ML20055C355

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Commission Approval of Proposed Policy Statement on Fitness for Duty at NRC-licensed Facilities Other than Nuclear Power Plants & Decision on Need for Rulemaking for Category I Facilities & Shipments
ML20055C355
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/16/1990
From: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:
References
FRN-58FR31467, TASK-RINV, TASK-SE AD68-2, AD68-2-002, AD68-2-2, SECY-90-053, SECY-90-53, NUDOCS 9003060118
Download: ML20055C355 (30)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:s eoooeeeeeeeeeeeeeseooooo l-RELEASED TOTHE PDR p,, t...%,, e e 7 :l 7A//00 cp date / ~ inP/ds 5 ....,1 oeeeeeeeeeeevoosseeessee RULEMAKING ISSUE February 16, 1990 SECY-90-053 For: The Commissioners From: James H. Taylor, Executive Director for 6,,erations

Subject:

PROPOSED POLICY STATEMENT ON FITNESS FOR DUTY AT NRC-LICENSED FACILITIES OTHER THAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Purpose:

To obtain Commission approval of a proposed Policy Statemtut and a decision.on the need for rulemaking for Category I facilities end shipments.

Background:

InSECY-87-12(June 14,1987), Fitnsss for Duty at NRC-Licensed Facilities Other Than Nuclear Power Plants, the-staff discussed the possibility that public and employee health und safety could be adversely. affected by personnel who idight perform activities at such facilities while chemically (drug) impaired. The staff stated its belief that the Commission should formally establish its position on the need for a fitness-for-duty program for key personnel involved in licensed activities other than power reactors. Such a-position would complement the Connission's Policy Statement on Fitness for Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel (51 FR 27921) and the final Fitness-for-Duty Rule that was published in June 1989(54FR24468). When the Fitness-for-Duty Rule for Nuclear Power Reactor Personnel was published as a proposed rule, the Commission specifically invited public consnents on the extent to which NRC regulations on fitness for duty s.hould address other regulated activities not currently within the scope of this proposed rule. Regulated activities considered for rulemaking or a policy sutement included: Construction and preoperaticnal testing of nuclear power plants.

Contact:

00T04 Stanley Turel, RES 49-23739 NOTE: TO BE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE WHEN THE FINAL SRM IS MADE AVAILABLE W3O(o0/l$ Y

,3, i The CormissichersL 2 l Transportation of nuch.cr ratt ric13. Operation of nonpower reactors. 1 Fuel cycle facilities. Utilization of nuclear materials by other material licensees, ,j Several comments were received from universities and others involved with research reactors or other nonpower reactors. The commenters statea that there is no need to extend coverage cf the rule to these facilities'because no drug-related problem has been demonstrated to exist and that.a relatively minor threat is pesed by these facilities to the public health ano saftty. Unbr, arable-costs und ir. practicality were slau cited as argumenu against inclusion ci these hcensees in the rule. A few comments received from individuals involved with handling special nuclear material made the same general points. There were no coments supportive of expanding coveruge of the rule to facilities other tharrnuclear power recctors. In SECY-89-030 (January 31,1989), the staff concluded that. 4 there was no reason at that time to extend coverage of the rule to other facilities but that extending the coverage of the rule could'be considered at a future time. The Commission reopened the issue and directed the staff, through the SRti.of February 16, 1989, to advise the Commission on the need to expand the Fitness-for-Duty Rule to cover fuel facilities and-other material licensees. The Commission also directed the staff (memo.fromChilktoStello, March 22',1989) to study.the need to amend Part 26 to include: material licensees and fuel. cycle facilities and how drugs and alcohol abuse affect their safety, especially the security of Category I facilities. 1 JDiscussion: Under f!RC or Agreetatet Stt te licenses, nuclear rcateritis are used in a wide variety of comercicl, academic, and medical applications. The licensees that could be affected by expanding the coverage of the Fitness-for-Duty Rule include licensees of l nonpower reactors, those that handle racioactive sources, anc those involved in fuel cycle, transportation, und waste. 4 ruanagement activities. About.8,600 licensees under flRC authority would be affected. Currently, the staff,is developing for review by the Cormission, a propostd ainendment to 10 CFR Part 55, Operators' Licenses, to incluce " Fitness-for-Duty" penalties for operators of nonpower reactors; therefore, this categcry, and those nuclear power plant persons covered by Part 26 are not included in this policy statement.

n 1 c 4 The Comissioners-3 l I - The diversity of the licensees is shown by the following list, i of, equipment or activities: Nuclear Material Licensees 1 Radiosctive Sources i I Nuclear medicine diagnosis and therapy, manufacturing and distribution, research and development, instrument calibration, incustrial radiography, gauging devices and gas chromatography, pool and dry irradiators, and well-logging. q Fuel Cycle, Transportation, Waste Storage and Disposal Comercialelow-level waste disposal, spent fuel storage, fuel fabrication, tronsportation, and disposing of or-storing their own radioactive wastes. ] Congress, as part of Public Law 100-690, Nov.18,1988, enacted the Drug-Free llorkplace Act of 1988, which requires that Federal contractors and grantees receiving $25,000 in grants.or t contracts provide a drug-free workplace.. Obviously, any l-licensee who is also a Federal contractor or grantee would be L Unfortunately, without a direct poll of licensees,.there is no required by that Act to provide a drug-free workplace. L sure way of knowing how many are subject to the act. Any direct effort to obtain this information by a poll of licensees would require OH8 clearance under the Paperwork Reduct ton Act. The staff estimates, however, that an overwhelmingLmajority (upto95%)ofthelicenseesarenot'coveredby:theAct. It would be possible, iflthe Commission 50 requests,.to' pose'a L question for public coment via this Federal Register notice l-(Enclosure 1)toascertainwhetherornotthe.Actaffects them. This poll, because of its voluntasy nature, would L provide only a crude estirate:. By its policy statement and the final rule creating 10 CfD Part 26, " Fitness-for-Duty Program," the Comission has made L a strong statement about the use of drugs and alcohol by personnel workin~g in nuclear power plants. The staff is ,j convinced that there is' a need to explicitly convey. a Commission position on drugs to the approximately 8,600 other p E licensees. However, after a careful review of the pros and and fuel cycle licensees (Enclosure 2)y Rule to covtr materful cons for extending the Fitness-for-Dut , the st6ff recomends that rulemaking be initiated only for NRC-regulated Category I fuel facilities and Category I shipments. The other material licensees should te covered by a policy staternent. L l w r a u-

.c t, a ,7 s re The Commissioners 4 f _p The recommended rulemaking for Category I facilities and I shipments would be desigreed to ensure fitness for duty of employees (1) who have direct access to large quantities of .t special nuclear n.6terial; (2) who are directly responsible -for protection of the material; and (3) who transport the material. Another reason for the rule is to maintain-comparability with the Department of Energy, which is j

  • Q developing similar requirements for its Category I facilities.

e Further discussion of the inclusion or' exclusion rationale in this rulemaking (e.g., shipments of spent fuel, Cetetory.II-e and III facilities and shipments, and protection of workers from consequences of molevolent acts) is provided in. The staff is proposing a policy statement on fitness for duty that would apply to all licensees not involved with nuclear power plants. This is based on the qualitative judgment of the amount and strategic value of the material possessed by each licensee and the atcendant overall risk to the public, i Although there are a great number of these licensees, many pose a low risk because they are solitary owner / employees whose keen. interest in the continuation of their businesses serves as a deterrent to involvement with drugs. The enclosed Federal Register notice (Enclosure 1) contains a proposed-policy statement on fitness for duty at material q licensees and nonpower reactor facilities that is generally ~ censistent with the previously published Comission policy statement.on fitness for duty for nuclear power reactor personnul. l 1 A 75-day comment period for response to the proposed policy l statement is recomended. After review of public comments and consideration of' experience with the Fitness-for-Duty 4 Rule for power reactors, the Comission may revise the policy for other then power reactcr licensees. Upon Comission - dpproval of the' Staff's recomendation, a pr0 posed rule on ~ fitness for duty for Category I facilities r.d shipments will E be developed and issued in final form within 2 years. Coordination: The Offices of Nuclea; Redctor Regulation and Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards concur in' the proposed policy statement. The Office of the General Counsel has no legal objection. q I-i

e-L - t' c t l The Coco.1ssioners 5 i Recoi.e.eridt.t ion : That the Corinission: 1. Approve the proposed policy statement as set forth in , for publication in the Federal Register with a 75-day conenent period. 2. Approve oevelopment of a proposed rule on fitt.tss f or duty for C6tegory I facilities and shipments. 3. flote: r a. The Office of Public Affairs plans to issue the proposed policy statement to the r.ewspaper editors on its current list via a note to editors et thfa $6me time it is published in the Federal Reg i t,te r, i b. Congression61 connittees will h. u tuirec (1 tlos roposed policy str.tement (Enclosurt.1). l g de as 11. Taydtr ecutive Director for Operations Ericlosures: 1. Federal Retister flotice 2. lleno from 0/llN55 3. Draft Cor gressional Letters Commissioners' comments or content abould be provided directly to the Office of the.ccerei.ary by con Wednesday, March 7, 1990. Commission Staff Office comments, if any, should be prc,vided to the Commissioners NLT Wednesday, February 28, 1990, with an information copy to the Office of the Secretary. If the paper is of such a nature that it requires additiornal time for analytical review and comment, the Commissioners and the Secretariat should be apprised of when comments may be expected. DISTRIBUION: Commissioners EDO OGC ACRS OIG ACNW LSS ASLBP GPA ASLAP REGIONAL OFFICES SECY

t' I ,.. :O I 9 1 t f. t a

.~. i i [7590-01) I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR CHAPTER 1 Proposed Policy Statement on ] Fitness for Duty at NRC-Licensed Facilities Other Than i Nuclear Power Plants J AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Comission, j i ACTION: Proposed policy statenent.

