ML20055B137

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards on Behalf of Pasny,Addressing Issues Raised by Draft Memorandum & Order Distributed Prior to Commission 820709 Meeting Re Status of Proceeding.Draft Order Unaffected by 10CFR9.103
ML20055B137
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/1982
From: Morgan C
MORGAN ASSOCIATES, POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20055B138 List:
References
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8207200400
Download: ML20055B137 (2)


Text

, ~....

-4 h'

MORGAt Assoc AT Es, C H ARTERE D ~

DatitETED L4w OrriCCs Y,/

U98k.

i 3w.

1899 L STRECT, N. W.

l PA AN M J. ALS CTTA, JR.

WAS H t NGTON, 0. C. 2 0 03 6 JJ j p {j} lf,}

HowARDT,ANOCRSON

  • 000 COWARD ASMwCRTH J. RICHARD COMEN i:: t i.- s:t.r..

paut r.COLARutu C007.ET:::3 a SE.C.';0; 4

wituAM A.CAGLCS 3hAhCd 5

HOFCCASTMAN

, M ARY AN N C M A LL j

FAMELA S. HOROwlTZ j

RHON DA M. MUG M CS ROBERT H. MUSBANDS

}

?

SUSAN S. M APLAN j

JOS E PH J. LCVIN, JR.

CHARLES MORGAN,JR.

l BARRY S. PR AVCR STEVEN C.VAGLC July 19, 1982 j

Chairman Nunzio J.

Palladino United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717.H Street, N.W.

Washington, D. C.

20555 Re:

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

(Indian Point, Unit No. 2)

Power Authority of the State of New York (Indian Point, Unit No. 3 )-

Docke t Nos. 5 0-2 47 SP, 50-286 SP

Dear Chairman Palladino:

Please find enclosed a letter to the Commissioners on behalf of the Power Authority of the State of New York (Power Author-ity).

It addresses issues raised by the Draft Memorandum and Order distributed prior to the July 9,1982 Commission meeting regarding the status of the Indian Point proceeding.

Although 10 C.F.R.

S 9.103 (1982) states, in part,

[s] tatements of views or expressions of opinion made by Commissioners or NRC employ-ees at open meetings are net intended to represent final determinations or beliefs.

Such statements may not be pleaded, cited, or relied upon before the Commission.

except as the Commission may direct, the Draft Order is not such a statement.

It is not part of the transcript of the July 9 meeting and is not intended to represent

?

i

~

8207200400 820719 PDR ADOCK 05000247 G

PDR Q>5 D 3

-ChoIrman Nunzio J.

Palladino

/

July 19, 198.1 (T

Page 2

/

a final determination.

Accordingly, the Draft Ordec is cited in the enclosed letter.

However, if the Commission were to determine that its regu-lation applies to a draf t order, the Power Authority requests that the regulation be waived due to "the unusual factual circum-stances present here."

In re Sacramento Municipal Utility i

District (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station), 9 N.R.C.

680, 682 n.1 (1979).

Certainly, the circumstances surrounding this j

unprecedented proceeding are at least as compelling as those in j

Rancho Seco.

T l

The Power Authority requests that the Commission consider i

the enclosed letter and the issues presented therein.

f i

Sincerely, v

bt Charles Morgan, Jr.

CM,Jr./ pat Enclosure cc:

Commissioner Jchn F.

Ahearne Commissioner Victor Gilinsky Commissioner Thomas M.

Roberts Commissioner James K.

Asselstine Official Service List i

i

.___a