ML20055D218
| ML20055D218 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1990 |
| From: | Charemagne Grimes Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055D219 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9007050173 | |
| Download: ML20055D218 (7) | |
Text
_
l oam
[d, %g k
UNITED STATES i
3e c;
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION T.
.' 1 wAswiwcTow,0. c. eosos
' $'M Y s e..+
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY l
i CITY OF AUSTINt TEXAS i
DOCKET NO. 50-498 1
l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNIT 1 l
AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No.17 License No. NPF-76 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment'by Houston Lighting & Power Company *
(HL&P) acting on behalf of itself and for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio (CPS), Central Power and Light Company (CPL),
J and City of Austin, Texas (COA) (the licensees) dated October 25, 1989, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Connission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the ruler, and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance:
(1) that the activities authorized l
by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations;
-l D.
The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the i
common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; j
and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of tne Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
" Houston Lighting & Power Company is authorized to act for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Central Power and Light Company and City of Austin, Texas and has exclusive responsibility and control over the physical construction, operation and maintenance of the facility.
1
[$$70"bkM 8
e i
2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical.Specifi-cations as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and Paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-76 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No.17, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix 8, are hereby incorporated in the license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
3.
The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION M
Christophe % M u
L th r I. Grimes Director l
Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of 1: clear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:
June 22, 1990 l
l
-. ~ -
- **
- vq%,,
UNITED $TATES
,/,
e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s
. J wAswmotoN,0. C. 70665
%, *... *./
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY 1
CITY OF AUSTIN l TEXAS DOCKET NO. 50-499 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. UNIT 2 1
AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE l
Amendment No. 7 License No. NPF-80 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Houstan Lighting & Power Company *
(HL&P) acting on behalf of itself and for the City Public Service i
i Board of San Antonio (CPS), Central Power and Light Company (CPL),
I and City of Austin, Texas (C0A) (the licensees) dated October 25, 1989, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I-1 l
B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; i
C.
There is reasonable assurance:
(1) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance witii the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordakce with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have i
been satisfied.
l 1
- Houston Lighting & Power Company is authorized wo act for the City Public j
Service Board of San Antonio, Central Power and Light Company and City of 1
Austin, Texas and has exclusive responsibility and control over the physical construction, operation and maintenance of the facility.
)
a 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specift-cations as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and Paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-80 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.
Technical Soecifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No.
7, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
3.
The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM4ISSION T
SUL14.,
33 uh Chrit,opher I. Grimes, Director Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications 1
Date of Issuance:
June 22,.1990 1
t t
4 r
ATTACHMENT To LICENSE AMENDMENT NOS.17 AND 7 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. NPF-76 ANO NPF-80 DOCKET N05. 50-498 AND 50-499 Replace the following page of the Appendix A Technical specifications with the attached page.
The revised page is identified by Amendment number and contains vertical lines indicating the areas of change.
The corresponding overleaf page is also provided to maintain do'cument completeness.
Memove Insert 3/4 3-14 3/4 3-14
?
e w
~.
TABLE 4.3-1 (Continued)
Cg REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 25 TRIP ANALOG ACTUATING MODES FOR CHANNEL DEVICE WilCH CHANNEL CHANNEL OPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL ACTUATION SURVEILLANCE E FUNCTIONAL UNIT CHECK CALIBRATION TEST TEST LOGIC TEST IS REQUIRED
" 19.
Reactor Trip System Interlocks
[
Intermediate Range a.
Neutron Flux, P-6 N.A.
R(4)
R M.A.
M.A.
2**
b.
Low Power Reactor Trips Block, P-7
- A.
R(4)
R N.A.
N.A.
1 c.
Power Range Neutron
,g Flux, P-8 N. A.
R(4)
R N.A.
M.A.
1 y
d.
Power Range Neutron g
Flux, P-9 N.A.
R(4)
R N.A.
N.A.
1 e.
Power Range I
Neutron Flux, P-10 N.A.
R(4)
R N.A.
N.A.
1, 2 f.
Turbine Impulse Chamber Pressure, P-13 N.A.
R R
N.A.
N.A.
1 20.
Reactor Trip Breaker N.A.
N.A.
N. A.
M(7, 11)
N.A.
1, 2, 3 *, 4 *, 5*
i
- 21. Automatic Trip and Interlock N.A.
N.A.
M.A.
M.A.
M(7) 1, 2, 3*, 4*, 5* '
Logic 22.
Reactor Trip Bypass Breaker N. A.
N.A.
N. A.
M(15),R(16)
N.A.
1, 2, 3*, 4 *, 5*
l I
i
TABLE 4.3-1(Conticuedl d
TABLE NOTATIONS
- When the Petetor Trip System breakers are closec and the Control Rod Drive System 1 ::d able of rod withdrawal.
- Below P-6 (1ntermediate Range Neutron Flux Interlock.\\ Setpoint.
- Below P-10 (Low Setpoint Power Range Neutron Flux Inter'ock) Setpoint.
(1) If not performed in previous 31 days.
(2) Comparisen of calorimetric to excore power indication abo'e 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER.
Adjust excore channel gains consistent with calorimetric power if absolute difference is greater than 2%. The provi31ons of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable to entry into MODE 2 er 1.
(3) Single point comparison of incore to excore AXIAL Ft.UX DIFFERENCt' above 15%
of RATED THERMAL POWER.
Recalibrate if the absolute difference is greater than or equal to 3%. The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not appli-cable for entry into MODE 2 or 1.
For the purpose of this surveillance requirement, monthly shall mean at least once per 31 EFPD.
(4) Neutron detectors may be excluded from CHANNEL CALIBRATION.
(5) Detector plateau curves shall be obtained and evaluated.
If a low noise preamplifier is used with the Source Range Detector, no plateau curve is obtained.
Instead, with the high voltage setting varied as recommended by the manufacturer, an initial discriminator bias curve shall be measured for each detector.
Subsequent discriminator bias curves shall be obtained, evaluated and compared to the initial curves.
For the Intermediate Range and Power Range Neutron Flux channels the provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable for entry into MODE 2 or 1.
(6)
Incore - Excore Calibration, above 75% of RATED THERMAL POWER.
The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable for entry into MODE 2 or 1.
For the purpose of this surveillance requirement, quarterly shall mean at least once per 92 EFPD.
(7) Each train shall be tested at least every 62 days on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS.
(8) (Not Used)
(9) Quarterly surveillance in MODES 3*, 4*, and 5* shall also include verification that permissives P-6 and P-10 are in their required state for existing plant conditions by observation of the permissive annunciator window.
SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4 3-14 Unit 1 - Amendment No f, 73,17 Unit 2 - Amendment No. 7
.