SUMMARY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is publishing a proposed policy statement with respect to fitness for duty of NRC licensee personnel (other than individuals licensed under 10 CFR Part 55 and nuclear power plant personnel who are subject to the fitness-for-duty program established pursuant to10CFRPart26). The proposed ' policy statement describes the measures that the NRC will use to execute its responsibilities to ensure the health and safety of the public. The proposed policy statement does not limit NRC authority and responsibility to follow up on operational events, material or equipment misuse, or niaterial handling events or NRC's enforcement authority when regulatcry 4

requirements tre not met. The Commission invites interested members of the public to provide consents on the proposed policy statement. t Ear.le w e I

l l l DATES: Thecommentperiodexpires[75daysafterpublication). Comments received after this date will be cchsidered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of consideration cannot be given except as to coments received before this date. i i ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Secretary of the Connission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consission, Washington, DC 20555, ATTN: Docketing and i Service Branch. Hand deliver connents to One White Flint North,11555 Rockville C Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m on Federal workdays. FOR FURThER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Turel, Division of Regulatory Applications, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission, Washington, DC 20555, telephone (301) 492-3739. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: i Introduction L The Nuclear Regulatory Conr.ission (NRC) recognizes drug and alcohol. abuse to be a social, medical, and safety problem affecting every segment of our society. Given the pervasiveness of the problem, it must be recognized to t exist to some extent in the nuclear industry. Therefore, the Connission believes it prudent to consider me.asures to provide reasonable assurance that a person who is under the influence of alcohol or any other substance, legal or illegal, that affects that person's ability to edequately perform duties 2 Enclosure

associated with the safe use of nuclear materials will not be allowed access to (1) hazardous a.aterial. (2) safety or safeguards systems at a nuclear fuel facility, or (3) equiprent that contains radioactive material of a nature, that, if misused, might be harmful to that person, the cc-workers, or the public health and safety.

Background

The issue of drug and alcohol abuse has been examined extonsively in the 1 context of fitness for duty in the nuclear utility industry. For example, a Task Force on Drug Abuse Problems, Policies, and Programs, established in 1982 - by the Edison Electric Institute's (EEI) Industrial Relations Division, Executive Advisory Committee, published guidelines in 1983 to help the nuclear utility industry establish comprehensive fitness-for-duty programs. The guidelines were revised in 1985 as the "EE! Guide to Effective Drug and Alcohol / Fitness for Duty Policy Development" and were provided to all nuclear power pl6nts. These programs include the training of managers, supervisors, and others in authods for icantifying and dealing with personnel potentially unfit for duty. The EEI guidelines include: 1. Issuance of a written policy to include formation of a substance abuse consnittee, a system of records and analyses, and periodic audits of the J program. 2. Involvement of top management in the progrum. 3. Consnunication of the policy to all levels of participants. 3 Enclosure

p 1 4. Behavlvral observation tiair.ing for supervisors. 5. Policy implernehtetion training foi supervisors. 6. Union participation. 7. Requirenants for contractors, vendors, and suppliers to abide by the company rules on drugs and alcohol. 8. Law enforcement liaison. 9. Chemical testing of body fluids,1ht1Ld1hg the breath ct.tay:Li test for alcchul. 10. Er.ployee assistence pic9 rams.

11. A policy implenientation checklist.
12. Sources of adoitional information.

Congress, as part of Public Law 100-690, flov. 18, 1988, enacted Subtitle D - Drug-Free licrkplace Act of 1988, which requires that persons other than individuals who have been uwardeo a contract for procurenent of $05,000 or more provide a drug-free workplace. Specifically, the Act states in part' "SEC. 5152 DRUG-FREE Il0RKPLACE REQUIREfiEllTS FOR FEDERAL C0llTRACTORS (a) Drug-Free llorkplace Requirement. (1) Requirements for persons other then individuals. No person, other than an individual, shull be considered a respchsible scurce, choer the neaking of such term as defined in section 4(8) of the Office of Ftderal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(8)), for the purposes of being awarded a contract for the procureuent of any 4 Enclosure

m S, property or services of a value of $25,000 or' ri. orc f r ou erty Federal 6gency unless such person has certified to the contract 1r.g ugercy th6t it will provide a drug free workplace by - (A) publishing a statement notifying ernployees th6t the un16wful manuf6cture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substchce is prohibited in the person's workplace and specifying the 6ctions that will be t6ker 6 gainst employees for violations of such prohibition; (D) establishing a drug-free ewareness program to inform employees 6 bout - (1)thedangersofdrugabuseintheworkplace; (ii)theperson'spolicyofmaintainingadrug-free workplace; (iii) ary avoil6ble crug counseling, rehabilitation, and employees assistbi.ce prograras; and (iv) the penalties that may be imposed upcq estployees for drug abuse violatioris; (C) making it a requirement that each employee to be eng6ged in the performance of such contr6ct be given 6 copy of the statement required by subparagraph (A); (D) notifying the employee in the stuttr ei.t iL(iu1:i0 by subparagr6ph (A), that u e toi.oition of employraent on such contiact, the employee will - (1) abide by the terms of the statement; and (11) r.otify the employer of any criminal drug st6tute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace rio later ther. E c6ys after such conviction; 5 Enclosure l a

D 1 i l L j f (E) notifying the ' contracting agtncy within 10 days af ter receiving notice under subparagraph (D)(ii) from an employee or i t otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; (F) imposing a sanction en, or requiring the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation 1 program by t.ny employee who is so convicted, as required by section $154; and (G) making a good-faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-freeworkplacethroughimplementationofsubparagraphs(A), (B),(C),(D),(E),and(F)." Identical provisions applicable to Federal Grant recipients are contained in Section 5153 of that Act. All NRC licensees that fall within the scope of that Act must, as a minimum, corrply with the drug-f ree workplace requirements for federal contractors and grant recipients. The NRC has published a final rulefornuclearpowerplantlicensees(10CFRParts2and26) entitled " Fitness-for-Duty Programs" on Jur.e 7, 1980 (54 FR 24468). This rule extends the scope of the Act to include Nuclear. Power Plant personnel regardless of whether or not there is a Federal contract for procurement of $E5,000 or roore. Discussion l The Commission has concluded that, although the EE! guidelines utilized in l l the power reactor industry are not appropriate for all categories of HRC licensees, they provide t reasonable f ramework for the development of fitness-f or-duty progrems for some NRC licensees. 6 Enclosure

Licensees affected by this proposed policy statement include licens6es that handle se61ed and unsealed sources and licensees involved in fuel cycle, transportation, and waste management activities. These licensees are subject to one or more of the NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 30 through 35, 39, 40, l 50, 60, 61, 70, 71, and 72 or to any equivalent regulctions in Agreement States. The policy statement affects about 8,600 material licensees under NRC 1 authority. The licensees are characterized by the following equipn.ent or activities: i Radioactive Sources: Nuclear medicine diagnosis and therapy. Manufacturing and distribution. Research and development. Instrunent calibration. Industrial radiography. Gauging devices and gas chrom 6tography. Pool and dry irradiators. Well-logging, i Fuel Cycle, Transportation, Waste Storage, and Disposal: Commercial low-level waste disposal. Spent fuel storage. Fuel fabrication. L Transportation. Disposing of or storing their own radioactive we.stes. 7 Enclosure 1

A The Consission believes tht.t personnel directly involved in the above i activities who, by virtue of chemical impairment, are not fit to properly carry out their assigned duties could adversely affect public and employee health and safety. Staff analysis of emergency preparedness requirements for fuel cycle and nutarials licensees (for example, NUREG-1140, "A Regulatory Analysis of Energency Prtperedress for fuel Cycle and Other Radioactive MaterialsLicenseos," June 1985)indicatesthatmaximumcredibleaccidents (perh6ps caused by human factors) at sces facilities can result in hazardous radiclogical releases that may be harmful to the health and safety of workers s,nd the public. Histakes associated with operation of radiography equipment or irradiators, with medical administration of radioisotopes, or with stor6ge or i f transportation of nuclear waste could alw result in serious consequences. The Commission believes t' hat the potential consequences of accidents postulated fcr fuel cycle and other radioactive material licensees, regardless of cause, pose a smaller risk to the public than to those postulated for nuclear power plants. However, personal impairment due to drug use and alcohol abuse can increase the likelihood of accidents. It is in the interest of public health and safety to provide reasonable assurance against this risk. Certain fuel facilities possess large quantities of high enriched uronium and are subject to the safeguards requirements of 10 CFR 73.20. For fuel facilities subject to i 973.20, the Commission is planning to supplement the policy statement with a rulemaking that wculd impose specific fitness-for-duty requirements. Indiviauals affected would include those who have direct accrss to high e enriched uranium, those who are directly responsible for prctecting the raterial and those who are responsible for transporting the material. l l 8 Enclosure

Policy Statement This statement sets forth Comission policy on fitness for duty for NRC-licensed activities other than those associated with the operation or construction of a nuclear power plant and individuals licensed under 10 CFR Part 55, " Operators' Licenses." It is Comission policy that all involved in the use or possession of nuclear material licensed by the NRC will not be under the influence of any substance, either legal or illegal, that could adversely affect their ability to adequately perform duties in any way related to safety. The use of illegal drugs, the misuse or abuse of over-the-counter drugs and prescription drugs, and the misuse or abuse of alcohol by those conducting NRC-licensed activities is unacceptable. It is Comission policy that all licensees are encouraged to establish programs appropriate to their operations to provide reasonable assurance that all involved in NRC-licensed activities are fit for duty. The Comission recognized that some licensees l are required to establish fitness-for-duty programs imposed on them under certain legal authority (e.g., the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 or Department ofTransportationRegulations). The NRC fully supports these programs and considers this policy complementary to them. The NRC may, from time to time, ask individual licensees or groups of licensees to provide such information as the Comission may need to assess program adequacy. Enforcement This Policy Statement does not limit the authority of the NRC to conduct necessary inspections or to take appropriate enforcement action when regulatory requirements are not met. 9 Enclosure

,V i i As explained in the Commission's Enforcenent Policy, Appendix C to l 10 CFR P6rt 2, the Commissir.n nay take enforcement action where the ccnduct of an individual places in question the NRC's reasonable assurance that licensed activities will be properly conducted. Accordingly, enforcement action may be taken regarding matters that raise issues of fitness for duty whether or not .there is a violation of specific Commission requirements. Instances of an individual being unfit for duty that could potentially affect public health and safety may be subject to the. enforcement process. Orders would be issued where necessary to achieve corrective actions on fitness-for-duty matters affecting the s6fety of licensed activities such as removal of a person who presents a potential halird to the public health and safety because he or she was unfit for duty. f After review of comments on the above pclicy statement, experience with existir.g drug-use prevention programs, and experience with fitness-for-duty programs for power reactor personnel, the Cornission may revise its policy for mater 1a1 licensees or may enter into rulemaking. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this day of ,1990. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. l l L 5imuel J7 Chilk, L Secretary of the Commission. L l L 1 l 10 Enclosure 1

