ML20056H560

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Replacement Page for Rept, Rept on Evaluations of Efficiencies Achievable in Operation of Region IV & V Ofcs. Error Discovered in Presentation of Parenthetical Numbers for Region V on Page 8
ML20056H560
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/07/1993
From: Turdici J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Hart K, Martin T, Newlin B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS (OPA), NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 9309100077
Download: ML20056H560 (3)


Text

__.

f( -% s u es" A.

i 4*

UNITED STATES f

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION b

WASHINGTON. D.C 20651MKS1

)

  • ...+

September 7, 1993 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Ken Hart, SECY i

Bob Newlin, PA T. Martin, RI S. Ebneter, RII J. Milhoan, RIII l

J. Martin, RIV B. Faulkenberry, RV T. Madden, CA M. Bridgers, OEDO B. Brach, NRR B. Hayes, OI T. Gody, NRR P. Bird, OP FROM:

James Turdici, OEDO

SUBJECT:

PAGE CHANGE TO REPORT ON EVALUATIONS OF EFFICIENCIES ACHIEVABLE IN OPERATION OF THE REGION IV AND V OFFICES Please replace the attached page in the recently provided report,

" Report on Evaluations of Efficiencies Achievable in Operation of the Region IV and V Offices."

An error was discovered in the presentation of the parenthetical numbers for Region V on page 8.

~

c 'ici W

rd ~

es DO 9-8-93 NUDOCS

Enclosure:

As stated Please replace the attached in the RIV/V Realignment cc:

J. Taylor, EDO report which I sent you yesterday.

I have also 1

sent a copy to the PDR.

i Margo Bridgers, OEDO l

l I

e, /"

9309100077 930907 F

PDR DRO NE ED 1?

i PDR h.t t

M TABLE 1

SUMMARY

OF SUGGESTED EFFICIENCY ACTIONS Actions Not involvino Admin. Contractual Support Region V Region IV FTE Savinos FTE Savinos l

1.

Consolidate the Enforcement Officer / Allegation Coordinatar 1.0 Functions with the Regional Counsel Function 2.

Reduce the State Liaison Function to Match Existing Workload 0.5 3.

Consolidate / Flatten Management Structure in DRSP/DRS 1.0 1.0 i

4.

Combine the Operating Licensing Section and the Reactor 1.0 Safety Section within DRSP into One Branch 5.

Adjust for PWR efficiencies 0.5 6.

Consolidate Work Activities Currently Being Performed by 1.0 Two Management Analysts and One Program Analyst 7.

Reduce Travel and Word Processing Service, Realign 1.9 0.5 Other Duties j

8.

Consolidate Three DRSS Branches Into Two Branches 1.0 l

9.

Reduce Level of Fersonnel Services 0.6 0.5 i

10.

Eliminate Deputy Regional Administrator Position in Region V*

1.0 II.

Accomplish the HP Mobile Lab (Van) Function by alternate M

M means SUB-TOTAL =

9.8 2.3 l

Actions Involvino Admin. Contract Sucoort 12.

Contract Administrative Services e.g., Word Processing, 3.7 5.0 Mail, Reproduction, Filing, Telecommunications and Receptionist Services 13.

Have Data Entry Contractors Perform Computer Programmer Activities M

1.7 SUB-TOTAL =

4.2 6.7 GRAND TOTAL 14.0 9.0 This is an efficiency action that would be implemented in all relevant options. The decision by the EDO had been made to eliminate this position prior to the initiation of i

the Region V Realignment Study.

l 7

l

--me w

+, - -, -

, -,,,.. -,, ~.

~

U l'l CORRECTED PAGE

-X TABLE 2

~

SUMMARY

FTE ANALYSIS-0PTION O REGION Y

[

FY-95 BASELINE

  • FY-95 OPTION 0 FTE SAVINGS j

NRR FTE 29 28.2 0.8 l

NMSS FTE 8

8 0

OTHER DIRECT 6

4.5 1.5 OVERHEAD 4g El (38.5)t 1LZ f7.5)t TOTAL REGION V 89 75.0 (79.2) 14.0 {9.8)

OVERHEAD RATIO 51.7%

45.7%

l l

f REGION IV l

FY-95 BASELINE

  • FY-95 OPTION O FTE SAVINGS j

I NRR FTE 47 46.7 0.3 j

NHSS FTE 16 16 0

OTHER DIRECT 6

6 0

OVERHEAD M (53.5)t _JL1 (2.011 TOTAL REGION IV 125 115.5 (122.2) 9.0 (2.3) OVERHEAD RATIO 44.8% 40.5% BOTH REGIONS 214 190.5 (201.4) 23.0 (12.1)

  • NOTE: The FY-95 Baseline is the same baseline used in the original study.

The FY-95 budget submission reduced Regions IV and V one additional l FTE. This additional FTE reduction is not reflected in the above numbers. t NOTE: Parenthetical values represent the total and respective FTE savings that would result if contracts were not used to provide administrative services. 8 .,,,.__c..- y, .,,I

CORRECTED PAGE / TABLE 2

SUMMARY

FTE ANALYSIS-OPTION O REGION V FY-95 BASELINE

  • FY-95 OPTION O FTE SAVINGS NRR FTE 29 28.2 0.8 NMSS FTE 8

8 0 ) 1 OTHER DIRECT 6 4.5 1.5 I OVERHEAD 1E El (38.5)t H J (7.5)t TOTAL REGION Y 89 75.0 (79.2) 14.0 (9.8) OVERHEAD RATIO 51.7% 45.7% REGION IV FY-95 BASELINE

  • FY-95 OPTION O FTE SAVINGS NRR FTE 47 46.7 0.3 NMSS FTE 16 16 0

OTHER DIRECT 6 6 0 OVERHEAD if it.,.B (53.51t _,32 E_0)1 TOTAL REGION IV 125 115.5 (122.2) 9.0 (2.3) OVERHEAD RATIO 44.8% 40.5% BOTH REGIONS 214 190.5 (201.4) 23.0 (12.1)

  • HOTE: The FY-95 Baseline is the same baseline used in the original study.

The FY-95 budget submission reduced Regions IV and V one additional l FTE. This additional FTE reduction is not reflected in the above l numbers. b l t NOTE: Parenthetical values represent the total and respective FTE savings that would result if contracts were not used to provide l administrative services. l 8 - -}}