ML20056B521
| ML20056B521 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1990 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20056B520 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-155-90-01-01, 50-155-90-1-1, NUDOCS 9008290118 | |
| Download: ML20056B521 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000155/1990001
Text
e
.
.
>
c
i
Enclosure 1
-,
SALP 9
,
FINAL SALP REPORT
P
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
SYSTEMATIC' ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
i
'
Inspect'on Report No. 50-155/90001
i-
Consumers Power Company
Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant
.
January 1,1989 through April 30, 1990
l .'
'
t
9008290119 900817
POR
ADOCK 0500
'
o
.
L
l
gg
j,
.
.
r
Enclosure I
f
Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant
h
A.
Summary of Meeting with Consumers Power %.vny on July 16, 1990
F
The findings and conclusions > of the SALP Board are documented in
Report No. 50-155/90001 and were discussed with the licensee on
July 16, 1990, at the Edgewater Inn, Charlevoix, Michigan
.While the meeting was primarily a discussion between the licensee
'
and NRC, it was_open to members of the public as observers.
-
The following licensee and NRC personnel were in attendance, as well
as the noted observers.
,
Consumers Power Company
G. Heins, Senior Vice President Energy Supply, CPCo
D. Hoffman, Vice President Nuclear Operations, CPCo
W. Beckman, Plant Manager, Big Rock Point
K. Berry, Director, Nuclear Licensing
1
^
D. Hughes, Director, Quality Assurance
C. MacInnis, Director, Public Affairs
E. Zianert, Director, Human Resources
S. LaJoice, Site Manager, Burns International Security Services
L. Monshor, Quality Assurance Superintendent
J. Beer, Chemistry / Health Physics Superintendent
J. Popa Maintenance Superintendent
M. Van Alst, Property Protection Supervisor
B. Rabideau, Property Protection Operations Supervisor
L. Darrah, Shift' Supervisor
.
D. Moeggenberg, Engineering Supervisor
E. Mosley, Instrument and Control Supervisor
R. Barnhart, Electrical / Instrument and Control Supervisor
L. Oostmeyer, Administration Supervisor
W. Trubilowicz, Operations Supervisor
P. Donnelly, Risk Assessment Administrator
D. Lacroix, Training Administrator
M.-Hobe, Senior Emergency Planner
L
S. Beachhum, Senior Engineer
l
B. Joba, Performance Engineer
c
G. Boss, Reactor Engineer
R. Alexander, Technical Engineer
W, Merwin. Technician
S. Amstutz, Secretary
L
l
>
>
v i
.
v
,
,
'
,
,
.
.,
,
.
.'
.
.
.
,
-
Nuclear' Regulatory Commission
l
s
m
?
C. Jl Paperiello, Diputy Regional Administrator, RIII
,
'
'W. L. Forney, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects, DRP-
.!
B. Clayton, Chief,. Reactor Projects Branch- 2, DRP
R.= DeFayette ' Chief, Reactor Projects Section 28. DRP
c
A. Masciantonio, Project Manager, NRR/PD III-I
E..A. Plettner,.Jr., Senior Resident Inspector, DRP
Other
,
.
,e
P. Clark, Petosky. News Review
1
S. Pangborn, Citizen Observer
A. Beckman Citizen Observer.
J. Beemon, Concerned Citizens of Charlevoix
D.:llahn, Michigan Department Public flealth
N. Williamsen, Citizen Observer
i
H. Orake, Citizen Observer
.
-G. Drake, Citizen Observer
l
B.
Comments Received from Licensee
Consumers Power Company's. August 6, 1990 response to the Big Rock Point
-Initial SALP 9' Report dated July 6,1990, included several comments that
have resulted in a minor revision to the Initial SALP Report. These-
i
changes are listed in Enclosure 2 and the revised pages are included as
Enclosure 3.
The affected pages of the Initial SALP Report should be replaced with
l
the~ corrected pages included in Enclosure 3.
C.
P,egional Administrator's' Conclusions Based on Consideration of Licensee
, ' ;"
,
Conments
While we acknowledge that you are making improvements in your security
program, we did not conclude that those improvements warranted a 'SALP 2 -
Improving rating at this time. We encourage you to continue your efforts
to upgrade your security program.
No changes.were made to the SALP
report for this consnent.
i
We acknowledge your connent that the improved performance incentive-
program was not suspended.
The fact that the Reactor Engineering and
Emergency Preparedness Departments were added to the program was not made
,
-known to the NRC until your response to the SALP report. This same
acknowledgement applies to your connent that the surveillance audits
m' '
actually contained a "walkdown" inspection of all of the E0Ps (E0P 1,
.'
2, 3,'4; and EIP 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) along with interviews with Operations
and Training personnel.- Our evaluation of the new information provided in
your response did not change the conclusions stated in the initial report;
'
therefore, the initial SALP report will not be revised.
6
,
,
,
.
.-
-
.
h
-
i,
'
o
.
-
.
Our concern with the condenser in-leakage test and the subsequent release
of radioactive gases to the turbine building was with the quality of the
management oversight and planning for_ this work, rather than with the
'
minor' contamination which resulted from the~ event.
No changes were made'
,
to the SALPzreport for this comment.
-
I have concluded that the information provided in your response to the
t
.
SALP report does not support a change in the rating for the affected
L,
area.-
'
l2
,
,
f
4
9
t
f
k
..
b *
t
t,
i
l-
ll
.
I
l
1
'
L
3
1