ML20055B137

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards on Behalf of Pasny,Addressing Issues Raised by Draft Memorandum & Order Distributed Prior to Commission 820709 Meeting Re Status of Proceeding.Draft Order Unaffected by 10CFR9.103
ML20055B137
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/1982
From: Morgan C
MORGAN ASSOCIATES, POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20055B138 List:
References
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8207200400
Download: ML20055B137 (2)


Text

_

,~....

< -4 L4w OrriCCs h' DatitETED ,

Y,/

i 3w.

MORGAt Assoc AT Es, C H ARTERE D ~ U98k.

1899 L STRECT, N. W.

l PA AN M J. ALS CTTA, JR. WAS H t NGTON, 0. C. 2 0 03 6 , JJ j p {j} lf,}  ;

HowARDT,ANOCRSON

  • 000 COWARD ASMwCRTH

J. RICHARD COMEN , , , , , , , _ , , , , , _ . . ,

paut r.COLARutu . i:: t i.- s:t.r. .

wituAM A.CAGLCS C007.ET:::3 a SE.C.';0; 4 HOFCCASTMAN 3hAhCd 5

, M ARY AN N C M A LL j FAMELA S. HOROwlTZ j RHON DA M. MUG M CS ROBERT H. MUSBANDS }

?

SUSAN S. M APLAN j

JOS E PH J. LCVIN, JR. ,

CHARLES MORGAN,JR. l BARRY S. PR AVCR ,

STEVEN C.VAGLC ,

July 19, 1982 j Chairman Nunzio J. Palladino United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717.H Street, N.W.

Washington, D. C. 20555 Re: Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

(Indian Point, Unit No. 2)

Power Authority of the State of New York (Indian Point, Unit No. 3 )-

Docke t Nos. 5 0-2 47 SP, 50-286 SP

Dear Chairman Palladino:

Please find enclosed a letter to the Commissioners on behalf of the Power Authority of the State of New York (Power Author-ity). It addresses issues raised by the Draft Memorandum and Order distributed prior to the July 9,1982 Commission meeting regarding the status of the Indian Point proceeding.

Although 10 C.F.R. S 9.103 (1982) states, in part,

[s] tatements of views or expressions of opinion made by Commissioners or NRC employ-ees at open meetings are net intended to represent final determinations or beliefs.

Such statements may not be pleaded, cited, or relied upon before the Commission . . .

except as the Commission may direct, the Draft Order is not such a statement. It is not part of the transcript of the July 9 meeting and is not intended to represent ,

?

i

~

8207200400 820719 PDR ADOCK 05000247 G PDR Q>5 D 3

-ChoIrman Nunzio J. Palladino

/ July 19, 198.1 Page 2 (T ,

/

a final determination. Accordingly, the Draft Ordec is cited in the enclosed letter.

However, if the Commission were to determine that its regu-lation applies to a draf t order, the Power Authority requests ,

that the regulation be waived due to "the unusual factual circum-  ;

stances present here." In re Sacramento Municipal Utility i District (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station), 9 N.R.C. 680, '

682 n.1 (1979). Certainly, the circumstances surrounding this j unprecedented proceeding are at least as compelling as those in j Rancho Seco. T l

The Power Authority requests that the Commission consider i the enclosed letter and the issues presented therein.

f i

Sincerely, Charles Morgan, Jr.

v bt '

CM,Jr./ pat Enclosure cc: Commissioner Jchn F. Ahearne Commissioner Victor Gilinsky Commissioner Thomas M. Roberts Commissioner James K. Asselstine Official Service List i

i

.___a