ML20056E709
| ML20056E709 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/28/1993 |
| From: | Michael Scott NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Komoriya H INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-L-1318, CON-NRC-03-90-027, CON-NRC-3-90-27 NUDOCS 9308250092 | |
| Download: ML20056E709 (6) | |
Text
"
PDR 7 %,
-4 UNITED STATES l
}
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
WASHINGTON. D.C. 205E60001
%,...../
APR 2 81993 International Technical Services, Inc.
ATTN:
Dr. Hideko Komoriya 420 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10170
Dear Dr. Komoriya:
Subject:
Task Order No.19 Under Contract No. NRC-03-90-027 Entitled
" Review of Texas Utilities Electric Company Steamline Break Methodology" (FIN L-1318)
You are hereby authorized to commence work under the subject Task Order effective May 1, 1993 with an established ceiling of $12,480.00.
In accordance with Section G.6, Task Order Procedures, of the subject centract, this letter definitizes Task Order No. 19.
This effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work and the Contractor's proposal dated April 7,1993, incorporated iarein by reference.
The period of performar.ce for Task Order No. 19 is May 1, 1993 through December 31, 1993. The total cost ceiling is $12,480. The amount of
$11,387.00 represents the total reimbursable costs and the amount of
$1,093.00 represents the fixed fee.
Accounting data for Task Order No.19 is as follows:
B&R No.
320-19-15-05-0 FIN No.
L-1318-3 BOC No.
2542 Appropriation No.
31X0200.320 Obligated Amount:
$12,480.00 The following individuals are considered by the Government to be essential to the successful performance of the work hereunder:
Hideko Komoriya Paul Abramson The contractor agrees that such personnel ss,all not be removed from the effort under this task order without compliance with Contract Clause H.1 -
Key Personnel.
I 9300250092 930428
)
PDR CONTR f-NRC-03-90-c27 ppg i
j a
t 7
t Dr. Hideko Komirya Contract No. NRC-03-90-027 Task Order No. 19 Page 2 of 2 The issuance of this task order does not amend any other terms or conditions of the 5 abject contract.
Your contacts during the course of this task order are:
Technical Matters:
Amira M. Gill l
Project Officer l
(301) 504-1212 Contractual Matters:
Brenda J. DuBose Contract Administrator (301) 492-7442 i
Please indicate your acceptance of this task order by having an official, 3
authorized to bind your organization, execute three copies of this document in the space provided and return two copies to the Contract Administrator-identified below:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTH: Ms. Brenda J. DuBose Division of Contracts and Property Management - P-902 Washington, D.C.
20555 The third copy may be retained for your records.
Sincerely, 6m YNA Mary Lynn Scott, Contracting Officer Contract Administration Branch No. 1 Division of Contracts and Property Management Office of Administration ACCEPT D:
TasCDrder No. 19 C A
s,-
iv y
O Aa l TITLE 4/
8 /f 9 3 D'TE /
A
'/'
//
Enclosure STATEMENT OF WORK TASK ORDER TDD TUEC Steamline Break Analysis
Title:
Methodoloy L-1318 FIN:
1505, 556 B&R Number:
Amira Gill (FTS 504-1212)
Project Manager:
Technical Monitor:
Frank Orr (PTS 504-1815)
Estimated Level of Effort:
About 3 professional staff-weeks in fiscal year 1993 1
Dece ter 31, 1993 Projected Corpletion Date:
ITS Contractor:
M80521 TAC Nos.:
3 NRR Priority No.:
1.
BACKGROUND topical report RXE-The Texas Utilities Electric Company (TUEC)
" Methodology for Reactor Core Response to Steamline Break 91-005, 1991, describes the TUEC steamline break (SLB)
Events," May 31, accident analysis methodology which will be used in licensing This methodology applications for the TUEC Comanche Peak plants.
uses a thermal-hydraulic code (RETRAN-02) currently under review for application to the Comanche Peak plants.
2.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this technical assistance program is to obtain expert technical sevices from the contractor to assist the staff in the review and determination of the acceptability of the submittal discussed above.
i l
3.
WORK REQUIREMEITIS l
]
The contractor will review the documentation describing the TUEC SLB analysis methodology and provide recommendations with bases on the acceptability of the methodology for Comanche Peak In the review, the contractor will licensing applications.
consider previous approvals of constituent models and and the intended use of restrictions or limitations on their use, the methodology, and recommend any restrictions or limitations to The contractor will also review any be placed on its use.
analyses provided to support the methodology and its
_ applicability _to the Comanche Peak plants. --
Expertise in thermal hydraulics and transient analysis, as well as expertise with the RETRAN code and steamline break event
===1"=i=. is reauired for this review.
