ML20055J018
| ML20055J018 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1990 |
| From: | Jordan M, Rau E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055J001 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-OL-90-03, 50-461-OL-90-3, NUDOCS 9007310280 | |
| Download: ML20055J018 (2) | |
Text
,g g s:.
- Y*.
y
[.' 4
,j py, ENCLOSURE 1.
i~
.U.
S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III-x
?:
Report No.:-. 50-461/0L-90-03
?, : '
DocketLNo.:
50-461:
License No. NPF-62
' Licensee:
Illinois Power Company g
Facility;Name:
Clinton: Power Station
- Examination Administered At
- Clinton Power Station
. Examination' Conducted:. June.4-8, 1990
! Chief Examiner:
[
W Eddie Rau Date.
ti
!fb
. 7 t/
. t Approved By: L M. ' J.' (f o Date
- 0perator'rdan,_ Chief Licensing Section
- 1
- ]
LExamination' Summary.
Examination administered during week of June:4,1990 (Report No.= 50-461/0L-90-03)).
j
. Written and-operating'requalification examinations were administered to ten-Senior Reactor Operators (SR0s) and six Reactor Operators'(R0s)'
Two operating, crews:and one staff; crew were evaluated during'the. simulator portion of the:
operating; examination.
JResults:
Eight of ten SR0s; four of six'R0s; and two of the.three crews passed 1
the examination. All failures were a result of performance on the simulator..
j The facility: results ' matched those of the. NRC.
Independent grading by-f 7
facility and individual / crew performance results' satisfied the criteria of.
]
NUREG;1021,.Revis un:5.: Based on this,'the Clinton Station 0perator
- Requalification Program is assigned an overall rating of satisfactory.
J J'
l' 9007310280 900725
""4 PDR~ ADOCK 05000461 t
V PDC
J V ine =
w*
V
~
m+.
a e
3; f..
%,uy p?% ^
~>
- - pg
- L 4-y s
ps l
r.
. s.
a m 1.px 1.
z ga g,-
m 4 l ENCLOSURE 3' fi y
g h@3 l+ f,
REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATION REP 0rtTc 4
w,
- c m,
m.
i T
M f';
g,w.jFacility:i.Clinton Power Station:.
- , ~,
In.'
Examinerf Edd.ie1RauL l
~
w?
4-8, 1990,
.n.1
. Dates of; Evaluation:x; June t
,y a.
9 Lo
-lp Assas Eyaluate'd:- Written;3 Oral; and Simulatorf
}
b d
3 Examination Results::
w v(
..R0 '.
SR0=
Total Evaluation.
- nj Pass / Fail;
. Pass /Fsil; Pass / Fail (S.orU).
]
Written Examination' 6/0, 10/0 16/b
'S p <w.
y
.y e,
l0perating Examin'ation; 1
u p
i<
K, Oral'.
.6/0L 10/0 16/0 S...
4 -#g t
~
s if 0'H
- Simulator 24/2-8/2-
-12/4:
.S. ;
~
W
..Q T,
Evaluat.ionfof: facility written examination grading S-pw "M
(Crew Examination Results:
p
'y~
9
-Crew.1.
iCrew 21 Crew:3'.
' Evalua t' ion '
%. ~
Pass / Fail' tPass/ Fail-Pass / Fail
.(S or U):
Ti
,4 c
Fail Pass-
-Pass'
-SL d
,?Overall Program Evaluation-
~J
.o ii
. : Satisfactory
~
.d.
w %-
4
~
?.~ w g i
f j
t y
c p
(
~l o
4 y
'.i
.I V s. f 4
F
,1 4
n:w F,
S0bmitte6 Forwarded:
A roved
- Q,Q C fL Q w
. //s'
)
I
, El Ret M.~ Jordan G. Wright.
- Examiner-Section Chief
.Branc ; Chief
~
W
- 07/;LS/90 07/;23/90 07
/90 1
l
'a., ' g g
c s
a i