ML20055E993

Package Consisting of Unsigned Nondisclosure Agreement Between NRC & Tdi

ML20055E993
Person / Time
Issue date:	09/19/1986
From:	Sinclair J NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
To:
Shared Package
ML20055E990	List: ML20055E989 ML20055E993
References
FOIA-89-192, FOIA-90-A-12 NUDOCS 9007130157
Download: ML20055E993 (4)

Text

._.. - - -.. - _ -

CfMl6 f i

s NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT i

This agreement is.made September 19, 1986 by and between Transamerica Delaval Inc. ('TDI'), a Delaware corporation and the. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.('NRC'), an independent regulatory commission'of the government of the United j

t states of America', having its principal place of business in l

Washington, D.C.

t Whereas,.the NRC informally requested TDI to make available transcripts of the depositions of Daniel Cady, Edward Deane, and Leola Rountree taken in'Long Island Lighting Company

v. TDI, pending in the southern District of'New York; and Whereas, TDI has agreed to. comply with the informal

[

^

request of the NRC; and Whereas, URC staff, including the.0ffice of Investigations, intends to use the depositions in the-furtherance of regulatory and investigatory functions; e

Therefore, TDI and the NRC agree as follows:

1.

The depositions will be treated as confidential j

material by the NRC.

Neither the depositions nor any information contained therein will'be disclosed by'the NRC to anyone outside of the NRC, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2-6.

t 618 90071%g379

$3090 12

..C.,

. ~...

2.

In the event the depositions are responsive to a Freedom of Information Act ('POIA') request, request for production, or subpoena served on the NRC, the NRC will i.

send a copy of the POIA* request, request for production, or subpoena to the undersigned counsel for TDI (' undersigned *);

11.

in the event the NRC intends to produce the depositions, it will advise the undersigned of the intended production no later than ten (10) days prior to the proposed production date.

The undersigned will submit any objections to the proposed production no later than five days prior to the production date.

The NRC will notify the undersigned of its final decision regarding production after its consideration of any objections no later than two days prior to-ultimate production of I

the requested documents; 111.

the NRC will notify the undersigned of any suit' brought to compel production of the depositions.

3.

In the event the HRC sua sponte intends to release the depositions to anyone outside of the NRC, it will advise the undersigned of the intended

(

production no lat6r than ten (10) days prior to f

the production date.

The undersigned will submit i

2 i

any objections to the production no later than five days prior to the production date.

The NRC l

will notify the undersigned of its final decision regarding release after its consideration of any-i e

objections no later than two days prior to ultimate releases 4.

In th'e event a committee or subcommittee of'the

\\

United states senate or House of Representatives (having jurisdiction over the development, utilisation, or application of nuclear energy, l

with respect to the activities or responsibilities of the NRC in the field of nuclear energy which l

1 are within the jurisdiction of such committees)

}

requests the depositions or information contained 4

therein, the NRC will probably provide the commit &.. nr subcommittee with the documents.- The NRC also willt l

i, notify the undersigned prior to the production; f

11, inform the committee or' subcommittee that the depositions or. applicable information l

contained therein is confidential and sh'ould l

l not be-publicly disclosed, l

The NRC cannot guarantee that Congress would honor.

such a request.

H 3

9.

i 5.

Nothing.in this agreement sha111 preclude the NRC from disclosing information contained in the depositions that is obtained from a source-

. independent of the~ depositions.

6.

Nothing in this agreement shall-be' construed to limit in any way-the powers, obligations and responsibilities _of the NRC as prescribed by law.

U.S. Nuclear = Regulatory Commission

' Washington, D.C.. 20555 j

By John Sinclair Operations Officer-Office:cf Investigations l

u l

Transamerica Delaval Inc.

By James.W..Quinn, Esq.

Weil, Gotshal &= Manges 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 l

By

.c Robert Smith, Esq.

Rosenman,: Colin,,Freund, ll Lewis & Cohen 575 Madison 4 Avenue-New York, New York-20022 i

Septemb'er. 19, 1986:

I l

~!

o

PUlA - UVelR susumetwo

)

RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF

=

~

Ir I PA=

• ^ '

INFORMATION ACT (FSIA) RECUEST JE8 gg j

e. -

-,s.-...

