ML20055E537
| ML20055E537 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/03/1990 |
| From: | Brach E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Menzies R REUTER-STOKES, INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055E542 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99901192 NUDOCS 9007120107 | |
| Download: ML20055E537 (5) | |
Text
n 4Docket Noi 99901192/90 01 g q jgg 7.0.b ';
&~y
.Hr.. Ralph Menzies, General Manager
_Reuter. Stokes Canada
-Division of Furst Manufacturing Company 465 Dobbie Drive Cambridge, Ontario N1R 5X9 Canada.
Dear Mr. Menzies:
This letter addresses the inspection of your facility at Cambridge, Ontario,
. Canada conducted by Messrs. R. C. Wilson and R. N.-Moist of this office on May.14 to 18, 1990, and the discussion of their findings with your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection was conducted to examine your quality assurance program and its implementation for supplying safety.related equipment for connercial U.S. power reactors. Areas examined during the NRC_ inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report; The inspection consisted of an examination L of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and-observations by the inspectors.
Within the scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to meet NRC requirements. However, the inspectors noted that.the applicable procurement / procedure requirements would permit procurement practices as stated in the report, at least ft,. Class C procurements, which would not_ comply with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
The inspectors recommended that RSC' reevaluate the existing-procurement. procedures in view of this concern.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, E._ William Brach,. Chief Vendor Inspection Branch Division'of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Appendix A-Inspection Report 99901192/90 01 DISTRIBUTION:
BGrimes RIDS Code NRR:09 VIB Reading DRIS Reading CBerlinger EBrach
~ RMoist ( -))
RWilson(2 9007120107 9007o3
~
UPotapovs
/j;, *.
PDR QA999 EFGCA
{
j(p 99901192 PDC
,0FC
- vIB:DRIS
- VIB:DRIS
- 5C;VIB:DR15
- S
...1L.?.}../.NR URI NU 15 r......p y.......fyg/:RMoist Q w......:........A.....yp/15/90
- UPotapovs pL.:
E ch s
HAME
- RCWilson
.........:3/t/90
- 6/22/90
- 6
- 6/f4/90 f
s DATE 'l:6/24/90 r'
i mqw f 3 je
.z;[
E m n o EDTERS10xES tE11Ea NRC HLE CENTER COPY h,qqqpid
- ~_3C
(%p] % p JUL' F* 8 1990 -
a Jc D cket+Noi 99901192/90 01 ynf,7 4 Mr.LRalph-Menzies, General Manager
-Reuttf Stokes Canada Division of Furst Manufacturing Company 465 Dobbie Drive Cambridge, Ontario N1R SX9 Canada:
n Df ar Mr. Menzies:
vn This letter addresses the inspection of your facility at Cambridge, Ontario, Canada conducted by Messrs. R. C. Wilson and R. N. Moist of'this office on May 14 to-18,-1990, and the discussion of their findings with your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection was conducted to examine your quality assurance program and its
. implementation for supplying safety-related equipment for. commercial U.S. power reactors. Areas examined during the NRC-inspection and our findings are
=,
discussed in the enclosed report. The inspection consisted of an' examination of procedures-and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
Within the scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to meet'NRC requirements. However, the inspectors noted that the applicable procurement / procedure requirements would permit commercial-grade procurement M,
practices for Class C procurements, which if employed for safety-related procurements would not comply-with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
The inspectors recommended that,RSC reevaluate the existing procurement procedures in view of this concern.
4 m
Should you h' ave any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.-
Sincerely, E. William Brach, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch Division of-Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
- Appendix A-Inspe'ction Report-99901192/90-01
-DISTRIBUTION:
BGrimes:
RIDS Code NRR:09 VIB Reading DRIS Reading E
CBerlinger EBrach UPotapovs RWilson(2)
RMoist(2)
- 'see previous concurrence L OFC
- VIB:DRIS
- VIB:DRIS
- 5C:VIB:DRIS
- BC:VIB:DRIS
- D:DRIS:NRR
- JIAME :RCWilson
- RMoist
- UPotapovs
- EWBrach
- BKGrimes m......:................:. __..........:___...........:......_..._.:.....____....:...........--
l
' DATE' :6/22/90
- 6/22/90
- 6/25/90-
- 6/ /90
- 6/ /90 I
'0FFICIAL RECORD COPY Document-Name:
REUTERST0KES LETTER
7, 1 ocket-Hoo.99901192/90-01 g,3
-e Mr. Ralph.Menzies, General Manager
.e Reuter. Stokes Canada Division of Furst Manufacturing Company 465=Dobbie Drive-Cambridge, Ontario N1R SX9-Canada
Dear Mr. Henzies:
This letter addresses the inspection of your f acility at Cambridge, Ontario, Canada-conducted by Messrs. R. C. Wilson and R. N. Moist of this office on-May-14 to 18, 1990, and the discussion of their findings with your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection was conducted to examine.your quality assurance program and its implementation for supplying safety.related equipment for commercial U.S. power reactors. Areas examined during the NRC inspection-and our findings are -
-discussed in the enclosed report. The inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel,,and observations-by the inspectors.
