ML20056E048
| ML20056E048 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/16/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20056E017 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99901174 99901174-90-01, 99901174-90-1, EA-91-162, NUDOCS 9308190262 | |
| Download: ML20056E048 (1) | |
Text
_.
l NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE Shur-Kut Supply Corporation (S-K)
Docket No. 99901174 Morton, Pennsylvania EA 91-162 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on June 18 through 20, 1990, it was found that certain of your activities were not performed in accordance with NRC requirements.
Criterion VII, " Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services," of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, states, in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that purchased material.... whether purchased directly or through contractors and subcontractors, conform to the procurement documents."
l Criterion V, " Instructions, Procedures and Drawings," of 10 CFR 50, i
Appendix B, states, in part, " activities affecting guality.... shall be l
accomplished in accordance with... instructions procedures, or drawings."
Contrary to the above, measures established to ensure that purchased materials
)
conformed to the procurement documents were inadequate in that the following Philadelphia Electric Company (PEco) Purchase Orders (P0s), invoking 10 CFR Part 21 and 10 CFR Part 50., Appendix B, were filled by S-K with parts that did not conform to the P0 requirements for dimension and/or chemistry (90-01-01):
l BW 345278 delivered on January 11, 1989 l
BW 610310 delivered on March 9, 1989 i
BW 611364-delivered on June 29, 1989 i
BW 611365 delivered on June 29, 1989 BW 611211 delivered on July 19, 1989 Please provide a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 witl. copies to the Director Office of Enforcement and the Chief, Vendor Inspection Branch, Division of Reactor Inspection and Licensee Performance, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this-Notice of i
Nonconformance.
This reply should be marked as a " Reply to a Notice of l
Nonconformance" and-should include for each nonconformance: (1) a description of the steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of the steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the dates your corrective actions and preventive measures were or till be completed.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland I
this{(fdayofAugust1993 9308190262 930816 h
t PDR GA999 EMV*****
4 99901174 PDR h
I
-...-