8tt out STLR

_ Robert M. RolfAo RW re PART 1.- AGENCY RECOROS RELEASED OA NOT LOCATED ISee checkd bones)

No opency recores s44ect to the twet have teen located.

bio additwmsl egency recorde evbject to the request have been loceted.

Reevoeted records are eveAable through another pupc $stributen prog <ern. See Commente Secten.

D e,,ei,eedy e,,,ie,fo,,,,s,,,t,on an,,e,y,n,,

Agency records subsect to the request that e's scentif*d on Appendistest Y

NRC NMc Document Room 2120 L Street. N W.. Wuhegion. DC 20655 E

Agency recoeds subtect to the regwest that are adentAed on Appendialesi e,e geog made,,eiitoie to,,,,, ne,,,,,,, en,,ep,,n,,

NRC PVMc Document Room. 2t 20 L Street N W Wuhengton. DC. m a folder under this FOIA number end requestee name.

g The nonproprietary version of the proposat:sl that you eg**ed to eccept e a telephone conveesation with a member of my staff is non being made svedetne for pu -

begociton and copytog et tN NRC PutAc Document Room 2120 L Street N W.. Wnheneton. DC. m a foeder unde

• this FOIA numbee and requester name Agency reConds Svbs ct to the request that ese sdentified on Appendialest_,

may be enspected red Copied St the NRC Local PVteC Docurt e.is Room,dem e

in the Comments Secten-Enclosed is information on how you may obtain eccess to end the cheepos foe copying records pieced e the NRC PuMc Document Room. 2120 t I teeet. N W.

X Washbgton. DC.

X

^*'****6'*""'*'""*'"*'**

RMords sub Ht to the request have been refereed to anothet Federal egencyties) fo# review and dvect respon6e to you t

You will be bened by the NRC for fees totating 6 in view of NRC's response to this eequest. no tw<thee xion is beeg taken on appear ietier deted No

~

PART I. A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Cortem clo< mat.on e the eeovested eecords is beeg withheid f,om putAc d.scioswee puesweat to the esempions descr. bed e and for the eessons staied e Peri it settens S. C. and 0 Aey reiesse ? portens of the docwmeats for wh.ch on8v part of the eecond is being asthheld are beeg made o.a.lebie foe public inspection en copyng m the NRC Pwtec Documt Room. 2t 20 L Street. N W., Washington. OC, e e foWes under this 801A numbes and esewestee came i

X COMM(NIS

• Copies of the records identified on enclosed Appendix E are enclosed.

t l

Sa Rt. OdRECTOR. pfSION f

(OOM OF NFORMATION AND PU8tlCATION$ SERVICES l

ff.

I Mg

Recorde 'outsect t; the esquest that see doectibed on the enclosed Apperdialeel F

e,e bein, wit,6eid n ihei, enia,o,y C, in pe,, unde, il tromptione and foe the reasone set forth below pursuerW to S U.S.C. 66221 and 10 CFR $.171a) of NRC Pfogulations.

j i, Two wwieid wforemen is,,opwir cia.emed purew.nue tauvow. oreer tentwTion si

3. The wwow bf.menon toisies eonee io the mieme# per orce ewise end prueesee of wnC. tixtwfioN al r

K The wnhheed enformenon e op cetecey eaampted teem putec d ectosure by statute hoicoted. ItxtwreDef 3e Sectens 141145 of i e Atomac tacey Act.Nch proh.twis the eschosure of Nstricted Deta or Fwme<ty betncied Dete 642 U S C 218121sta l

1 Secten 14 7 of the Atomac trergy Act whech prohbts tte disclooswo of Unclapsfod Safeguares informatun (42 U $ C. 2167).

4. The witMend mformaten as a trede secret er comrneecW or fnencial esformaten that is beang wahheed for the reason (si e%hcated ftXtMPTION el The otormaten is cons.dered to be confidentiel bussness (proprietaryl enfermation.

Tte nfo<mation is considesed to be propeietory eformation puesvent to 10 CFR 2 7904dHil.