-9,*: 4' . I e 6 t I 1 i 4 t 4 4 s Is 9 ? L

R. UNITa9 sTATas iq,f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f 954SD600007004, D. C. Sette ON I s 998 o,,, n gNewSv6 Office of Nuclear, DirectorRegulatory Research Eric 5. Beckjord E MORANDUM FOR: Robert M. Bernero Director FROM: Office of Nuclear, Material Safety and Safeguards

SUBJECT:

FITNESS-FOR-DUTY FOR OTHER THAN NUCLEAR P0WER PLANTS Your April 18,'1989 memorandum presented a plan to fulfill the directives of the Comunission s SRM (Chilk to 5tallo Marct 22,1989,SECY-8g-30)ontheabove subject and asked that we identify whIch material and fuel cycle licensees should be included or excluded in a rulemaking on Fitness-for-Duty, using 4 assessed risk to workers and the public as a basis for the decision. - Associated costs and benefits, as appropriate for regulation of such licensees, were requested as well. We have reviewed the pros and cons for extending the Fitness-for-Duty Rule to cover material and fuel cycle licensees and concluded that rulemaking should be initiated only for a select set of licensees:. NRC regulated Category I facilities and Category I shipments. Esployees of such licensees who have access to strategic special nuclear.materialsuch material, or who transp should be covered by the rule. We recommend that other materials licensees be covered by a policy statesent which includes a. declared intention on the part of NRC to initiate enforcement action, including possible suspension of license, if personnel are found to be unfit-for-duty at the workplace. The rationale for selecting Category I facilities and Category I shipments for the rulemaking is based on the need to maintain comparabil ty with the Depart-l mentofEnergy(D0E). Further discussion of this decision as well as the exclusion of others from consideration for rulemaking (shipments of spent fuel, Category II and III facilities and shipments, and protection of workers from consequences of malevolent acts) are found in Enclosure 1, a meno on this subject from the Director Division of Safeguards and Transportation. Implementation of these recommendations must betlin with a Commission Paper thich indicates that there is.no analytical bas's for quantitative evaluation of public rio associated with materials and fuel cycle licensees.

Rather, judpent and experience must form the basis for our decision. To perform a qua itative assessment of risks related to drug or alcohol abuse by workers would be a major effort.

It should be noted that, several years ago, RES . initiated on behalf of NMSS a risk assessment study of fuel cycle activities thich.was dropped by RES, on the basis of a relative risk ranking of research activities, in favor of reactor-related confirmatory work. Therefore, we ~ cannot provide the risk-related base requested in item 2 of your memo. l oso/E EDCt.

,- u;. itse 3, the costs associated with extending the reactor rule to cover -Hereover, licensees is tied to item 2, and is likewise unknown. Costs might be unterial determined for implementing tha rulemaking or the policy, but we do not have di.ta on the number of accidents that would be avoided should a licensee fitness-for-duty program be implemented. Again, we must use judgment and a prudent approach in the case of adopting the DOC position on rulemaking for Category I facilities and shipments. With regard to the Policy Statement and Commission Paper you are now circulating, we suggest that it be modified to reflect our above reccomendations. If possible, the proposed rule for Catellery I facilities and Category I shipments should be. included with this Consissson Paper, but in the interest of time, could be developed separately. A schedule of activities for the latter approach is proposed in Enclosure 2. k wa Robert M. Bernero, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Enclosures:

As stated e e 4

f.e,k i umiso sTAfss NUCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMISSION i waewmorow, o, c, seems %ooooo

,wy 11 M 1

MEMORANDUM FOR: Willard 8. Brown; Sirectore 4 Special Issues Directorate Office of Nuclear Material Safety and safeguards l j FROM: Robert F. Burnett. Director Division of Safeguards and { Transportation. MS$

SUBJECT:

FITNESS-F0R-0UTY FOR SAFEGUARDED FUEL FACILITIES AND SHIPMENTS-(19455 89-233) The following infomation is provided for your use in responding to paragraph 2 1 of the Beckjord-to-Bernero memorandum of April 18. Set forth are rationale for our views on whether material and fuel cycle licensees subject to safe- -guards should "... be included in the tw1emsking or excluded, and the basis t for the decision based on an assessed risk to workers and the public." Catocoru ! Fixed Hites and Shipments. TheDepartmentofEnergy(00E)is mov' ng "orward w13h a proposed rule (enclosed) that would provide for unannounced drug testing as wall as testing for cause an( for reasonable suspicion in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services (Mandatory Guidelines for Federal idorkplace Drug Testing Programs " Employeesl affected include those who have direct access to or direct responsibility for transportation of or protection of Category I quantities of s m:ial nuclear material The. 00E has detemined that all such individuals s sould "... seet the highest standards of reliability." Both in the interest of comparability and on its own merit, we believe it prudent to adopt the DOE position. Comparable requirements should be imposed pt NRC regulated Category I facili-ties and for Category I shipments. Upont Fuel Shipments. Inasmuch as the use of materials contained in sunt " vel for the construction of a nuclear weapon is deemed to be bayond t1e capabilities of any domestic adversary spent fuel in shipments need be protected only against sabotage. The level of protection for spent fuel during shipment can therefore be lower than that for Category I material at a . fixed site. The staff considered the following factors in reaching a . recommendation concerning the need for the " fitness-for-duty" requirements. i 1. The safeguards events reports for spent fuel shipments made during i the past five years revealed no safeguards events stusming from the use of drugs or alcohol. L l .c I I e a 6 $ 6

e i i 1 M(' 2 3 " 4 2 Willard Brown, PMDA rogram assures that spent fuel is t. A comprehensive qualit assurance oaded for s ipment. A shipping cask is designed properly packaged and Further. to withstand accidents and hence accident-like sabotage. experiments have shown that casks are highly resistant to sabotage. Spent fuel shipments en route are protected by a safeguards system designed to minimite the possibilities of radiological sabotage, 3. i especially within a heavily populated area, and to facilitate t L of unauthorized persons. A central control station receives call-ins from the shipment.A response force 4. tracks location, and determines satisfactory status.from any of sev L l On the basis of the foregoing factors, the staff believes that drug abuse is f nt safeguards and that there is no l not a serious threat to spent fuel shi need to extend the fitness-for-duty ru e to apply to the shipments. Catescry l'! and !!! Facilities and Shionents. License conditions provide that no facility may possess and no shtpment may contain the kinds and quantity of l The licensed materials are chiefly U 238 material necessary for a weapon. Apart from the highly unlikely event of criticality, they area ma and U-235. The safeguards concords with these facilities radiologically benign. health effects upon the public. (shipments) is to assure against multiple, simultaneous adversary acts that l cight allow an adversary to accumulate material from two or (shipments). alams, frequent surveillance, early warning, and provision for prompt response in the event of unauthorized removal or other lo existence of an adversary and would prompt imposition of countemeasures atFor th material. remaining facilities and for subsequent shipments. commercial fuel facilities, the public is further protected by material accountability and quality assurance programs. l Action by a drug abuser appears to offer little opportunity for endangering The staff the public health and safety or the comon defense and securit shipments. Safeguards are Protection of Workers from Consequences of Malevolent Acts. I designed fundamentally to protect the public at-large against radiological sabotage and against the consequences of loss of control of material that To a great extent the same measures could be used to construct a weapon. However, it is a spatial that protect,the public also protect workers. e 4 ___._...._...__._,,...__m_ -,..,.m.,_m_.. ,_,.m,_..

t .1 i } J Willard Brown, PMDA 3 MAY 8 81588 1 l reality that workers at a fixed site or transporting a shipment are closer to potential adversary targets than are members of the public. Thus for. some scenarios, workers are more subject to the consequences of radiological sabotage and to the consequences of active defense against loss of control of material. In at least partial compensation, workers are likely more aware 1 of and better trained to cope with these possible perils than are members of the public. Also, various emergency procedures already in place for fixed l sites and shipments further promote safety and safeguards for workers. The staff believes that the combination of measures recommended earlier in this i memorandum together with those already in place adequately pistapt workers against perils steaming from safeguards activities. j LIQM ~ Robert F. Burnett, Director Division of Safeguards and Transportation NMS$ j

Enclosure:

As states t i 9 I-h o O +

_-.--__.-,,_-.-------..-,..-,,_.,._._,,,.,--.s

+---,,,m.,n... we.,.

- _.~ -.-. .'. -a t.,....,,. ; *. p

  • C.

..3 4 ~

  • i * ?. ',...

l /. j. .'6* i.*.- .e.t 4 t,.1

  • e6 s

...*,.g j s... *.. s *t g. .t. 4 s. ,..j. . $ ;l 1.'.,. 2,. ....t*,':4...44.;l"#..T. f.*. *J.. c,.l..,',p.... '

  • 9.:d U..T... o..%.-

.:'f ?

  • H:

3..? 1. r t = ...o. e ,/* ~

  • A.

..:.3 'v. {.. t *..*.. (. 6 :.-.n i . ' 7 6 :'.' i W. h ;r .r. P : ?. %i. hrid4*3., toss.. 3 v...,p..c..

  • 'c,

~ u ,.m.t :.. W.Pg.r!,;<. ' 3.Ge+,.. i. a.i. " r. c .o ". ,u m.F.o u..r.y.. s e,: ;.r.s, c.. m......., v n: as +: ::. n.'.-1 w. :0. t m - .,,.,.g....,,,. . m.. o,.; w..e :.p.. 1 f..': "$' d'd...a 7.. ..c =::; e t y 7.'. W ".c. w rl,.. r.,. s.r. ..yg. u :. i.,. 4 ......, e.. m-wa M : 7.v *.'rt. :'. i.*

! 7 ';; e ' 4. i.., z,.

