions beyond the 2-mile ring, should be recommended in a prioritized fashion. Provide the downwind sectors at time cf release. This will usual!y be one scuor (or two if wind is on a sector line).
Pick at most, three sectors to encompass wind meandering situations and the crosswind distributior of radioactivity.
(j) The evacuation time estimates and population data are provided in State Police procedures obtain this information from them.
c.
As time permits, Protective Action Recommendations (PARS) are developed using Attachment 2. Prior to the declaration of a State of Emergency by the State CEO, local community CEO's can choose to implement the precautionary PARS shown on the right side of Attadment
- 2. This is more than adequate to protect the public most at risk. In the time period after the declaration of a State of l
Emergency by the State CEO and in the event of actual or l
1mmment radiation releases, more event-specific PARS will be developed by NU and the Director DEP-RCD.
d.
The Director DEP-RCD should develop specific PARS.
More detailed data from models and, if available, field teams should be used. NU should provide PARS based on plant conditions, actual or potential radiation releases and forecast meteorology. The Director DEP-RCD should consider evacuation time estimates and resource constraints. The precautionary PARS in Attachment 2 should be invoked as a first step if more specific PARS development is Eqt possible in a timely manner.
If rapid wind direction changes covering more than 6 e.
sectors are expected at the time of radiation releases, actions in rings of 2 miles or 5 miles or 10 miles may be warranted.
4.
Sten 4 - Recommend PARS to the State CEO a.
After declaration of a State of Emergency by the State
- .s i
State Agencies Rev. August 1902 l
DEP-RCD 4 Public Protective Action Recon==endations Page: 7 of 1, i
O 1
CEO, the Director DEP-RCD is responsible to provida PARS to the State CEO. The Director State DEP-RCD should consider the PARS provided by NU.
- b. should be used by the Director DEP-RCD and the Director State OEM (or the local community CP/OEM) to determine the feasibility of implementing the PARS prior to submittal for approval. Consideration of
~
environmental constraints and resource constraints are j
warranted.
l 5.
Sten 5 - Approve the PARS The State CEO should approve the PARS. The mechanism a.
1 to do this is through the approval of the implementing EBS message.
I 6.
Sten 6 - Implement PARS 4
O a.
The Director State OEM and local community CEO's should implement the approved PARS. The Director State OEM is responsible for notifying the EPZ local communities, the host communities and NU of the i
approved PARS.
b.
The public notification of the PARS will be accomplished through the activation of the Public Alening System and the coordinated release of the EBS message, This action shall be accomplished by the Director State OEM and local communities CEO's promptly (within 15 minutes) after the approval of the PARS.
i 7.
Step 7 - Monitor and Renort on Implementation of PARS 1
a.
The Director State OEM and local community CEO's should coordinate and monitor the implementation of the j
PARS. Periodic reports on the status should be provided, in particular resource utilization that would effect initiating additional PARS.
O l-i
e 5:2:e Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Acuen Recommenda iens Page: E cf 17 8.
Sten 8 - Additional PARS Changing plant conditions or changes in meteorology may a.
warrant additional PARS. These should be developed using Steps I and 2 above.
b.
The impact of additional PARS on the effective implementation of the previous PARS should be evaluated.
If a PARS is being implemented, (e.g. two-mile ring evacuation at Millstone takes about 87 minutes), the additional PARS should take this time and the resource constraints into consideration.
3.2 Past Plume Protective Actions - Relocation a.
The Director DEP-RCD will dispatch field teams to do relocation surveys of area radiation doses and surface contaminations in areas traversed by the plume.
b.
The Director DEP-RCD will have his staff analyze the field team data.
c.
The Director DEP-RCD with help from the Director OEM and State Police, will designate areas as restricted areas that meet the criteria shown in Attachment 4. Relocation from Restricted Areas will be recommended to the State CEO.
d.
Based on the restricted area designations, the Director DEP-RCD with help from the Director OEM, the State Police and local community CEO's will develop a plan for approval by the State CEO to ensure that access to and egress from the Restricted Areas will be controlled. In addition, monitoring and decontamination stations to support this control are in place.
3.3 Post Plume Return - The Director DEP-RCD will recommend return of evacuated public to areas not designated as Restricted Areas.