Within the scope of-this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to
^
meet NRC requirements. However, the inspectors noted that the applicable procurement / procedure requirements would permit procurement practices as stated in the report, at.least for Class C procurements, which would not comply with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
The. inspectors recommended that RSC reevaluate-the existing procurement procedures in view of this cones 1 Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to
' discuss them with you.
Sincerely, E. William Brach, Chief-Vendor Inspection Branch-Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor. Regulation
Enclosure:
-Appendix A-Inspection Report 99901192/90 01 DISTRIBUTION:
Erimes RIDS Code NRR:09 VIB Reading DRIS Reading CBerlinger EBrach-UPotapovs
-RMoist (( )
RWilson N
OFC-.:VIB:DRI5-
- VIB:DRIS
- 5G:VIB:DRIS
- UG
....d \\ Wy 15/N R URIS W?-. --... --:....-....-.-.
NAME :RCWilson /gg /:RMoist [jw
- UPotapovsG.l..:
v-E ch s
..............:....... 2.....
- 6/fi/90.............:3/t/90 DATE ' :6/M /90
- 6/22/90 5/90 f
I v
s
,nq-p i
ObEdgg g g g pD gETYERST0KES LETTER
mz 9
JUL v3 jggy 4
, Docket'No.c99901192/90-01
- Mr. Ralph Menzies, General Manager Reuter-Stokes Canada 3,
Division of-Furst Manufacturing Company f
.465 Dobbie Drive h
Cambridge, Ontario N1R-5X9 Canada-
Dear Mr. Menzies:
- This letter, addresses the inspection of your facility at Cambridge, Ontario, Canada conducted by Messrs. R. C. Wilson and R. N. Moist of this office on a
May 14 to 18, 1990, and the discussion of their findings with your staff at the' i.
conclusion of the inspection.
-The inspection was conducted to examine your. quality assurance program and its~
implementation for supplying safety.related equipment for comme-cial U.S. power reactors.
Areas examined during the NRC inspection and our findings are
' discussed in the enclosed report.- The inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and y
L observations by the inspectors.
Within the scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to meet NRC requirements.
However; the inspectors noted that the applicable
^
procurement / procedure requirements would permit commercial-grade procurement-g practices for Class C procurements, which if employed for safety-related L
procurements would not comply with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
The inspectors recommended that RSC reevaluate the existing procurement procedures in view of this concern.
Should you have any. questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, L
E. William Brach, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Appendix A-Inspection Report 99901192/90 01 DISTRIBUTION:
-BGrimes RIDS Code NRR:09 VIB Reading DRIS Readin CBerlinger EBrach UPotapovs RWilson(2)g
,l RMoist(2)
- see previous concurrence OFC
.:VIB:DRIS
- VIB:DRIS
- 5C:VIB:DRIS
- BC:VIB:DRIS
- D:DRIS:NRR HAME :RCWilson
- RMoist
- UPotapovs
- EWBrach
- BKGrimes DATE: :6/22/90
- 6/22/90
- 6/25/90
- 6/ /90
- 6/ /90 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
-' Document Name: REUTERST0KES LETTER
l
..s h' '#'4*#o,,
UNITED STAYEs NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
i I
wsHmotow, p. c. m6s L
- 1.,,.. [
sui. n im i
L Docket No; 99901192/90-01 l
L
- Mr. Ralph Menzies, General Manager Rwter-Stokes Canada Division of Furst Manufacturing Company
't 465 Dobbie Drive Cambridge Ontario N1R SX9 L
C.tnada
Dear tir. Menzies:
)
This letter addresses the inspection of your facility at Cambridge, Ontario, p
. Canada' conducted by Messrs. R. C. Wilson and R. N. Moist of this office on l
May 14 to 18, 1990, and the discussion of their findings with your staff at the I
conclusion of the inspection.
i 1
The inspection'was conducted to examine your quality assurance program and its implementatica for supplying safety-related equipment for commercial U.S. power reactors. Areas examined during the NRC inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. The inspection consisted of an examination L
'of procedures and representative records,-interviews with personnel, and l
observations by the inspectors.
Within tne scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to meet NRC requirements. However, the inspectors noted that the applicable procurement / procedure requirements would permit comercial-grade procurement practices for Class C procurements, which if employed for safety-related I
.procurerier.ts would not comply with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
The inspectors t
l recommended that RSC reevaluate the existing procurement procedures in view of this concern.
l Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you, y
Sincerely, if p g'
. W1 li Brach, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear. Reactor Regulation l
Enclosure.
Appendix A-Inspection Report 99901192/90-01 p
f 4
m a
y
.,y
.,n w
-