.g w b t. W ::c. r. W.w,ary.e 4:a ::i t:3.l). .i.v s.. ts,. . /C^ .n,'~

  • se,< a I

rt : 5 it'a,'t. * ' a, # -,. y. ... ;, lo... ',. ,..,s y.;rpi... '<.ea'r 4 ;'. 4.r. '., r < 1 M. e.se W]:.'. 7. s.g.p.:, ?g r,,. snr&. n.,... v..a..m o...... a.. 3. d 1 y,...... .r t v .t tll1 g,. k,v..\\14; t.s* :me i# *.* ,;d$ set .q'* 24.;.',J.. .?. ' 5 : ii.ee s,sa, g

  • w.:.*M. pg ;. i,4. C t.gi.
  • JP,f i =.t.'./. ;*4.' ! A M. r 1

.b *.t..e

  • .**?

t

  • e" b(@tt.*.J *. f. ', ';, p,,,,

'. fr t *: O y r ep;3:en v..i 4 4 r."l.? '"~n.t m;~ 'r*t.tm.~r ' G.y:M. ' t ?. *!.:.. a., v :t. m..e g.w. .Qt s 4 a.V.;:.~.s s 1 <lu 'q.ro6 W 54 wt M;a i."... v g . wld.p; JW.i w' tp;.t*M.,fr :u.s.,. ww:,n'. . o. s w t: J,, iv. s: e. (. fy,n V ,;f. ..y e u a*

..-.* *. 1 'e ' '.
  • ..c 4 res8 f

r, w., 4 m %.I A

4. r:3 an,. su..s

..n... w.!, <. '. ...a s w :, m. r i>. m u.: ml.: i+ W ~..., HW Or.ls.*.104;e%,/h.'.%f 9);.'m.nc %>d.7 .J;,.,. 4.... s.:s. r.,..vl, r..r. -. - we.m w.>.. . AM'M#Ep & '/::. ' ' ab. r..n . :... r, . s. t... i *- 4 * ' '..b* "AM. et 't f L. ' 1.Tl)8 6 '1.U' E*b + , y. t.;.t.;; 1,N a:.w 4 d t,rsta r.'e 74.sc . 38 .'d I t.I .t.. fi fl @ tu i *',,r? 4.,h 14 v. M' *@@d ' 11,f M.9'li $'.h@ t 4 *t..t %. WJ,m.','.t*:.4 s.,:.e 't

J.WS..+
- r?) t.**. l,
N/.J C hi+46*

. vg..... j a.I 6. ' r..e. 3 @'S .% t.M!,/..e. 6 .kar..?! )*;;.t'

  • k!;.C s'dl

M,Me . 8. eJd'd!

i...

r* tim 9 tost.v..th,Mt.J. Va:.* *' hmar.; l@w.I. c . t; w.,s. y p....;,u a:.q..'.st,,f. teja.o,H'. t, <t a. '.

  • .T.. g 'i.

.l. s..,, ;*...,t v, y..s.i: : :. it n l; s cc.u;. @t.J,.**d t."J,*g?,4 ..q > ..a w..e;.e 9.u,:..+r W' %s. u.sle e.:'#'bl,,,.j, -t o. ... N : 4 u'.:. '. v.m,.e y *...:,.... . d,.; s A,. w,,'.:.:., S.. f. ed. <. m , g ggw).',',d..pe ig:/;,g7f.4 l 8 v.J.nns;:.c. $ V, n.u.;a.".y. 4;;.1e f., W..!**D.. .,' e ".4=4' 'J'....... t :.,.., l;.' y..- 7 N V'I

  • l' l

..w. :. a w. %. w.<.;d

  • f@f/dd*' ts' t ~6'y. ', *:.V p/
%M e.u. >.. *. '.tD.y. y i
  1. J:4. J.(i.F M.f /:.k
  • I

,4 ~ t [, %. .9 /. n:a.. ~.':. 4! [7 ,6 :.'i

  • b)2 / Oc.*...:* 4.i../.,,.v.. r.,...'., ;.,.

i J N,., l.6) :* O

  • 4? '.

. '. e.. Fa'r't' lll'.4*"g** : u\\$1*=..M..... 3 P..e* ::a. ./ h a niist.4:.. t.;,..P..S. .s a p. w..gn..a.y.i.4. n.;<.::...n. ':, c. e.yw ...r ', .. l.

  • .4 4 4 ? r. t a.....

...:.a..:.,.......>... ,. i. . u... s g..m...,,,.. 3., w.7 w...p:,p;...,.,ca.. .,.,.w..... n. . u.:.. ..,:.:....a.., +..........,.

a. m:..

a... ...c,.....,..,. m:.,.......,: g. u.n.... . -, - -...... -.,,. e,3.n m,. t,.h".t : D8 par..tm.w.enI Of WW#W'N -..~ .. ~..,., ...w:.9. a.En0 Y9Y ".. ....u m ed:;.ww.,:.: - 'O.E." :'l.' 2::l.ll!" .c M ~ ~ m:

  • s i m.

.s..u.a..: w,,u.a..,:..e.... .a..v.:.,... . :u.e.. .... c...,...e ,n. y,.. ;i.. ...'..".. ;. 1. 0 CF. R. PartJ10'* W... 54.. u.M.,W.c,.'.m G. . m,....

  • a;,.......;. :. r....

.u...' s. ~ ini w.- . *e3t;l,. Criterla and Proce'dures for DMerm. 'ng 7,. .s.t >;.*3 t.t e n

.! a h.;. /. Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter ~U.i'

, g. or Significant Quantities of SpecialWJ...J.i. .,c,. 4..; e * : ..;g s 5 Y.s.W r,' ' T.,J'*.M' ...,.~ !.p.:. l. - . Nuclear Material; Pr.oposed Rule <' , Me,'..,,.i l... ..#.: w reases..- ... :..;. /. .... e..:.;. :.... e.. 'w. g. .,.. g.;;g, :, *, ;g o.,.. -,, n. n,..1,,p. 1.... g , u;:.p.;.. c ,c,. P .... i. p.

. 4,.:.

,. 4..v.y im.u._. e.w.t.@......... s..:... :..

z. i s. <.?*i,.W W &:mi.......r'.

t s n... '..<>.,..e..

o. n :: -.
  • ...s.y m..
.%O nu s.m e"...t.y'. ^.*t*.' %t 'g..;. m..t.Y.! *n' h
  • .*u.

.r,,. si.: :: *... ?

  • M W *.::]. ~ . '...

(.,, 'sg.,g, j,,,;,. i t: t t ells. ;4.*19.'.t .,;g.

  • ..s... ;..... f.. y..,

,,.e.'.' g . 7 ....#',g;.4..Q r. fcW. : .\\.ge.,',9.. g.4:<:..., g. ;.:.p/f.?. . *. f,3... 'T t:".M,1....g., .1,.. . C p.t; u.tret t,.. 4tt.. -f. "

  • i d.. qq
p. qty.?..

.., s

  • .;.;, 3;...g.3.g.,. y,c,

. i 4.w.w,@;, p,.. s M.y,.g.,.;, ,,sg,,.y.., 3-.. p.,.., g,, g,.,.),.,,, g;.,.f... l 3,;y w.tk t,.t *?W.i *T

g. t m i,s.q,;,. p;..,
  • g...,..........s

, j 4... s..rt .s

  • *.~? q *.,.i,,,r "...i..,.:.y.

'.. f.f n. , i,,g g.;% , p,y.g.. y. s.., .e.,...-/* :.",.:.r...r.s.. 7 r., ;..: *. s........ . q,,,; g p;., g;,.,;.,.j),:.'.g;,g.,,*k,,,.,;;.,3 sp.s.*,.~,.,.4 .s... . s: .:...,.. g.., ;m..,.,. >..,,. y g,s. 6.c.... s,,.. r. *t.u.? 54 r%Crt. / *c. r- , t.- Lo..e"am . ~. ' . te.,,.5..;,, 9,, g, q,,,,,,g.. ,q p=, '. 6 i.. ....,,j.. ; s. y. H.,s,3 g,,.rg;g.g l a r j a

4.,.,.e. g.

9 ., a.,.

  • dr.:. j h e&...,,o.. -

,,....a..;.;,,...., s.;,,,. s.* e. ;t. ;. ; :', ' p ~; :. a:.p,.,3,.;; il.A :s w .-.. ~ ,.,;;p. y..., y,_, ; ;.e

    • i.,(+.
.,;.~..

m.p.;;.gJ.,..p, A. 5,,.% .,.g. sy %..v4 . ; 4,j cyp,.y.7,p q.,;.-

g..., ;

s. s, ..e. e,. g. one,wvv.m.---,-wv,-.w,,,,,.-,m.--.nen

~..

7.,.

s.u r...y. s..- ..... -. r.....

  • .. a.y. Q.;.

r,.n'. v. 3.? ; dl.;'<'.y f., . ;:,.).;,. ; ...s. .v v..., ,". y. :....., a, ;...,. ' . y.,. y .y. i., : 't'* Federal Register / vol. M. No'. rt / 'Ibreday. Febevery 8. test / P Nympond rule sp?s alesbolhabitually le sasses.he P&AP h esmwM SEPARTt4ENT OF ENEROY,'Q., I ' formahas * - l ...;d he DDE Freedom of l.. Reading Room. Room 1E-1 revlew. medical assessinent. "irit ,C gPR Part 790 '., *.*.. ' '.. management evaluauon,and eees Build sc001nd ndence Annue.

  • determinetlen.In order for anindivi between the SW
shington, Ortlede and Proeedwee forDetermining Eligibility for Aseese to *.,e be plac

.b.oun of,es,,o a.m and 400 p.m a ,,u,s, e,. .,,e,,on sub,,un, som,ieie su rewe.e,e. se*,m'eu be... rate:'a m'^e!as t;.ti;,,y,,wh;* yg,g- ~ C. lass,m,ues.s.t.ter e.r S,igMfloont l ed u,es ,usis., m te,,e, a ue,, . Manptb lew from puWc dk*IMnH1 wm l seommof.af; e,dsea - ni taltially and to continw annu PEAp seseos authoriantionis ben a DOE escurity nuesomen Seewity. Department Emery.

  • asTions Propond rule.