)
$ i i
Based on its review, the contractor will provide questions for Upon completion of the review, TUEC response if necessary.
including resolution of issues, the contractor will provide a (TER) with its recommendations technical evaluation report l
regarding the acceptability of the topical report.
Subtasks (and Proiected Comnletion Dates)
Subtask 1 Initiate Review and Issue Review Questions j
Jud6 15, 1993 August 31, 1993
-In The contractor will perform an initial review of RXE-91-005.
performing the review, the contractor should ensure that the models comply with previous and/or new restrictions imposed on the code (s) and methodologies according to their intended use.
In the review of the thermal-hydraulic models described in the the contractor should ensure that either previous
- report, restrictions on use are resolved, or the methodology and calculations comply with any remaining restrictions imposed by previous approvals, according to their intended use.
The contractor should also review the useage interface between the system analysis methods and core analysis codes (if separate) to assure acceptable results according to applicable regulatory criteria.
If necessary, the contractor will generate a set of questions to The questions should be specific and be sent to the licensee.
serve to clarify or obtain information on areas not fully The questions should be as complete as discussed in the report.
possible to avoid the necessity of further questions.
Preliminary discussions with the NRC Technical Monitor before formal action (e.g. submitting questions) are encouraged.
Subtask 2 Final Review September 30, 199'3 Thecontractorwillthoroughlyreviewthetohicalreportand clarifying documentation provided by the licensee in response to initial questions.
If necessay, additional questions may be generated to clarify licensee responses which are still not satisfactory or to obtain additional descriptive information to Such questions, if any, should be minimal, and complete the TER.will be considered deliverables for this subtask if provided. If additional questions are not necessary, a verbal status report will be provided, and the Draft TER discussed below under Subtask 3 will constitute the deliverable documentation for this subtask The review may also involve contractor as well as for Subtask 3.
discussions with the licensee, at the arrangement of the Technical Monitor, to clarify all technical issues involved in the reviev. _.
_L 2
c
-3 Subtask 3 Draf t TER Ocu>ber 29, 1993 the contractor shall Based on the results of the above subtasks, prepare a draft TER discussing the results of the topical report review including review of any supplemental information supplied The draft TER should be prepared in accordance t
by the licensee.
" Publication of Unclassified with NRC Manual Chapter 3202, Regulatory and Technical Reports Prepared by NRC Contractors."
- findings, The draft TER shall document the review effort, conclusions and recommendations, with bases, on the acceptability of using RXE-91-005 for performing SLB analyses for the Comanche Care should be taken to avoid inclusion of the Peak plants.
The-draft licensee's proprietary information in the draft TER.
TER shall be prepared and sent to the NRC Technical Monitor for review and comment.
i Subtask 4 Final TER Novater 30, 1993 f
Upon receipt of comments from the NRC Technical Monitor, the contractor shall prepare a final TER which addresses the NRC The TER should be in accordance Technical Monitor's comments. " Publication of Unclassified with NRC Manual Chapter 3202, Regulatory and Technical Reports Prepared by NRC Contractor."
The contractor will submit one reproducible and four reproduced copies of the final TER to the NRC Project Manager.
4.
Level of Effort month The level of effort is extended to 3 person weeks over a 7 period.
5.
Reportina Reauirements (a) Review Questions See Subtasks 1 and 2, above.
g (b) Verbal Status Report (s)
The contractor will verbally report the progress of each subtask at least once prior to completing the subtask to the NRC Technical Monitor.
This is in addition to the verbal report explicitly specified in Subtask 2.
(c) Draft TER See Subtask 3, above.
(d) Final TER
~
-~
n 1
-4 Upon completion of the project, the contractor will submit a TER for the topical report reviewed to the NRC Project Manager as discussed in Section 3, Subtask 4 of this document.
I (e) Monthly Business Letter Report A monthly business letter report is to be submitted by the 15th of the month to the NRC Project manager. The report will contain the following:
A listing of any efforts completed during the period, including milestones reached.
The amount of funds expended for manpower and computer services, both during the period and cumulative to date.
Any problems or delays encountered or anticipated.
1 A summary of progress to date, and Plans for the next reporting period.
6.
Meetinas and Travel l
Two one-persen trips to the NRC headquarters in Rockville, f
Maryland, nhould be planned and budgeted for meetings to resolve ^
open issuec.
If used, these meetings will be of one or two days duration. Dates will be mutually agreed upon between the NRC Project Manager and the contractor.
7.
NRC Purnished Materials The NRC will provide all necessary materials to facilitate i
successful completion of this project.
This will include topical report RXE-91-005.
s 1
_