The enlotmation was submitled and teCeived m confedance pursuant to 10 CFR 2 ?$0(dH2).

$[ The wghhead enformation consists of entesagency or etesagency records that are not sva.lable through escovery evreg lit:3ation it AtleTION St Applicable Pnveege Deinbe'attve Ptocess Disclosure of p'edecisionO mformateon wov d tend to mhetat the open and (fank eaChenge of idets essentel to the delikat'rve peocesa ;

e wh..,eco,ds.,..nhhod m the. ent.<eiy. ihe f acts a,e me si. c atey etert.med ah the e,pdws.one efemaison. thee eso e, no,pasonabey sea,egabie Iac portene because tN release of the f acts wowtd permet an indirect snowiry eso the peedeces.onal process of the egency.

Attorney wofk psoduct p#iviiege fDocuments precased by an atto#ney in coniempleton of biegaien i Attorney

• cleent privilege IConfident.al communecatens between ar* sito#ney and his her chent I

4. The wahhew eformaten is esempted f<om pubi.c o.sclosv's because its disclosure woved selv t e a clear'y unmanented evesen of po'sonal privecy it AIMPTION el e

7. The withhod informaien cons.sts of ruords corneded foe fa* enforcement purposn and is beeg *ithhod foe the renontst edicated it XtMPiloN 7) o.wiese,e cwid,enonabi, be e.puied io inie,te.e.an an enio.coment p.oceed.g becaose a coved evesiihe scope d eci.on and focus of en.

Ioncement ef foris and thus cov d pon.bi, vio* them to tan e ut.on to sh.eid coient C weongdo.ng or a violat.on of NRC <eovpements from invesiegatoss a

t atMPfiON 7 iAli Doutosure woved ccastitute en unmarranted evaseon of personal povacy itxtMPflON ffCil The eformat.on conSGts of rames of edividvest and othes information the d.sclosure of wh*ch cowd reasonabir be esoected to eticalidentaios of e

X

• • a'**^'***'*'*OND

~'otHtR X

Critical Self-Evaluative Privilege - Exemption 5 PART I. C-DENYING OFFICIALS ev.svani i, io CFR s is<bi and, e rs ici of ihe v s Nucies. Reevivo y Comm.n.on. eve.ons a has beee det, mined ihai the ef mc.on.*cd e.emoi est The pe' sons responsible for the den.at one those off. cia's censit.ed from peocsuct.on o< disclosure and that vts production o' disciosw's is cont'ary to the pubi.c mte'Sevices Of t.ce of Adm.nistration and Resources Manage tetow as denyeg offic.ais and the Duector. Division of Feeedom of inf ormat.on and Pubeicaices den.als that may to appered to the (secutive Deector for Opeiations ig Don O(NYING OFFICIAL flit t sOF FICE RECORDS OtNigD APPitLAlt QFFICIAt E DO' ;

I S4CRETARY

_ Ben _B Hayei D keci m _ Office of Investiaations App. F/1 F/4 and F/5 X

i Johr. C. Hoyle Ass't Secretary of the Comission

. App. F/2 X

alamn A. Fitzgerald Ass't General Conniel for Appa F/3 and X

Adjudications & Opinions F/6 PART B. D-APPEAL RIGHTS l

The derdal by each denyng officialidentif'ed in Part 11 C may be appealed to the Apposete Official identif~ d in that section. Any such appeal must be in writeg and an.

e be rnado withn 30 daye of receipt of this sesponse. Appeals must be eddressed a: appeopriate to the tsecutive Director foe Operations or to the Secretary of the Commesso -

U.S. Nucleat fleguistom Commission. Washington, DC 20565. and should etearty etate on the envCope end in the lette# that it is an " Appeal from an instied FOtA Decmon NRC FORM do4 (Port al U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATCRY CO FOIA RESPONSE CONTINUATION

1 1

c,; : '

RO8 FotA-89-198

=APPENDIE-D DOCUMENTS MAINTAINED AT TER PDR-

_ DESCRIPTION NUMBER DATE 1.

8/30/83 I&E Information-Notice:No.-83-58:; TDI s

Generator Crankshaft Failure,JAcc. No.

8308040044'.