. y elaimed to be confidentialhas been., ormation of security eeneers suasesantine Department of deleted. DOE reserves the right to . genloped in the some of the espervisory psytew. medical aansement / deterimine the eenfidential stat Elis luutna e propowd rule f 15ecurty Anurenw Program uon 'es. " laformauen er dete and treet mana ment enluetion.and security. 9 l s. . (PEAP).whichis a spuia eenseevthettation program for positions that sovie.In the event of a dures sentained.. Procedwo is set forth is $ P ese e a igibility for a .aftere direct secess to CategoryIto of spaialnuclear meterial ~ f.PneeduralRequhasels'- on. th j ou Part no shallbe ~ sa the eurtent to +w dimet roepenstemty for used (the current to Cm Part M0 wm.. % gasept/ve Oreferlauf

  • c

[ estion of A after. beoome H Cm Part no.Sub transport. a lonis 1).PSAP 4 ' Under Eamuw Order tam egentin - that are iden j Igeasuue. this proped ducHon reacter t afford direct messes to Category I '.fste required to det luons includ those positions:(e): as nuclear material e poteaualfor,. +.- ' ' pr* Posed rules are mejor rules as. operstore;or with rtation er 'i.. denned in the <; this proposed rule and has determined - esmoing sneeseptable damage to. ..mational security.De proposed rule cela

  • quantities of SNM or heve direct l

forth the artteria for determining peepoulbi for trans enu md u nuclear, shal H is n>t a major rule be ectiono Ce ry . allsibility for this aseees authertsetion (b) that are program,which includes supervisory . -material roducuon reector operefore; ' poquirements proposed la this rule I and(c) th the potential for asusing ' soview, medical aseeeement.r masoceptable damage to national :.n not have an annualeffect sa the

  • t management mlusuoa,and securr r i

t evview and clearanse determinspot tin a major increpe in oosts or. , his necess authorisation. estled a PSAP g, Cm N. l*. p, rices f,or co,nsumers,ladtvidua pcurity. set to alearancs.le a security review and g, g,g a,s.,,io,ai em esme, of *is,a,os u,t,es.,,de,,i. . determination and is eenducted by DOE.. c. no ies n a P,Asaos,lo.. ,,,,,e,noi,s.,o,,eo,,,e, m.. e neermmingEngibme,roowms for.. ei escu,n, e,s.muoia. e U ,,,e,,,,, .a,a Commeme.m,.,s,i e eu mata en o g,sgag,gg,,sgg,g,t. ave,ee elrects.n som,euuotemp ,, befo,e m,ch. a...:.eu _ ems is Di,ec,o,. tanoveuen, or on the ability of United .. Clace of Safeguards and Secunty.DP-St. Department of Energ Part M0 and Statu bued enterprises to compete <, i A. with famign based enterprises. rnum H u M Cm Pmno. Bloom E-340. Washington, DC 3DNS. ; -- a.Criteri d Pr d" for nd then add a Subpart 3 enti . J. ~ sgu storyMexibility Apt I*I A'3'88": con susmeen oeronesafiou soortact: d SmrHy *. ' In sesordanos with section 005(b) of bestun Hershkowin (Prostaa Manager,, EHabhohment e Pm AP) and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, s U.S.C. Assurenes Program Peroom!$mrity Assurance Prosram).

  • Determination ofin Ividual's Eligib!!!ty 401 et seq DOE Lads that sections aos 135bB6M. or Stephen P. Smith t

'and 004 of said Act do not apply to this for Access to a PEAP Position." as ut - espal Attorney). (302) 886 0416 gp. ;, III.Opportualty fer PublicComment *.'.. ruk becan , forth below. supp6sassavanysuponesatsees., E contractore will affect only operating Government owned Llatroduodea and Seekpeund. . laterested persons are invited to.

  • The protection of certain of the participate in this rulemaking bysubmit:Ing data, views. or a Departrnent's security interests with the with rupect to the proposal set forth in,,,,gg eaug,s, f.,,g

. potential,if misund,of causingunacceptable damage to the national this nouce. Comments should besubmitted to the address security. requires the implementeuen of 'et on *e baan em desigud to escure that the Addrnus section of this nouse and Sm is noin er this proposed rule.it. a unis occupying petitions should be idanuSed on the envelope enviroment .v g is a room!wourHy clemace effort affording access to certain material. with the designation."Rulemaking facilities and as meet the highest Comment".Sta copies should be had eels only with,a determination to standards of !!!.This e uveis Fant. deny.er suspend a PSAP sonese .eubmitted. All written commenta. fied received on or before the date speci authorisation. Accordingly,propereuen ePSAP ha cocomplishedander In the beginning of this nouce and all *. af meltbet an environmental assessme system of continuous evaluation wh. nor an environmentalimpact statement Identifies those individuals whose other relevant information w(!! be eat may be impaired b physical' oonsidered by DOE before taklag naa!,is required. action on this rule. All written.. e ne of. or emotional disorders, aantrolled substancre, at the see of ~ ,, t,, T,,<*:..'. i ..,..a .. c, *;.. s. ,,:s .1 -,n,.,_ _,,,,.,,, _,,.., w -__,-,_,.,.,-,--,-e.,,,,v.,. ,.y, ,,,,,.,m.,-a_. em.,...e

l..J. s l f.,' G.'. '.c deret nepeur / Vd. Ss. h as / needey.retireery a, s j hpkwettes a DOE sees,ty ud Den..* l> " re Sesamlptedsteme"* P. T ** * :'.Iw sentrWitng esem ORn and special nuclear malertal. Cop l 4.U: 8 i pensed AadueerActhas he be ' *. ca. r nas peepsen.. 4 D.6 *tt..; 7.. !e [merwiete E 8M** '.Y.c#b.' * 'r

  1. " /,

A esSubpan A of tiis port. Y NEnesetive Ordwe 30680. Apre at..

  • W.

t <f-i 'esed ens 4 Redueuen Act andhasben pmas peandisO'./ !f.'e# (.* Pless."Seoerity Regelsmente er - N*". A DevernmentEmployment.'1888& s' , og,,g e,,g,g,,,,g g., g. , *.. pte,.a,s, pulgnee,e,ns of ptAp peations,

  • 8 -

Pebevery 30,19tn.*SafegestehngCl amedes segaksessen. ,..s n, ,,,,,, / 'Of ""* t 4 ". - and tan 64. Seposeber14. sees."Dmp. sevesw , eduelenMese teemessent 9.4 5..,.m e,ebedse." ^. ;: : Me47 l CEhas spotswed *le proposed tale P,sePa We*,i.e,.u. ~ - heas W

er Sie preete6sm of Esecutive Ordee

.o-

  • ..t

. nsas :.:._w ew * -o. mended. s. . t..'.(c 58 FR11gre,*Depwenent of " patmgekW&in,

== = w*""' O'- 8'- ss.Thegbe

  • d"h es,ieyese Hea)lth and Hwnen Sev6 eve. Mandatory -

tuhport S-CHterte end Procedoms. l 8anatismen. DOE &nds ta ele * - Guidelines fw PodatelWorkplace Org ter utaW6shment of Personnet. 4 - * ! seletise esises no Federslises. '.. t pileetiens and therefore as Seg Assumnw Pmemm(PSAP) }, y Pmemme"_d i T

desalis3assessmentleregebed.

gr.w b ,, $ tee, EnglMuty f CetSe4metsla13 '2RPort754 Amstkos Pe.. . : s g d g,, g"8e p ';d,- y

4.aos.*e.e

.e ,e.*. ~

      • '*I

,.l PN J gg,,,,,

Itit.se pwpese6...a c... e...~i. n w en es. w eb. ne e

h ikd nna et Energy' Washlagten. DC 30868. 6.' " *

  • ie,s mromaA gresnest
f. g.

~- and preemdwee for imp (lementing aDepartmentof Energy gtgg,gg pagey,' "...,,, 4., g,.. Q. meopamentso.. mas e-iesertty y for ee-rity stowenes progrom(PEAP)d " Tk poweendsirth d so i a ' insertty.easwes Persont, len. > 6esername Progreta.PSAP pt!Quantives of Spoo Nealene indiv6 duals la positions whleh affor nu 'F D y,f,,, g,,,,' 3 kl.If We enesteptable. damage to es ee 2n PSAP tecess anthertestian, pp es*e=, Pen-a -er protection o Category quantities of * ' u.- i Dr. - i mer.m. 2",ds"e."s.".e*,* t c. ~ lgesp g. - ps e'.. g *je,wez,;u m ia *e t i f,m.es.s': vl t >.8

herE.WedsE.

i t --t-ePwa.

  • wo, cosos to sena.e P-**a t===*i-a*r.2,..

u s..a Te%.s meetTwo o> e.*e = e hi,h.i e===Pa .t sider s of ao f".ef.*w".fe..t is i ga . men,eg*, "-*' Tt,a awa+ <d under the PLAP a ro rue a cae n,ea P.n.n.d.w sges

a..e y.f e.

ammplishe procedes lhDOE and o f.QSd g,tingy[aent meY e treP Im ,.e* ** *.. : establish DOE sontractors to staine in thecensation and continuing PARTpto CRffERLA' ANO b an Im muonal $sedm.&e use ad ju PROCEDURES FOR OgTERMINING r eentroUed substenen,or es une W tu

  • tdentified PSAP positions. Individsale. Individuals for ass Skl3tSil.ITY FOR ACCESS 70 alcoholhabitually to emeses.This CLASSIFitD MATTER Og I

eclected for assignment to PSAP. pmem wtH mdm ee Mak meuMng - SIENIFicANT CU ANTITIES OP - i b

  • positione must be granted a PSAPeseess authorisauon

. wemes potential threat represamted y R MATERIAL. such employees to en easeptable level. I. SPECIALNUCn.EA The determination tog' ant initially an dures and mguirements set .1.The esthority ettetten for Part Pte .sentinoes to read ao feBown ;','en ** " l in Subparts A and S of this part.l. the 88" 'Y J

  1. **SU N ** " UFauthoriasties to e l

Nethseth SesS44.5 SEL.essU.S.C. rias); eecast.es stat. ' g M s.s1 seeps,The criteria and p'resieduree 'O l bued upon a D,OE secunty assessm est. es emended (42 U.sc sam).Lo.sessa establishing a personalsecutify emended (4: ,g,,, g g,,,,,j,,,g,,,,;,y,,,,,,, d l i SCPR teet-tes Comp.,p.em. se eW pmgram sgg epgj.. . defon,ed in *e so=e of an initi* aa I 2.0 teens,scrRtese6.tesa come,p). sea.no anL*"I.I,$"y',,*e(,;iwi*.De.t. maxe en =n=i saer m*w P.==... as m amended.s CTR.Chep.IV; esc 10 sic m ggmftaha!*o=".?. "$a'- u ,,,,...s....~... so, nap,oc.un. m.

