ML20056B539
| ML20056B539 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/31/1990 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUREG-1362, NUREG-1362-DRF-FC-ER, NUREG-1362-DRFT, NUDOCS 9008310201 | |
| Download: ML20056B539 (1) | |
Text
-
.~.
((m' 'o,,
~
UNITED STATES
'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
l-WASHING' ton, D. C. 20555 l:.....*/
August 1990 y.f t
- p ERRATA SHEET Report Number
NUREG-1362 ll Report
Title:
Regulatory Analysis for Proposed Rule on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal:
Draft Report for Comment Prepared by:
Division of Safety Issue Resolution Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Date Published:
July 1990
[
Instructions:
Section 7.2, on page.7-3, should read as follows:
I l
7.2 Summary of Environmental Review Requirements i
l The staff has considered how environmental impacts from relicensing under the proposed 10 CFR Part 54 might differ from environmental impacts that might occur _with relicensing under existing regulations.
There will be little difference because the requirements for renewal should be similar. 'Both approaches would result in operation of plants up to 20 or more years beyond the expiration of the initial license.
Under both approaches, modifications and refurbishment are not expected to involve changes to the overall design of plants; thus, basic plant operating parameters, such as thermal performance, power output, and fuel utilization, would not differ.
There will be, therefore, no basis for differing environmental effects.
The environmental review requirements for individual license renewal actions will be the subject of a separate rulemaking, involving changes to 10 CFR Part 51.
Division of Freedom ofInformation and Publications Services Omcc of Administration 9008310201 900031 L
1362 R 1
p i
L iihg;;;jmu~1- "lll~
DC pngg5 i
\\
i h
j i
i
-