ML20055B562
| ML20055B562 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 07/20/1982 |
| From: | Lazo R Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OLA, NUDOCS 8207220500 | |
| Download: ML20055B562 (3) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 03cxETEE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
'F t
Before Administrative Judges Q
Robert M. Lazo, Chairman Dr. Peter A. Morris Dr. Cadet H. Hand, Jr.
gg gg7 9
)
In the Matter of:
)
Docket No. 50-309-0LA
)
MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
)
)
July 20, 1982 (Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station)
)
)
)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Concerning Schedu'e for Further Proceeding)
In a motion filed on May 17, 1982, the Applicant has proposed a schedule for further proceedings in the above-identified matter.
The Staff has joined the Applicant in moving the Board to adopt the proffered schedule. With slight modifications, the State of Maine would also agree with the schedule proposed by Applicant.
In its response dated June 1, 1982, Intervenor, Sensible Maine Power (SMP) has registered several objections to the proposed schedule. More specifically, SMP has urged the Board (1) to order simultaneous discovery upon all contentions in this case, coincident with its ruling upon the
$EN'RE8!Ro?88gg, oV PDR
=_.
admissibility of Environmental Impact Appraisal (EIA) and Safety Evaluation Report (SER) contentians; (2) to compromise the proposed discovery periods at 120 days; and (3) to adopt a statement expressly recognizing and governing delay or disruption in the discovery schedule.
The schedule set forth below, is generally respcasive to the specific requests of SMP.
It provides sufficient time for the orderly completion of this proceeding in a timely manner. No need is seen for the adoption of a statement regarding delay or disruption of the schedule set herein.
If, for unexpected reasons, the schedule cannot be held to, the Board, in consideration of the needs of the parties, will take appropriate action.
For the foregoing reasons and in consideration of the entire record in this matter, it is this 20th day of July, 1982 I
ORDERED That the following hearing schedule be set for this proceeding:
n SCHEDULE August 30, 1982 Contentions due on EIA and SER issues.
September 15, 1982 Reply to EIA and SER contentions by Applicant and Staff September 30, 1982 Intervenor's response to Applicant's and Staff's reply to EIA and SER contentions.
. SCHEDULE (cont'd)
October 25, 1982 ASLB ruling on EIA and SER contentions Discovery begins on all admitted contentions.
January 24, 1982 Last discovery request on all contentions.
February 14, 1982 Motions for Summary Disposition to be filed.
March 25, 1982 Answer to motions for Summary Disposition.
April 22, 1982 ASLB ruling on motions for Summary Disposition.
May 9, 1982 Filing of written direct testimony.
May 20, 1982 Filing of cross-examination plans.
June 7, 1982 Prehearing Conference or Hearing as appropriate.
j' Robert M. Lazo, Chairman y ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
-