  • o ei e

A.,,,,,,,,,.P.========_. m Those em,iop er.ew .u.,e.n A-oen.e e,Re. and -o** ^== CewgoryI quanUWs M $NM which... om wi. .n=enors,.a agems a se ooE ao er.es.. t, Dete n.ining Eng is f would permit an individual to mmove er Ase to Ci m. e.e.f 5,e. m either occupy or make applicadon for. son.. misme thet meterialin spite of . ou.n PSAPposideas.... 't a..., e '. 'M..ue6eer MotonaL '..t .....d prevent such unauthorised ac $$ ?t6.1souvenMa.ses and Aapenes A.. INo.st Neessneak " (e) Atomic Energy Act of1954,se eubstance tacJuded in Schedule EDennensted es subport A) .' amended. Section 11. "Definidonei. D.. S.Part M0is amended by designettas es defined by Section 802(6) of Title 23 Section 141. Policy":Secuen Ms. ll Most through no.39 and Appendia A of the United States Code, the. " Department of Defense Participation'tSecuen 144 possession of whichis unlawfulande . b thalt entirety es Subpart A.and by cddlag a subpart headans to med as set " General Provisions"; which provide Chapter is d that 71 tie.The wr,n. , statutory authority for estabhohing and L... a.. Ser$ above.8.Part M0le amendedby adding ? .t Subpert & to read as est fore below: l ,l t >. i. . g,

    • 7.-

s. s,. -.n

Fedesel Repedt l Vd. Sd. No.11 / Dursday. February S. 'ttes / Proposed Itu .. < l ':., 4.. V l rys. dem mes apply es the me, aytut e,.y pmesse.4)Inevidnis elected for " . :m,4.o essepring a PSAP p=iven bei net pl* be sempleto ihm documents shell roeult la tod embenance remuant to a 4

  • ' their kassignment from PSAP dunes ad prescripties er seer esas

. ! j ' assignment to PSAP Positione must be ,;a ' and an effort be made to reassign the,.:"- hiU la , stestead bylaw. ." o 2 y. yested a PSAP soones aut or ss on answdance with the dures and,'1.'. tadMdual to e poeluen est does set,.. ?pleelear Maternal Fredestion Reester is this put. -'.m. poquin a PSAP soeen authortestion. - ! pareter*means anineviduleeruned *soeuimments seti(b)The PSAPlavolves four(4) le) Each applicant for a PSAP posttion

y DOE sentractor management te! perste (manipulate the eastels of) e *. esm

~" and eat.h individual eseupying a PSAP, CS owned anelser meterial predacties ovaluation. and security determinatlee.. assess authodsation shall undergo

  • "'t A DOE determinauen to grant taltlally for the use of ulegal drugs in *. *- >

...**.4 ! nester... '.. n J "PSAP Approving Othe4e!" mesas a-..and to continw annually an individual's tes anos wie se previsions of the ' ! isresanal semerity rupseelbillun.....i. PSAP ocoeas authods ..upon a DOE security anewment o any, deierminauon of the use of IDese) drugs . /se enterDOEMficialwiedirest ' f DOE druglauns program. A f ., s .~ informauen of security sensern bawd en a drug test shallruuft in the < ~ - deve dla the eeurse of the f the t.... annagerto reWew au relevant DOE F satt.ag... up tv my rwiew, medical smessent,, terminetton of contdereuen o ! aferniation,inclu 'PSAP Management, cal, eng . management evaluation, and seewity* !* ***. employee who has been determlaed to l 8eserityReprt"aspartof the DOE 8'VlOE shau snake its desiolos as to a he a meer of illegal drugs based on dru l seawHy seekw pressoa,and wh is (c)D bot shallbe immediately reassigned .PSAP assess authodsation la *

  • liga the PSAP duties and seed scopensible for granting er esatisming determining est as inev6dul be i.'.4. scoordanos with es criteria in i Fle.it
  • Y art A of this to PSAP esceu neerleauen er

...e., a[*justion ofindividuals applying for er* a eis part Nlatut of the PSAPisle un .m dund ~ of El'"o'A of.er the f)N to 7.yggpp,,gg a r ts m...Etht **'8k

  • T
    • 'g"g, *....senserns woulung from his er her * + -

!) sha sport any security " 1 - /

i.,

a mdeapWW affords direct access to er has direct" i 0*9, I1 $bpa 1 of this N,"g.g, 'Y % ""' esopensibul for trans tion er " P= w.ne ~..r'! '. 6,.s ig%aw.Sa*PSn. m c. , k$',*M d$.*u., arttena b n al... f h)N empervisory mview shau be;tc, al and e aster osior e., Fee,.to s. 8Mt.py supervleerymess.. which the superviser ',,O sense unaaseptable damage to. '.M ' ' performed on all applicants for PSAP esperviser d abaB naluate a wantinformsties of,,,,,,:. ". Q astional essertty.. *, v:... .anarityintmetN supmim shan s f.,7 "'Seserity Cenesen" useams the " peeluona. tronalerees to PSAP positions, ,. MPoM any wourity sonoms woulung * *.,,

  • presence of informaties regarding as '.

andMdals occupying PSAP positteas '.anaividual applytag for er holding a '.. but not yet holding a PSAP tecess $ rom We or her mykw to the approphat,e. . FSAP position that easy be consideredderogatory under the erlieria la Subpart authorisatloa. and PSAP-cleared.3 ' ; % '.. management omclal following the we laitiat sr ohe Co.iroi s - a==! mvw= af ad PSAP<w=d.. emMto oes.' ,, -, ' q,,,,,

t. A ef this part.

...N. espinea., .. / i (h) Aesognfilobfiecur/ty Concerne ..No.3306.007." Questionnaire forSensitin Posinens" of an a i .. u.a.,iawe Dama,e mean. I ~ ta'eident that sound result la e nuclear explosive detonation,a maler-PSAP position and an annualopdate of facilitate early recognition of an .esvironmental release from e aselear. ' the '-Questionnaire for senettive ' r, indwidualwho repreunts a poulble,, .* Pultions."inc.luding a completed Part E. security ooneern. individuals who in the, 1 l materialproduction reactor,er sa. of eachincumbentin a PSAP position kdgment of the responsible supervisor. g - ,Dterruption of nuclear waspons i I . production with a algniGeast impact sa , shall be completed and forwarded to the exhibit unusual conduct that! be, "' *.e referred to the site Occupational ' ap(propriate PSAP Approving Ometal. j asuomalescurity.,...... va.' J.' c) Before being considered for a % Medical Director w'no may arrange for;j<, p. Pseesderes .c./ . g ". <. N i. 3Mt.se DeWessed'et Pl$p peWeena,. PSAP position. au applicants must '.,. , abe PSAP. cleated employee to be t andergo a thorough prwmployment esamined by the appropriate medical : ". d shock covering the post to years, which sta!!.information indicating a possible . m P' SAP positions shall be designated bF security concern shall be reemtd *+ . Ce cognisant Operations Omce..,,,,.- hseludes validation of the appucant's.g.,./. edu immediately to the approriste lQ ; ; - ., Manapr in accordance with the. sopheanre employment record: a ereditshock: a local apney c ' ['%.l': . folkwing criteria: '.5..,,.- Approving Omnial.(i) Teinporary Aeo (a) Puitions that afford direct necess ' eheck for the locations of interest. as to Catege y !quantitles of SNM or have i d by oute or locallaw;and . f. 75APDuties.Where anindivid6alhas ,, direct responsibility for transportationtecuen of Category I quanutlee.of,,. perm tteeentact with concern or a condition which may !!!y. Each apphcant being cons .., er l ' '. ' '.. 5 * *...: ii. (d)PSAP position and each individual temporer0y affect his or her reliabl fora (b) Postuono that are identified as..: occupying a PL. position but not yet the indMdual with the recommendation ,.-auclear material productica reactor. bolding a PSAp access authoritation. and approval of the site Occupational ,.i.; c v..<...r... shallexecute the appropriate PSAP.L Medical Director or the PSAP Approving c.. operators.... (c) Positions with the potential for. - relanees. acknowledgments, and Omelalmay be temporarily reanigned . eswing unacceptable damage to....neuomal security which are not included ' waivers.Th authorisation shall not be further '.s PSAP clured employee is tempotarcy .. An patograph (a) or (b) of this section, procemd until thm documents are reassigned to non PSAP dutis the . cad are approved by the Director,,Omco completed. Failure of anindividual . af Safeguarda and Security. DOF.g 5 e* .' a' ~.. ,,5, ..' f..., A.; r. g ..l. 4 ~..,, .,,._-_,-.v,,

~ 4 _.. I _ Fodsent Regleter I Vcl H. No rt / Theode'y.'Febroery 3. Spaw t ervwn..... ll.. I for,ePSAp' m is m outm d J semiped w non PSAP det6es and thir i e7e em atand>v6due he sonstdered b er.leisty ate 6e she .e fo, an mumi a, u ent ser,.e of a

  • 5e.'

BonalMedien!D.we.ener and/or

  • PSAP Appm%.gOme i

.etmed imme lei,. PEAP acome eetheressuon.N / A,,rev g O e i.. * *. + ' beving f' SAP positions faeneyment .e . soinsteted to PEAP dvues e eWestment lesdmg to rehabilitation , cppooprista, map determine 6e d . Ammperary restnsaions to be piean en en'these sports and foneerd his or her he employee.The PGAP Appryrhg the me of alcoholhabitaapy to encase i thonal ' recommendation, encinding eny seews senhatiesi - Ofbe4al shallbe soufnad knandetely o.. shau be required to eeneern, to blue PSAP Approving. upon the deciales to erssperergy as prescribed by the af to 4 seassign the employee to men PSAP. omotet. u.. ' daues and the masse for onek aatisC Medical Director la order to semeseenunnd shabiutaises.s ) l and spen the deautonle mistate e.ek. evahmoon shallbe sensistest ertil /mprom segwiremanes. dog's 1 appropriateDepartmanAalesbotaase.sous u f.,m.se, of d,,,e stregram for the use ofIU employes.if the sensen ser thebrporsty toassignmest was based.- tesung aU be esminshed a m.,d.,,,e me. is with h Department of Hulth and ern,the PEAP l, .. nf"reedvawus/sonduct.UponreferralW.s=gn*eg",/ 4,,,.ang ofLsensa m.si a e ne spen a securi i a . Mft"*0 aid'cP.*e Testin Programa." that will test au .esquest for reinstatessen. ~,' =---mma. occupauonalMedicalDirector may.. ladivi vals in, or applying for, a PSAP ...* ir*===dicaleseminedse.De M uon.7k Qam shaUlaclud (e) The me a.ranse for $e employee to be ecialista. - l Purpose of the PSAP medical 's. *. tesung and testing en, mined by sporopriate sp/Medient anannounced,,,,gg,, pig 4 easminationis to ensure that s (1,4epeer of docupotiano applica!!an far, or ineembent la. e PSAP. Dire..r.Upon compleues of the

  • g,,,,ia,re,dgag,egIa h,os,beea P,S,AP s,,,

yosition sees not represent a securityeeneers or heve a condiusa which may m.edictesessment,the ette, S -.,o MedicaiDi,ecio than ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,u,,,,,,,,,,,, .ecu,ny e.n.e,ns,veuiung

  • inmadu.i f,em,e,forning,.

