ML20055C597

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That 900410 Changes to Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Inst Triga Reactor Facility Emergency Plan Decrease Effectiveness of Currently Approved Plan & Therefore Not Acceptable
ML20055C597
Person / Time
Site: Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute
Issue date: 05/22/1990
From: Alexander Adams
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Irving G
ARMED FORCES RADIOBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
References
RTR-REGGD-02.006, RTR-REGGD-2.006 NUDOCS 9005290007
Download: ML20055C597 (4)


Text

o- .

May 22,1990 Docket No, 50-170 Colonel George W. Irving, III, BSC, USAF Director.

F Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute Bethesda, Maryland 20814-5145

Dear Colonel Irving:

SUBJECT:

REVIEW 0F THE ARMED FORCES RADI0 BIOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE (AFRRI)

TRIGA REACTOR FACILITY EMERGENCY PLAN The staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has reviewed and evaluated the changes to the AFRRI TRIGA Reactor Facility Emergency Pian that you submitted on April 10, 1990 as supplemented on May 3, 1990 in compliance

!. with10CFR50.54(q). The changes were reviewed against the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, the guidance criteria set forth in Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 2.6 and ANSI /ANS-15.16-1982, " Emergency. Planning for Research Reactors."

Based on its review, the staff has concluded that the proposed changes decrease the effectiveness of the currently approved emergency plan and therefore should not be incor) orated into the currently approved emergency plan. Accordingly, we request t1at you revise the plan to include the additional information identified in the enclosed staff Emergency Plan Review within 30 days of the date of this letter. Following receipt of your revisions, the staff will continue its review.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 492-1121.

Sincerely, Original signed by:

Alexander Adams, Jr., Project Manager i Non-Power Reactor, Decommissioning and l Environmental Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects  !

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

l. As stated cc w/ enclosure: See next page o DISTRIBUTION SE Docket fueJ EHylton ACRS (10) p,8 ' NRC & Local PDRs AAdams Plant file-

.oo

'88

['PDNP WTravers r/f OGC EJordan EKelly, RI MKnapp, RI l M [AALTR2GIrving/2]

88 , t PDNP A PDNP:. P 88 E. on AAd mj SW is 3pcl\

/ 90 5/ 5/ 3./90 vi

\\

s 4 l

' #p %M 9'o

- s .e ' a -

7g UNITED STATES i f' g

.e t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W A$HING TON, D. C. 20$55

)

%q

' May 22, 1990 Docket No. 50-170 i Colonel George W. Irving, III, BSC, USAF Director 2 Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute Bethesda, Maryland 20814-S145

Dear Colonel Irving:

9

SUBJECT:

TRIGA REACTOR FACILITY EMERGENC The staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has ewed and

} =

you evaluated submitted on theAp)ril changes 10, 1990 to the AFRRI TRIGA Reactor Fac with 10 CFR 50.54(q . as supplemented on May 3, 1990-in complia nce The changes were reviewed against the requirements Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, the guidance criteria set forth in R 1

Regulatory Guide 2.6 and ANSI /ANS-15.16-1982, Reactors. " evision "1 Emergen to or Research i

Based on its review, the staff has concluded that nges the proposed ch i

the effectiveness of the currently approved emergencydecrease plan and th not be incorporated into the currently approved energency plan erefore should Accordingly, we request tlat you revise the plan to include the additional informi .

identified date of this in the enclosed staff Emergency Plan Review letter. within 30 d ays of the

. continue its review. Following receipt of your revisions, the staff will i

The reporting and/or recordkeeping neerequireme P.L.96-513.

er affect If you have any quest.

id, please contact me at (331) 492-1121 .

Sincerely, M -

Alexander Adams, Jr., ro et Manager Non-Power Reactor, Dec;o issioning and Environmental Project Directorate '

c Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure: See next page

7

-. ~_. _ _

9; ,

J.- l AFRRI TRIGA REACTOR FACILITY f.

i Areas that need to be addressed or revised i Definitions i i

definitions of terms unique to the facility.Section 2 of NUREG-To help define the site and s operational boundaries or your f acility, the emergency plan should include diagrams showing and-defining the site boundary and operational boundary s .

Organization and Responsibilities Section 3 of NUREG-0849 discusses the need for arrangements and agreements, confirmed in writing, with local offsite support groups. Such letters of

  • agreement with offsite support organizations should be provided.

Section 3 of NUREG-0849 states that the Emergency Plan should list.the line of. succession operatirns. by title for the individual in charge of directing emergency The roster should list the successors by title.Please provide a line of suc i

Emergency Response Section 7 of NUREG-0849 and Reg. Guide 2.6 indicates that the Emergency Plan i should include a notification list of emergency response personnel. The Emergency Plan chould direct the reader to a procedure which includes a .

notification list providing names and telephone numbers of emergency response personnel.

j Section 7 of NUREG-0849 states that the Emergency Plan should describe the proposed method to ensure personnel accountability. In the revised Emergency Plan, the method is not provided.

p description of the proposed accountability procedure.Please provide in the Emerg Emergency Action Levels (EALs)

Section 5 of NUREG-0849 states that the Emergercy Plan should contain EALs.

In your revised implementing pruedures. plan, the EAls were removed f rcm the plan and moved to the adjacent to the emergency classification system.They should be returned to t Emergency Procedures Regulatory Guide 2.6, Section C.5 states that implementing procedures should

'be in an annex to the Emergency Plan, of procedures is available, nor is the reader directed to the procedures inin some other document.

Maintaining Emergency Procedures Section 10 of NUREG-0849 discussed the review and update of the Emergency Plan.

Please the plan. provide in the Emergency Plan the frequency for reviewing and updating

-.-r.---- - --. _ . - . _ . . - _ , , - ~ - ,

T. =.3

.:7

,tj ',

fT' .' ;, -

i- .. Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Docket No. 50-170 7 -Institute CC:

f '. Director, Maryland Office of Planning

. 301 West Preston Street Baltimore, Maryland E1201 County Tve:Utive-p Montgomery County Government Rockville, Maryland 20850

. Reactor Facility Director Armed Forces Radiobiology (L

Research Institute National Naval Medical Center Bethesda, Maryland '20814 i

lc l

l 1~

'\.+

< l i..