3.4 Post Plume Re-Entrv - The Director DEP-RCD shall establish re-entry into Restricted Areas using exposure criteria consistent with the EPA exposure criteria for Emergency workers.
h
s e
State Agencies Rev. August :993 i
DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Recorn:nendations Page: 9 of 17 O
3.5 Post Plume Recoverv - The Director DEP-RCD will establish recovery criteria consistent with that in Attachment 5.
3.6 Post Plume Incestion Pathway - The Director DEP-RCD will use the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administra: ion criteria as given below. Recommendations will be provided to the State CEO.
3.7 Incestion Pathwav Protective Action Guides - PAGs permit Dexibility of action for the reduction of radiation exposure to the public via the food pathway due to the occurrence of a contaminating event. The following Preventive and Emergency PAGs for an exposed individual in the population are adopted as follows:
a.
Preventive PAG which is (a) a 1.5 Rem projected dose commitment to the thyroid or, (b) a 0.5 Rem projected dose commitment to the whole body, bone marrow, or any other organ.
b.
Emercencv PAG which is (a) a 15 Rem projected dose commitment to the thyroid or, (b) a 5 Rem projected dose commitment to the whole body, bone marrow, or any other organ.
t 3.8 Incestion Pathway Protective Actions - Specific actions are appropriate when the health benefit associated with the reduction in dose that can be achieved is considered to offset the undesirable health, economic, and social costs which also could be expected to occur. It is the intent of these recommendations that not only should the Protective Actions cited for the Emergency PAG be initiated when the dose levels are reached, but also that actions appropriate at the Preventive PAG level should be considered.
This has the effect of reducing the period of time required during which the Protective Action with the greater economic and social impact needs to be operative. Once one or more Protective Actions are initiated, it is recommended by the EPA and FDA that the action or actions continue for a sufficient time to avoid the projected dose. In reaching a decision, consideration should also be given to the long-standing FDA policy on the purposeful blending of adulterated and unadulterated food. The following Protective Actions should be considered for implementation when the projected dose equals or exceeds the appropriate PAG:
a.
Ereventive PAG J
e State Agencies Rev Augus: 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Reconunend icas Page: 10 cf 17 1.
For pasture-
";moval of lactating dairy cows from contaminatec
/ge and substitution of uncontaminated stored feed; (.
astitute source of uncontaminated water.
2.
For milk: (a) Withholding of contaminated milk from the market to allow radioactive decay of short-lived radionuclides.
This may be achieved by storage of frozen fresh milk, frozen concentrated milk, or frozen concentrated milk products; (b) storage for prolonged times at reduced temperatures also is feasible, provided ultra high temperature pasteurization techniques are employed for processing (Finley, R.D., Warren, H.B., Hargrove, R.E. " Storage Stability of commercial Afilk, Journal of Afilk and Food Technology", 31(12:382-387, December 196S); (c) diversion of fluid milk for production of l
dry whole milk, nonfat dry milk, butter, or evaporated milk.
3.
For fmits and vegetables: (a) Washing, brushing, scrubbinc. or I
peeling to remove surface contamination; (b) preservation by canning, freezing and dehydration or storage to permit radioactive decay of short-lived radionuclides.
4 For grains: (a) Milling and (b) polishing.
5.
For other food products: (a) Processing to remove surface contamination.
6.
For meat and meat products: (a) Consider on a case-by-case basis.
'7.
For animal feeds: (a) Actions relative to animal feeds, other than pasture, should be carried out on a case-by-case basis;-(b) increase noncontaminated mineral calcium to a maximum.
b.
Emercencv PAG - Responsible officials should isolate food containing radioactivity to prevent its introduction into commerce, and determine whether condemnation or another type of disposition is appropriate.
Before taking this action, the following factors should be considered:
1.
The availability of other possible Protective Actions discussed in paragraph a., Preventive PAG.
3 s
State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Publi: Protective Action Recommendations Page: 11 of 17 5
?
2.
Relative proportion of the total diet by weight represented by the item in question.
i 3.
The imponance of the panicular food in nutrition and tha availability of uncontaminated food or substitutes having the l
same nutritional propenies.
4.
The relative contribution of other foods and other radionuclides to the total projected dose.
5.
The time and effon required to effect corrective action.