Asunediately to non.PSAP duties, and ,e,o,, a tical assessment to the. gduuoae,euswesad.fo. manner.The esamination shall naalede the pSAP Appteving Omcial sha!!be' from et. appropriete management smalal.(g) Temporaryastrie (2) Aehabilitet/en.Indivi dltl pwnien. In the evnt ht a 64ndition er.. aoufie en evaluation to determine the presence Cf any physical or mental condition that otroumstance develoN!!ty of a h,afiect

  • eswee or may cause a significant defect that me

==i-niiamas a asshmaua f=m sa the lodement er milabiller of the the lvd#m,.t or r Uaiores.u sne Oc.u auo i pu of illegal drugs shall be required to er .. eeswi f,om u.se of mega.ich may e MedicalDimeter may recommand gndividual. including that wh I endergo evalseuen and testing as sem ugs. presenbed by the site Occupauosa sestrictions.The site Oesapational. Medical Director or other designated see of alcohol habitual!y to emeses. (b) When performed.The medies! MedicalDirector sha;lreport 9 omcial,as appropriate.in order to immediately Gene restricuens in wriung , seeesoment la performed initially open I o . ensure continnd rehabilitsuon spplicants for PSAP poettions and to se appropriate management omstal. who shallneufy immediately the emplcyns occupying PSAP positions. Part is intended to interfere who have not yet received a PSAP appropriate PSAP ApprovingOf!Lolal. * .,,eccess authonestion.De medicalassessment shall be performed annually. Removal of the astrictions requires from conducting medical and souficationin wrlung to both themanagement official an . or more often as may be rebutred by the ette OccupationalMedical irector.for ApprovingOfficialby the site drugs. as a metter of. corporate polley., llN . OcespauonalMedicalDirector. $.71460 003 eeeurtty revtew PSAP. cleared employees. (c) Contente of enedecol essessmenf-(hj SicA /eove from o ps#pos/t/en.

  • ww,,

s n, De medical suesoment shall include: a PSAP. cleared employ (en who have been I*I #A'8 P'#I##**#* D 0**I I comprehensive medical examination; anon sicaleave for five 8)or more J enardneuon for use of alcohol - consecuuve work days are required tocomponuts of me PSAP pmcau is a security review sad clurance I habitually to emeess; a y ychologicalsport in person to the site Occu suonal determination performed by the PSAP essessment and/or pe Medical Driector before being al owed. to stum to normal dutles.%e alte Approving Omcialupon receipt of the c evaluation as provide forin any epp!! cable DOE medical standards for Occupational MedicalDirector shag management evaluauen and personnel reliability programs. and aspermitted by Federal regulations; a acommedstion.. provide a recommendauon to b j (b) Aeview forin/tio/PSAP occes appropriate management official outAorisation. An initial PSAP eo i rekording the employee's return to work. examination for h came of any authortution requirn a special thyur m AP.cleand employee mayin background investigstjon completed seported unusal conduct.(d)Eremination for use ofslophol. certain circumstances also be required 5 hobitually to excen.%e use of alcohol. A within Se last five W yntsD h h it Occupational ediudication and determinado a beisitually to excus repfwents a. ~poterai61 threat to neuoul s Medical Dir,ctor for written approval to . [ PSAP accus ausonsenon sha retum to normal duties after any periodbased upon a review of 6e . as inconsistent with acr. ass to a PSAP of sick lesvs.. t. - posiuon. According.y.the medical. ' 171LSl Managementevolussen.... background investigenon and the i t assessmer.1 shallinclude: (1) Diagnosis.Individuale in, or (a)Evoluotion componenta. A . hformadonprovidedbymanagemen and medical sources.. applying for, a PSAP position sha!! be.. management evaluation based upon a

  • (c) The criterioD PSAP acceud earefulreview of the results of b.

saamined for b use of alcahol. supervisory nylew. medical apenment.and drug t habitually to eyess.$cch ladividuals i diegnosed currently to vee alcoholhabitually to saceas shall be temporar0y

'.q..i ~..,,'
  • L h

. b... :. - ~., %. f.. u.;, t ., W..,. ', ..,.'.' f %;b,-{.:,7.,

...,y <.z.,. :.

. u.' -. ~ u l.;y' ~,. i;.. p......

?.

e. ~... x. .gy.. A.: n . p., ;.'..:. .p w= mrWW m ..'..s.... l h,

. 7,.ee.* a l Federal Regleter / Vol. M. No. 21 / hreday. Februarp 3.190s / P ..~ 4e artte'eli and preesdures oestelmoilin + W. "**" 4 admandle asserdense with ee *:r;. t ep'deted SF.ies,OMB Centrol No. '.-.:'r its A and 5 of thle part. heensW underJ0 CMt And MA - l ehudeend procedutos eentainedini 88064uri.*Questiennetre for Sensitive. ". ... + Posittens?' including esmpleted Pen R. s. matters of l se shalt... n A. le the ettention of j. A and S of thle part. 4.......) psM assees eusheriserden. The PEAP eleared em W 't.t'tl eeneers re Ofno6al,pushas*.'t'f.'e . Onse an employee has '... undergo a 14milted be grvand PSAP A illegal druge er use of',i 't [, '. stion atleast every Ave (8) i. &determinaties te eenlinue use

  • Inves masteed die PSAP sesome authodsstionl,

evaluated in escordance with the..'. m o, a a review and e udiestles <'::isritena under SebpaN A. l.M seeese authorisation shallbe .7., arm. l heseshe shallthereaher and en P&AP,'beoed T sumuusiessere evelsetienby1.The evaluaties shall " > "

  • F '.
  • f '

tien resulting the,rd r annual security' evolution, and the

  • N s ' Pert.

..!* 'N *.informetien provided by manegement " g O e eredit check and national and of the . t.', /,4*. :'... ' t imaalaristmalveeordo chuk,where mm es.e.. assenhas. review of the indMduateMRpass.eenal esserity Ala.and s 4;..h',n.. r.;y(y. s;.9 :s. s.T y,l.i=* t',u.y,.,.,:.;,:,~;;,.,,.L*,g..,f..q g' ' '.;w';',s ,s. ,,,,v. 't. a ::. l. -i."*

,, _ ;'s,..,%,y',.., ;.. s.* i.*..

4,,p : t i u.rw..'t :.. J.- r ".s.::'. r.. .y., .: stex % : a.,;,. ': <g :.,%~*;;.*. ;,. ;;/dy' n i,.:. . t. v ..o.s 3.y.s.r'.a n ..a.v. p,oe...:.: u...'*:y..'....;.s m v7 ~*[#.'* ,t:. ....... h *. v. v r.. s..

  • '.v

.:...,c .. ?.. C. r'.i n.'.."r's . r .r +., n'N V' .c ,..,. 4t. l ;': e. vn u'..u d 6. %. 4 '..'"t ~. .w.i.s.s.*e*M w.m.<;sht*,.sr.:.,vv";y .. ct. .s

,.{.c
:Qln;. ?.p:...'. e....i.,,,..;,[ g. ;, ?,j %.

7..~. . o.,,; Q. g,:, ;.p,gg,;,*:;"n,W.- 4'ha 5 ? ** v1 d ' W.' '. - 8 .. : "...t...,, .anv,::tr.r~ :- s... :: s ... s. A a:'. yo. . n v......r "..s. . p. 7:, pj 4.;,,7 ' u W.g. ,,.3..,,;,:,%gg.,.;,..:;, ra ..s,.i...ise.r.'..e r.r.,o.. c , o.~ t.y'p;e :. '*s.: t.~ noyt '.s.tr.wsa.4 :

  • *.. A '.r..: 's 'l.* st:' yJ:.... f) *',,, g,,,. ;,,f.,g,.;,q,, 7,, j;,h.,y;r,,c,p.... Wig

.t ...;,,.p.. '; y .., ;,,,q.,.. A, ';,*g g c.r .,,.;;;.yyw. 4, ;y.:t **.t me', ~~ M,'/pf,,, ,.g. s,, f op;-. s::. t:1.*[.".. *f;I. ',.ti s..T.c?2 **..wrs..i.., se.. n..: e +a... 5.1..... 4 i, ce r.- .g.s 2..r. %; ;.~ h.%~a.:.y.. sl: 'ojyi),.,. 4.,j;,,.,j.,.;;y;;;, y,,.,,..3,, o.,,.,,,...,,, ,s,,,,,.,. P .a::.;.,veja,

6. it !. i, e

.. 3,g.. l,4,,.J....e,% Msr. ;;;:.y :r L.ic

f n.
.* ;3.2r.j..,,,..,.
;,;.
s e v '. w. p e 4.s. *; i :

o,u,, zR.,;,,g.,.,.,,;,.,\\, y :,. :. ,,., '. -.., j u ;,',; 1: g,,,.j,..,r..s... c..g;'d;, 3, A,.

  • r :n.)...f (d ". '

. of3 q.;stv **,..t.y;:.;.J.s.1r ry. >y h,.

c,,

..P 'r "' i t' c * '

y*

lg.,,.,a..r'.t p.;. *. ; +h ?s T *..;.tl.*W t.J.'%i 4 f'*.'. *

,,,,,;..lp,.. s't
. >.g..g e.,4. g,,3.,g,,,,,,3,'y,,, j ', b / $!. f t. r.

s *in. %.. i.1/l/7 r *.4 '. % l r* 1:'.lfe , y ' 3,,,, 1 ! a,... .p l ey. / fg e..e. 4..... c.t ;.,g*,g',,ilic.a.t... s.D'.

