ML20056H102
| ML20056H102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 08/30/1993 |
| From: | Burski R ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| W3F1-93-0171, W3F1-93-171, NUDOCS 9309080231 | |
| Download: ML20056H102 (5) | |
Text
w Entergy Operations,Inc.
m ENTERGY
- n a E.i a t A 7D'S
, %c 7:, iT~
}
R. F. Bursk.1 l
1 M 1..
W3F1-93-0171 A4.05 PR r
I August 30, 1993 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
[
Subject:
Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Fitness for Duty Performance Data, Six Month Report Gentlemen:
In accordance with 10CFR26.71(d), Entergy Operations, Inc. hereby submits l
by attachment, the Fitness for Duty Performance Data for the six month period from January 1 through June 30, 1993.
If you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact j
T.S. Becker at (504) 739-6693.
i i
Very truly yours,
/ li 7
v i
R.F. Burski Director Nuclear Safety RFB/TSB/ssf
}
I Attachment cc:
(w/ Attachment)
J.L. Milhoan (NRC Region IV), D.L. Wigginton (NRC-NRR),
N.S. Reynolds, R.B. McGehee, NRC Resident Inspectors Office g
kh b K
l2 0
k R
FITNFRS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 June 30, 1993 Enterov Operations, Inc.
Company 6 Months Ending Waterford 3 SES. P.O. Box B. Killona. Louisiana 70066 Location
. (504) 739-6308 Joan 0. Kief f. Analyst. Associate Senior Contact Name Phone (Include Area Code)
Cutoffs: Scronn/Confirr.ation (ng/ml)
O Appendix A to locrR26 1
Marijuana 50 /
15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 N/A
/
Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyc11 dine 25 /
25 N/A
/
opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04%
N/A
/
Testing Results Licenoce Long-Torn Short-Tara Employees Contractor Contractor Personnel Parsonnel 2
/
365 Average Number with 325 Unescorted Access Categories i
i i
i i
i Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positiva Pro-Access 29 0
N/A N/A 60 0
4 For-Cause 0
0 N/A N/A 0
0 t
Post Accident
+
ror-cause 0
0 N/A N/A 0
0 i
Observed behavior 1
Random 424 0
N/A N/A 153 0
rollow-up 12 0
N/A N/A 0
0 0
0 0
N/A N/A 18 0
T D"1 465 0
N/A N/A 231 0
i a
)
[L l!
1 c
n A
0
+
w n
+
5 A
A A
A
/
/
/
/
N N
N N
m 4
A A
A A
~
/
/
/
/
N N
N l
i A
3
/
A A
A em N
/
/
/
w N
N N
A 2
/
A A
A N
/
/
/
N N
N
~
~
~
A A
A A
S 1
/
/
/
/
a E
I N
N v
I 4
I e
C N
w A
n T
NW T
A e
S 0
/
0 0
B N
U S
C 0
I M
A F
0
/
0 0
I 1'
C EPS r=
R e
A O
v 0
/
0 0
h N
F S
T W
SE A
T 0
/
0 0
N EV I
TI W
S A
O 0
/
0 0
P N
DEKR A
0
/
0 0
I N
F N
O C
F O
A 0
/
0 0
N N
W ODKA r
E s
R ee B
ee c
sy a
no r
l el t
a cp n
t i m ho o
LE se T
1
i Fitness for Duty Program Six Month Performance Data
)
i FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM
SUMMARY
During this reporting period, approximately 48.5 percent of the population have been randomly tested. There were no positives to report during this period.
)
POSITIVE RESULTS:
The Fitness for Duty Program appears to be having a positive impact on the workforce concerning substance abuse.
There were no positive results among j
personnel with access to the protected area.
l MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
)
i i
Of the four employees enrolled in follow-up testing during the last j
reporting period, two of them have satisfactorily completed their follow-up programs during this reporting period. Two employees are still enrolled in follow-up testing programs. Although all results have been negative, one test did show the presence of alcohol in an individual.
Entergy 1
Operations, Inc. defines the presence of alcohol as a breath test result showing a BAC between.005% and.039%. The appropriate management was notified and the individual was counseled.
The sitff administering the Fitness for Duty program was decreased by one position due to right-sizing in the Company. The position of Supervisor-Personnel Assurance was eliminated. Supervisory duties were given to a manager position and an individual in the department was appointed as lead.
i Page 1
i i
A EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC):
On March 30, 1993, an unsatisfactory result from a blind performance sample was returned from Waterford's confirmatory laboratory, Doctors & Physicians Laboratory (DPL). Notification of the event was sent to the NRC on May 25, 1993. A thorough investigation was performed by Entergy and we are i
satisfied that the false negative result was due to a contractual error in the testing methodology used at the confirmatory laboratory coupled with the composition of D and L isomers in the spiked sample.
Entergy is confident that instances similar to the false reporting esncern can be avoided by DPL in the future by strictly following the provisions of the contract.
1 1
l PROGRAM WEAKNESSES:
Annual internal audit indicated the need for better documentation of calibration and maintenance data, and better tracking of requirements for the personnel files of the Fitness for Duty staff. These items have been addressed and will be re-audited during the next reporting period.
I Page 2
. - -