3.9 In addition to the above FDA recommendations, the State of l
Connecticat will do monitoring of food pathways in areas where the radioactivity levels are 10 times less than the U.S. FDA Preventive PAG Response Levels. These monitoring actions will cover pathways where the dose is 10 times less than those given in Section 3.7.a.
above.
4.0 Anachments i
Steps In Public Protective Action Process PARS Development Flow Chan PARS hnplementation Evaluation Chart EPA Recommended Actions for Relocation Anachment 5 Recommended Surface Contamination Levels for Persons and
[
Other Surfaces in Both Low and High Background Radiation
[
Areas t
s
'I i
i
t State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD 4 Public Protective Acuen Re:c::unenda: ions Page: 12 of 17 O
ATTACFDfEST 1 I
STEPS IN PUBLIC PROTECTIVE ACTION PROCESS Process Responsibility Steps l
1.
Event Classification Nonheast Utilities (NU) 2.
Declare State of Emergency in Connecticut State CEO per General Statutes 3.
Develop Public Protective Action NU**, State DEP, Local Community Recommendation (PARS)
CP/OEM 4
Recommend PARS to the State CEO State DEP 5.
Approve PARS State CEO, Local CEO-h 6.
Implement PARS:
a.
Notify local CEOs State OEM b.
Notify Public through EBS and State OEM, Local Community CEO-Public Alerting System Notify Host Communities State OEM, Local Community CEO*
c.
d.
Notify State Agencies State OEM 7.
Monitor and repon on the implementation State OEM, Local Community CEO-of PARS.
8.
Provide additional PAR 5 NU, State DEP 9.
Go to Step 4 above..
NOTES:
- Only applies prior to the Declaration of a State of Emergency by the State CEO per Connecticut State General Stamtes.
i
l l
t State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Recommendations Page: 13 of 17 ATTACHMENT 2 PARS DEVELOPMENT FLOWCH ART (Part A) s GENERAL EMERGENCY See Note 1
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ +l EAL's EXIST 1
1 1
1 1
I Precautionarv PAR's (2) y
- 1. If not environmentally constrained, Evacuate 2 mHe ring and She!ter RAD. RELE ASE N
3 sectors cownwinc Yes Posture out to 5 miles.
4 OCCURING Code OR BRAVO l
IMMINENT
- 2. If environmentally constrained, Shelter 2 mile rinc and 5 mile
~
downwind 3 sectors.
r'
- 3. Milk animals on stored ALPHA feed out to 10 miles
~
Go To downwind 3 sectors.
See: ion 3.1 Step 2 Precautionary PAR's (2)
- 1. If not environmentally constrained, Evacuate 2 mile radius and 5 miles downwind 3 sectors. Shelter 5 to 10 miles downwind,3 sectors.
- 2. If environmentally constrained, Shelter 2 mile ring and 10 miles downwind 3 sectors.
- 3. Milk anire.als on stored feed to 10 miles downwind 3 sectors.
NOTE I:
Prict to Declaration of a State of Emergency in Connecticut by the State CEO, local community CEOs should use the Precautiona:y PARS shown on the right side of this page.
O' NOTE 2:
If downwind sectors at the expected time of release are unknown, delay these downwind actions. Take the 2 mile nng ac: ions only.
o State Agencies Rev. Autust 1993 DEP-RCD 4 Pubii: Protective Action Recommendations Page: 15 of 17 ATTACIDfEST 3 PARS BIPLEMENTATION EVALUATION CH ART GENERAL EMERGENCY DECLARED V
REVIEW P4R's Y
au e time of release Should The No release duration, winc PAR's Se direction, road conditions, environmental conditions, implemented?
and any other evacuability constraints.
O Yes Evaluate availability of y
resources and preparedness to implement protective Actions.
Can The Recommended Yes Actions Be implemented?
No Y
Can The No B arriers To implementation Be Mitigated?
Yes
)
V V
V v
REASS ESS THE MITIGATE IMPLEM ENT TH E m
EC O MME ND ATIONS THE B ARRIERS RECOMMENDED ACTIONS i
r
.~ - -_ -
i 1
State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Recommendations Page: 15 of 17 O
.\\
ATTACIBIENT 4 EPA RECONDfENDED ACTIONS FOR RELOCATION Limiting Projected Recommended Effective Dose * (Rem)
Actions
Comments After First First 50 Year Year Years l
Whole Body *)
2 2.00 2.5 25 Relocate the general population.
l Skin"'
2 100 2 25 2250 Whole Body *)
22 Apply simple dose These protective reduction techniques.
actions should be Skin'"
2 100 taken to reduce doses to as low as practicable levels.
f These actions are recommended for planning purposes. Protective action i
decisions at the time of the incident must take existing conditions into consideration.