2-1/16/84-Inspection Report No. 9990b3341/83-03

'TDI, Acc. No.uS402130524.-

3.

1/16/84 Inspection Report No.- 999003341/83-02 TDI,.Acc. No. 8402130518.

4._

1/17/84 Letter to TDI with enclosures,: Acc. No.

I 8402130510.

5, 7/86

- NUREG-12161 SafetyfEvaluation Report

~

-Related'to theLoperability and' l

Reliability of Emergency'DieselE

[

Generators Manufactured by TDI,JAcc.HNo.

8609100233.

l '.

[-.

L i --

ll l

l l

i i

i.

I, o

r l

l I.

l-i 1

+

6 R00=

POIA-89-192 APPENDIE E DOCUMENTS. BRING PLACBD IN TEE PDR NUMBER DATE-DESCRIPTION 1.-

7/23/82-

'Istter to Mr. Joe Barrios, from Mr. C.

C. Nei, re pride of Texas. Engine-Problems, (3 pgs.)

2..

10/7/83 Memo for R. K. Herr from John Collins, i

subject:

" Requested Investigation of TDI,'(3 pgs.).

3.

10/14/83 Letter to Michael-S. Miller from Linda L.' Martin, re:

Review:of documents-at i

Titan Navigation,r Inc.,. (20 pgs. ).

4, 12/21/83 Letter;to Anthony F. Earley from Alan'

.i Roy : Dynner re s ' Subpoena. to U.S. ; Steel'

]

Corporation, (17 pgs.).

5, 1/17/84-Memo.forLDarrell G. Eisenhut from John

}

T.-Collins, subject:j "TDI-Vendor i

Program 1 Branch Inspection' History," (1

(

L pg. ) Acc., No. : 861215050316 with i

. attachments.' Vendor Program Branch TDI Inspection - History, '(7 pgs'. ).

{

6.

6/14/85 Letter to Edward Baker.from Thomas F.

O Burns _ enclosing BNL's Technical Report-I of Vendor Trip to TDI, _(10 pgs.).

7.

3/30/87.

Letter to Thomas E. Ross from E. Heil l

Jensen,re Sacramento Municipal Utilit'y District V, TDI, (3 pgs.)i I

(

l J

b q

i i

l T

i a

t i

j 4,

I

~

.m..

~. - - -

qu 4

7 Rot FOIA-89-193 4

y

.APPENDIE F.

DOCUMENTS. BRING WITMBELD IN TEEIR ENTIRETY' ll NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION

1. '

Various Dates Handwritten Investigator's Notes',

(1 pg.) - EXEMPTION 5.

2.

Undated Draft Meno, subject:

"New Information Concerning TDI-Emergency Diesel Generators, Board

)

Notification'83 _," (2 pgs.)-

EXEMPTION 5.

3.

9/4/02 Transamerica;Delaval Inter-Office Correspondence,'(4!pgs.)L-

~'

-EXEMPTION 5.1 l

4.

1/27/83

. Investigator's Notes, (4 pgs.)

EXEMPTION 7D..

I 5..

10/24/83 Memo for the File, subjects "TDI Emergency' Diesel: Generators," (1 pg.) - EXEMPTION 5.-

6.

9/25/86 Memo with, attached. Depositions of-Individuals, (786 pgs.).

EXEMPTION 7D.

l l

l F

o d

4 4

... ~.

l

,1..'

?..

)

Huwrow & Wu,r.:Awo to, c.., u..

staart-P, o som isas e..........v...........w R cawowo,Vsao:wIa eoeas

... ~.........

..e.

e u.......

v:ca.

.eo..,e

..eoo T e tc........

............c

,.,...' '. ".'. 71.'...

..... J.!,."..'..*.*,.,

Tetre..... eo4 >.. ai -

.. ~.....

on.~

April 26, 1989 e.., u.... u

...... l n..........

.~.

.....m..n.....

...u..,

u.

.,1

..'0*.7.'TZ"I.",*,*.'.

"***'""'l

-24566.3i

.....,........,u.

".'.'..a

............ - i

,Td'." L " !.* L "s',*l.