  • d.ff. eJ./.. i;c# g.3 ' .rb i, p.

a f.+3..,.,,i s i.a r., g+.%<,. m. .e.

m.. i.mi....

...F -. a,. 3 e,;, .n.,. a e j,.;. w.,,. g.g.Q-U. '> (....e. .;.'.e i. . eha. +".;Y.*/t-h !. *. ' *

o.,;.

i .m i. d' I. : .. ;;;,. j,,, s.p.,.. ru..gf n.. :+ n,r,. -:. p y. 3,i s. m. i. u. e

.4 <... n. :~. y..-s.c.

.i.'i.;. /.s i

  • s..eg+ 4 b.uirt.k s 1;*y:rt-*P ; 6

.:.N. J

  • s. '. n f s.,:

t.* ht'4 5,: .v i .e.,4..g..rg. vt o

n. t wm~n::.

/ .:..m.:-.; 9,r+....r.% j.:.: >e....: m g .n.:.u..... g, r. m:.3.,ay:m. c:::.:w.u., s..n.m.g.:e u.:, .w v .....n ..u.::...:,,:e1.~.r+:..s.e ;3 :y+. .p, . 3p:..,g.

. 9
.u v.. :ri.e;

,.m , n. ;; ~..,;... ?. . -, v.u, : m:r......y.. e..rp..yt.y.3 o..,n..,s.......s v. . s, r a-r., + ;~.. :, ',...,.,.,,;,,..,,..u.,. p -+ y f:,.n.....: n -r..,... ry;fri m:~,. . q.. e, r .z.-,,. ..U e i Jn k' dptt.'

h'
::p'.'$.f,,,.,,,,; '4. -

my}y.g.T . ;a M ;..,. y,. p.. .." f:-9 'r

  • W'O.*;,b.] :'>.:el.':4 's. :.n,n.in ? ; 0;. 4,.':
  • h;$5k $. c:.; n. Q:.A::,,

1: t^ 1.p? .~. *"':'~+ n. . ;...,. s p,.

$ar.a.

p.: o n.,e...a;) :., ' 't':'.s:. ;7.T :j"*. i ?).' ^t f;.;" ...t. ' ~i

>i n ' '

r.t!. A.se j +.f,3., p,,,,,,,qe*...':). g..." '. n'.?;k. v: .,7 i. ;.;F:t-lr..3: ~. r..~b;9c&tvn '.;.7 :f ;;<;*g; ;.tf.,,, .n a.,

  • /.7':

A, O'p. :.:.%o...y..;x *a., b,s.v.

  • .H:r '.'M:*".W.' ?M,*t>n
c.. p. M :..::.,c '. 4.9 W..t/s t:...~ s e.... nw;t.:. W

,,o n M.':' ',., i M 43. e *M/ 2

.f,.; M '

3 .y,:,.i.% . * (%,:,a ga. :f f %*

  • f q ;-.<ct.6. e.g.e,i Wl'.

c. wi~ :.. ':.. y.:r M -i.:...?e1 W l +. y ; i n.....;. o g i; ag.g ..[,...,../.? )%,. e f** MIf. l 'f p i,l,J,'...., :l y..,;.;'. 3 ;,..-' ' T : ~,? *, ~... ;.:.. J. ;,.,y. n; . gg,s. ... s '..:.. a ~;M.. :.-pM. ..i Sr.,s.

  • 3..i '.,tr, s... *...,,v.

,s. u.g*. 4.s :,., :q.p. c. ' A ;; :f,;;,, 2 r+.t s; =4 :;.".:....:4,./.4..g,, q : 7,,, l,,., ;d; >; 2 ;'. :f.,,j.,,':w,,,.'q;.w."..l .:c.c,.y.

n,. e e

.x.....v:.s. <ii

c. r; sv.. nt r.p..,..; e.",.

t1:l+c 't eM% e ?_.... ... yo.*!4-Q t.,r....

n..s,

. g * *:' *.y&":u.G. :~..: ;. c ;.:,... it' L

  • V :.. '. '...;....* "^ ~. y. =.$,": ;q * '. :'~' ^ i.:.'s s.~u.,
.g.:::n.

..; n

  • . t...%..y.;

,. - :,'.,'.~;.,. %.:*e.,..a as n',...ss.~.:.,,: :,m.m..,

n. :; :w^.4,%:.
p. f

,..g "*".s. .* *y *,,,,,>*. ,; f.,..,i.. ......,,, U. ' E. '#I E M * *~*. ,.....v . [I.k, '\\ V ' ' '. * * 'D 'I.8. "'.U. #' g.',/.J.h. 3 ...,i,.. ,g, r..., ;... ;.. /[ ld. *;,'"T** ,...,q i... 4

  • ,' 4 :

r **;;.*. thT.d W.fJ'3"WE'f/g.,[.;.' ( p.,y, ( :.p.,.p,f.gl.ig;. 4,.bii....

.4.

.,=...s...,t,,.,. 4 '# 7 ,,,)

  • ,,'.....'..t.t.

v ...S ....g ~

  • *T.l'.[Ji /1,

. ' t j,,9. g, *. 4,.,

g ;.e.;..',. ;,.

. i thl f *

" ' T. '..,'.. *

. Q:.,0 t <.yssr*.te, *,,..J. O, ti * .,ya ',...'*c

  • .. ". ; h.g'*.*..

'.I N. f.'. V* *,:~:.* * 's N!: k..., s..,d.:. h,'.*.N$.t,d.4 J. wl,g. <,.a , e; ef 3, [,.. ' s.. ' y;;l" '.***,# N? *' od ' '.. .. /, .',e. ... ? }t. y;. . ':1..4. a.' t .. % ;y.. k .'.g',!:'.,*f t., ?.*; t.c h:* ="+ a.,.' * * ;..,R f. '.. g.,."..v. e. r..**.$ *Ve).m..-:* r..I.,:.4..,' t...'. gr'..s... '. ^ 4. w iW..mtru ! * *-;*

..;.y.;.,,,..,.,:(.;'.n.::y' g. c t '.,ac G,.

,y.s' ' : p(:"q ,'n.9 5..'%%....@ .'. 4 '* c . ? '!, i. * * :' Y. %,,. 9, : ...... 4 NJ.. N' g...... .s e*i+ g .. g.. 'i **-)/:.f 'i..:.i.5.,dl. W,n ti,a. c '...C'.. '.m:p t egya ;v r.,.:..;en' ....... =.... 9. : 7..y, .g. # 3....., .'. ;1..* "w;.:~.'. :.,m+.qr; f ry a .v -m.?:.,:.o*. " s s .,,,..'b f.d F ; d'? * ;; * * -e*~' ' ? ?*."' :. ...n .;,.p .,4. ...'..s c. r. s. ~... y.....i, :t. >. r..v..t...t..vr --., :v.n,.t , ~ ' ~ - M.h, . i

.;.1.

' s 7' h,' ',. Y 'D M ' M'I h.t'. 5.*h".= * * ?;%*ursW W'O .' '.G N. %. m.u., m ;s, Q '*1.:'a;T:*4 %v .'sa:f.r %:: .A

  • l.'E '!V 1

.... s. . 1 ::. T; h;1i& 's.. ^ ' :$? FM : e.r:m:. lt.*di.). ,h k-v'~t~ ; ' dM~a;;s.~d ; T1 L.t+.+p.w:n#~.t ..%'h :a :r.&.r s P ewd;.4m' p ';t ~hs.e: en . * * ' k+ :.m'"? d-.i w:4urr;cr 1 t WM t *;:= d.., .;?'L.*tM*s' 1a' : ir,. i, a ?; ;;, r :,;;..;.7<.* t\\. <. - 4' W. ? '.NAd-a ' * '7. ;.. Mr.2 %<'.:. 8'"! ", * ' r. ' ~.:,.,.; m.1:ew c: o n:. f. AW

  • lVr?

Ma7%

  • .4'."e h at h ';rgr segi. W e.sli* W.:.r.,

';. ' m: a :. M..y: t-G ' 9: :*:;e .......' 8. t 5. %7;r!*r ? 's., c. ... M, t ..s .;; 3,.3.,, *, *, ' ~ * < > + ' v- /* . (.,., 4* 4..h j. :,..; h *. "2 *l u. *. - q:...* !. <. t;a. 4.', ca .,. *.. ~.... .... ~

M.

. s .. 't 1 Y '.'.. f *.. 4. - 3.. w..., 7'. 3 ...*t' p'. . a.,* 4 .....; ;. l.. ,.: :p t o

  • * *. ?t

-. m..--..

V ' 'w'y' g' ;, - eu m a yyy y _. ~ 'r .t. ,-} 1 00. - g De 4 ,s. I L b I sj 'k 9 g .t 1v', .s 4 .l I s . I k-f 1 , Enclosure J 4 t l i 4.,. i 8r fr '-' e e k s, Er 4@h 7.,

f.Cf.o i DRAFT IDENTICAL LETTERS T0: Cfiairman John B. Dreaux, Senate Subconunittee on Nuclear Regulation ec: Alan K. Simpson Chairman Philip R. Sharp, House Subconnittee on Energy and Pwer cc: Carlos J. Moorhead The Honorable Morris K. Udall, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment Connittee on Interior and Insular Affairs United States House of Representatives h shington, D.C. 20515

Dear Hr. Chhirman:

The NRC h6s sent to the Office of the Federal Register for publication the enclosed proposed policy statement on f1tness for duty for individuals licensed by the NRC to use or pcssess nuclear material for purposes other th6n oper6 ting a nuclear power reactor. The Cornission's policy for individuals at nuclear power pl6nts was previously published on June 7, 1989 (54 FR 24468). The proposed policy statement, in part, describes Commission expectations 6nd raeasures the Commission will take in providing reasonable assurance that individuals working at facilities licensed to possess nuclear mate 161 are not under the influence of any substance, legal or illegal, which would adversely affect their ability to perform jcb duties or maintain public health and s6fety. The notice provides for a 75-day public comment period. Sincerely, Eric S. Beckjord, Director Office of Iluclear Regulatory Research cc: Representative James V. Hansen t r l l l EHCLOSURE 3 l l l: i}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20055C355&oldid=5511506"