The sum of the effective dose equivalent resulting from exposure to external sources and the committed effective dose equivalent incurred from all significant inhalation pathways during the early phase.
Committed dose equivalent.
Italics represents numerical values from EPA PARS which are not directly stated
~
but inferred or derived from the report.
I O
w w
-..a u.
e e
State Agencies Rev. Augun 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Prote:tive Action Recc==endaticas Page: 16 of 17 ATTACIDENT 5 RECOSDIENDED SL'RFACE CONTAMINATION LEVELS FOR PERSONS AND OTHER SURFACES IN BOTH LOW AND HIGH BACKGROUND RADIATION AREAS I
I j
High Background (.1 z-JJb to 5 mR/h Gamma Exposure) 7, Conditio.o Geger-counter Thin Recommended 1
Window Reading Action s
\\
\\,
Af.'cr hia m;"*?ien
<2X bkgd and Uncenditional release Above bird
> 2X bkgd er >.5 =R/b Centinue to Above bkgd decentaminate er refer to low bkgd mer.itoring and d-con station.
Equipment may also be stored for decay or y
disposed or as
[
spprep-inte 1
Low Background (<.1 mR/h Ga=ma Irposure Rate) l Cond113cn Gdge.r-counter Thin Recommended Window Reading Action Befort Decenta ;-"ico
< 2X bkgd Unconditional release
> 2X bkgd Decents nate After Si=ple ' Decenr 2
? 2 tion
< 2X bkgd Unconditional release j, effort
> 2X bkgd Full decenta=ination After Full De-a-?-> tion
<2X bkgd Unconditional release effert
> 2Xbkgd
' Continue to Decontaminner persens
<.5 =R/h Release anir als and equipment i
State Agencies Rev. August 1993 DEP-RCD-4 Public Protective Action Recommendations Page: 17 of 17 i
n vATTACHMFNT 5 (CONT'D) t Low Background (<.1 mR/h Gamma Exposure Rate)
Condition Geiger-counta Thin Recommended Window Reading Action l
Afta Additional Full *
< 2X bigd Unconditional full I
release Deccotammation effort l
> 2X bkgd Send persons for special evalastion
<.5 z:A'h Refer, or use informed judgment on further control of animals and equipment High Background (.1 mR/h to 5 mR/h Gamma Exposure)*
Condition Geiger-counter Thin Recommended Window Reading Action Before Deccet= " s tion
<2X bkgd and <.5 mR/h Unconditional release Above bkgd
<2X bkgd and <,5 mR/h Decontaminate; Above bkgd equipment may be stored l
or disposed of as appropriate o
, <> s CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE CONI 5.01 ON-CALL TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM O
This Procedure Change is Approved, and Appropriate 10CFR50.54(q)
Actions Have Been Taken.
s _ er fjead Manager, Technical Support Revision:
24 Effective Date:
September 17.1993 4 6' Concurrence:
Corporate Nuclear [mergency Plan Coordinator O
CORPORATE ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS (CONI) PROCEDURE J
l CONI 5.01 O
ON-CALL TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure defines the responsibilities and duties of the on-call Technical Support Team during nuclear incidents.
2.0 APPLICABILITY J
This procedure applies to those Nuclear Engineering and Operations personnel selected to serve on the NUSCO Technical Support Team. The Team consists of a technical manager, a mechanical engineer, an electrical engineer, and a core thermal and hydraulic engineer.
One Team is scheduled for "radiopager on-call" duty each week. Several Teams alternate on-call responsibility; see Attachment 8.A for the complete personnei roster.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 CONI Procedures,1.07, "OFIS Operations."
4.0 DEFINITIONS None.
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The Manager of Technical Support shall coordinate all plant / system engineering activities to support resolution of the nuclear plant emergency and report to the CERO Director at the Berlin Office Emergency Operations Center (EOC). He shall support the site Technical Support Center (TSC) with expanded technical expertise as necessary and as requested. Attachments 8.8 and 8.C provide further information and guidelines.