ACT REQUEST CERTIFIED MAIL

[d/A - /7'/I 3 I

RETU,RN RECEIPT REQUESTED' g J /f

~

Director',> Division of Rules and Records Management

-Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Sir:

This is a request for ' documents =and' records pursuant'to the Freedom of Information Act, 5_U.S'.C. $ 552 (1982) and 10 C.F.R.

i

$$ 9.1.204.

This request ja made ontbehalftof the Long; Island: Lighting l

Company whose principal-place ofl business iis located-in: '

g Hicksville, New York.

i i

L' In this request,- the terms " documents and! files" are defined I

to include the following:

t All reports,< records,. lists, inter-office memoranda, intra-office-1.

memoranda, data, telegrams; correspon-L dence, schedules,. photographs, sound-L reproductions, ledger-books,--log books,1 L

data sheets, graphs,. catalogues,.

1 computer' tapes, records'or printouts, notes, records of telephone conversa-tions, meeting agendas, attendance

lists, minutes or notes-of' meetings, statements or any other handwritten-,

a typewritten, = printed, r ecorded or i-

-graphic material of any kind or l=

description' whatsoever 1

^

.\\

4

~ _ _ _ _ _

t..

Huwrow;8: WI LLI Awo -

~

s f

1 April 26, 1989 i

Page 2

-I 1

The documents and files sought in this request are:

All ffles of the 01 Lice.,9fiInvesti-gations that pertain to any investi-gglip.n of Transamerica Delaval, fnc. (or p

Imo Delavale.Inc. and Imo' Industries, L

reflecting name changes since 1986)~that l

previous.ly were withheld under Exemption 5(A)~of the Freedom of Itiformation.Act, 7

J.S.C..s-552(b)(7)(A) and 10 C.r.R.

9.5(a)(7)(1).

( Fue-15)us t _ 28, 1986 letter from T.S. Ellis to NRCtand l

October _ 6,1986-let ter f rom Donnie H.

Grimsley to T.S.

Ellis, III,_ enclosed)

[

and any subsequent documents' pertaining-L

' to Transamerica Delaval, Inc., Imo l

Delaval, Inc. or Imo-Industries in the file of the NRC's Office of Investigation and all documents bearing-report or tracking number.Q. 5-84-008.

l If the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: withholds documents or records responsive to1thisf reguest, then weirequest.that-you f urnish us with a -detailed statement.ofJ the: reasons fort l denying.

y access to each document withheld and;the followinglinformation regarding each such document so.that.we may' determine whether to seek a' judicial _ remedy under thei Act:

(

(a) the date of each such' document or" record;l (b)

.the identity of the author:or 1

authors and addressee or-addressees of each such' document or record; i

'(c) the identity.of all personsLin the _ Nuclear ' Regulatory Commission-i or elsewhere who received copies of s

each such document ~or1 record;

S (d) the title of each such document or record).

i (e) the general nature and subject matter of each such document; or-record; and 1'

Lo a

-i A

1 i

,. ~.,.,

~

q.

y7 -_

,.,l' HUNTON & WILLIAMO e.'

l April 26, 1989

-l

Page 3 L

L (f) whether each such document or.

t record contains any factual information, including, but not limited-to, dats, descriptions, and-s l

critiques of methodologies or statements of policy.

If portions of any responsive documents are deleted before l

t disclosure, we request, pursuant to 10 C.F.R S 9.19, a-written statement describing the' scope and reasons for any deletion.

It_is not necessary that the documents be copied and 1

delivered'to us.

We will be happy to review the documents at the production location. -LILCO will pay any appropriate copying costs or fees -attributable to this request and needs no prior-notice of the amount of.such fees.

We request a response within ten working days of receiptLof

- i this request pursuant to 5.U.S~.C. S 552(a)(6)(A) and 102C.F.R $

9.25.

'i Please call me if-you have any questions regarding.this request.

Si a

y, i

l-I

[

l A

l Ro ert M.nRo e

-177/6391 L

i l-6

)

\\

l l'

a l

i

~

it o.

i j

d HUNTONL 8c. WILLI AMO 707 East MAIN Statet P. o. som 15 35 i

• • ","',"l'"7,',"""*"'

R cawoao.V aoaa A e081e f a t t*a..e eta..... s.

ve6s.a..s e.e...e..s w.. s.a f... t.

