ML20055F465
| ML20055F465 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 06/29/1990 |
| From: | Creel G BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| FRN-55FR14288, FRN-56FR32066, RULE-PR-55 55FR14288-00036, 55FR14288-36, AD55-2-45, NUDOCS 9007170166 | |
| Download: ML20055F465 (2) | |
Text
_....
d.l
'" [j? -'
.~
DOCKET NUMBER 4
PROP k N-
' 80 l/; 8
- i 4'
( ~)L. P;Q j4;2,yg) l BALTIMORE 4
OAS AND' j g,gty,g; gg ELECTRIC USNRC s
LCHARLES CENTER'
- P.O. BOX 1475
- BALTIMORE, MA@fR2$03A)}!Tg3 y
i,c vf % M Si Chf 7M r 00CKiijHG 4 gig gT Oconotc,o oR t.NCH vice pace
!;c
- Nuctean E,.cao, o:
ooo no...*-
June 29,1990 6
U. S.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:
Document Control Desk 4
SUBJECT:
. Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit'Nos. ! & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Prooosed Rule - Ooerators' Licenses 10 CFR Part 55 A
Gentlemen:
Baltimore Gas and Electric - (BG&E) Company fully supports the setting of high standardst fora licensed --operators in - the area of fitness for - duty. We - are aware of
' concerns that ' the proposed rule would single out licensed operators and treat 'them differently from other ' nuclear power plant personnel 'We can also sympathize with the -
argument that the proposed rule is a challenge to = the. ' licensed operators' trustworthi-
-ness, in addition to that challenge posed 'to all. nuclear power plant personnel by 10 CFR Part 26.
- However; we strongly believe that different treatment' of ' the licensed operator can be adequately ' justified given the broad range of responsibilities BG&E places on them.-
Both ~ BG&E : and.the public depend on our - plant personnel in fact, all of our employees, to' make. timely,' informed judgments and take appropriate action. As a public-utility, L we fully un'derstand our obligations to the public. In our quest to - maintain their trust in our ' operations, we elected to require our employees to hold ; themselves to high :tandards prior ~ to the' promulgation of 4 any Federal Regulations regarding fitness for' duty.-
We - l support the principle of strict accountability 'of ' fitness for duty for til our Lemployees,. but' we question whether the proposed rulemaking 'is needed in view of the
~ specific, provisions currently contained in 10 CFR Part 55.
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
3 Very truly yours,
/
l t
/
s
", c GCC/JMO/ dim 9007170166 900629 l
/
-W PDR PR 55 55FR14288 PDR gji
,g/O. '
4 r
m
f ' s.l:9 ;.'
1
+
. Docketing andl Services Branch June - 29, 1990 Page 2
.1 cc:
D.- A. Brune, Esquire
)
J.'
E.
Silberg, Esquire :
R. ' A. Capra, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., NRC T. T. Martin, NRC L. E.- Nicholson, NRC R. I. McLean, DNR r
I 1
kh R
l' l.
/
(1-1 1-I
'i
,s i
b.
.r i
u, I..
s 4
l5
~
't