5.2 The Team will report to the Manager of Technical Support, or designee.
5.3 Each discipline shall have the following reference materials available:
Electrical -
Wiring diagrams, schematics, electrical vendor information.
Mechanical -
Operations Critical Drawings, FSAR, Technical Specifications, piping drawings, building layout i
drawings, mechanical / civil vendor information.
l O
CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 1 of 5
e Thermal / Hydr @ulic -
Emergency Operating Procedures, system, dependencies, HELP programs.
6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 The Technical Support Team, Berlin Office telephone extensions and home telephone numbers are given in Attachment 8.A.
6.2 The on-call Technical Support Team shall report to the Berlin Office EOC, obtain information on the incident, call out the discipline engineers listed in.A or others as necessary, and provide appropriate discipline engineering support.
6.3 The first Team member to arrive shall set up the telephones providing a direct link with the Site TSC and initiate contact with the Site Manager of Technical Support or designee.
6.4 If the first Team member to arrive is not the on-call Manager, the member shall serve in this capacity until the assigned Manager arrives.
6.5 Activate the computer terminal and use TSO Logon ID numbers BE075DC, BEO75DD or BE075DE to access the Off-Site Information System (OFIS); see Reference 3.1.
6.6 The Team will use W133 (x5869) in Berlin if additional work space is needed.
l 6.7 As key discipline engineering milestones are achieved, the Manager willinform the CERO Director.
6.8 All Team engineering information is to be reviewed by the Manager or his designee prior to release to the site by the discipline engineer (s), and shall be recorded. Recommendations must be processed through the CERO Director.
6.9 All Team discipline information pertinent to plant recovery shall be assembled and kept in the EOC until the CERO Director has announced that the event is stable.
6.10 As the need develops, the Manager may elect to call in additional NUSCO discipline engineering support and outside technical experts / consultants such as the NSSS vendors, architect / engineers, etc.
6.11 General Guidance The following general guidance applies to all Team activities:
During a nuclear emergency, plant response is controlled by the plant operators in coordination with the Emergency Operation Facility. The plant operational staff switches from a normal operations to an emergency operations mode using Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs), with the goal of assuring essential safety functions and bringing the plant to a safe state.
The opportunity for the Team to contribute to direct accident management during CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 2 of 5
,~
- 3 this phase is minimal, with the exception of providing site technical staff and plant operators with answers to direct requests as needed, and verifying plant status in a review mode.
The key contribution of the Team during the accident is its ability to predict the potential consequences (and corresponding timing) of the evolving accident.
This analytical prediction can be performed assuming current plant conditions, as well as alternate scenarios resulting from postulated new f ailures, equipment recovery, or use of alternate equipment. Therefore:
Durina Accident seauences covered by EOPs and managed by plant operators by adherence to those procedures, the Team should do the following:
Assess plant status by monitoring appropriate OFIS parameters (e.g.,
RVLMS).
Given current plant status, assess expected timing of critical conditions as input to Event Based Tables (EBT) (e.g., core uncovery calculations if a LOCA is in progress).
Provide degraded core information to Radiological Assessment 1or inputs to EBTs.
Develop accident management strategies by assessing likely paths to core damage and containment failure, by anticipating consequences of possible additional failures, and evaluating consequences of alternate equipment line-ups.
Durino accident secuences for which EOPs are no lonaer projected to be successful. plant operators will need direction through ad-hoc developed strategies endorsed by upper-managernent. The Team should do the following:
Given current plant status, develop recommendations for strategies necessary to save the reactor core and plant containment.
Provide inputs to decisions for beyond design basis accident management. During accident sequences for which the EOPs are no longer projected to be successfulin preventing severe core damage, the Corporate Technical Support Team and the Site Technical Support Team willjointly develop strategies necessary to arrest core damage, prevent containment failure, and reduce radiological releases. These strategies can be implemented upon concurrence of the SERO and CERO directors.
The different roles of plant control room emergency operation and of EOC Technical Support Team are highlighted in Attachment 8.B. Attachment 8.C provides a summary of Team functions and individual responsibihties.
6.12 Activities to be Performed by the Manaoer. Technical Support Team The following general guidelines are applicable:
O CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 3 of 5
c 6.12.1 Upon arrival at the EOC, assures that communication equipmen,t is connected, that the Team is adequately staffed, and OFlS is in service on the computer terminal. Establishes Technical Support Center (TSC) administrative controls.