!J e.i..

TELEPHONE SO4 *788-Stoo '

l '.

,i..t vi...i....ai.ws.

TtLtx 6844251

'"8".'.".".'.'.".*.*W^**

l.

.......a..

.....$ n, vi.. i.a e 3 5 '*

TCLtCOPICm 804+788 8Al8' n tsi..,

t. c...v.e e,..e m

l.

us..................

27, 1990

,,..,u....u........

p February l-s E.s.avittt, ts..g. 4 8.P I

l

......E to.9 m............

m e...

vi... u........u.

....a....*'

24566.300005i o

1-

,,is.

i

.'.,U.* ".'.'N.'.,.T..'.,'n'".

7286l

~

6........

l me....

. s.............

APPEAL OF INmAL FOIA DECISION l=

Secretary of the Commission l

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

_fd./=/gf hp.) 7 Waashington,-DC 20555 C3wd 31.90 Appeal FromiInitial FOIA Decision' i

FOIA No.89-192

Dear Sir:

t

[

This is an appeal f rom a partial: response to-FOIA request.

l 89-192 dated February 8, 1990.

A copy of this. partial response l.

and list of. documents beingEwithheld in their entirety (Appendix F) are enclosed.

i Pursuant to l'0 C.F.R.-Subpart A we request'that you reconsider withholding. documents listed as.F2,.F3 and F6 that.

l were withheld by John C.

Hoyle,. Assistant Secretary of the Commissibn and James A. Fitzgerald,. Assistant General Counsel for

~~

1 Adjudications and Opinions, as listed 'on t?n' enclosure. -

Please produce these~ records pursuant-to the guidelines set-o out at 10 C.F.R.

S 919 (January 1, 1989).

If you deny, in?whole or in part, this appeal we ask that you provide: the following:

1.

.The saen.ption. relied on; d

2.

An explanation of how the-exemption. applies to agency i

records withheld; and 3.

The reasons for asserting.the exemption I

(10 C.F.R..$ 9.31).

If_you have any. questions,~please call me.

Sincerely,

/

Karen L. Lebo 541/6391 k

q{

]S" ff I

4

-,w' w

y, v

-.,e, e,,-<

.-<w--

3 0

..i' HUNTON 8C WI LLI A M S j

ror r.Ast MAm statti P.o. Box 153s

' ~

• a, r ;*~ =,7,*, v'.

nic==ono, vi ointi eo eie

• * * ^

m.

......u 1,,..,,,

r c u e....o

7......

...., -..u

,m...........

,,,.........u......

February 27, 1990

....,.....u.........

....m....n....u......

...-.a...

n.

,...,.........u...

24566.3000C

., u,..u u 72L

... u, o..u. n..,..

..u u...........

i m.. a c.... >. u.

.,s.,.

APPEAL OFINITIAL FOIA DEC fd-A.g g g 7*/f dg Executive Director for Operations o

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission h 4 g g,,,g

/

Washington,-DC 20555~

Appeal From Initial FOIA Decision FOIA-No.89-192 t

Dear Sirt This is an appeal from a partial response to FOIA request 89-192 dated February 8, 1990.

A copy of this partial response

~

and list ofLdocuments being withheld in their entirety (Appendix l

F) are enclosed.

Pursuant to 10 C.F.R.

S 9.29 we ask that you l

reconsider withholding 1 items.F1, F4 and.F5 whose production was l '

denied by Ben B.

Hayes,--Director, Office of Investigations and i

that you? produce them in'whole, or in part, pursuant to.

guidelines set out in 10 C.F.R.

$ 9'.19-(January 1, 1989).

If you deny, in whole or in part, this appeal we ask that you provide the following:

1.

The exemption relied ont 2.

An explanation of how the exemption applies to agency records withheld; and 3.

The reasons for asserting the exemption (10 C.F.R. S 9.31).

-If you have any questions, please call me.

Sincerely,-

Kar en -.L.

Lebo 541/6391 l.

f=7 0" m

-