O 6.12.2 Assures that selected data and critical equipment availability are routinely and timely reported and trended on wall board.
6.12.3 Assures that a Log is initiated, dated and maintained. As an example, the following information should be logged:
TSC staff and arrival times important direct communications with plant e
Recommendations provided to Manager, Technical Support (MTS)
Recommendations of MTS to CERO Director and Manager, Radiological Assessment Results of Mechanical / Electrical /T-H evaluations andtimes of communication to the CERO Director Updated evaluations reflecting changes in plant conditions All other significant communications 6.12.4 Meets with the CERO Director to assess plant status, confirm current situation, receive assignment if any.
6.12.5 Maintains communications with Site Manager TSC, supports Site TSC needs and provides them with the results of Team analyses and calculations.
6.12.6 Provides the Manager, Radiological Consequence Assessment l
estimates of the time to core uncovery and estimates / projections of the extent of core damage.
6.12.7 Once plant status is determined, do the following:
Thermal-Hydraulic:
Assess core cooling, critical safety functions Assess plant trends and timing of events based on current status Assess alternate equipment that might improve the situation and provide a recommendation to the CERO Director.
Complete Attachment 8.D if core damage is predicted.
Mechanical:
Evaluate alternate line-ups CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 4 of 5
Review plant actions to recover equipment, correct situation Electrical:
Evaluate alternate power line-ups Review plant actions for restoration or identification of alternate equipment and instrumentation systems 6.12.8 Communicate results/ recommendations to the CERO Director.
6.12.9 Revise evaluations made in Attachment 8.D if conditions / plant j
status changes.
6.12.10 Initiate responses to direct requests from EOF, Radiological Assessment as required.
6.12.11 If plant situation evolves beyond EOP applicability, develop I
strategies to save core and containment. Provide inputs for plant operators, to be cleared with CERO Director.
7.0 FIGURES None i
8.0 ATTACHMENTS O
Attachment No.
Attachment Title 8.A On-Call Technical Support Team 8.B Characteristics of Emergency Operations vs. ECC Technical Support Guidelines 8.C EOC Technical Support Team Guidelines 8.D Protective Boundary Assessment j
O CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 5 of 5 1
~.
o.
ATTACHMENT 8.A ON-CALL TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM O
HOME OFFICE FUNCTION NAME TELEPHONE EXTENSION The following on-call personnel may act as the Manager of Technical Support:
MANAGERS J. A. Blaisdell (Lead) 203-688-8602 5869 D. A. Dube 203-229-5432 3356 A.R.Roby 203-237-8237 3157 R. P. Necci 203-568-8019 5942 l
J. H. Ferguson 203-633-3158 5815 M. P. Hills 203-739-4049 3825 M. S. Kai 203-666-0363 3179 G. R. Pitman 203-721-7473 3129 The following on-call personnel may act as the Technical Team, reporting to the Manager of Technical Support:
MECHANICAL R. C. Thomas 203-342-4298 3845 F. J. Lukaszek 203-529-7032 3846 G. E. Cornelius 203-651-9006 3371 M. Kupinski 203-229-1379 3345 C. J. Ashton 203-739-3311 5115 P. D. Mason 203-522-3803 3131-CY R. W. Wells 203-442-5532 3614 S. J. Weyland 203-346-6563 3287 ELECTRICAL G. M. Olsen 203-537-0760 5506 R.J. Young 203-388-1942 3489 D. B. Vail 203-295-0477 5776 G. R. Townsend 203-635-0691 5059 K. J. Filippides 203-635-3111 3771 S.1. Stricker 203-739-8893 5409-MP M. T. Smaga 203-657-8282 3994 CORE THERMAL &
M. L. VanHaltern (Lead) 203-668-1155 5321 HYDRAULIC A. Gharakhanian 203-693-0396 5710 A. Chyra 203-584-2571 3709 D. J. Parker 203-295-9068 3828 Y. F. Khalil 203-645-7474 3604 J. Parillo 203-721-9265 3412 C.H.Wu 203-628-2148 5367 l
N. K. Jain*
203-688-2391 3098 W. B. O'Connell' 203-659-9476 3047 J. R. Guerci*
203-667-3588 5791 l
' Alternate CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page:
8.A-1 of 1
O O
O ATTACHMENT 8.B e
e CHARACTERISTICS OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS VS. EOC TECHNICAL SUPPORT GUIDELINES EMERGENCY OPERATIONS EOC TECHNICAL SUPPORT Performed by trained, licensed operators
- Performed by engineering and management personnel Actions based on:
- Actions based on:
Accident management strategies derived from likely paths Specific procedures to assure success of safety functions (criticality control, core coverage, heat removal, to core melt and containment failure containment)
Anticipation of potential problems or phenomenon Reaction to plant symptoms (flux, flows, pressures, temperatures)
Identification of alternative line-ups.
Input to Emergency Action Level classifications Defensive strategy (Do what is necessary to safe the core and Success-oriented (goal is to bring plant to a safe stable state) a containment)
Broad range of options in response to unfolding events Lim'.ed number of options prescribed strong incentives for c
adherence to procedures Actions might have negative side effects Actions should be unambiguously beneficial Time for decision-making during degraded core conditions on Time for decision-making on order of minutes order of hours to days CONI 5.01 Rev. 24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.B-1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 8.C EOC TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM GUIDELINES EUNCTIONS Provide input to support EAL changes Provide engineering support to the Site TSC and the CERO Evaluate / recommend alternative actions to resolve emergency
+
INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITIES Manager Coordinate activities of Technical Support Team Respond to requests from the CERO Director and Site TSC staff Recommend changes to EALs or Major alternative actions to the CERO Director Assure that significant actions are documented Identify required resources to Manager of Resources Electrical Have access to wiring diagrams, schematics and electricallayout drawings Front line safety systems Support systems Power supply systems Evaluate / Recommend alternative power line-ups Have quick access to power requirements of critical equipment Have quick access to power capabilities of various power sources Provide support to plant staff as requested Mechanical Have access to current piping, OPS critical, building layout drawings Have access to the following current information:
FSAR Functional capabilities / capacities of critical pumps / heat exchangers Evaluate / Recommend alternative piping line-ups Determine accessibility of critical valves Determine operability of alternative equipment l
CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: Septernber 17,1993 Page:
8.C-1 of 2
, <* s ATTACHMENT 8.C EOC TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM GUIDELINES O
Provide support to plant staff as requested Thermal / Hydraulic Have access to capabilities of critical equipment Assess performance / estimate time of failure for protective boundaries (cladding, RCS boundary, containment)
Provide input to radiological consequences on extent of core damage Provide functional requirements for non-standard uses of equipment Heat load Make up requirements Provide support to plant staff as requested Develop strategier to save core and containment O
i l
O CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.C-2 of 2
o
+
ATTACHMENT 8.D PROTECTIVE BOUNDARY ASSESSMENT (use if a severe accident is in progress) am!pm time of day date plant decay heat (btu /sec) minimum injection rate (gpm) actual injection (gpm)
Assumina existina couipment remains available, calculate the followina if applicable:
- 1) Estimated time of core uncovery am/pm
- 2) Estimated core damage progression timing 5%
(information used by Manager, Radiological Consequences Assessment) am/pm 10 %
am/pm 40%
am/pm 70 %
- 3) Estimated containment pressurization due to hydrogen burn psi
- 4) Assessment of plant condition (locate position in matrix)
Cntmt Closed and Closed and RCS Cooled Challenged impaired Bypassed Minimal Damage Badly Damaged Core Debris Ex-Vessel j
i
)
- 5) Recommended strategy (see next page)
)
I CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page:
8.D-1 of 2 1
,t.
J
- rE4 MENT 8.D CANDIDATE STRATEG nS FOR SEVERE ACCIDENTS O
Prior to recommending a strategy not covered by EOPs, evaluate pros and cons using i
available guidance.
RPV/RCS Containment BWRs and PWRs BWRs and PWRs Spray containment
- Inject into RPV/RCS
- Depressurize RPV/RCS
- Inject into containment Vent containment Inert containment Flood containment BWRs Only Spray within the RPV PWRs Only Operate fan coolers Restart RCPs Operate recombiners Depressurize steam generators r
Inject into steam generators
(
O CONI 5.01 Rev.
24 Date: September 17,1993 Page: 8.D-2 of 2